Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T06:32:06.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Mark Jaccard
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Sustainable Fossil Fuels
The Unusual Suspect in the Quest for Clean and Enduring Energy
, pp. 328 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, M.Comment on: R. W. Bentley. ‘Global Oil and Gas Depletion,’” Energy Policy 31, 4 (2003): 389–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, M.Mineral Depletion with Special Reference to Petroleum,” Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 1 (1990): 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, M., and Lynch, M.. “Fixed View of Resources Limits Creates Undue Pessimism,” Oil and Gas Journal 95, 14 (1997): 56–60Google Scholar
Adelman, M., and C. Watkins. “Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Prices 1982–2002: Implications for Depletion and Investment Cost,” Working Paper 03–016, MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, 2003
Aldy, J., Barrett, S. and Stavins, R.. Thirteen Plus One: A Comparison of Global Climate Policy Architectures (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2003)Google Scholar
Allard, P., Djlevic, D. and Delarue, C.. “Origin of Carbon Dioxide Emanation from the 1979 Deng Eruption, Indonesia: Implications for the Origin of the 1986 Nyos Catastrophe,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 39 (1989): 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S., and Newell, R.. “Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 109–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W., Kanaroglou, S. and Miller, E.. “Urban Form, Energy, and the Environment,” Urban Studies 33, 1 (1996): 7–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K., and L. Hurwicz. “An Optimality Criterion for Decision-Making Under Ignorance,” in Carter, C. and Ford, J. (eds.), Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics: Essays in Honour of G. L. S. Shackle (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972)Google Scholar
Atmosphere, Climate & Environment Information Programme. “History of Air Pollution,” Encyclopedia of the Atmospheric Environment (Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University, 2002)
Ayres, R.The Second Law, the Fourth Law, Recycling and Limits to Growth,” Ecological Economics 29 (1999): 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, C., Lindgren, K. and Andersson, B.. “Global Energy Scenarios Meeting Stringent CO2 Constraints – Cost-Effective Fuel Choices in the Transportation Sector,” Energy Policy 31 (2003): 961–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachu, S., and Gunter, W.. Characteristics of Acid Gas Injection Operations in Western Canada, Report PH4/18 to the Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2003)Google Scholar
Beckerman, W., and Pasek, J.. Justice, Posterity, and the Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M., Hobbs, B. and Ellis, H.. “The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in the Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: Implications for IA Practitioners,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37 (2003): 289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.Global Oil and Gas Depletion: An Overview,” Energy Policy 30, 3 (2002): 189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, J.Estimating the Rebound Effect in US Manufacturing Energy Consumption,” Energy Economics 26 (2004): 123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstam, M.The Wealth of Nations and the Environment (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1991)Google Scholar
Berry, G. “Present and Future Electricity Storage for Intermittent Renewables,” in Proceedings of the Pew Center Workshop ‘The 10–50 Solution: Technologies and Policies for a Low-Carbon Future’ (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2004)
Berry, L.A Review of The Market Penetration of US Residential and Commercial Demand-Side Management Programmes,” Energy Policy 21, 1 (1993): 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besenbruch, G., L. Brown, J. Funk and S. Showalter. “High Efficiency Generation of Hydrogen Fuels Using Nuclear Power,” paper presented at the OECD/NEA Information Exchange Meeting on the Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Paris, 2000
Bier, V., Haimes, Y., Lambert, J., Matalas, N. and Zimmerman, R.. “A Survey of Approaches for Assessing and Managing the Risk of Extremes,” Risk Analysis 19, 1 (1999): 83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockris, J.Energy: The Solar-Hydrogen Alternative (New York: Halstead Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Bodansky, B.International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2004)Google Scholar
Bradley, R.The Increasing Sustainability of Conventional Energy, No. 341 (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1999)Google Scholar
Brilhante, O.Brazil's Alcohol Programme: From an Attempt to Reduce Oil,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Mangement 40, 4 (1997): 435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Petroleum. BP Statistical Review (London: British Petroleum, 2004)
British PetroleumEnergy in Focus: Statistical Review of World Energy 2004 (London: British Petroleum, 2004)
British PetroleumStatistical Review of World Energy 1998 (London: British Petroleum, 1998)
Brookes, L.The Greenhouse Effect: The Fallacies in the Energy Efficiency Solution,” Energy Policy 18, 2 (1990): 199–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L.Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth (New York: Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Brown, M., Levine, M., Romm, J., Rosenfeld, A. and Koomey, J.. “Engineering-Economic Studies of Energy Technologies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Opportunities and Challenges,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 23 (1998): 287–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, R.More Precious than Oil,” Texas Monthly, February 1991: 109Google Scholar
Bucher, B., and Carraro, C.. “Economic and Environmental Effectiveness of a Technology-Based Climate Protocol,” Climate Policy 4 (2005): 229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Air Resources Board. On Road Activity, Emissions Inventory Series (Sacramento: California Air Resources Board, 2002)
Campbell, C., and Laherrere, J.. “The End of Cheap Oil,” Scientific American 278, 3 (1998): 78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carraro, C., and Levesque, F. (eds.). Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, P., and Sheppard, S.. “The Welfare Economics of Land-Use Planning,” Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2002): 242–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciriancy Wantrup, S.Resource Conservation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1952)Google Scholar
Cole, D., and Grossman, P.. “When is Command and Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection,” Wisconsin Law Review 5 (1999): 887–938Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Ayres, R., Herendeen, R., Moffatt, I, Opschoor, H., Rapport, D., Rees, W., Simmons, C., Lewis, K., Templet, P., Kooten, J. G., Bulte, E., Wackernagel, M. and Silverstein, J.. “Forum on the Ecological Footprint,” Ecological Economics 32, 3 (2000): 341–394Google Scholar
Craig, P., Gadgil, A. and Koomey, J.. “What Can History Teach Us? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002): 83–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, J.Pollution, Property and Prices (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Daly, H. “Operationalizing Sustainable Development by Investing in Natural Capital,” in Jansson, A., Hammer, M., Folke, C. and Costanza, R. (eds.), Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Heal, G.. “The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources,” Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974): 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCanio, S.Economic Models of Climate Change – A Critique (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCarolis, J., and Keith, D.. “The Cost of Wind's Variability: Is There a Threshold?The Electricity Journal, January/February 2005: 69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffeyes, K.Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Deutch, J., and Moniz, E. (co-chairs). The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Dewey, S.Don't Breathe the Air (Texas: Texas A&M University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Diamond, J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (New York: Viking Penguin, 2005)
Dixon, R., Winjum, J., Andrasko, K., Lee, J. and Schroeder, P.. “Integrated Systems: Assessment of Promising Agroforests and Alternative Land Use Practices to Enhance Carbon Conservation and Sequestration,” Climatic Change 30, 1 (1994): 1–23Google Scholar
Dooley, J.US National Investment in Energy R&D: 1974–1999 (Washington, D.C.: Battelle Memorial Institute, 2001)Google Scholar
Downing, R., Ramankutty, R. and Shah, J.. RAINS-ASIA: An Assessment Model for Acid Deposition in Asia (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennen, T., Baker, A. and Kamery, W.. Electricity Generation Cost Simulation Model, report No. SAND 2002–3376 (Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drolet, B., Gretz, J., Kluyskens, D., Sandmann, F. and Wurster, R.. “The Euro-Québec Hydro-Hydrogen Pilot Project [EQHHPP]: Demonstration Phase,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 21, 4 (1996): 305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R., Stogran, M., Chan, P. and Chan, S.. Oil Sands Outlook: Potential Supply and Costs of Crude Bitumen and Synthetic Crude Oil in Canada 2003–2017 (Calgary: Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2004)Google Scholar
Dunn, S.Hydrogen Futures: Toward a Sustainable Energy System (Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute, 2001)Google Scholar
Ellerman, D., Joskow, P., Schmalensee, R., Monetero, J.-P. and Bailey, E.. Markets for Clean Air: The US Acid Rain Program (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerman, D., Joskow, P. and Harrison, D.. Emissions Trading in the US: Experiences, Lessons and Considerations for Greenhouse Gases (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2003)Google Scholar
European Commission. ExternE: Externalities of Energy (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1995)
European Commission.External Costs: Research Results on Socio-Environmental Damages Due to Electricity and Transport (Brussels: Director-General for Research, European Commission, 2003)
Farla, J., and K. Blok. “Energy Conservation Investments in Firms: Evaluation of the Energy Bonus in the Netherlands in the 1980s,” Industrial Energy Efficiency Policies: Understanding Success and Failure, Proceedings of Workshop by the International Network for Energy Demand Analysis in the Industrial Sector (Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 1998)
Fetter, S.Climate Change and the Transformation of World Energy Supply (Palo Alto, Calif.: Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, 1999)Google Scholar
Fickett, A., Gellings, C. and Lovins, A.. “Efficient Use of Electricity,” Scientific American 263, 3 (1990): 64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischoff, B., Bostrom, A. and Quadrel, M.. “Risk Perception and Communication,” Annual Review of Public Health 14 (1993): 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, C. “Clean Air for Hong Kong,” in Haq, G., Han, W., and Kim, C. (eds.), Urban Air Pollution Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia, Proceedings of Workshop, Air Pollution in the Megacities of Asia Project, Seoul, Korea (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Fung, M., and T. Macyk. “Reclamation of Oil Sands Mining Areas,” in Barnhisel, R., Darmody, R. and Daniels, W. (eds.), Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands (American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy Series 41, 2000): 755–774Google Scholar
Gale, J., Christensen, N., Cutler, A. and Torp, T.. “Demonstrating the Potential for Geological Storage of CO2: The Sleipner and GESTCO Projects,” Environmental Geosciences 8, 3 (2001): 160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, J., and Kaya, Y. (eds.). Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2003)Google Scholar
Garwin, R., and Charpak, G.. Megawatts and Megatons: A Turning Point in the Nuclear Age? (New York: Knopf, 2001)Google Scholar
Geller, H.Energy Revolution: Policies for a Sustainable Future (Covelo, Calif.: Island Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. “The Crisis of Resources: Its Nature and Its Unfolding,” in Daneke, G. (ed.), Energy, Economics and the Environment (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1982), 22Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N.The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Environmental Facility. Renewable Energy: GEF Partners with Business for a Better World (Washington, D.C.: Global Environmental Facility, 2001)
Goeller, H., and Weinberg, A.. “The Age of Substitutability,” American Economic Review 61 (1978): 1–11Google Scholar
Gold, T.The Deep Hot Biosphere (New York: Copernicus Books, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldemberg, J. (ed.). World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Goldemberg, J., and Johansson, T. (eds.). World Energy Assessment: 2004 Update (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2004)Google Scholar
Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T., Reddy, A. and Williams, R.. Energy for a Sustainable World (New Delhi: Wiley-Eastern Limited, 1988)Google Scholar
Goodland, R. “Environmental Sustainability in the Hydro Industry: Disaggregating the Debate,” in Dorcey, T. (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on ‘Large Dams: Learning from the Past, Looking in the Future’ (Washington, D.C.: IUCN, World Conservation Union, and World Bank Group, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodstein, D.Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil (New York: Norton, 2004)Google Scholar
Green, C.Potential Scale-Related Problems in Estimating the Costs of CO2 Mitigation Policies,” Climatic Change 44 (2000): 331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D.CAFE or Price? An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978–1989,” The Energy Journal 11, 3 (1990): 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D., Kahn, J. and Gibson, R.. “Fuel Economy Rebound Effect for US Household Vehicles,” The Energy Journal 20, 3 (1999): 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, L., and Bernow, S.. “Design of Coordinated Energy and Environmental Policies: Use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 721–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, L., Greene, D. and Difiglio, C.. “Energy Efficiency and Consumption – the Rebound Effect – a Survey,” Energy Policy 28 (2000): 389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z.Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica 25, 4 (1957): 501–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimston, M., and Beck, P.. Double or Quits: The Global Future of Civil Nuclear Energy (London: Earthscan, 2002)Google Scholar
Grubb, M.Energy Efficiency and Economic Fallacies,” Energy Policy 18, 8 (1990): 783–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M.Technologies, Energy Systems, and the Timing of CO2 Emissions Abatement,” Energy Policy 25 (1997): 159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubler, A.Technology and Global Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfele, W.Energy in a Finite World: A Global Systems Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1981)Google Scholar
Hahn, R., and Stavins, R.. “Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Integrating Theory and Practice,” American Economic Review 82, 2 (1992): 464–468Google Scholar
Hahn, R., and Sunstein, C.. “The Precautionary Principle as a Basis for Decision Making,” The Economists' Voice 2, 2, article 8 (2005): 1–10Google Scholar
Hammer, H., Lofgren, A. and Sterner, T.. “Political Economy Obstacles to Fuel Taxation,” The Energy Journal 25, 3 (2004): 1–17Google Scholar
Haq, G., W. Han and C. Kim (eds.). Urban Air Pollution Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia, Proceedings of Workshop, Air Pollution in the Megacities of Asia Project, Seoul, Korea (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)
Haq, G., Han, W., Kim, C. and Vallack, H.. Benchmarking Urban Air Quality Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. and Sterner, T. (eds.). Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe (Washington, D.C.: Resoures for the Future, 2004)Google Scholar
Hartwick, J.Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources,” American Economic Review 66 (1977): 972–974Google Scholar
Hawken, P., Lovins, A. and Lovins, H.. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution (Boston: Little, Brown, 1999)Google Scholar
Heal, G., and Kristrom, B.. “Uncertainty and Climate Change,” Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (2002): 3–39Google Scholar
Heinberg, R.The Party's Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies (Gabriola Island, B.C.: New Society Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar
Hirst, E.Actual Energy Savings after Retrofit: Electrically Heated Homes in the Pacific Northwest,” Energy 11 (1986): 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchon, B., Gunter, W., Gentzis, T. and Bailey, R., “Sedimentary Basins and Greenhouse Gases: A Serendipitous Association,” Energy Conversion and Management 40 (1999): 825–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, B., and Meier, P.. Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multi-Criteria Methods (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffert, M., Caldeira, K., Benford, G., Criswell, D., Green, C., Herzog, H., Jain, A., Kheshgi, H., Lackner, K., Lewis, J., Lightfoot, H., Mannheimer, W., Mankins, J., Mauel, M., Perkins, L., Schlesinger, M., Volk, T. and Wigley, T.. “Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet,” Science 298 (2002): 981–987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffert, M., Caldeira, K., Jain, A., Haites, E., Harvey, L., Putter, S., Schlesinger, M., Schneider, S., Watts, R., Wigley, T. and Wuebbles, D.. “Energy Implications of Future Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content,” Nature 395, 29 (1988): 881–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P.Tomorrow's Energy: Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and the Prospects for a Cleaner Planet (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Hohmeyer, O.Social Costs of Energy Consumption (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmeyer, O., Ottinger, R. and Rennings, K. (eds.). Social Costs and Sustainability: Valuation and Implementation in the Energy and Transport Sector (Heidelberg: Springer, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdren, J. (chairperson). Report to the President on Federal Energy Research and Development for the Challenges of the Twenty-first Century (Washington, D.C.: President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Energy Research and Development, 1997)Google Scholar
Holling, C. “An Ecologist View of the Malthusian Conflict,” in Lindahl-Kiessling, K. and Landsberg, H. (eds.), Population, Economic Development and Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Holloway, S.Safety of Underground Disposal of Carbon Dioxide,” Energy Conversion and Management 38 (1997): S241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M.National Academy of Sciences Report on Energy Resources: Reply,” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 49, 10 (1965): 1720–1727Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 1995, Second Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Climate Change 2001, Third Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 3: Reference Manual (Paris: IPCC/OECD, 1997)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeSpecial Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Summary for Policy Makers, Synthesis Report, Climate Change 2001: Third Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
International Energy Agency. Energy Balances of non-OECD Countries 1998–1999 (Paris: OECD, 2000)
International Energy Agency.Key World Energy Statistics 2004 (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004)
International Energy Agency.Oil Crises and Climate Challenges: 30 Years of Energy Use in IEA Countries (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004)
International Energy AgencyPhotovoltaic Power Systems Programme, Trends in Photovoltaic Applications in selected IEA Countries between 1992 and 2001 (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2002)
International Energy AgencyRenewables in Global Energy Supply: an IEA Factsheet (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2002)
International Energy AgencyThe Prospects for CO2Capture and Storage (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004)
International Energy AgencyWorld Energy Investment Outlook (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2003)
International Energy AgencyWorld Energy Outlook (Paris: OECD, 2002)
Jaccard, M. “Renewable Portfolio Standard,” in Cleveland, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy, Volume 5 (New York: Elsevier, 2004), 413–421Google Scholar
Jaccard, M. “Policies that Mobilize Producers Toward Sustainability: The Renewable Portfolio Standard and the Vehicle Emission Standard,” in G. Toner (ed.), Building Canadian Capacity: Sustainable Production and the Knowledge Economy (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2005)
Jaccard, M., Bailie, A. and Nyboer, J.. “CO2 Emission Reduction Costs in the Residential Sector: Behavioral Parameters in a Bottom-Up Simulation Model,” The Energy Journal 17, 4 (1996): 107–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Chen, H. and Li, J.. “Renewable Portfolio Standard: A Tool for Environmental Policy in the Chinese Electricity Sector,” Energy for Sustainable Development, special issue on China, 5, 4 (2001): 113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Failing, L. and Berry, T.. “From Equipment to Infrastructure: Community Energy Management and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction,” Energy Policy 25, 11 (1997): 1065–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J., Bataille, C. and Sadownik, B.. “Modeling the Cost of Climate Policy: Distinguishing between Alternative Cost Definitions and Long-Run Cost Dynamics,” The Energy Journal 24, 1 (2003): 49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J. and Fogwill, A.. “How Big is the Electricity Conservation Potential in Industry?The Energy Journal 14, 2 (1993): 139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Rivers, N. and Horne, M.. The Morning After: Optimal Greenhouse Gas Policies for Canada's Kyoto Obligations and Beyond (Toronto: CD Howe Institute, 2004)Google Scholar
Jaccard, M., and Y. Mao. “Making Markets Work Better,” in Johansson, T. and Goldemberg, J. (eds.), Energy for Sustainable Development: A Policy Agenda (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2002)Google Scholar
Jackson, T. (ed.). Mitigating Climate Change: Flexibility Mechanisms (London: Elsevier Science, 2001)Google Scholar
Jacoby, H., and Ellerman, D.. “The Safety Valve and Climate Policy,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A., and Stavins, R.. “The Energy-Efficiency Gap: What Does it Mean?Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 804–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A., Newell, R. and Stavins, R.. “Environmental Policy and Technological Change,” Environmental and Resource Economics 22, 1–2 (2002): 41–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, A., Hammer, M., Folke, C. and Costanza, R. (eds.). Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Jochem, E. (ed.). “Energy End-use Efficiency,” chapter 6 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Johansson, T., Bodlund, B. and Williams, R. (eds.). Electricity: Efficient End-Use and New Generation Technologies, and Their Planning Implications (Lund: Lund University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Johansson, T., Kelly, H., Reddy, A. and Williams, R. (eds.). Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Joskow, P.Utility-Subsidized Energy-Efficiency Programs,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 20 (1995): 526–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, P., and Marron, D.. “What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs,” The Energy Journal 13, 4 (1992): 41–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammen, D., and Hassenzahl, D.. Should We Risk It? Exploring Environmental, Health, and Technological Problem Solving (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Kammen, D., and Pacca, S.. “Assessing the Costs of Electricity,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 301–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanos, P.Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Evolution and Definition of a New Environmental Policy Approach,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44, 1 (2001): 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H.. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (New York: Wiley, 1976)Google Scholar
Kemp, R.Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of Technological Impact of Policy Instruments (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997)Google Scholar
Kemp, R.Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate in California. Misguided Policy or Example of Enlightened Leadership? (University of Maastricht: MERIT, 2003)
Khanna, M.Non-Mandatory Approaches for Environmental Protection,” Journal of Economic Surveys 15, 3 (2001): 291–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazzoom, D.Energy Savings Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances,” The Energy Journal 8, 4 (1987): 85–89Google Scholar
Kraushaar, J., and Ristinen, R.. Energy and the Problems of a Technical Society (New York: Wiley, 1993)Google Scholar
Krautkraemer, J.Non-renewable Resource Scarcity,” Journal of Economic Literature 36, 4 (1998): 2065–2107Google Scholar
Kruger, J., and Pizer, W.. The EU Emissions Trading Directive: Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2004)Google Scholar
Kwoka, J. “The Limits of Market-Oriented Regulatory Techniques: The Case of Automotive Fuel Economy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 4 (1983): 695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, J.The Carbon War: Global Warming and the End of the Oil Era (New York: Penguin Books, 1999)Google Scholar
