Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT: INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN WAR
- LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: A FRAMEWORK
- LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: BATTLEFIELD ISSUES
- 9 Obedience to Orders, the First Defense
- 10 Command Responsibility and Respondeat Superior
- 11 Ruses and Perfidy
- 12 Torture
- 13 Rules of Engagement
- 14 Targeting
- 15 Attacks on Cultural Property
- 16 The 1980 Certain Conventional Weapons Convention
- 17 Gas, Biological, and Chemical Weapons Treaties
- References
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
14 - Targeting
from LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: BATTLEFIELD ISSUES
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Table of Cases
- Table of Treaties
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT: INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN WAR
- LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: A FRAMEWORK
- LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: BATTLEFIELD ISSUES
- 9 Obedience to Orders, the First Defense
- 10 Command Responsibility and Respondeat Superior
- 11 Ruses and Perfidy
- 12 Torture
- 13 Rules of Engagement
- 14 Targeting
- 15 Attacks on Cultural Property
- 16 The 1980 Certain Conventional Weapons Convention
- 17 Gas, Biological, and Chemical Weapons Treaties
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
In common Article 2 international armed conflicts, lawful and unlawful combatants may be targeted. In common Article 3 non-international armed conflicts, individuals who may be targeted are, in general terms, any positively indentified armed individual resisting antigovernment forces – insurgents, insurrectionists, rebels, and revolutionaries.
In this chapter we examine what objects may be lawfully targeted in a common Article 2 armed conflict. The law of armed conflict/international humanitarian law (LOAC/IHL) pertaining to the targeting of objects differs from that pertaining to targeting combatants – human beings. When “targeting” is described throughout this chapter, it is the targeting of objects – not combatants – that is being described. That is not to suggest that human beings cannot be military objectives, cannot be targets. They can be, just as military pack animals and working dogs in certain circumstances can be valid targets.
The targeting of objects involves all of LOAC's four core principles, distinction, military necessity, unnecessary suffering, and proportionality – particularly distinction. Distinction, the cardinal principle of LOAC/IHL, is at the heart of lawful targeting. Proportionality is always a primary consideration for an attacking force and its targeting planning. Proportionality may dictate the timing of an attack to minimize damage collateral to that inflicted on the military personnel on the target; proportionality may dictate that a lawful military object not be targeted at all. A lack of military necessity should scratch a legitimate target from an air tasking order or fire support plan.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Law of Armed ConflictInternational Humanitarian Law in War, pp. 519 - 555Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, , and , eds., Commentary on the Additional Protocols (Geneva: ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), 631
and , eds., Customary International Humanitarian Law, vol. I, Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
, “Targeting,” in, , ed., International Law Studies, vol. 78, Legal and Ethical Lessons of NATO's Kosovo Campaign (Newport, RI: Naval War College, 2002), 173, 177
and , eds., Documents on the Laws of War, 3d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 139
, “Article 52,” in, , , and , eds., New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflict: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982), 326
, Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday, 1948), 378
, A Bridge Too Far (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1974), 90
and , eds., Operational Law Handbook, 2008 (Charlottesville: Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School, 2008), 20
, Law on the Battlefield, 2d ed. (Manchester: Juris Publishing, 2004), 70–1
, “The End of Innocence: Rethinking Noncombatancy in the Post-Kosovo Era,” Strategic Rev.
