Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Texts and abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Publication
- Part II Reputation
- Chapter 2 Patronage and the Eclogues
- Chapter 3 Variety and the Georgics
- Chapter 4 Morals and minimalism
- Part III Interpretation
- Appendix A Virgil commentaries in Latin editions, 1469–1599
- Appendix B Virgil commentaries ranked by number of printings
- Index
- References
Chapter 3 - Variety and the Georgics
from Part II - Reputation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Texts and abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Publication
- Part II Reputation
- Chapter 2 Patronage and the Eclogues
- Chapter 3 Variety and the Georgics
- Chapter 4 Morals and minimalism
- Part III Interpretation
- Appendix A Virgil commentaries in Latin editions, 1469–1599
- Appendix B Virgil commentaries ranked by number of printings
- Index
- References
Summary
We do not display greatness by going to one extreme, but in touching both at once, and filling all the intervening space.
Pascal, Pensées §353 (trans. W. F. Trotter)Virgil’s Georgics was sometimes assigned in schools, but it was never as widely studied as his Eclogues – almost no poem was – or his Aeneid. The Georgics was imitated, but not to the extent of defining a genre, as the Eclogues defined pastoral and the Aeneid defined epic (especially for readers who did not know Greek). One reason was terminology. In the sixteenth century there were, as we shall see, many poems modeled on the Georgics, but “georgic” was not established yet as a separate genre; it was the name of a book (as in the phrase “Virgil’s third georgic”) but not of a mode or kind. In the Renaissance there were commentaries on the Georgics, but no theories of georgic poetry.
The theme was different as well. In scholarship today, the phrase labor omnia vincit (Geo. 1.145, “labor conquers everything”) is routinely cited as “[t]he central principle of the Georgics.” The orthodoxy on this point is so secure that it seems self-evident, but it was not so in the Renaissance. In the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, the most popular commentators on the Georgics were the same ones who were popular on the Eclogues: the ancients Servius and Probus, and the moderns Mancinelli and Badius Ascensius. Naturally, when Virgil does write about labor, the commentators do so as well; but they do not make it the theme of the whole poem. Servius, for example, when he explains labor omnia vincit, says only that no one loves labor; Mancinelli, that Virgil’s phrase has an echo in the newly discovered text of Manilius on astronomy; Badius, that necessity is the mother of invention; and Probus says nothing at all.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Virgil in the Renaissance , pp. 77 - 100Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, “Pastoral versus Georgic: The Politics of Virgilian Quotation,” in Renaissance Genres: Essays on Theory, History, and Interpretation, ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986), pp. 241–67, at p. 244.Google Scholar
, A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance, 2 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961)Google Scholar
, The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar
, ed., La varietas à la renaissance (Paris: Champion, 2001)
and , “Le style au quattrocento et au XVIe siècle,” in Poétiques de la renaissance, ed. and (Geneva: Droz, 2001), pp. 532–65Google Scholar
Hermogenis opera, ed. (Leipzig: Teubner, 1913), pp. 389–95
, “Enarrationem in Ouidii Metamorphosin præfatio,” in P. Ovidii Nasonis metamorphosis cum integris ac emendatissimis Raphaelis Regii enarrationibus (Venice: Simon Bevilaqua, 1497)Google Scholar
, L’idéal et la différence: la perception de la personnalité littéraire à la Renaissance (Geneva: Droz, 1993).Google Scholar
, Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
, Homer’s Readers: A Historical Introduction to the Iliad and the Odyssey (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1981)Google Scholar
, Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986)Google Scholar
, The Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid: A Study of the Influence of Ancient Homeric Literary Criticism on Vergil (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1974)Google Scholar
, The Allegorical Epic: Essays in Its Rise and Decline (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar
, Virgil’s Elements: Physics and Poetry in the Georgics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opera (Venice: s.n., 1492)
Auli Gellii noctes atticae (Paris: Joannes Tornaesius, 1592), p. 190.