Leggett, J., Pepper, W. and Swart, R.. “Emissions Scenarios for IPCC: An Update,” in Houghton, J., Callander, B. and Varney, S. (eds.), Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Levine, M., Hirst, E., Koomey, J., McMahon, J. and Sanstad, A.. Energy Efficiency, Market Failures, and Government Policy (Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, B. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, D., and Kulick, J.. “Demand Side Management and Energy Efficiency in the United States,” The Energy Journal 25, 1 (2004): 19–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, A.Energy Savings Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances: Another View,” Energy Journal 9, 2 (1988): 155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, A.Negawatts: Twelve Transitions, Eight Improvements, and One Distraction,” Energy Policy 24, 4 (1996): 331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, A.Saving Gigabucks with Negawatts,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 115, 6 (1985): 19–26Google Scholar
Lovins, A.Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace (San Francisco: Friends of the Earth International; Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing, 1977)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Datta, E., Bustness, O.-E., Koomey, J. and Glasgow, N.. Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation, Profits, Jobs and Security (Snowmass, Colo.: Rocky Mountain Institute, 2004)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Datta, E., Feiler, T., Rabago, K., Swisher, J., Lehmann, A. and Wicker, K.. Small is Profitable: the Hidden Economic Benefits of Making Electrical Resources the Right Size (Snowmass, Colo.: Rocky Mountain Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Lovins, L., Krause, F. and Bach, W.. Least-Cost Energy: Solving the CO2Problem (Andover, Mass.: Brick House Publishing, 1981)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Neymark, J., Flanigan, T., Kiernan, P., Bancroft, B. and Sheppard, M.. The State of the Art: Drivepower (Snowmass, Colo.: Rocky Mountain Institute, 1989)Google Scholar
Lyman, E., and Dolley, S.. “Accident Prone,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56, 2 (2000): 42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M.Facing the Elephant: Oil Market Evaluation and Future Oil Crises. (Boulder: International Research Center for Energy and Economic Development, 1998)Google Scholar
Maddison, A. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective (Paris: OECD, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, C. “Hydrogen and Energy,” Chemical Economy and Engineering Review 5, 1 (1973): 7–25Google Scholar
Marland, G., Boden, T. and Andres, R.. “Global, Regional, and National CO2 Emissions,” in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change (Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2001)Google Scholar
McKibbin, W. and Wilcoxen, P.. A Better Way to Slow Global Climate Change (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1997)Google Scholar
McNeill, J. An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World (New York: Norton, 2000)Google Scholar
Menanteau, P., Finon, D. and Lamy, M.-L.. “Prices Versus Quantities: Choosing Policies for Promoting the Development of Renewable Energy,” Energy Policy 31 (2003): 799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, G., and Hassett, K.. “Measuring the Energy Savings from Home Improvement Investments: Evidence from Monthly Billing Data,” Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 3 (1999): 516–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millman, S., and Prince, R.. “Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17, 3 (1989): 247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M., and Henrion, M.. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxnes, E. “Estimating Customer Costs or Benefits of Energy Efficiency Standards,” Journal of Economic Psychology 25, 6 (2005): 707–724
Mueller, D.Public Choice II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Mulder, P., Groot, H. and Hofkes, M.. “Economic Growth and Technological Change: A Comparison of Insights from a Neo-Classical and an Evolutionary Perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68 (2001): 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munasinghe, M., and Shearer, W.. Defining and Measuring Sustainability: The Biogeophysical Foundations (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995)Google Scholar
Nadel, S.Lessons Learned: A Review of Utility Experience with Conservation and Load Management Programs for Commercial and Industrial Customers, Report no. 1064-EEED-AEP-88 (New York: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakicenovic, N. (ed.). “Energy Scenarios,” chapter 9 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., and Grubler, A.. “Energy and the Protection of the Atmosphere,” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 13, 1–3 (2000): 4–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., Grubler, A. and McDonald, A. (eds.). Global Energy Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Nanduri, M., Nyboer, J. and Jaccard, M.. “Aggregating Physical Intensity Indicators: Results of Applying the Composite Indicator Approach to the Canadian Industrial Sector,” Energy Policy 30 (2002): 151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Newell, R., Jaffe, A. and Stavins, R.. “The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999): 941–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, A.Demand-Side Management: Overcoming Market Barriers or Obscuring Real Costs,” Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 840–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, R., and Danish, K.. Designing a Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for the US (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2003)Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.The Allocation of Energy Resources,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1973/74): 529–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northwest Power Planning Council. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program: A Multi-Species Approach for Decision Making (Portland, Ore.: Northwest Power Planning Council, 2000)
Nuclear Energy Agency. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity (Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, 1998)
Odell, P.Dynamics of Energy Technologies and Global Change,” Energy Policy 27, 13 (1999): 737–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, P.Oil and Gas: Crises and Controversies 1961–2000 (Brentwood, UK: Multi-Science, 2001)Google Scholar
Odell, P.Why Carbon Fuels Will Dominate the 21st Century's Global Energy Economy (Brentwood, UK Multi-Science, 2004)Google Scholar
Ogden, J.Prospects for Building a Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24 (1999): 227–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, J., and Williams, R.. Solar Hydrogen: Moving Beyond Fossil Fuels (Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute, 1989)Google Scholar
Ogden, J., Williams, R. and Larson, E., “Societal Lifecycle Costs of Cars with Alternative Fuels/Engines,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, J., Bouwman, A., Hoek, K. and Berdowski, J.. “Global Air Emission Inventories for Anthropogenic Sources of NOx, NH3 and N2O in 1990,” Environmental Pollution 102 (1998): 135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, M.The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
O'Neill, B., MacKellar, F. L. and Lutz, W.. Population and Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, 2001)Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Economic Instruments for Pollution Control and Natural Resources Management in OECD Countries: A Survey (Paris: OECD, 1999)
Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentOutlook 2000 – Perspectives 2000 (Paris: OECD, 2000)
Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentVoluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Usage in the Policy Mixes (Paris: OECD, 2003)
Ottinger, R., Wooley, D., Robinson, N., Hodas, D. and Babb, S.. Environmental Costs of Electricity (New York: Oceana, 1990)Google Scholar
Pacala, S., and Socolow, R.. “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies,” Science 13 (2004): 968–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffenbarger, J., Lammers, G. and Ocaña, C.. Electricity Reform: Power Generation Costs and Investment (Paris: International Energy Agency, 1999)Google Scholar
Palmer, K., Oates, W. and Portney, P.. “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (1995): 119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmgren, C., Morgan, M., Bruin, W. Bruine and Keith, D.. “Initial Public Perceptions of Deep Geological and Oceanic Disposal of Carbon Dioxide,” Environmental Science and Technology 38, 24 (2004): 6441–6450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panwar, T. “Air Pollution Management in India,” in Haq, G., Han, W. and Kim, C. (eds.), Urban Air Pollution Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia, Proceedings of Workshop, Air Pollution in the Megacities of Asia Project, Seoul, Korea (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Parry, I., Williams, W., III, C. Roberton and Goulder, L.. “When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 1 (1999): 52–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M.What is Energy Efficiency?” Energy Policy 24, 5 (1996): 377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrings, C. “Reserved Rationality and the Precautionary Principle: Technological Change, Time, and Uncertainty in Environmental Decision Making,” in Costanza, R. (ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Peterson, C., Rice, S., Short, J., Esler, D., Bodkin, J., Ballachey, B. and Irons, D.. “Long-Term Ecosystem Response to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,” Science 302 (2003): 2082–2086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigou, A.The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1920)Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Investment,” Journal of Economic Literature 29, 3 (1991): 1110–1152Google Scholar
Pitzer, K.Thermodynamics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995)Google Scholar
Pizer, W.Optimal Choice of Policy Instrument and Stringency under Uncertainty: The Case of Climate Change,” Resource and Energy Economics 21 (1999): 255–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, D.Induced Innovation and Energy Prices,” American Economic Review 92, 1 (2002): 160–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., and Linde, C.. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (1995): 97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabl, A., and Spadaro, J.. “Public Health Impact of Air Pollution and Implications for the Energy System,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25 (2000): 601–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radetzki, M.Coal or Nuclear in New Power Stations: Political Economy of an Undesirable but Necessary Choice,” The Energy Journal 21, 1 (2000): 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesohl, S., and Boyd, G.. “Advances in Energy Forecasting Models Based on Engineering Economics,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 345–381Google Scholar
Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R. and Swart, R.. Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead (Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Rasmussen, N. (ed.). Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (Washington, D.C.: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1975)Google Scholar
Reddy, A. “Energy Technologies and Policies for Rural Development,” in Johansson, T. and Goldemberg, J. (eds.), Energy for Sustainable Development: A Policy Agenda (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2002): 115–136Google Scholar
Rhodes, J., and D. Keith. “Biomass Energy with Geological Sequestration of CO2: Two for the Price of One,” in Gale, J. and Kaya, Y. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2003), 1371–1377Google Scholar
Rifkin, J.The Hydrogen Economy: The Creation of the Worldwide Energy Web and the Redistribution of Power on Earth (New York: Tarcher/Putnam, 2002)Google Scholar
Robert, K.-H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., Larderel, J. Aloisi, Basile, G., Jansen, J., Kuehr, R., Thomas, P. Price, Suzuki, M., Hawken, P. and Wackernagel, M.. “Strategic Sustainable Development – Selection, Design and Synergies of Applied Tools,” Journal of Cleaner Production 10 (2002): 197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M., and Spence, M.. “Effluent Charges and Licenses under Uncertainty,” Journal of Public Economics 5 (1976): 193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P.The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World (New York: Houghton Mifflin 2004)Google Scholar
Rogner, H.-H.An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon Resources,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 22 (1997): 217–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogner, H.-H. (ed.). “Energy Resources,” chapter 5 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Romm, J.The Hype About Hydrogen: Fact and Fiction in the Race to Save the Planet (New York: Island Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Rothman, D., and Bruyn, S. (eds.). “Probing into the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis,” special issue, Ecological Economics 25 (1998)Google Scholar
