Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T09:02:08.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Steven Lynn
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rhetoric and Composition
An Introduction
, pp. 296 - 318
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans.From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Adams, Katherine. A Group of Their Own: College Writing Courses and American Women Writers, 1880–1940. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Albertinti, John.Teaching of Writing and Diversity: Access, Identity, and Achievement.” In Bazerman, Handbook387–97.
Allison, Libby, Bryant, Lizbeth, and Hourigan, Maureen. Grading in the Post-Process Classroom: From Theory to Practice. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1997.Google Scholar
Anderson, Diane.Casting and Recasting Gender: Children Constituting Social Identities through Literacy Practices Research in the Teaching of English.” College English 36 (2002): 391–427.Google Scholar
,Anonymous. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Ed. Caplan, Harry. London: Heinemann, 1954.Google Scholar
Applebee, Arthur.The Child's Concept of Story: Ages Two to Seventeen. University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Applebee, Arthur.Writing in the Secondary School: English in the Content Areas. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1981.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Rhetoric. Trans. Rhys, William Robert. New York: Modern Library, 1954.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Topics Books I & VIII: With Excerpts from Related Texts. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ashley, Hannah.Playing the Game: Proficient Working-Class Student Writers: Second Voices.” Research in the Teaching of English 35 (2001): 493–524.Google Scholar
Atwill, Janet.Rhetoric Reclaimed: Aristotle and the Liberal Arts Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint, Hippo, Bishop of. Confessions. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Austin, Gilbert.Chironomia, or a Treatise on Rhetorical Delivery. (First published London: 1806.) Eds Robb, Mary Margaret and Thonssen, Lester. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Rise, and Cooper, Charles. The St. Martin's Guide to Writing. Boston: St. Martin's, 2001.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis.Of the Advancement of Learning. (5th edn.) Ed. Wright, W. A.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1957.Google Scholar
Bain, Alexander.English Composition and Rhetoric: A Manual. (First published 1866.) Facsimile repr. Delmar, NY: Scholars' Facsimiles, 1996.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Charles Sears.Ancient Rhetoric and Poetic. (First published 1924.) Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1959.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Charles Sears. “The Elementary Exercises of Hermogenes.” In his Medieval Rhetoric and Poetic. New York: Macmillan, 1928. 23–38.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Charles Sears.Medieval Rhetoric and Poetic. New York: Macmillan, 1928.Google Scholar
Ballif, Michelle. Seduction, Sophistry, and the Woman with the Rhetorical Figure. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bandura, A.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 1997.Google Scholar
Barnard, H. C.A History of English Education from 1760. University of London Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan.Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Barrett, Edward, ed. Text, ConText, and HyperText. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.
Bartholomae, David. “Freshman English, Composition, and CCCC.” In Views from the Center: The CCCC Chairs' Addresses 1977–2005. Ed. Roen, Duane H.. New York: Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles.Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. New York: Erlbaum, 2008.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles.Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Charles Allen.Swift's Classical Rhetoric. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary, Clinchy, Blythe, Goldberger, Nancy, and Tarule, Jill. Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books, 1987.Google Scholar
Benson, Thomas, and Prosser, Michael, eds. Readings in Classical Rhetoric. 1969 reprint. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
Bereiter, Carl, and Scardamalia, Marlene. “Learning about Writing from Reading.” Written Communication 1 (1984): 163–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, James.Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories.” College English 44 (1982): 765–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, James.Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.” College English 50 (1988): 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, James.Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900–1985. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd.The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric (January, 1968): 1–14.Google Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia. Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia, and Herzberg, Bruce. The Bedford Bibliography for Teachers of Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1984.Google Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia, and Herzberg, Bruce. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. (2nd edn.) New York: St. Martin's, 2001.Google Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia, Herzberg, Bruce and Reynolds, Nedra. The Bedford Bibliography for Teachers of Writing. (6th edn.) Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2004.Google Scholar
Black, Edwin.Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Blair, Hugh.Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Eds. Ferreira, Linda and Halloran, S. Michael. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, A. M.Interacting with Audiences: Social Influences on the Production of Scientific Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.Google Scholar
Bolgar, R. R.The Classical Heritage and Its Beneficiaries. Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Bolgar, R. R. “The Teaching of Rhetoric in the Middle Ages.” In Rhetoric Revalued. Ed. Vickers, Brian. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1982. 79–86.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne.The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bordelon, S.Challenging Nineteenth-Century Feminization Narratives: Mary Yost of Vassar College.” Peitho 6 (2002): 1–5.Google Scholar
Botley, Paul.Latin Translation in the Renaissance: The Theory and Practice of Leonardo Bruni, Giannozzo Manetti and Desiderius Erasmus. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bowers, W.J.Student Dishonesty and its Control in a College. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, 1964.Google Scholar
Braddock, Richard, Lloyd-Jones, Richard, and Schoer, Lowell. Research in Written Composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1963.Google Scholar
Brereton, John, ed. The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875–1925: A Documentary History. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995.
