Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-19T15:59:17.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Information Density and Cortical Magnification Factors

from Part Four - Formal Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Roland Baddeley
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Peter Hancock
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Peter Földiák
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is well known that sensory information on a number of modalities is arranged in a spatial “map” in biological brains, such that information from similar sensors arrives close together in the cortex. For example, much visual sensory information is represented in a map in the primary visual cortex, which is arranged roughly as the image coming in through the eyes. The human somesthetic cortex receives touch information arranged so that sensors which are close to each other on the body tend to be represented in close areas in the cortex. Similarly the bat auditory cortex receives information arranged by frequency, so that close frequencies produce a similar response.

A common feature of these feature maps is that the representation scale is non-uniform: some areas are magnified when compared with others. For example, the area of the visual cortex which corresponds to the fovea is magnified much more than that for peripheral vision (in terms of angle on the retina). The cortical area given over to touch sensors in the lips and fingers is proportionally much greater than that given over to the back. The bat has a much magnified representation for frequencies around its echo-location frequency than elsewhere (Anderson and Hinton, 1981).

These magnified areas of feature maps all seem to correspond to receptors which are proportionally more important than others. Information from the fovea is required for discernment of detail in an object; information from the fingertips or lips is needed for fine manipulation of tools or food; while the detailed frequency differences around the bat's echo-location frequency are important if it is to find and catch its prey.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×