Ryan, J. “Hubbert's Peak: Déjà Vu All Over Again,” International Association of Energy Economics Newsletter, 2nd Quarter, 2003
Ryan, M.Fuel Costs Taking More of O&M Budget: Even as Costs Drop, Efficiency Rises,” Nuclear Fuel 24, 14 (1999): 1–10Google Scholar
Sanden, B., and Azar, C.. “Near-Term Technology Policies for Long-Term Climate Targets – Economy Wide Versus Technology Specific Approaches,” Energy Policy 33 (2005): 1557–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanstad, A., and Howarth, R.. “Normal Markets, Market Imperfections, and Energy Efficiency,” Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, A., and Victor, D.. “The Future Mobility of the World Population,” Transportation Research Part A 34 (2000): 171–205Google Scholar
Scheer, H.The Solar Economy: Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Global Future (London: Earthscan, 2002)Google Scholar
Scheraga, J.Energy and the Environment: Something New under the Sun?Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schipper, L. (ed.). “On the Rebound: The Interaction of Energy Efficiency, Energy Use and Economic Activity,” Energy Policy 28, 6–7 (2000): 351–354Google Scholar
Schipper, L., Meyers, S. and Kelly, H.. Coming in from the Cold: Energy-Wise Housing in Sweden (Santa Ana, Calif.: Seven Locks Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Schmidt-Bleek, F.MIPS and Factor 10 for a Sustainable and Profitable Economy (Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute, 1997)Google Scholar
Schumacher, E.Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered (London: Blond and Briggs, 1973)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1934)Google Scholar
Sebold, F., and Fox, E.. “Realized Savings from Residential Conservation Activity,” The Energy Journal 6, 2 (1985): 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackley, S., McLachlan, C. and Gough, C.. The Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage (Manchester: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, 2004)Google Scholar
Sharp, J., Jaccard, M. and Keith, D.. Public Attitudes Toward Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide in Canada, Report to Environment Canada and the Alberta Ministry of Environment (Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, 2005)Google Scholar
Shell International Inc. Exploring the Future: Energy Needs and Possibilities (London: Shell International Inc., 2001)
Simon, H.Prediction and Prescription in Systems Modeling,” Operations Research 38, 1 (1990): 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J.The Ultimate Resource (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Simon, J.The Ultimate Resource II (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Sims, R., Rogner, H.-H. and Gregory, K.. “Carbon Emission and Mitigation Cost Comparisons between Fossil Fuel, Nuclear and Renewable Energy Resources for Electricity Generation,” Energy Policy 31 (2003): 1315–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, R., and Arnott, R.. The Oil Supply and Demand Context for Security of Oil Supply to the EU from the GCC Countries (Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2005)Google Scholar
Slovic, P.Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy,” Risk Analysis 13 (1993): 675–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smil, V.Energy at the Crossroads (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Smil, V.Energy in the Twentieth Century: Resources, Conversions, Costs, Uses, and Consequences,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25 (2000): 21–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., Pitcher, H. and Wigley, T.. “Global and Regional Anthropogenic Sulphur Dioxide Emissions,” Global and Planetary Change 29, 1–2 (2001): 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderholm, P., and Sundqvist, T.. “Pricing Environmental Externalities in the Power Sector: Ethical Limits and Implications for Social Choice,” Ecological Economics 46 (2003): 333–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics,” American Economic Review 64 (1974): 1–14Google Scholar
Solow, R.On the Intertemporal Allocation of Natural Resources,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88 (1986): 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.“Sustainability: An Economist's Perspective,” in Dorfman, R. and Dorfman, N. (eds.), Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings (New York:Norton, 1993), 179–187Google Scholar
Stavins, R.The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed Preference Approach,” American Economic Review 89, 4 (1999): 994–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, A.Science and Precaution in the Appraisal of Electricity Supply Options,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 86 (2001): 55–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoneman, P.The Economics of Technological Diffusion (London: Blackwell, 2002)Google Scholar
Suskind, R.The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neil (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003)Google Scholar
Sutherland, R.The Economics of Energy Conservation Policy,” Energy Policy 24, 4 (1996): 361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, R.Market Barriers to Energy Efficiency Investments,” The Energy Journal, 12, 3 (1991): 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, G.Public Choice and Environmental Regulation: Tradable Permit Systems in the United States and CO2 Taxation in Europe (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998)Google Scholar
Sweeney, J.The California Electricity Crisis (Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Tainter, J.The Collapse of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Thomas, C., James, B., Lomax, F. and Kuhn, I.. “Fuel Options for the Fuel Cell Vehicle: Hydrogen, Methanol or Gasoline?International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 25 (2000): 551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K.Incentives for Energy Conservation in the Commercial and Industrial Sectors,” The Energy Journal 9, 3 (1988): 113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkenburg, W. (ed.). “Advanced Energy Supply Technologies,” chapter 7 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Turner, J.Sustainable Hydrogen Production,” Science 305 (2004): 972–974CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turton H., and L. Barreto. “Automobile Technology, Hydrogen and Climate Change: A Long-Term Modeling Analysis,” International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy (forthcoming, 2005)
Tzimas, E., and Peteves, S.. “The Impact of Carbon Sequestration on the Production Cost of Electricity and Hydrogen from Coal and Natural Gas Technologies in Europe in the Medium Term,” Energy 30 (2005): 2672–2689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists. Energy Security: Solutions to Protect America's Power Supply and Reduce Oil Dependence (Cambridge, Mass.: Union of Concerned Scientists, 2000)
United Nations. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report (New York: United Nations, 2005)
United Nations.World Urbanization Prospects: The 2001 Revisions, Data Tables and Highlights (New York: Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat, 2002)
Unruh, G.Understanding Carbon Lock-in,” Energy Policy 28 (2000): 817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Congressional Record, 1875
US Department of Energy. National Energy Technology Laboratory Report on Proposed Capacity Additions (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2004)
US Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Review 2002 (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2003)
US Energy Information AdministrationInternational Energy Annual 2001 (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2002)
US Energy Information AdministrationInternational Energy Outlook 2004 (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2004)
US Environmental Protection Agency. Achieving Clean Air and Clean Water: The Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Oxygenates in Gasoline, EPA420-R-99-021 (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, 1999)
US Environmental Protection AgencyAP-42: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume II: Mobile Sources, 5th edition (Research Triangle Park, N.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2001)
US Environmental Protection Agency.National Air Pollutant Emission Trends Report, 1900–1995 (Research Triangle Park, N.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1996)
US Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Inventory Emission Trends Data (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, 2003)
US General Accounting Office. Acid Rain: Emissions Trends and Effects in the Eastern United States (Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office, 2000)
Vaitheeswaran, V.Power to the People (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003)Google Scholar
Burgh, J., and Gowdy, J.. “Evolutionary Theories in Environmental and Resource Economics: Approaches and Applications,” Environmental and Resource Economics 17 (2000): 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, B.Nuclear Energy: Tenfold Expansion or Phase-Out?Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69 (2002): 287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D.The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Viklund, M.Energy Policy Options – From the Perspective of Public Attitudes and Risk Perceptions,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 1159–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violette, D.Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through DSM Projects: Lessons Learned from DSM Evaluation in the United States (Boulder: Hagler Bailly Consulting, 1998)Google Scholar
Weiszacker, E., Lovins, A. and Lovins, L.. The Factor Four – Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use (London: Earthscan, 1997)Google Scholar
Wachs, M., and D. Beal. “Taxing our Highways,” Westways, November/December 2000
Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W.. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on Earth (Stony Creek, Conn.: New Society Publishers, 1996)Google Scholar
Walsh, M.Global Trends in Motor Vehicle Use and Emissions,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 15 (1990): 217–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, C. “Oil Scarcity: What Have the Past Three Decades Revealed?” Energy Policy (forthcoming, 2005)
Weidou, N., Johansson, T., Wang, J., Wu, Z., Mao, Y., Zhu, Q., Zhou, F., Li, Z., Anderson, B., Farinelli, U., Jaccard, M. and Williams, R.. “Transforming Coal for Sustainability: A Strategy for China,” Energy for Sustainable Development 7, 4 (2003): 21–30Google Scholar
Weitzman, M.Prices vs. Quantities,” Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974): 477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. “Nuclear and Alternative Energy Supply Options for an Environmentally Constrained World: A Long-Term Perspective,” in Leventhal, P., Dolley, S. and Tanzer, S. (eds.), Nuclear Power and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons: Can We Have One Without the Other? (Washington, D.C.: Brassey's Inc., 2002)Google Scholar
Williamson, O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Wilson, E.The Future of Life (New York: Knopf, 2002)Google Scholar
Wirl, F.The Economics of Conservation Programs (Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirl, F.Lessons from Utility Conservation Programs,” The Energy Journal 21, 1 (2000): 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, R., and Bishop, R.. “How to Decide when Experts Disagree: Uncertainty-Based Choice Rules in Environmental Policy,” Land Economics 73, 4 (1997): 492–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. Energy Services for the World's Poor (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2000)
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987)
World Energy Council. Survey of Energy Resources 2001 (London: World Energy Council, 2001)
World Health Organization. World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002)
Worrell, E., Ramesohl, S. and Boyd, G.. “Advances in Energy Forecasting Models Based on Engineering Economics,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 345–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, K., and Barreto, L.. “Energyplexes for the 21st Century: Coal Gasification for Co-producing Hydrogen, Electricity and Liquid Fuels,” Energy 30 (2005): 2453–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittel, W., W. Weindorf, R. Wurster and W. Bussmann. “Geothermal Hydrogen – A Vision?” Paper presented at European Geothermal Energy Council's 2nd Business Seminar, European Geothermal Energy Council 2001, Altheim, Austria
Adelman, M.Comment on: R. W. Bentley. ‘Global Oil and Gas Depletion,’” Energy Policy 31, 4 (2003): 389–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, M.Mineral Depletion with Special Reference to Petroleum,” Review of Economics and Statistics 72, 1 (1990): 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, M., and Lynch, M.. “Fixed View of Resources Limits Creates Undue Pessimism,” Oil and Gas Journal 95, 14 (1997): 56–60Google Scholar