Brereton, John, Traditions of Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Briscoe, Marianne, Artes Praedicandi, published with Barbara Jaye, Artes Orandi. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 1992.Google Scholar
Britton, James.The Development of Writing Abilities, 11–18. London: Macmillan, 1975.Google Scholar
Britton, James.Language and Learning. Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1970.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth, and Warren, Austin. Modern Rhetoric with Readings. New York: Harcourt, 1949.Google Scholar
Brooks, Phyllis.Mimesis: Grammar and the Echoing Voice.” College English 35 (November 1973): 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Stuart C., Jackson, Rebecca, and Enos, Theresa. “The Arrival of Rhetoric in the Twenty-First Century: The 1999 Survey of Doctoral Programs in Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review 18 (Spring 2000): 233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgh, James.The Art of Speaking … in which are given Rules for expressing properly the principal passions and Humours, which occur in Reading or Public Speaking. Philadelphia: Aitken, 1764.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth.Counter-Statement. (3rd edn.) Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth.A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Camargo, Martin.Ars Dictaminis, Ars Dictandi. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 1991.Google Scholar
Camargo, Martin. “Rhetoric.” In The Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages. Ed. Wagner, David. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983. 96–124.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil.Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Campbell, George.The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Ed. Bitzer, Lloyd. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Campbell, JoAnn.Freshman (sic) English: A 1901 Wellesley College ‘Girl’ Negotiates Authority.” Rhetoric Review 15 (1996): 110–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, JoAnn. “‘A Real Vexation’: Student Writing in Mount Holyoke's Culture of Service, 1837–1865.” College English 59 (1997): 767–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canby, Henry Seidel, et al. English Composition in Theory and Practice. New York: Macmillan, 1909.Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry.Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric. Eds. King, Anne and North, Helen. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Caplan, Harry. trans. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst.An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Charney, Davida. “The Effect of Hypertext on Processes of Reading and Writing.” In Literacy and Computers. Eds. Selfe, Cynthia and Hilligoss, Susan. New York: Modern Language Association, 1994. 238–63.Google Scholar
Charney, Davida, and Carlson, R.. “Learning to Write in a Genre: What Student Writers Take from Model Texts.” Research in the Teaching of English 29 (1995): 88–125.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius.De Inventione, with De Optimo Genere Oratorum and Topica. Trans. Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius.Cicero on Oratory and Orators: With His Letters to Quintus and Brutus. Trans. Watson, John Selby. London: George Bell and Sons, 1884.Google Scholar
Clark, Donald Lemen.The Rise and Fall of Progymnasmata in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Grammar Schools.” Speech Monographs 19 (1952): 259–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Donald Lemen.Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education. New York: Columbia University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Cole, A. T.Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Cole, Thomas.The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Board, College Entrance Examination. On Further Examination: Report of the Advisory Panel on the Scholastic Aptitude Test Score Decline. New York: CEEB, 1977.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas.Rhetoric in the European Tradition. University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas.Logical Hylomorphism and Aristotle's Koinoi Topoi.” Central States Speech Journal 29 (1978): 92–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, Robert.Composition Studies and Science.” College English 45 (1983): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, Robert.Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, Robert. Quoted in Octalog, “The Politics of Historiography.” Rhetoric Review. 7:1 (Autumn, 1988): 30.Google Scholar
Connors, Robert.Mechanical Correctness as a Focus in Composition Instruction.” College Composition and Communication 36 (1985): 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, Robert. Selected Essays of Connors, Robert J.. Eds. Lisa Ede and Andrea A. Lunsford. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2003.
