Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jrqft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:36:21.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Virgil’s Odyssey

from Part III - Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

David Scott Wilson-Okamura
Affiliation:
East Carolina University
Get access

Summary

Indeed, the safest road to Hell is the gradual one – the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.

Screwtape

Prioritizing episodes

The previous chapters were about reputation as much as interpretation: what did the Eclogues and Georgics mean, but also who was their author? What were his virtues? his vices? his methods of working? their results, compared with those of other writers? This chapter and its sequel are, if possible, even more ambitious. The goal of them is to give a survey of the whole Aeneid, as it was understood by European readers from about 1300 to 1600.

To accomplish this goal many even of the poem’s most luminous episodes will have to be passed over in silence. For these sins of omission no contrition is forthcoming. Mapping every crest and crevice of interpretation would not only be impossible, it would defeat the purpose of a survey, which is to sketch the big picture; to limn large-scale features of the interpretive landscape; to draw connections between seemingly discrete authors; and to locate specialized research in its historical, pan-European context. Whereas an inventory should be exhaustive, a survey must needs be selective. Our task here is not to catalogue details, but to place them in perspective.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lodovico, Castelvetro, Poetica d’Aristotele vulgarizzata e sposta, ed. Romani, Werther (Rome: Laterza, 1978–79)Google Scholar
Craig, Kallendorf, In Praise of Aeneas: Virgil and Epideictic Rhetoric in the Early Italian Renaissance (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1989)Google Scholar
Montaigne, , Essais 2.10 (“Des livres”), ed. Thibaudet, Albert (Paris: Gallimard, 1950), p. 451.Google Scholar
Alice, Hulubei, “Virgile en France au XVIe siècle: Éditions, traductions, imitations,” Revue du seizième siècle 18 (1931–32), 1–77, at 53.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W., William Shakspere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke, 2 vols. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944), vol. ii, p. 420Google Scholar
Patricia, Parker, “Romance and Empire: Anachronistic Cymbeline,” in Unfolded Tales: Essays on Renaissance Romance, ed. Logan, George M. and Teskey, Gordon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989), pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
Natale, Conti, Mythologia siue explicatio fabularum (Padua: P. P. Tozzi, 1616), 6.23 (p. 353).Google Scholar
Howard, Clarke, Homer’s Readers: A Historical Introduction to the Iliad and the Odyssey (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Robert, Lamberton, Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Judith, Yarnall, Transformations of Circe: The History of an Enchantress (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994), –6Google Scholar
Andrew, Ford, “Performing Interpretation: Early Allegorical Exegesis of Homer,” in Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World: The Poetics of Community, ed. Beissinger, Margaret H. et al. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1999), pp. 33–53Google Scholar
George de, Forest Lord, Homeric Renaissance: The Odyssey of George Chapman (London: Chatto & Windus, 1956)Google Scholar
Don Cameron, Allen, Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Elmer O’Brien, S. J., The Essential Plotinus, 2nd edn. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1964), pp. 41–42.Google Scholar
Schlunk, Robin R., The Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid: A Study of the Influence of Ancient Homeric Literary Criticism on Vergil (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Michael, Murrin, The Allegorical Epic: Essays in Its Rise and Decline (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Hardie, Philip R., Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Julian, Ward Jones, “Allegorical Interpretation in Servius,” Classical Journal 56 (1961), 217–26Google Scholar
Opere minori, ed. Robertis, Domenico De et al., 2 vols. in 3 pts. (Milan: Ricciardi, 1979).
Edward, Kennard Rand, “Dante and Servius,” Dante Studies 33 (1916), 1–11Google Scholar
Erich von, Richthofen, “Traces of Servius in Dante,” Dante Studies 92 (1974), 117–28Google Scholar
Georg, Rabuse, “Macrobio,” in Enciclopedia dantesca, ed. Bosco, Umberto, 6 vols. (Rome: Istituto della enciclopedia italiana, 1970–78), vol. iii, pp. 757–59Google Scholar