, “The Use of Macrobius and Boethius in Some Fourteenth-Century Commentaries on Virgil,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 3.1 (1996), 3–22, at 5.Google Scholar
, “Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue: Easterners and Westerners,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 25 (1978), 59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Virgil and the Cosmos: Religious and Philosophical Ideas,” in The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 204–21Google Scholar
, Index rerum et nominum in scholiis Servii et Aelii Donati tractatorum (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1930)Google Scholar
, The Veil of Allegory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969), pp. 146–47, 142–43.Google Scholar
, Prosody and Purpose in the English Renaissance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), pp. 203–6.Google Scholar
“Maister Phaers Conclusion to His Interpretation of the Æneidos of Virgill,” in The .xiii. Bookes of Æneidos (STC 24802; London: William How, for Abraham Veale, 1584)
, Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 108Google Scholar
, Spenser’s Poetry and the Reformation Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), pp. 216–20Google Scholar
, “Rural Dialectic: Pastoral, Georgic, and The Shepheardes Calender,” Spenser Studies 9 (1991), 1–20Google Scholar
, “Hellish Work in The Faerie Queene,” Studies in English Literature 41 (2001), 91–108Google Scholar
, Excess and the Mean in Early Modern Literature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
, The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey (Cambridge University Press, 1969), pp. 293–95.Google Scholar
, The Resources of Kind: Genre-Theory in the Renaissance, ed. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1973), p. 16.Google Scholar
, God Speed the Plough: The Representation of Agrarian England, 1500–1600 (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 207.Google Scholar
, The Georgic: A Contribution to the Study of the Vergilian Type of Didactic Poetry (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1919).Google Scholar
Bartolomeo Scala: Humanistic and Political Writings, ed. (Tempe, AZ: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1997), pp. 426–45.
, introduction, Il vendemmiatore: poemetto (Catania: Tirelli-Guaitolini, 1928), pp. xiv–xxii.Google Scholar
, ed., The Silkewormes and their Flies (Binghamton, NY: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1989), pp. xi–xiii.Google Scholar
, Virgil in Medieval England: Figuring the Aeneid from the Twelfth Century to Chaucer (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 42–43.Google Scholar
, Thee First Foure Bookes of Virgil His Aeneis Translated intoo English Heroical Verse (STC 24806; Leiden: John Pates, 1582)Google Scholar
, ed., P. Vergili Maronis opera, rev. edn. (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e letteratura, 2008), pp. 173–74
“Ille ego qui fueram, tenerorum lusor amorum,” in Publii Ovidii Nasonis sulmonensis poetae clarissimi opera (Venice: Lazarus Soardus de Saviliano, 1492)
Opera P. Virgilii Maronis (STC 24789; London: Henry Middleton, 1580), p. 581.
“Epitaphs vpon Virgil, by diuers illustrious persons,” in , The Epigrams of P. Virgilius Maro, and Others. With the Praises of Him and His Workes (STC 24825; London: George Purslowe, 1624)
, Ovid’s Changing Worlds: English Metamorphoses 1567–1632 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
, “The Death of the ‘New Poete’: Virgilian Ruin and Ciceronian Recollection in Spenser’s The Shepheardes Calender,” Renaissance Quarterly 56 (2003), 723–56Google Scholar
, “Spenser’s Retrography: Two Episodes in Post-Petrarchan Bibliography,” in Spenser’s Life and the Subject of Biography, ed. , , and (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1996), pp. 99–130, at pp. 115–19.Google Scholar
, “The Laurel and the Myrtle: Spenser and Ronsard,” in Worldmaking Spenser: Explorations in the Early Modern Age, ed. and (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2000), pp. 63–78.Google Scholar
, Spenser’s Famous Flight: A Renaissance Idea of a Literary Career (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993), p. 23.Google Scholar
, “The Grand Style: Italy, France, and Spain,” in The Old World: Discovery and Rebirth, ed. and (London: Aldus, 1974), pp. 201–37, at p. 233.Google Scholar
The De arte poetica of Marco Girolamo Vida (1527), ed. and trans. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1976), pp. 32–33.
, Les arts poétiques du xiie et du xiiie siècle: Recherches et documents sur la technique littéraire du moyen age (Paris: Champion, 1924), pp. 86–89Google Scholar
“La Vita dell’autore,” in Orlando Furioso, ed. (Venice: Vincenzo Valgrisi, 1560)
, Proclaiming a Classic: The Canonization of Orlando furioso (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), p. 174Google Scholar
, “An Inaugural Oration by Cristoforo Landino in Praise of Virgil (from Codex «2», Casa Cavalli, Ravenna),” Rinascimento 2nd ser. 21 (1981), 235–45.Google Scholar
Ben Jonson, ed. , , and , 11 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925–52), vol. iv, p. 293.
, Poetices libri septem 3.28 (Lyon: Antonius Vincentius, 1561), pp. 119–20, at p. 119.Google Scholar
, Vida’s Christiad and Vergilian Epic (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964), pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
Silvae, ed. (Florence: Olschki, 1996), pp. 42–43.
, The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982)Google Scholar
Collected Works of Erasmus, gen. eds. and , 84 vols. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974–), vol. xxiv, p. 298
, Origin and Originality in Renaissance Literature: Versions of the Source (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
, Le reflet des fleurs: Description et métalangage poétique d’Homère à la renaissance (Geneva: Droz, 1994)Google Scholar
Scritti critici, ed. (Milan: Marzorati, 1973), pp. 62–63.