Connors, Robert, Ede, Lisa, and Lunsford, Andrea A., eds. Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Consigny, Scott.Gorgias: Sophist and Artist. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Cope, E. M.An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices. London: Macmillan, 1867.Google Scholar
Corbett, William P. J., and Connors, Robert. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. (4th edn.) New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cowan, Gregory, and Cowan, Elizabeth. Writing. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1980.Google Scholar
Crowley, Sharon.Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students. New York: Macmillan, 1994.Google Scholar
Crowley, Sharon.The Methodical Memory: Invention in Current-Traditional Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Daiker, Donald, Kerek, Andrew, and Morenberg, Max, eds. Sentence Combining: A Rhetorical Perspective. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985.
D'Angelo, Frank.Composition in the Classical Tradition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.Google Scholar
D'Angelo, Frank.A Conceptual Theory of Rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop, 1975.Google Scholar
Daniell, Beth. “Dissoi Logoi: Women's Rhetoric and Classroom Practice.” In Teaching Rhetorica: Theory, Pedagogy, Practice. Eds. Ronald, Kate and Ritchie, Joy. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2006. 82–92.Google Scholar
Delpit, Lisa.Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dillard, Joe. Black English: Its History and Usage in the United States. New York: Vintage, 1973.Google Scholar
Dixon, John.Growth through English: A Report Based on the Dartmouth Conference 1966. (2nd edn.) Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Dixon, Peter.Rhetoric. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar
Donovan, Timothy, and McClelland, Ben. Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1980.Google Scholar
Durst, Russell. “Writing at the Postsecondary Level.” In Smagorinsky. 78–107.
Eagleton, Terry.Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto.The Search for the Perfect Language. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar
Edwards, Bruce.The Tagmemic Contribution to Composition Teaching. Dept. of English, Kansas State University, 1980.Google Scholar
Elbow, Peter.Closing My Eyes as I Speak: An Argument for Ignoring Audience.” College English 49 (January 1987): 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbow, Peter.Everyone Can Write: Essays Toward a Hopeful Theory of Writing and Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Elbow, Peter.Writing with Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Progress. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Elbow, Peter.Writing Without Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Emig, Janet.The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1971.Google Scholar
Enders, Jody.Rhetoric and the Origins of Médieval Drama. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Enos, Richard Leo.Ancient Greek Writing Instruction.” In Murphy, A Short History of Writing Instruction. 9–34.
Enos, Richard Leo.Greek Rhetoric before Aristotle. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, 1993.Google Scholar
Enos, Theresa, ed. The Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age. New York: Garland, 1996.
Enos, Theresa, ed. Learning from the Histories of Rhetoric: Essays in Honor of Winifred Bryan Horner. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993.
Erasmus, Desiderius.Collected Works of Erasmus. Literary and Educational Writings 2: De Copia, De Ratione Studii. Ed. Thompson, Craig R.. University of Toronto Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Committee, Executive, College Conference on Composition and Communication (CCCC). “Students' Right to Their Own Language.” CCC 25 (Fall 1974): 1–32.Google Scholar
Faigley, Lester.Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal.” College Composition and Communication 48 (1986): 527–42.Google Scholar
Faigley, Lester. “Nonacademic Writing: The Social Perspective.” In Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Eds. Odell, Lee and Goswami, Dixie. New York: Guilford, 1985. 231–48.Google Scholar
Fantazzi, Charles. Juan Luis Vives, In Pseudodialecticos: A Critical Edition. Leiden: Brill, 1979.Google Scholar
Fitts, Karen, and Lalicker, William B.. “Invisible Hands: A Manifesto to Resolve Institutional and Curricular Hierarchy in English Studies.” College English 66 (March 2004): 427–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliegelman, Jay.Declaring Independence: Jefferson, Natural Language, and the Culture of Performance. Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Flower, Linda, and Hayes, John R.. “Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes.” In Cognitive Processes in Writing. Eds. Gregg, L. W. and Steinberg, E. R.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. 3–30.Google Scholar
Flynn, Elizabeth. “Composition Studies from a Feminist Perspective.” In The Politics of Writing Instruction: Postsecondary. Eds. Bullock, Richard and Trimbur, John. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1991. 137–54.Google Scholar