David, Thompson, Dante’s Epic Journeys (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Kallendorf, , “Philology, the Reader, and the Nachleben of Classical Texts,” Modern Philology 92 (1994), 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavinia and Beatrice: The Second Half of the Aeneid in the Middle Ages,” Dante Studies 119 (2001), 103–24, at 106–9.
Maresca, Thomas E., Three English Epics: Studies in Chaucer, Spenser, and Milton (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Matthew, Fike, Spenser’s Underworld in the 1590 Faerie Queene (Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 2003).Google Scholar
Rathborne, Isabel E., The Meaning of Spenser’s Fairyland (New York: Columbia University Press, 1937), , esp. pp. 149–54Google Scholar
The Prophetic Moment: An Essay on Spenser (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971), pp. 86–88, 196
Quest Structures and the World of the Poem (New York: Garland, 1996), pp. 60–61, 72–74, 93–95.
Coluccio, Salutati, De laboribus Herculis, ed. Ullman, B. L., 2 vols. (Zurich: Thesaurus Mundi, 1951), vol. ii, pp. 457–62.Google Scholar
Bernard, Weinberg, A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance, 2 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), vol. ii, p. 833.Google Scholar
Singleton, C. S., Dante’s Commedia: Elements of Structure (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954), p. 62.Google Scholar
Symbolarum libri Virgilij (Augsburg: J. Prætorius, 1599), col. 1547.
Publii Virgilii Maronis . . . opera cum commentariis (Venice: Philippus Pincius Mantuanus, 1499)
Paulo, Manuzio on Aen. 6.282, in Opera P. Virgilii Maronis. Pauli Manutii annotationes brevissimae in margine adscriptae (STC 24789; London: Henry Middleton, 1580), p. 265Google Scholar
Somnium, Scipionis (Commentary on the Dream of Scipio), ed. and trans. George, Edward V. (Greenwood, SC: Attic, 1989), pp. 32–35.Google Scholar
Ioannis Saresberiensis episcopi Carnothensis policratici sive De nugis curialium et vestigiis philosophorum libri , ed. Clemens, C. I. Webb, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909).
Œuvres complètes, ed. Boulenger, Jacques, rev. Scheler, Lucien (Paris: Gallimard, 1955), pp. 375–76.
Julian, Ward Jones, “The So-Called Silvestris Commentary on the Aeneid and Two Other Interpretations,” Speculum 64 (1989), 835–48.Google Scholar
Commentum quod dicitur Bernardi Silvestris super sex libros Eneidos Virgilii, ed. Ward Jones, Julian and Frances Jones, Elizabeth (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1977), p. 30
Jane Chance, Nitzsche, The Genius Figure in Antiquity and the Middle Ages (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), pp. 42–64.Google Scholar
Pietro, Alighieri, Il Commentarium di Pietro Alighieri, ed. della Vedova, Roberto and Maria Teresa Silvotti (Florence: Olschki, 1978), pp. 11–17.Google Scholar
Commentary of Mixed Type: The Glosses in MSS Harley 4946 and Ambrosius G111 inf., a Critical Edition, ed. Jones, Julian Ward (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediæval Studies, 1996), pp. 129, 126, and 171.
Giorgio, Padoan, “Tradizione e fortuna del commento all’‘Eneide’ di Bernardo Silvestre,” in Padoan, Il pio Enea, l’empio Ulisse: Tradizione classica e intendimento medievale in Dante (Ravenna: Longo, 1977), pp. 207–22; and the Jones edition, pp. xiv–xx.Google Scholar
Landino, , Disputationes Camaldulenses, Bk. 4, ed. Lohe, Peter (Florence: Sansoni, 1980), pp. 212–18Google Scholar
Dante con l’espositioni di Christoforo Landino, et d’Alessandro Vellutello (Venice: Giovambatista Marchio Sessa & Fratelli, 1578)
Kallendorf, , “Historicizing the ‘Harvard School’: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Italian Renaissance Scholarship,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99 (1999), 391–403, at 394–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Vergilii Maronis poemata quæ extant omnia (Zurich: Christoph Froschauer, 1561).
Translated and Commented on by Sir John Harington, ed. Cauchi, Simon (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), p. 9
Common Places 1.10.3–7, trans. Marten, Anthonie (STC 24669; London: Henry Denham and Henry Middleton, 1583), pt. I, pp. 73–77.Google Scholar
Elyot, , The Boke Named the Gouernour 1.10 (STC 7635; London: Thomas Berthelet, 1531)Google Scholar
Baswell, Christopher, Virgil in Medieval England: Figuring the Aeneid from the Twelfth Century to Chaucer (Cambridge University Press, 1995), .Google Scholar
Tasso, , Le prose diverse di Torquato Tasso, ed. Guasti, Cesare, 2 vols. (Florence: Le Monnier, 1875), vol. i, p. 302.Google Scholar