Adelman, M., and C. Watkins. “Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Prices 1982–2002: Implications for Depletion and Investment Cost,” Working Paper 03–016, MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, 2003
Aldy, J., Barrett, S. and Stavins, R.. Thirteen Plus One: A Comparison of Global Climate Policy Architectures (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2003)Google Scholar
Allard, P., Djlevic, D. and Delarue, C.. “Origin of Carbon Dioxide Emanation from the 1979 Deng Eruption, Indonesia: Implications for the Origin of the 1986 Nyos Catastrophe,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 39 (1989): 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S., and Newell, R.. “Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 109–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W., Kanaroglou, S. and Miller, E.. “Urban Form, Energy, and the Environment,” Urban Studies 33, 1 (1996): 7–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K., and L. Hurwicz. “An Optimality Criterion for Decision-Making Under Ignorance,” in Carter, C. and Ford, J. (eds.), Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics: Essays in Honour of G. L. S. Shackle (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972)Google Scholar
Atmosphere, Climate & Environment Information Programme. “History of Air Pollution,” Encyclopedia of the Atmospheric Environment (Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University, 2002)
Ayres, R.The Second Law, the Fourth Law, Recycling and Limits to Growth,” Ecological Economics 29 (1999): 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, C., Lindgren, K. and Andersson, B.. “Global Energy Scenarios Meeting Stringent CO2 Constraints – Cost-Effective Fuel Choices in the Transportation Sector,” Energy Policy 31 (2003): 961–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachu, S., and Gunter, W.. Characteristics of Acid Gas Injection Operations in Western Canada, Report PH4/18 to the Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2003)Google Scholar
Beckerman, W., and Pasek, J.. Justice, Posterity, and the Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M., Hobbs, B. and Ellis, H.. “The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in the Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: Implications for IA Practitioners,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37 (2003): 289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.Global Oil and Gas Depletion: An Overview,” Energy Policy 30, 3 (2002): 189–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, J.Estimating the Rebound Effect in US Manufacturing Energy Consumption,” Energy Economics 26 (2004): 123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstam, M.The Wealth of Nations and the Environment (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1991)Google Scholar
Berry, G. “Present and Future Electricity Storage for Intermittent Renewables,” in Proceedings of the Pew Center Workshop ‘The 10–50 Solution: Technologies and Policies for a Low-Carbon Future’ (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2004)
Berry, L.A Review of The Market Penetration of US Residential and Commercial Demand-Side Management Programmes,” Energy Policy 21, 1 (1993): 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besenbruch, G., L. Brown, J. Funk and S. Showalter. “High Efficiency Generation of Hydrogen Fuels Using Nuclear Power,” paper presented at the OECD/NEA Information Exchange Meeting on the Nuclear Production of Hydrogen, Paris, 2000
Bier, V., Haimes, Y., Lambert, J., Matalas, N. and Zimmerman, R.. “A Survey of Approaches for Assessing and Managing the Risk of Extremes,” Risk Analysis 19, 1 (1999): 83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockris, J.Energy: The Solar-Hydrogen Alternative (New York: Halstead Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Bodansky, B.International Climate Efforts Beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2004)Google Scholar
Bradley, R.The Increasing Sustainability of Conventional Energy, No. 341 (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1999)Google Scholar
Brilhante, O.Brazil's Alcohol Programme: From an Attempt to Reduce Oil,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Mangement 40, 4 (1997): 435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Petroleum. BP Statistical Review (London: British Petroleum, 2004)
British PetroleumEnergy in Focus: Statistical Review of World Energy 2004 (London: British Petroleum, 2004)
British PetroleumStatistical Review of World Energy 1998 (London: British Petroleum, 1998)
Brookes, L.The Greenhouse Effect: The Fallacies in the Energy Efficiency Solution,” Energy Policy 18, 2 (1990): 199–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L.Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth (New York: Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Brown, M., Levine, M., Romm, J., Rosenfeld, A. and Koomey, J.. “Engineering-Economic Studies of Energy Technologies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Opportunities and Challenges,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 23 (1998): 287–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, R.More Precious than Oil,” Texas Monthly, February 1991: 109Google Scholar
Bucher, B., and Carraro, C.. “Economic and Environmental Effectiveness of a Technology-Based Climate Protocol,” Climate Policy 4 (2005): 229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Air Resources Board. On Road Activity, Emissions Inventory Series (Sacramento: California Air Resources Board, 2002)
Campbell, C., and Laherrere, J.. “The End of Cheap Oil,” Scientific American 278, 3 (1998): 78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carraro, C., and Levesque, F. (eds.). Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, P., and Sheppard, S.. “The Welfare Economics of Land-Use Planning,” Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2002): 242–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciriancy Wantrup, S.Resource Conservation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1952)Google Scholar
Cole, D., and Grossman, P.. “When is Command and Control Efficient? Institutions, Technology, and the Comparative Efficiency of Alternative Regulatory Regimes for Environmental Protection,” Wisconsin Law Review 5 (1999): 887–938Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Ayres, R., Herendeen, R., Moffatt, I, Opschoor, H., Rapport, D., Rees, W., Simmons, C., Lewis, K., Templet, P., Kooten, J. G., Bulte, E., Wackernagel, M. and Silverstein, J.. “Forum on the Ecological Footprint,” Ecological Economics 32, 3 (2000): 341–394Google Scholar
Craig, P., Gadgil, A. and Koomey, J.. “What Can History Teach Us? A Retrospective Examination of Long-Term Energy Forecasts for the United States,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002): 83–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, J.Pollution, Property and Prices (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Daly, H. “Operationalizing Sustainable Development by Investing in Natural Capital,” in Jansson, A., Hammer, M., Folke, C. and Costanza, R. (eds.), Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P., and Heal, G.. “The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources,” Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974): 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCanio, S.Economic Models of Climate Change – A Critique (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeCarolis, J., and Keith, D.. “The Cost of Wind's Variability: Is There a Threshold?The Electricity Journal, January/February 2005: 69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffeyes, K.Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Deutch, J., and Moniz, E. (co-chairs). The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Dewey, S.Don't Breathe the Air (Texas: Texas A&M University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Diamond, J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (New York: Viking Penguin, 2005)
Dixon, R., Winjum, J., Andrasko, K., Lee, J. and Schroeder, P.. “Integrated Systems: Assessment of Promising Agroforests and Alternative Land Use Practices to Enhance Carbon Conservation and Sequestration,” Climatic Change 30, 1 (1994): 1–23Google Scholar
Dooley, J.US National Investment in Energy R&D: 1974–1999 (Washington, D.C.: Battelle Memorial Institute, 2001)Google Scholar
Downing, R., Ramankutty, R. and Shah, J.. RAINS-ASIA: An Assessment Model for Acid Deposition in Asia (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drennen, T., Baker, A. and Kamery, W.. Electricity Generation Cost Simulation Model, report No. SAND 2002–3376 (Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drolet, B., Gretz, J., Kluyskens, D., Sandmann, F. and Wurster, R.. “The Euro-Québec Hydro-Hydrogen Pilot Project [EQHHPP]: Demonstration Phase,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 21, 4 (1996): 305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R., Stogran, M., Chan, P. and Chan, S.. Oil Sands Outlook: Potential Supply and Costs of Crude Bitumen and Synthetic Crude Oil in Canada 2003–2017 (Calgary: Canadian Energy Research Institute, 2004)Google Scholar
Dunn, S.Hydrogen Futures: Toward a Sustainable Energy System (Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute, 2001)Google Scholar
Ellerman, D., Joskow, P., Schmalensee, R., Monetero, J.-P. and Bailey, E.. Markets for Clean Air: The US Acid Rain Program (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellerman, D., Joskow, P. and Harrison, D.. Emissions Trading in the US: Experiences, Lessons and Considerations for Greenhouse Gases (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2003)Google Scholar
European Commission. ExternE: Externalities of Energy (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1995)
European Commission.External Costs: Research Results on Socio-Environmental Damages Due to Electricity and Transport (Brussels: Director-General for Research, European Commission, 2003)
Farla, J., and K. Blok. “Energy Conservation Investments in Firms: Evaluation of the Energy Bonus in the Netherlands in the 1980s,” Industrial Energy Efficiency Policies: Understanding Success and Failure, Proceedings of Workshop by the International Network for Energy Demand Analysis in the Industrial Sector (Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 1998)
Fetter, S.Climate Change and the Transformation of World Energy Supply (Palo Alto, Calif.: Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, 1999)Google Scholar
Fickett, A., Gellings, C. and Lovins, A.. “Efficient Use of Electricity,” Scientific American 263, 3 (1990): 64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischoff, B., Bostrom, A. and Quadrel, M.. “Risk Perception and Communication,” Annual Review of Public Health 14 (1993): 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, C. “Clean Air for Hong Kong,” in Haq, G., Han, W., and Kim, C. (eds.), Urban Air Pollution Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia, Proceedings of Workshop, Air Pollution in the Megacities of Asia Project, Seoul, Korea (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Fung, M., and T. Macyk. “Reclamation of Oil Sands Mining Areas,” in Barnhisel, R., Darmody, R. and Daniels, W. (eds.), Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands (American Society of Agronomy, Agronomy Series 41, 2000): 755–774Google Scholar
Gale, J., Christensen, N., Cutler, A. and Torp, T.. “Demonstrating the Potential for Geological Storage of CO2: The Sleipner and GESTCO Projects,” Environmental Geosciences 8, 3 (2001): 160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, J., and Kaya, Y. (eds.). Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2003)Google Scholar
Garwin, R., and Charpak, G.. Megawatts and Megatons: A Turning Point in the Nuclear Age? (New York: Knopf, 2001)Google Scholar
Geller, H.Energy Revolution: Policies for a Sustainable Future (Covelo, Calif.: Island Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. “The Crisis of Resources: Its Nature and Its Unfolding,” in Daneke, G. (ed.), Energy, Economics and the Environment (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1982), 22Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N.The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Environmental Facility. Renewable Energy: GEF Partners with Business for a Better World (Washington, D.C.: Global Environmental Facility, 2001)
Goeller, H., and Weinberg, A.. “The Age of Substitutability,” American Economic Review 61 (1978): 1–11Google Scholar
Gold, T.The Deep Hot Biosphere (New York: Copernicus Books, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldemberg, J. (ed.). World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Goldemberg, J., and Johansson, T. (eds.). World Energy Assessment: 2004 Update (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2004)Google Scholar
Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T., Reddy, A. and Williams, R.. Energy for a Sustainable World (New Delhi: Wiley-Eastern Limited, 1988)Google Scholar
Goodland, R. “Environmental Sustainability in the Hydro Industry: Disaggregating the Debate,” in Dorcey, T. (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on ‘Large Dams: Learning from the Past, Looking in the Future’ (Washington, D.C.: IUCN, World Conservation Union, and World Bank Group, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodstein, D.Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil (New York: Norton, 2004)Google Scholar