Fox, Margaret.Women's Speaking Justified, Proved and Allowed by the Scriptures. London: n.s., 1666.Google Scholar
Franklin, Benjamin.The Autobiography and Other Writings. Ed. Jesse Lemisch, L.. Afterword Carla Mulford. New York: Signet-Putnam, 2001.Google Scholar
Freire, Paolo.Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Trans. Ramos, Myra Bergman. New York: Continuum, 1968.Google Scholar
Fries, Charles.The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt, 1925.Google Scholar
Gage, John. “On ‘Rhetoric’ and ‘Composition.’” In An Introduction to Composition Studies. Eds. Lindemann, Erika and Tate, Gary. Oxford University Press, 1991. 15–32.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D., and Torrance, M.. “Revision in the Context of Different Drafting Strategies.” In Studies in Writing, Vol. IV. Eds. Torrance, and Galbraith, . Amsterdam University Press, 2004. 137–57.Google Scholar
Genung, John F.Outlines of Rhetoric. Boston: Ginn, 1886.Google Scholar
Genung, John F.The Practical Elements of Rhetoric. (2nd edn.) Boston: Ginn and Co., 1886.Google Scholar
Gibson, Walker.Tough, Sweet and Stuffy: An Essay on Modern American Prose Styles. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Paula, Gillam, Alice, Brown, Lady Falls, and Stay, Byron. Writing Center Research: Extending the Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol.In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Gilyard, Keith.African American Contributions to Composition Studies.” CCC 50.4 (1999): 626–44.Google Scholar
Glenn, Cheryl.Making Sense. Boston: Bedford, 2002.Google Scholar
Glenn, Cheryl.Rhetoric Retold: Regendering the Tradition from Antiquity through the Renaissance. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald.Professing Literature. Chicago University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Jardine, Lisa. From Humanism to the Humanities: Education and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Graham, Steve, MacArthur, Charles, and Fitzgerald, Jill, eds. Best Practices in Writing Instruction: Solving Problems in the Teaching of Literacy. New York: Guilford, 2007.
Graves, Donald.Writing: Teachers and Children at Work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann, 1983.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen.Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Joseph.The Thread of Discourse. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 1976.Google Scholar
Haden, Suzette.Why Newsweek Can't Tell Us Why Johnny Can't Write.” English Journal 65 (November 1976): 29–35.Google Scholar
Hairston, Maxine.Diversity, Ideology, and Teaching Writing.” College Composition and Communication 43 (1992): 179–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, Maxine.The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 33 (1982): 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hake, R. L., and Williams, J. M.. “Sentence Expanding: Not Can, or How, But When.” In Sentence Combining and the Teaching of Writing. Ed. Donald Daiker et al. Conway: University of Akron, 1979. 134–46.
Hall, Jon.Cicero and Quintilian on the Oratorical Use of Hand Gestures.” Classical Quarterly 54 (2004): 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman. “The Athenian ‘Politicians,’ 403–322 B.C.” In Greek Literature. Vol. V: Greek Literature in the Classical Period: the Prose of Historiography and Oratory. Ed. Gregory Nagy. New York: Routledge, 2001. 345–67.Google Scholar
Harmon, S. D. “'The voice, pen and influence of our women are abroad in the land': Women and the Illinois State Normal University, 1857–1899.” In Hobbs. 84–102.
Harris, Joseph.A Teaching Subject: Composition Since 1966. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997.Google Scholar
Hartwell, Patrick.Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” College English 47 (February 1985): 105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Gerald.Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. (2nd edn.) Long Grove, IL: Waveland, 2002.Google Scholar
Havelock, Erik.The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hawk, Byron.A Counter-History of Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, John R. “New Directions in Writing Theory.” In MacArthur et al. 28–40.
Heath, Shirley Brice.Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, J.How Harvard Destroyed Rhetoric.” Harvard Magazine (July–August 1995): 37–43.Google Scholar
Hill, Adams S.The Principles of Rhetoric and Their Application. New York: Harper, 1878.Google Scholar
Hillocks, George, Jr. “Middle and High School Composition.” In Smagorinsky. 48–77.
Hillocks, George, Jr. Research on Written Composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 1986.Google Scholar
Hillocks, George, Jr. “Writing in Secondary Schools.” In Bazerman. Handbook. 311–29.
Hillocks, George, Jr., and Mavrogenes, N.. “Sentence combining.” In Hillocks. Research. 142–6.
Hirsch, E. D.Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. New York: Vintage, 1988.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D.The Knowledge Deficit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D.Philosophy of Composition. University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Catherine, ed. Nineteenth-Century Women Learn to Write. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1995.