Kaske, Carol V., Spenser and Biblical Poetics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Jeff, Dolven, Scenes of Instruction in Renaissance Romance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Baldwin, William, The Mirror for Magistrates, ed. Campbell, Lily B. (Cambridge University Press, 1938), p. 68Google Scholar
Michael, Murrin, The Veil of Allegory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969), pp. 146–47Google Scholar
Pierre, Courcelle, “Interprétations néo-platonisantes du livre VI de l’Énéide,” in Recherches sur la tradition platonicienne, ed. Guthrie, W. K. C. (Vandoeuvres: Hardt, 1955), pp. 93–136, at pp. 100–2.Google Scholar
John, Penkethman, The Epigrams of P. Virgilius Maro, and others. With The Praises of him and his Workes (STC 24825; London: George Purslowe, 1624)Google Scholar
The Zodiake of Life, trans. Googe, Barnabe (STC 19151; London: Raufe Newberie, 1576), p. 176.Google Scholar
Ross, Charles S., “Angelica and the Fata Morgana: Boiardo’s Allegory of Love,” Modern Language Notes 96 (1981), 12–22Google Scholar
Michael, Murrin, “Trade and Fortune: Morgana and Manodante,” in Fortune and Romance: Boiardo in America, ed. Cavallo, Jo Ann and Ross, Charles (Tempe, AZ: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies, 1998), pp. 77–95.Google Scholar
David, Quint, “The Anatomy of Epic in Book 2 of The Faerie Queene,” Spenser Review 34.1 (winter 2003), 28–45, at 33–39.Google Scholar
David, Read, Temperate Conquests: Spenser and the Spanish New World (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2000), pp. 72–74.Google Scholar
Boccaccio, , Genealogiae deorum gentilium 8.6 (Vicenza: Simon Bevilaqua, 1487)Google Scholar
Henry, Gibbons Lotspeich, Classical Mythology in the Poetry of Edmund Spenser (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1932), pp. 14–22.Google Scholar
Douglas, Biow, Mirabile Dictu: Representations of the Marvelous in Medieval and Renaissance Epic (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Louis, Montrose, “The Elizabethan Subject and the Spenserian Text,” in Literary Theory/Renaissance Texts, ed. Parker, Patricia and Quint, David (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), pp. 303–40, at pp. 329–30Google Scholar
Patricia, Parker, Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property (London: Methuen, 1987)Google Scholar
Jane Chance, Nitzsche, The Genius Figure in Antiquity and the Middle Ages (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), pp. 42–50Google Scholar
Marilynn, Desmond, “Bernard Silvestris and the Corpus of the Aeneid,” in The Classics in the Middle Ages, ed. Bernardo, Aldo S. and Levin, Saul (Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies, 1990), pp. 129–39.Google Scholar
Timaeus a Calcidio translatus commentarioque instructus, ed. Waszink, J. H. (London: Warburg, 1962), p. 37
Scaliger, J. C., Poetices libri septem 4.23 (Lyon: Antonius Vincentius, 1561), p. 194.Google Scholar
John, Watkins, The Specter of Dido: Spenser and Virgilian Epic (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), pp. 105–6Google Scholar
Quitslund, Jon A., Spenser’s Supreme Fiction: Platonic Natural Philosophy and The Faerie Queene (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001), pp. 124–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, Courcelle, “Virgile et l’immanence divine chez Minucius Felix,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 1 (1964), 34–42Google Scholar
Alan, Kreider, English Chantries: The Road to Dissolution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Eamon, Duffy, The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England 1400–1500 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Mazzola, The Pathology of the English Renaissance: Sacred Remains and Holy Ghosts (Leiden: Brill, 1998), pp. 55–63Google Scholar
Stephen, Greenblatt, Hamlet in Purgatory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Jacques Le, Goff, La naissance du Purgatoire (Paris: Gallimard, 1981)Google Scholar
Takami, Matsuda, Death and Purgatory in Middle English Didactic Poetry (Cambridge: Brewer, 1997)Google Scholar
Sabine, MacCormack, The Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustus (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Pierre, Courcelle, “Les pères de l’église devant les enfers virgiliens,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 30 (1955), 5–74.Google Scholar
Aurelij augustini de ciuitate dei (Venice: Nicholas Jenson, 1475), n.p.
Luther’s Works, gen. eds. Pelikan, Jaroslov and Lehmann, Helmut T., 55 vols. (St. Louis, MO: Concordia, and Philadelphia, PA: Fortress, 1958–86)
The Poetical Works of Gavin Douglas, Bishop of Dunkeld, ed. Small, John, 4 vols. (Edinburgh: Patterson, 1874), vol. iii, p. 2.