Green, C.Potential Scale-Related Problems in Estimating the Costs of CO2 Mitigation Policies,” Climatic Change 44 (2000): 331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D.CAFE or Price? An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978–1989,” The Energy Journal 11, 3 (1990): 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D., Kahn, J. and Gibson, R.. “Fuel Economy Rebound Effect for US Household Vehicles,” The Energy Journal 20, 3 (1999): 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, L., and Bernow, S.. “Design of Coordinated Energy and Environmental Policies: Use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 721–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, L., Greene, D. and Difiglio, C.. “Energy Efficiency and Consumption – the Rebound Effect – a Survey,” Energy Policy 28 (2000): 389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z.Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change,” Econometrica 25, 4 (1957): 501–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimston, M., and Beck, P.. Double or Quits: The Global Future of Civil Nuclear Energy (London: Earthscan, 2002)Google Scholar
Grubb, M.Energy Efficiency and Economic Fallacies,” Energy Policy 18, 8 (1990): 783–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, M.Technologies, Energy Systems, and the Timing of CO2 Emissions Abatement,” Energy Policy 25 (1997): 159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubler, A.Technology and Global Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häfele, W.Energy in a Finite World: A Global Systems Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1981)Google Scholar
Hahn, R., and Stavins, R.. “Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Integrating Theory and Practice,” American Economic Review 82, 2 (1992): 464–468Google Scholar
Hahn, R., and Sunstein, C.. “The Precautionary Principle as a Basis for Decision Making,” The Economists' Voice 2, 2, article 8 (2005): 1–10Google Scholar
Hammer, H., Lofgren, A. and Sterner, T.. “Political Economy Obstacles to Fuel Taxation,” The Energy Journal 25, 3 (2004): 1–17Google Scholar
Haq, G., W. Han and C. Kim (eds.). Urban Air Pollution Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia, Proceedings of Workshop, Air Pollution in the Megacities of Asia Project, Seoul, Korea (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)
Haq, G., Han, W., Kim, C. and Vallack, H.. Benchmarking Urban Air Quality Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. and Sterner, T. (eds.). Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe (Washington, D.C.: Resoures for the Future, 2004)Google Scholar
Hartwick, J.Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources,” American Economic Review 66 (1977): 972–974Google Scholar
Hawken, P., Lovins, A. and Lovins, H.. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution (Boston: Little, Brown, 1999)Google Scholar
Heal, G., and Kristrom, B.. “Uncertainty and Climate Change,” Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (2002): 3–39Google Scholar
Heinberg, R.The Party's Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies (Gabriola Island, B.C.: New Society Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar
Hirst, E.Actual Energy Savings after Retrofit: Electrically Heated Homes in the Pacific Northwest,” Energy 11 (1986): 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchon, B., Gunter, W., Gentzis, T. and Bailey, R., “Sedimentary Basins and Greenhouse Gases: A Serendipitous Association,” Energy Conversion and Management 40 (1999): 825–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, B., and Meier, P.. Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multi-Criteria Methods (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffert, M., Caldeira, K., Benford, G., Criswell, D., Green, C., Herzog, H., Jain, A., Kheshgi, H., Lackner, K., Lewis, J., Lightfoot, H., Mannheimer, W., Mankins, J., Mauel, M., Perkins, L., Schlesinger, M., Volk, T. and Wigley, T.. “Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability: Energy for a Greenhouse Planet,” Science 298 (2002): 981–987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffert, M., Caldeira, K., Jain, A., Haites, E., Harvey, L., Putter, S., Schlesinger, M., Schneider, S., Watts, R., Wigley, T. and Wuebbles, D.. “Energy Implications of Future Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content,” Nature 395, 29 (1988): 881–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P.Tomorrow's Energy: Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and the Prospects for a Cleaner Planet (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Hohmeyer, O.Social Costs of Energy Consumption (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohmeyer, O., Ottinger, R. and Rennings, K. (eds.). Social Costs and Sustainability: Valuation and Implementation in the Energy and Transport Sector (Heidelberg: Springer, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdren, J. (chairperson). Report to the President on Federal Energy Research and Development for the Challenges of the Twenty-first Century (Washington, D.C.: President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Energy Research and Development, 1997)Google Scholar
Holling, C. “An Ecologist View of the Malthusian Conflict,” in Lindahl-Kiessling, K. and Landsberg, H. (eds.), Population, Economic Development and Environment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Holloway, S.Safety of Underground Disposal of Carbon Dioxide,” Energy Conversion and Management 38 (1997): S241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M.National Academy of Sciences Report on Energy Resources: Reply,” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 49, 10 (1965): 1720–1727Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 1995, Second Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Climate Change 2001, Third Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 3: Reference Manual (Paris: IPCC/OECD, 1997)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeSpecial Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Summary for Policy Makers, Synthesis Report, Climate Change 2001: Third Assessment Report (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
International Energy Agency. Energy Balances of non-OECD Countries 1998–1999 (Paris: OECD, 2000)
International Energy Agency.Key World Energy Statistics 2004 (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004)
International Energy Agency.Oil Crises and Climate Challenges: 30 Years of Energy Use in IEA Countries (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004)
International Energy AgencyPhotovoltaic Power Systems Programme, Trends in Photovoltaic Applications in selected IEA Countries between 1992 and 2001 (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2002)
International Energy AgencyRenewables in Global Energy Supply: an IEA Factsheet (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2002)
International Energy AgencyThe Prospects for CO2Capture and Storage (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004)
International Energy AgencyWorld Energy Investment Outlook (Paris: International Energy Agency, 2003)
International Energy AgencyWorld Energy Outlook (Paris: OECD, 2002)
Jaccard, M. “Renewable Portfolio Standard,” in Cleveland, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy, Volume 5 (New York: Elsevier, 2004), 413–421Google Scholar
Jaccard, M. “Policies that Mobilize Producers Toward Sustainability: The Renewable Portfolio Standard and the Vehicle Emission Standard,” in G. Toner (ed.), Building Canadian Capacity: Sustainable Production and the Knowledge Economy (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2005)
Jaccard, M., Bailie, A. and Nyboer, J.. “CO2 Emission Reduction Costs in the Residential Sector: Behavioral Parameters in a Bottom-Up Simulation Model,” The Energy Journal 17, 4 (1996): 107–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Chen, H. and Li, J.. “Renewable Portfolio Standard: A Tool for Environmental Policy in the Chinese Electricity Sector,” Energy for Sustainable Development, special issue on China, 5, 4 (2001): 113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Failing, L. and Berry, T.. “From Equipment to Infrastructure: Community Energy Management and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction,” Energy Policy 25, 11 (1997): 1065–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J., Bataille, C. and Sadownik, B.. “Modeling the Cost of Climate Policy: Distinguishing between Alternative Cost Definitions and Long-Run Cost Dynamics,” The Energy Journal 24, 1 (2003): 49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J. and Fogwill, A.. “How Big is the Electricity Conservation Potential in Industry?The Energy Journal 14, 2 (1993): 139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccard, M., Rivers, N. and Horne, M.. The Morning After: Optimal Greenhouse Gas Policies for Canada's Kyoto Obligations and Beyond (Toronto: CD Howe Institute, 2004)Google Scholar
Jaccard, M., and Y. Mao. “Making Markets Work Better,” in Johansson, T. and Goldemberg, J. (eds.), Energy for Sustainable Development: A Policy Agenda (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2002)Google Scholar
Jackson, T. (ed.). Mitigating Climate Change: Flexibility Mechanisms (London: Elsevier Science, 2001)Google Scholar
Jacoby, H., and Ellerman, D.. “The Safety Valve and Climate Policy,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A., and Stavins, R.. “The Energy-Efficiency Gap: What Does it Mean?Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 804–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A., Newell, R. and Stavins, R.. “Environmental Policy and Technological Change,” Environmental and Resource Economics 22, 1–2 (2002): 41–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, A., Hammer, M., Folke, C. and Costanza, R. (eds.). Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Jochem, E. (ed.). “Energy End-use Efficiency,” chapter 6 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Johansson, T., Bodlund, B. and Williams, R. (eds.). Electricity: Efficient End-Use and New Generation Technologies, and Their Planning Implications (Lund: Lund University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Johansson, T., Kelly, H., Reddy, A. and Williams, R. (eds.). Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Joskow, P.Utility-Subsidized Energy-Efficiency Programs,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 20 (1995): 526–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, P., and Marron, D.. “What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs,” The Energy Journal 13, 4 (1992): 41–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammen, D., and Hassenzahl, D.. Should We Risk It? Exploring Environmental, Health, and Technological Problem Solving (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Kammen, D., and Pacca, S.. “Assessing the Costs of Electricity,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 301–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanos, P.Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Evolution and Definition of a New Environmental Policy Approach,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44, 1 (2001): 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H.. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (New York: Wiley, 1976)Google Scholar
Kemp, R.Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of Technological Impact of Policy Instruments (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1997)Google Scholar
Kemp, R.Zero Emission Vehicle Mandate in California. Misguided Policy or Example of Enlightened Leadership? (University of Maastricht: MERIT, 2003)
Khanna, M.Non-Mandatory Approaches for Environmental Protection,” Journal of Economic Surveys 15, 3 (2001): 291–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazzoom, D.Energy Savings Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances,” The Energy Journal 8, 4 (1987): 85–89Google Scholar
Kraushaar, J., and Ristinen, R.. Energy and the Problems of a Technical Society (New York: Wiley, 1993)Google Scholar
Krautkraemer, J.Non-renewable Resource Scarcity,” Journal of Economic Literature 36, 4 (1998): 2065–2107Google Scholar
Kruger, J., and Pizer, W.. The EU Emissions Trading Directive: Opportunities and Potential Pitfalls (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2004)Google Scholar
Kwoka, J. “The Limits of Market-Oriented Regulatory Techniques: The Case of Automotive Fuel Economy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 4 (1983): 695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, J.The Carbon War: Global Warming and the End of the Oil Era (New York: Penguin Books, 1999)Google Scholar
