Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T14:57:33.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Observing School Restructuring in Multilingual, Multicultural Classrooms: Balancing Ethnographic and Evaluative Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Amanda Datnow
Affiliation:
Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California
Susan Yonezawa
Affiliation:
Center for Research in Educational Equity, Assessment, and Teaching Excellence, University of California, San Diego
Hersh C. Waxman
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

The goal of this chapter is to discuss a methodology for conducting classroom observations in culturally and linguistically diverse schools implementing externally developed reform designs. The classroom observation strategy discussed in this chapter was developed for a study entitled Scaling Up School Restructuring in Multicultural, Multilingual Contexts. In this study, we conducted longitudinal case studies of 13 elementary schools in Sunland County Public Schools (SCPS), each of which was implementing one or more nationally regarded school reform designs.

Assessments of such reform models have become particularly important as the number of schools implementing these models has increased dramatically in the past few years. The passage of the Obey–Porter law, a bipartisan initiative that allocated 150 million federal dollars in the fall of 1998 (and additional funds in subsequent years) to schools willing to adopt research-based reform programs, is evidence of the growing enthusiasm for external models. This was spurred in part by research suggesting that scaling up externally developed school reform models or promising programs may be the best way to systematically raise students' academic achievement (Stringfield et al., 1997).

However, we know little about how these reforms can be implemented successfully in districts serving linguistically and culturally diverse student populations. Many externally developed school reform models were developed mindful of schools serving students who speak English as a first language. None of the models was developed specifically for multicultural, multilingual student populations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity
, pp. 174 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1994). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Charters, W. W., & Jones, J. E.(1973). On the risk of appraising non-events in program evaluation. Educational Researcher, 2(11), 5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A., & Jordan, J. (1996). The Audrey Cohen College System of Education: Purpose-centered education. In S. Stringfield, S. M. Ross, & L. Smith (Eds.), Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs (pp. 25–51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Comer, J., & Haynes, N. (1996). Rallying the whole village: The Comer process for reforming education. New York: Teachers College Press
Core Knowledge Foundation. (1995). Core Knowledge Sequence. Charlottesville, VA: Author
Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453–477Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento: California Association of Bilingual Education
Datnow, A. (2001). The sustainability of externally developed reforms in changing district and state contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle
Davidson, A. L., & Phelan, P. (1993). Cultural diversity and its implications for schooling: A continuing American dialogue. In P. Phelan & A. L. Davidson (Eds.), Renegotiating cultural diversity in American schools (pp. 1–26). New York: Teachers College Press
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Evertson, C., & Green, J. L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 162–207). New York: Macmillan
Fetterman, D. M. (1984). Ethnography in educational evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Fillmore, L. W., & Meyer, L. M. (1992). The curriculum and linguistic minorities. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 626–658). New York: Macmillan
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts. Albany: State University of New York Press
Giroux, H. (1984). Ideology, agency, and the process of schooling. In L. Barton & S. Walker (Eds.), Social crisis and educational research (pp. 306–333). London: Croom and Helm
Gold, R. (1958). Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces, 36, 217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. C. (1993). The role of theory in qualitative program evaluation. In D. J. Flinders & G. E. Mills (Eds.), Theory and concepts in qualitative research (pp. 24–46). New York: Teachers College Press
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: “What is strong objectivity?” In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York: Routledge
Heady, R., & Kilgore, S. (1996). The modern red schoolhouse. In S. Stringfield, S. M. Ross, & L. Smith (Eds.), Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs (pp. 139–178). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1993). What your 5th grader needs to know: Fundamentals of a good fifth grade education. New York: Dell
LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liggett, A. M., Glesne, C. E., Johnston, A. P., Brody, S. H., & Schattman, R. A. (1994). Teaming in qualitative research: Lessons learned. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(1), 77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. London: Wadsworth
Loucks, S. F., & Crandall, D. P. (1981). The practice profile: An all-purpose tool for program communication, staff development, evaluation, and improvement. Andover, MA: NETWORK
Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. ;Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. (1978). Learning lessons. New York: Cambridge University Press
Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education, 65(1), 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Metz, M. H. (1978). Classrooms and corridors: The crisis of authority in desegregated secondary schools. Berkeley: University of California Press
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity – One's own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21Google Scholar
President's Initiative on Race. (1997, September 30). President's initiative on race. Paper presented at the Advisory Board meeting, Mayflower Hotel, Washington, DC.
Rose, M. (1989). Lives on the boundary. New York: Penguin
Ross, S. M., Smith, L. J., Lohr, L. L., & McNelis, M. J.(1994). Math and reading instruction in tracked first-grade classes. The Elementary School Journal, 95(1), 105–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanger, J. (1996). The complete observer?: A field research guide to observation. London: Falmer Press
Scheirer, M. A. (1996). A template for assessing the organizational base for program implementation. In M. A. Scheirer (Ed.), A user's guide to program templates: A new tool for evaluating program content (pp. 61–80). San Francisco: Jossey-BassCrossRef
Sizer, T. R. (1992). Horace's school: Redesigning the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Wasik, B. A. (1996). Roots and wings: Universal excellence in elementary education. In S. Stringfield, S. M. Ross, & L. Smith (Eds.), Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs (pp. 207–231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Smith, D. M. (1992). Anthropology of education and educational research: CAE presidential address. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23, 185–198Google Scholar
Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972–1973 (SRI Project URU-7370). Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute
Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., Yoder, N., Schaffer, E., Nesselrodt, P., Gamse, B., Brigham, N., Moss, M., Herman, R., & Bedinger, S. (1997). Special strategies studies final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
Stringfield, S. C., Ross, S. M., & Smith, L. J. (1996). Bold plans for school restructuring: The New American Schools designs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Tharp, R. G. (1997). From at-risk to excellence: Research, theory, and principles for practice (Research Report No. 1). Santa Cruz: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence, University of California
Weis, L., & Fine, M. (1993). Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools. Albany: State University of New York Press
Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking – and rejecting – validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121–152). New York: Teachers College Press
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Yonezawa, S., & Datnow, A. (1999). Supporting multiple reform designs in a culturally and linguistically diverse school district. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 4(1), 125–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×