Preface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2009
Summary
This book had its origins in two questions related to symbolism, and in my dissatisfaction with the existing answers. Firstly, given the central place of symbolism and symbolic activity in human behaviour and mental life, is it possible to have a general, unified theory of the symbol? Secondly, if symbolism is so obviously important, why has it been almost completely neglected by the very discipline which claims to be concerned with human behaviour and mental life – psychology, especially scientific psychology? At present, the answers to these two questions may be found in the extensive non-psychological literature on symbolism. In this literature, which spans many different fields – philosophy, sociology, anthropology, hermeneutics, semiotics, aesthetics, and so on – and which is, perhaps not surprisingly, full of controversies, one observation which is made time and time again is that symbolism is inherently elusive; that the complex and multifaceted nature of the symbol rules out not just a coherent scientific treatment, but any kind of general theory. Thus, the answer to the first question is: ‘no’; and the answer to the second question is: ‘because symbolism is beyond the reach of science’.
In this book I challenge those answers. I do so by bringing together three lines of argument, none of which, to my knowledge, has previously been proposed. The first line of argument reverses the typical treatment of symbolism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Freud, Psychoanalysis and Symbolism , pp. ix - xiiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999