Leggett, J., Pepper, W. and Swart, R.. “Emissions Scenarios for IPCC: An Update,” in Houghton, J., Callander, B. and Varney, S. (eds.), Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Levine, M., Hirst, E., Koomey, J., McMahon, J. and Sanstad, A.. Energy Efficiency, Market Failures, and Government Policy (Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, B. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, D., and Kulick, J.. “Demand Side Management and Energy Efficiency in the United States,” The Energy Journal 25, 1 (2004): 19–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, A.Energy Savings Resulting from the Adoption of More Efficient Appliances: Another View,” Energy Journal 9, 2 (1988): 155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, A.Negawatts: Twelve Transitions, Eight Improvements, and One Distraction,” Energy Policy 24, 4 (1996): 331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovins, A.Saving Gigabucks with Negawatts,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 115, 6 (1985): 19–26Google Scholar
Lovins, A.Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace (San Francisco: Friends of the Earth International; Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing, 1977)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Datta, E., Bustness, O.-E., Koomey, J. and Glasgow, N.. Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation, Profits, Jobs and Security (Snowmass, Colo.: Rocky Mountain Institute, 2004)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Datta, E., Feiler, T., Rabago, K., Swisher, J., Lehmann, A. and Wicker, K.. Small is Profitable: the Hidden Economic Benefits of Making Electrical Resources the Right Size (Snowmass, Colo.: Rocky Mountain Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Lovins, L., Krause, F. and Bach, W.. Least-Cost Energy: Solving the CO2Problem (Andover, Mass.: Brick House Publishing, 1981)Google Scholar
Lovins, A., Neymark, J., Flanigan, T., Kiernan, P., Bancroft, B. and Sheppard, M.. The State of the Art: Drivepower (Snowmass, Colo.: Rocky Mountain Institute, 1989)Google Scholar
Lyman, E., and Dolley, S.. “Accident Prone,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 56, 2 (2000): 42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M.Facing the Elephant: Oil Market Evaluation and Future Oil Crises. (Boulder: International Research Center for Energy and Economic Development, 1998)Google Scholar
Maddison, A. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective (Paris: OECD, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, C. “Hydrogen and Energy,” Chemical Economy and Engineering Review 5, 1 (1973): 7–25Google Scholar
Marland, G., Boden, T. and Andres, R.. “Global, Regional, and National CO2 Emissions,” in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change (Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2001)Google Scholar
McKibbin, W. and Wilcoxen, P.. A Better Way to Slow Global Climate Change (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1997)Google Scholar
McNeill, J. An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World (New York: Norton, 2000)Google Scholar
Menanteau, P., Finon, D. and Lamy, M.-L.. “Prices Versus Quantities: Choosing Policies for Promoting the Development of Renewable Energy,” Energy Policy 31 (2003): 799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, G., and Hassett, K.. “Measuring the Energy Savings from Home Improvement Investments: Evidence from Monthly Billing Data,” Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 3 (1999): 516–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millman, S., and Prince, R.. “Firm Incentives to Promote Technological Change in Pollution Control,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17, 3 (1989): 247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M., and Henrion, M.. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxnes, E. “Estimating Customer Costs or Benefits of Energy Efficiency Standards,” Journal of Economic Psychology 25, 6 (2005): 707–724
Mueller, D.Public Choice II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Mulder, P., Groot, H. and Hofkes, M.. “Economic Growth and Technological Change: A Comparison of Insights from a Neo-Classical and an Evolutionary Perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68 (2001): 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munasinghe, M., and Shearer, W.. Defining and Measuring Sustainability: The Biogeophysical Foundations (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1995)Google Scholar
Nadel, S.Lessons Learned: A Review of Utility Experience with Conservation and Load Management Programs for Commercial and Industrial Customers, Report no. 1064-EEED-AEP-88 (New York: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakicenovic, N. (ed.). “Energy Scenarios,” chapter 9 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., and Grubler, A.. “Energy and the Protection of the Atmosphere,” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 13, 1–3 (2000): 4–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., Grubler, A. and McDonald, A. (eds.). Global Energy Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Nanduri, M., Nyboer, J. and Jaccard, M.. “Aggregating Physical Intensity Indicators: Results of Applying the Composite Indicator Approach to the Canadian Industrial Sector,” Energy Policy 30 (2002): 151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Newell, R., Jaffe, A. and Stavins, R.. “The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999): 941–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, A.Demand-Side Management: Overcoming Market Barriers or Obscuring Real Costs,” Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 840–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, R., and Danish, K.. Designing a Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for the US (Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2003)Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.The Allocation of Energy Resources,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1973/74): 529–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northwest Power Planning Council. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program: A Multi-Species Approach for Decision Making (Portland, Ore.: Northwest Power Planning Council, 2000)
Nuclear Energy Agency. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity (Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, 1998)
Odell, P.Dynamics of Energy Technologies and Global Change,” Energy Policy 27, 13 (1999): 737–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, P.Oil and Gas: Crises and Controversies 1961–2000 (Brentwood, UK: Multi-Science, 2001)Google Scholar
Odell, P.Why Carbon Fuels Will Dominate the 21st Century's Global Energy Economy (Brentwood, UK Multi-Science, 2004)Google Scholar
Ogden, J.Prospects for Building a Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24 (1999): 227–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, J., and Williams, R.. Solar Hydrogen: Moving Beyond Fossil Fuels (Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute, 1989)Google Scholar
Ogden, J., Williams, R. and Larson, E., “Societal Lifecycle Costs of Cars with Alternative Fuels/Engines,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, J., Bouwman, A., Hoek, K. and Berdowski, J.. “Global Air Emission Inventories for Anthropogenic Sources of NOx, NH3 and N2O in 1990,” Environmental Pollution 102 (1998): 135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, M.The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965)Google Scholar
O'Neill, B., MacKellar, F. L. and Lutz, W.. Population and Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, 2001)Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Economic Instruments for Pollution Control and Natural Resources Management in OECD Countries: A Survey (Paris: OECD, 1999)
Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentOutlook 2000 – Perspectives 2000 (Paris: OECD, 2000)
Organization for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentVoluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Usage in the Policy Mixes (Paris: OECD, 2003)
Ottinger, R., Wooley, D., Robinson, N., Hodas, D. and Babb, S.. Environmental Costs of Electricity (New York: Oceana, 1990)Google Scholar
Pacala, S., and Socolow, R.. “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies,” Science 13 (2004): 968–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffenbarger, J., Lammers, G. and Ocaña, C.. Electricity Reform: Power Generation Costs and Investment (Paris: International Energy Agency, 1999)Google Scholar
Palmer, K., Oates, W. and Portney, P.. “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (1995): 119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmgren, C., Morgan, M., Bruin, W. Bruine and Keith, D.. “Initial Public Perceptions of Deep Geological and Oceanic Disposal of Carbon Dioxide,” Environmental Science and Technology 38, 24 (2004): 6441–6450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panwar, T. “Air Pollution Management in India,” in Haq, G., Han, W. and Kim, C. (eds.), Urban Air Pollution Management and Practice in Major and Megacities of Asia, Proceedings of Workshop, Air Pollution in the Megacities of Asia Project, Seoul, Korea (Seoul: Korea Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Parry, I., Williams, W., III, C. Roberton and Goulder, L.. “When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37, 1 (1999): 52–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, M.What is Energy Efficiency?” Energy Policy 24, 5 (1996): 377–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrings, C. “Reserved Rationality and the Precautionary Principle: Technological Change, Time, and Uncertainty in Environmental Decision Making,” in Costanza, R. (ed.), Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Peterson, C., Rice, S., Short, J., Esler, D., Bodkin, J., Ballachey, B. and Irons, D.. “Long-Term Ecosystem Response to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,” Science 302 (2003): 2082–2086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigou, A.The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1920)Google Scholar
Pindyck, R.Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Investment,” Journal of Economic Literature 29, 3 (1991): 1110–1152Google Scholar
Pitzer, K.Thermodynamics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995)Google Scholar
Pizer, W.Optimal Choice of Policy Instrument and Stringency under Uncertainty: The Case of Climate Change,” Resource and Energy Economics 21 (1999): 255–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, D.Induced Innovation and Energy Prices,” American Economic Review 92, 1 (2002): 160–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M., and Linde, C.. “Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (1995): 97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabl, A., and Spadaro, J.. “Public Health Impact of Air Pollution and Implications for the Energy System,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25 (2000): 601–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radetzki, M.Coal or Nuclear in New Power Stations: Political Economy of an Undesirable but Necessary Choice,” The Energy Journal 21, 1 (2000): 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesohl, S., and Boyd, G.. “Advances in Energy Forecasting Models Based on Engineering Economics,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 345–381Google Scholar
Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R. and Swart, R.. Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead (Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 2002)Google Scholar
Rasmussen, N. (ed.). Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (Washington, D.C.: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1975)Google Scholar
Reddy, A. “Energy Technologies and Policies for Rural Development,” in Johansson, T. and Goldemberg, J. (eds.), Energy for Sustainable Development: A Policy Agenda (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2002): 115–136Google Scholar
Rhodes, J., and D. Keith. “Biomass Energy with Geological Sequestration of CO2: Two for the Price of One,” in Gale, J. and Kaya, Y. (eds.), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2003), 1371–1377Google Scholar
Rifkin, J.The Hydrogen Economy: The Creation of the Worldwide Energy Web and the Redistribution of Power on Earth (New York: Tarcher/Putnam, 2002)Google Scholar
Robert, K.-H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., Larderel, J. Aloisi, Basile, G., Jansen, J., Kuehr, R., Thomas, P. Price, Suzuki, M., Hawken, P. and Wackernagel, M.. “Strategic Sustainable Development – Selection, Design and Synergies of Applied Tools,” Journal of Cleaner Production 10 (2002): 197–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M., and Spence, M.. “Effluent Charges and Licenses under Uncertainty,” Journal of Public Economics 5 (1976): 193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P.The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World (New York: Houghton Mifflin 2004)Google Scholar
Rogner, H.-H.An Assessment of World Hydrocarbon Resources,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 22 (1997): 217–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogner, H.-H. (ed.). “Energy Resources,” chapter 5 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Romm, J.The Hype About Hydrogen: Fact and Fiction in the Race to Save the Planet (New York: Island Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Rothman, D., and Bruyn, S. (eds.). “Probing into the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis,” special issue, Ecological Economics 25 (1998)Google Scholar
Ryan, J. “Hubbert's Peak: Déjà Vu All Over Again,” International Association of Energy Economics Newsletter, 2nd Quarter, 2003
