Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T17:24:15.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Procedural institutionalization beyond the Western democracies: three bases of voluntaristic restraint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

David Sciulli
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Is the integrity of corporate directorates' collegial form upheld by law in any nation-state (Note 1982, Useem 1984)? Is the integrity of the collegial form of corporate research divisions upheld by law in any nation-state (Braithwaite 1982), or that of research facilities within public or private universities (Parsons and Platt 1973)? Do professional associations uphold by law the integrity of collegial formations at their members' various work sites, whether within universities, corporations, hospitals, or other complex organizations (Abbott 1988)? Do artistic, intellectual, or scholarly networks uphold by law the integrity of the collegial form framing their members' exchanges of information, including their anonymous refereeing and independent reviewing of publications and prizes (Crane 1972)?

The integrity of collegial formations is not currently upheld by law in any modern nation-state. As a result, not a single modern nation-state protects and expands heterogeneous actors' and competing groups' prospects for social integration as a matter of public policy. Yet, collegial formations are to be found, both historically and today, within different sectors, industries, and organizations of different civil societies. By no means are all of these sectors located within civil societies of Western democracies exclusively. Yet, in every instance to date, actors who have adopted the collegial form of organization have done so on their own, independently of the support of legal or formal sanctions. One result of this ad hoc activity, of course, is that collegial formations are distributed quite unevenly across the civil societies in which they are found at all.

Type
Chapter
Information
Theory of Societal Constitutionalism
Foundations of a Non-Marxist Critical Theory
, pp. 183 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×