14 (Summer 2000)Google Scholar
, The Conduct of Hostilities Under the Law of International Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 116
, “The Last of the First: Veterans of the Jagdwaffe Tell Their Story,” 73–1
J. of Military History (Jan. 2009), 231, 238–9Google Scholar
and , The Battle for the Falklands (New York: Norton, 1983), 88
, “Taking Out Saddam's Floating Pleasure Palace,” U.S. Naval Institute's Proceedings (Sept. 2008), 33
Google Scholar
, Reflections on the Law of War (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007), 232–3
, The Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), para. 5.29.3, at 76
, and , On Point: The United States Army in Operation Iraqi Freedom (Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press, 2004), 214
, Angler (New York: Penguin Press, 2008), 119
, The Dambusters Raid (London: Arms and Armour, 1990), 153
, The Dambusters Squadron (London: Arms and Armour, 1993), 29
, Bomber Harris: His Life and Times (London: Greenhill Books, 2001), 254
, The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, 2d ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), 158
, “Precision Attack and International Humanitarian Law,” 859
Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross (Sept. 2005), 445, 450–1Google Scholar
, Conduct of the Persian Gulf War (Washington: GPO, 1992), 103
, “Some Legal (and a Few Ethical) Dimensions of the Collateral Damage Resulting from NATO's Kosovo Campaign,” 31
Israel Yearbook on Human Rights (2001), 51, 63Google Scholar
and , “The Protection of Civilian Objects – Current State of the Law and Issues de lege ferenda
,” in, and , eds., The Law of Air Warfare (Utrecht, the Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, 2006), 35, 57
, “Targeting and Humanitarian Law: Current Issues,” 33
Israel Yearbook on Human Rights (2003), 59, 69Google Scholar
, International Law: A Treatise, vol. II, Disputes, War and Neutrality, 7th ed., , ed. (London: Longman, 1952), para. 213, at 513–14
, America's Pursuit of Precision Bombing, 1910–1945 (Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1995), 204
, Blankets of Fire (Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996), photos p. 2
, Bombs, Cities, and Civilians (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1993), 132
, War and Law Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 281
, “Targeting After Kosovo: Has the Law Changed for Strike Planners?” vol. LVI-2
Naval War College Rev. (Spring 2003), 64
Google Scholar
, Targeted Killing in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 5
and , “Targeted Killing and Assassination: The U.S. Legal Framework,” 37
U. Richmond L. Rev. (2002–2003), 667, 671Google Scholar
and , “Assassination and Preventive Killing,” XXV no. 1, SAIS Rev. of Int'l Affairs (Winter–Spring 2005), 41, 45Google Scholar
, “If the Hat Fits, Wear It, If the Turban Fits, Run for Your Life: Reflections on the Indefinite Detention and Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists,” 56
Hastings L. J. (2004–2005), 801, 873Google Scholar
, “Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law,” 872
Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross (Dec. 2008), 991–1047Google Scholar
, “Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence?”, 16–2
European J. of Int'l L. (2005), 171, 179Google Scholar
and , “We Must Not Make A Scarecrow of the Law: A Legal Analysis of the Israeli Policy of Targeted Killings,” 36
Cornell Int'l L. J. (2003), 233, 239Google Scholar
, “Israeli Raid Kills 8 at Hamas Office; 2 Are Young Boys,” NY Times, Aug. 1, 2001, A1
Google Scholar
, “The Targeted Killing of Salah Shehadeh,” 7–3
J. of Int'l Crim. Justice (July 2009), 617
Google Scholar
, “War on Terror Alters U.S. Qualms about Assassination,” Int'l Herald Tribune, March 29, 2004, 2
Google Scholar
, “Terrorism, the Law, and the National Defense,” 126
Military L. Rev. (1989), 89, 121Google Scholar
and , “Bush Has Widened Authority of C.I.A. to Kill Terrorists,” NY Times, Dec. 15, 2002, A1
Google Scholar
, The Law of War on Land: Part III of the Manual of Military Law (London: HMSO, 1958)
, “In Israel, a Divisive Struggle Over Targeted Killing,” Washington Post, Aug. 25, 2006, A1
Google Scholar
, “Editorial Comment: The Detention of Civilians in Armed Conflict,” 103–1
AJIL (Jan. 2009), 48, 50Google Scholar
, “Humans in the Cross-Hairs: Targeting and Assassination in Contemporary Armed Conflict,” in and , eds., New Wars, New Laws? Applying the Laws of War in 21st Century Conflicts (Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 2005), 137, 147
, “Why Do People Become Terrorists?” 6–3
J. of Int'l. Crim. Justice (July 2008), 507, 520–21Google Scholar
, The Law of Nations, or, Principles of the Law of Nature (Northhampton, MA: Thomas M. Pomroy for S. & E. Butler, 1805), 327
, “The Indefinable Concept of Terrorism,” 4
J. of Int'l Criminal Justice (Nov. 2006), 894, 898Google Scholar
, “On the Offensive: Assassination Policy Under International Law,” 25(3) Harvard Int'l Rev. (Fall 2003)Google Scholar
, “Kosovo 1999: The Air Campaign – Have the Provisions of Additional Protocol I Withstood the Test?” 837
Int'l Rev. of the Red Cross (2000), 147
Google Scholar