Blyth, Charles R., “The Knychtlyke Style”: A Study of Gavin Douglas’ Aeneid (New York: Garland, 1987), pp. 26–41.Google Scholar
Hankins, John E., “The Pains of the Afterworld: Fire, Wind, and Ice in Milton and Shakespeare,” PMLA 71 (1956), 482–95, at 487–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, Golding, “The Epistle,” in The .xv. Bookes of P. Ouidius Naso, entytuled Metamorphosis, translated oute of Latine into English meeter (STC 18956; London: Willyam Seres, 1567)Google Scholar
Bradley, , Shakespearean Tragedy (1904; repr. London: Penguin, 1991), pp. 244–46.Google Scholar
Mary, Louise Lord, “The Use of Macrobius and Boethius in Some Fourteenth-Century Commentaries on Virgil,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 3.1 (1996), 3–22, at 6.Google Scholar
Josephine, Waters Bennett, “Spenser’s Garden of Adonis,” PMLA 47 (1932), 46–80, at 57.Google Scholar
Brents, Stirling, “The Philosophy of Spenser’s ‘Garden of Adonis,’PMLA 49 (1934), 501–38Google Scholar
Colin, Burrow, Epic Romance from Homer to Milton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 116–20Google Scholar
Raphael, Lyne, Ovid’s Changing Worlds: English Metamorphoses 1567–1632 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 107–11Google Scholar
Greenlaw, Edwin A., “Spenser and Lucretius,” Studies in Philology 17 (1920), 439–64, at 442–43.Google Scholar
John Erskine, Hankins, Source and Meaning in Spenser’s Allegory: A Study of The Faerie Queene (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971), p. 271.Google Scholar
Robert, Ellrodt, Neoplatonism in the Poetry of Spenser (Darby, PA: Darby, 1960), pp. 77–86Google Scholar
James, Nohrnberg, The Analogy of The Faerie Queene (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976), pp. 533–62Google Scholar
Englished, Mythologized, and Represented in Figures (1626), ed. Hulley, Karl K. and Vandersall, Stanley T. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970), p. 695
Lecteurs païens et lecteurs chrétiens de l’Énéide, 2 vols. (Paris: Institut de France, 1984, 1989), vol. i, pp. 483–93.
P. Vergilii Maronis poemata (Zurich: Christoph Froschauer, 1561).
Octavianus, Mirandula, Illustrium poetarum flores, per Octavianum Mirandulam collecta et à studioso quodam summa diligentia in locos communes digesti (Lyons: Joannes Tornaesius, 1579), pp. 615–17Google Scholar
Ex P. Ouidii Nasonis metamorphoseon libris xv electorum libri totidem (Antwerp: Heirs of Martinus Nutius, 1618).
Margaret, Tudeau-Clayton, Jonson, Shakespeare and Early Modern Virgil (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 23.Google Scholar
The Works of Edmund Spenser: A Variorum Edition, ed. Greenlaw, Edwin et al., 11 vols. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1932–57), vol. x, p. 471.
Greene, Thomas M., The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), pp. 270–74.Google Scholar
David, Galbraith, Architectonics of Imitation in Spenser, Daniel, and Drayton (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Colin, Burrow, “Spenser and Classical Traditions,” in The Cambridge Companion to Spenser, ed. Hadfield, Andrew (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 217–36Google Scholar
Krier, Theresa M., Gazing on Secret Sights: Spenser, Classical Imitation, and the Decorums of Vision (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990), p. 79.Google Scholar
Pigman, G. W., “Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance,” Renaissance Quarterly 33 (1980), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harry, Berger, Revisionary Play: Studies in the Spenserian Dynamics (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988), pp. 36–50, 173–83, 195–214, 243–73Google Scholar
Caroline, Bynum, The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), p. 5.Google Scholar
Pigman, G. W., “Imitation and the Renaissance Sense of the Past: The Reception of Erasmus’ Ciceronianus,” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 9 (1979), 155–77Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Martin L., Literary Imitation in the Italian Renaissance: The Theory and Practice of Literary Imitation in Italy from Dante to Bembo (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), esp. ch. 12.Google Scholar
Gabriel Harvey’s Ciceronianus, ed. Wilson, Harold S. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1945), p. 72.
Andrew, Fichter, Poets Historical: Dynastic Epic in the Renaissance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Ronsard, , Œuvres complètes, ed. Laumonier, Paul et al., 20 vols. (Paris: Société des Textes Français Modernes, 1914–75), vol. xvi, p. 18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×