Ryan, M.Fuel Costs Taking More of O&M Budget: Even as Costs Drop, Efficiency Rises,” Nuclear Fuel 24, 14 (1999): 1–10Google Scholar
Sanden, B., and Azar, C.. “Near-Term Technology Policies for Long-Term Climate Targets – Economy Wide Versus Technology Specific Approaches,” Energy Policy 33 (2005): 1557–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanstad, A., and Howarth, R.. “Normal Markets, Market Imperfections, and Energy Efficiency,” Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, A., and Victor, D.. “The Future Mobility of the World Population,” Transportation Research Part A 34 (2000): 171–205Google Scholar
Scheer, H.The Solar Economy: Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Global Future (London: Earthscan, 2002)Google Scholar
Scheraga, J.Energy and the Environment: Something New under the Sun?Energy Policy 22, 10 (1994): 811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schipper, L. (ed.). “On the Rebound: The Interaction of Energy Efficiency, Energy Use and Economic Activity,” Energy Policy 28, 6–7 (2000): 351–354Google Scholar
Schipper, L., Meyers, S. and Kelly, H.. Coming in from the Cold: Energy-Wise Housing in Sweden (Santa Ana, Calif.: Seven Locks Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Schmidt-Bleek, F.MIPS and Factor 10 for a Sustainable and Profitable Economy (Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute, 1997)Google Scholar
Schumacher, E.Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered (London: Blond and Briggs, 1973)Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.The Theory of Economic Development (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1934)Google Scholar
Sebold, F., and Fox, E.. “Realized Savings from Residential Conservation Activity,” The Energy Journal 6, 2 (1985): 73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shackley, S., McLachlan, C. and Gough, C.. The Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage (Manchester: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, 2004)Google Scholar
Sharp, J., Jaccard, M. and Keith, D.. Public Attitudes Toward Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide in Canada, Report to Environment Canada and the Alberta Ministry of Environment (Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, 2005)Google Scholar
Shell International Inc. Exploring the Future: Energy Needs and Possibilities (London: Shell International Inc., 2001)
Simon, H.Prediction and Prescription in Systems Modeling,” Operations Research 38, 1 (1990): 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J.The Ultimate Resource (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Simon, J.The Ultimate Resource II (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Sims, R., Rogner, H.-H. and Gregory, K.. “Carbon Emission and Mitigation Cost Comparisons between Fossil Fuel, Nuclear and Renewable Energy Resources for Electricity Generation,” Energy Policy 31 (2003): 1315–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, R., and Arnott, R.. The Oil Supply and Demand Context for Security of Oil Supply to the EU from the GCC Countries (Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2005)Google Scholar
Slovic, P.Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy,” Risk Analysis 13 (1993): 675–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smil, V.Energy at the Crossroads (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Smil, V.Energy in the Twentieth Century: Resources, Conversions, Costs, Uses, and Consequences,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25 (2000): 21–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., Pitcher, H. and Wigley, T.. “Global and Regional Anthropogenic Sulphur Dioxide Emissions,” Global and Planetary Change 29, 1–2 (2001): 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderholm, P., and Sundqvist, T.. “Pricing Environmental Externalities in the Power Sector: Ethical Limits and Implications for Social Choice,” Ecological Economics 46 (2003): 333–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics,” American Economic Review 64 (1974): 1–14Google Scholar
Solow, R.On the Intertemporal Allocation of Natural Resources,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88 (1986): 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.“Sustainability: An Economist's Perspective,” in Dorfman, R. and Dorfman, N. (eds.), Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings (New York:Norton, 1993), 179–187Google Scholar
Stavins, R.The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed Preference Approach,” American Economic Review 89, 4 (1999): 994–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, A.Science and Precaution in the Appraisal of Electricity Supply Options,” Journal of Hazardous Materials 86 (2001): 55–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoneman, P.The Economics of Technological Diffusion (London: Blackwell, 2002)Google Scholar
Suskind, R.The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O'Neil (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003)Google Scholar
Sutherland, R.The Economics of Energy Conservation Policy,” Energy Policy 24, 4 (1996): 361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, R.Market Barriers to Energy Efficiency Investments,” The Energy Journal, 12, 3 (1991): 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, G.Public Choice and Environmental Regulation: Tradable Permit Systems in the United States and CO2 Taxation in Europe (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998)Google Scholar
Sweeney, J.The California Electricity Crisis (Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Tainter, J.The Collapse of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Thomas, C., James, B., Lomax, F. and Kuhn, I.. “Fuel Options for the Fuel Cell Vehicle: Hydrogen, Methanol or Gasoline?International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 25 (2000): 551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K.Incentives for Energy Conservation in the Commercial and Industrial Sectors,” The Energy Journal 9, 3 (1988): 113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkenburg, W. (ed.). “Advanced Energy Supply Technologies,” chapter 7 in Goldemberg, J. (ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000)Google Scholar
Turner, J.Sustainable Hydrogen Production,” Science 305 (2004): 972–974CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turton H., and L. Barreto. “Automobile Technology, Hydrogen and Climate Change: A Long-Term Modeling Analysis,” International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy (forthcoming, 2005)
Tzimas, E., and Peteves, S.. “The Impact of Carbon Sequestration on the Production Cost of Electricity and Hydrogen from Coal and Natural Gas Technologies in Europe in the Medium Term,” Energy 30 (2005): 2672–2689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists. Energy Security: Solutions to Protect America's Power Supply and Reduce Oil Dependence (Cambridge, Mass.: Union of Concerned Scientists, 2000)
United Nations. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report (New York: United Nations, 2005)
United Nations.World Urbanization Prospects: The 2001 Revisions, Data Tables and Highlights (New York: Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Secretariat, 2002)
Unruh, G.Understanding Carbon Lock-in,” Energy Policy 28 (2000): 817–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Congressional Record, 1875
US Department of Energy. National Energy Technology Laboratory Report on Proposed Capacity Additions (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2004)
US Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Review 2002 (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2003)
US Energy Information AdministrationInternational Energy Annual 2001 (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2002)
US Energy Information AdministrationInternational Energy Outlook 2004 (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Energy, 2004)
US Environmental Protection Agency. Achieving Clean Air and Clean Water: The Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel on Oxygenates in Gasoline, EPA420-R-99-021 (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, 1999)
US Environmental Protection AgencyAP-42: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume II: Mobile Sources, 5th edition (Research Triangle Park, N.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2001)
US Environmental Protection Agency.National Air Pollutant Emission Trends Report, 1900–1995 (Research Triangle Park, N.C.: US Environmental Protection Agency, 1996)
US Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Inventory Emission Trends Data (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, 2003)
US General Accounting Office. Acid Rain: Emissions Trends and Effects in the Eastern United States (Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office, 2000)
Vaitheeswaran, V.Power to the People (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003)Google Scholar
Burgh, J., and Gowdy, J.. “Evolutionary Theories in Environmental and Resource Economics: Approaches and Applications,” Environmental and Resource Economics 17 (2000): 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, B.Nuclear Energy: Tenfold Expansion or Phase-Out?Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69 (2002): 287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, D.The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Viklund, M.Energy Policy Options – From the Perspective of Public Attitudes and Risk Perceptions,” Energy Policy 32 (2004): 1159–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violette, D.Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through DSM Projects: Lessons Learned from DSM Evaluation in the United States (Boulder: Hagler Bailly Consulting, 1998)Google Scholar
Weiszacker, E., Lovins, A. and Lovins, L.. The Factor Four – Doubling Wealth, Halving Resource Use (London: Earthscan, 1997)Google Scholar
Wachs, M., and D. Beal. “Taxing our Highways,” Westways, November/December 2000
Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W.. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on Earth (Stony Creek, Conn.: New Society Publishers, 1996)Google Scholar
Walsh, M.Global Trends in Motor Vehicle Use and Emissions,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 15 (1990): 217–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, C. “Oil Scarcity: What Have the Past Three Decades Revealed?” Energy Policy (forthcoming, 2005)
Weidou, N., Johansson, T., Wang, J., Wu, Z., Mao, Y., Zhu, Q., Zhou, F., Li, Z., Anderson, B., Farinelli, U., Jaccard, M. and Williams, R.. “Transforming Coal for Sustainability: A Strategy for China,” Energy for Sustainable Development 7, 4 (2003): 21–30Google Scholar
Weitzman, M.Prices vs. Quantities,” Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974): 477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. “Nuclear and Alternative Energy Supply Options for an Environmentally Constrained World: A Long-Term Perspective,” in Leventhal, P., Dolley, S. and Tanzer, S. (eds.), Nuclear Power and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons: Can We Have One Without the Other? (Washington, D.C.: Brassey's Inc., 2002)Google Scholar
Williamson, O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Wilson, E.The Future of Life (New York: Knopf, 2002)Google Scholar
Wirl, F.The Economics of Conservation Programs (Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirl, F.Lessons from Utility Conservation Programs,” The Energy Journal 21, 1 (2000): 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, R., and Bishop, R.. “How to Decide when Experts Disagree: Uncertainty-Based Choice Rules in Environmental Policy,” Land Economics 73, 4 (1997): 492–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. Energy Services for the World's Poor (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2000)
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987)
World Energy Council. Survey of Energy Resources 2001 (London: World Energy Council, 2001)
World Health Organization. World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002)
Worrell, E., Ramesohl, S. and Boyd, G.. “Advances in Energy Forecasting Models Based on Engineering Economics,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004): 345–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, K., and Barreto, L.. “Energyplexes for the 21st Century: Coal Gasification for Co-producing Hydrogen, Electricity and Liquid Fuels,” Energy 30 (2005): 2453–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittel, W., W. Weindorf, R. Wurster and W. Bussmann. “Geothermal Hydrogen – A Vision?” Paper presented at European Geothermal Energy Council's 2nd Business Seminar, European Geothermal Energy Council 2001, Altheim, Austria

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Mark Jaccard, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
  • Book: Sustainable Fossil Fuels
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754104.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Mark Jaccard, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
  • Book: Sustainable Fossil Fuels
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754104.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Mark Jaccard, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
  • Book: Sustainable Fossil Fuels
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754104.011
Available formats
×