Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T15:06:36.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Using Multiple Perspectives in Observations of Diverse Classrooms: The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIPO)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Jana Echevarria
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Psychology, California State University, Long Beach
Deborah J. Short
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Linguistics, U.S. Department of Education
Hersh C. Waxman
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

Mai knew that the teacher wanted her to become a good writer. And the teacher, Mrs. Galinski, had the students write every day in this 2-hour summer school class. For a half hour each morning, they would read a newspaper article individually and then discuss it as a class. Next, they had 30 minutes to write about the topic in their journals. Sometimes Mai understood the topic, like the article about teenagers getting drunk and crashing a car, but at other times she didn't, like the article on global warming, which had a lot of unfamiliar science words. For 20 minutes (after a 10-minute break), students would then volunteer to read their story or essay aloud, but Mai was too nervous about her English skills and her writing ability to speak up. The American students read aloud, and once in a while one of her fellow English as a Second Language (ESL) classmates took the chance too. Mrs. Galinski would comment on the students' texts, but Mai and the other students didn't. The class ended with 30 minutes of sustained silent reading, which Mai enjoyed because she could read what she wanted to and never had to talk about it. At the end of the class, the teacher would collect their journals and mark them in the evening, returning them the next day. Mai would try to understand the teacher's comments, but she wasn't sure her writing was improving. The teacher would write “Awkward phrasing,” “Verb tenses don't match,” “No clear antecedent,” and “Use more descriptive words,” but Mai didn't know what to do.[…]

Type
Chapter
Information
Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity
, pp. 21 - 47
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applebee, A., & Langer, J. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60(2), 168–175Google Scholar
August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Bartolome, L. I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(2), 173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennici, F. J., & Strang, E. W. (1995). An analysis of language minority and limited English proficient students from NELS 1988 (Report to the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
Berman, P., McLaughlin, B., Minicucci, C., Nelson, B., & Woodworth, K. (1995). School reform and student diversity: Case studies of exemplary practices for LEP students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education
Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. Javella, & W. Levelt (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 241–256). New York: Springer-Verlag
Colburn, A., & Echevarria, J. (1999). Meaningful lessons. The Science Teacher, 66(2), 36–39Google Scholar
Crandall, J. A. (1993). Content-centered learning in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 111–126Google Scholar
Echevarria, J. (1998, April). A model of effective sheltered content instruction. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children, Division of Diverse Exceptional Learners Conference, Minneapolis
Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (1998). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching English-language learners with diverse abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Echevarria, J., & Short, D. (2001, April). The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol and the achievement of English language learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2000). Making content comprehensible for English language learners: The SIOP Model. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1991). Students' experience of the curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 465–485). New York: Macmillan
Guarino, A. J., Echevarria, J., Short, D., Schick, J. E., Forbes, S., & Rueda, R. (2001). The Sheltered Instruction Observation: Reliability and validity assessment. Journal of Research in Education, 11(1), 138–140Google Scholar
Kauffman, D., Burkart, G., Crandall, J., Johnson, D., Peyton, J., Sheppard, K., & Short, D. (1994). Content-ESL across the USA. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics
Macías, R. F. (1998). Summary report of the survey of the states' limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services, 1996–97. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education
Moss, M., & Puma, M. (1995). Prospects: The congressionally mandated study of educational growth and opportunity (First year report on language minority and limited English proficient students). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. (1999). K–12 and LEP enrollment trends. Available at http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/reports/state-data/index.htm
Sheppard, K. (1995). Content-ESL across the USA (Technical report, vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education
Short, D. (1991). How to integrate language and content instruction: A training manual. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics
Short, D. (1998). Social studies and assessment: Meeting the needs of students learning English. In S. Fradd & O. Lee (Eds.), Creating Florida's multilingual global work force (Section VI, pp. 1–12). Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education
Short, D., & Echevarria, J. (1999). The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol: A tool for teacher-researcher collaboration and professional development (Educational Practice Report No. 3). Santa Cruz, CA, and Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence, University of California
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×