Hooks, Bell.Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Horner, Bruce.Terms of Work for Composition: A Materialist Critique. Foreword John Trimbur. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Horner, Winifred Bryan.Nineteenth-Century Scottish Rhetoric: The American Connection. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Horner, Winifred Bryan, and Kerri Barton. The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric. (2nd edn.) Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Horner, Winifred Bryan.Rhetoric in the Classical Tradition. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Horner, Winifred Bryan, Leff, Michael C., and Murphy, James Jerome, eds. Rhetoric and Pedagogy: Its History, Philosophy, and Practice: Essays in Honor of James J. Murphy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.Google Scholar
Howard, Rebecca Moore.Sexuality, Textuality: The Cultural Work of Plagiarism.” College English 62 (2000): 473–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Rebecca Moore.Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators. Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999.Google Scholar
Howell, Wilbur S.Eighteenth-Century British Logic and Rhetoric. Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Howell, Wilbur S.Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. Princeton University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth, and Power, Brenda. Living the Questions: A Guide for Teacher Researchers. York, ME: Stenhouse, 1999.Google Scholar
Hubert, Henry.Harmonious Perfection: The Development of English Studies in Nineteenth-Century Anglo-Canadian Colleges. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hurlbut, B. S. “College Requirements in English.” In Twenty Years of School and College English. Eds. Adams Sherman Hill et al. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1896.Google Scholar
Irmscher, William. Teaching Expository Writing. New York: Harcourt, 1979.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Martin. “The Canon of Delivery in Rhetorical Theory: Selections, Commentary, and Advice.” In Delivering College Composition: The Fifth Canon. Ed. Kathleen Blake Yancey. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 2006.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan.Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jarratt, Susan. “Rhetoric.” In Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures. (3rd edn.) Ed. David G. Nicholls. New York: Modern Language Association, 2007. 73–102.Google Scholar
Jensen, L.A., J.J. Arnett, S.S. Feldman, and E. Cauffman, It's Wrong, but Everybody Does it: Academic Dishonesty among High School Students.” Contemporary Educational Psychology (2002) 27(2): 209–28.CrossRef
Johnson, Nan.Nineteenth-Century Rhetoric in North America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Joos, , Martin. The Five Clocks:A Linguistic Excursion into the Five Styles of English Usage. New York: Harcourt, 1961.Google Scholar
Judy, Stephen.On Second Thought: Reviewing the SAT Decline.” English Journal (November 1977): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Victoria.Machiavellian Rhetoric: From the Counter-Reformation to Milton. Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katula, Richard.The Origins of Rhetoric: Literacy and Democracy in Ancient Greece.” In Murphy. Synoptic History. 3–20.
Kellog, R. T.Attentional Overload and Writing Performance: Effects of Rough Draft and Outline Strategies.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 14 (1988): 355–65.Google Scholar
Kellog, R. T.Effectiveness of Pre-Writing Strategies as a Function of Task Demands.” American Journal of Psychology 103 (1990): 327–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Douglas.The Art of Poetry and Prose. Turnhout: Brepols, 1989.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George, trans. Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford University Press, 1991.
Kennedy, George. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. “The Earliest Rhetorical Handbooks.” The American Journal of Philology, 80:2 (1959): 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George. “A Hoot in the Dark: The Evolution of General Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 25 (1992): 1–21.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Writings from the Greco-Roman World). Society of Biblical Literature, 2003.Google Scholar
Kent, Thomas.Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing Process Paradigm. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kimball, Bruce.Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. New York: Teachers College Press, 1986.Google Scholar
King, Margaret.Thwarted Ambitions: Six Learned Women of the Italian Renaissance.” Soundings 59 (1976): 280–304.Google Scholar
Kinloch, Valerie Felita.Revisiting the Promise of Students' Right to Their Own Language.” College Composition and Communication 9 (September 2005): 83–113.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, James.Greek Rhetorical Origins of Christian Faith. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, James.Theory of Discourse. New York: Norton, 1971; repr. 1986.Google Scholar
Kitzhaber, Albert.Rhetoric in American Colleges, 1850–1900. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kleingünther, A.Protos Heuretes. Philologus. Suppl. 26 (1933): 43–65.
Knoblauch, Cyril, and Brannon, Lil. Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of Writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1984.Google Scholar
Kopelson, Karen. “Of Ambiguity and Erasure: The Perils of Performative Pedagogy.” In Relations, Locations, and Positions: Composition Theory for Writing Teachers. Eds. Vandenberg, Peter, Clary-Lemon, Jennifer, and Hum, Sue. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 2006. 563–71.Google Scholar
Kubota, Ryuko.New Approaches to Gender, Class, and Race in Second Language Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (February 2003): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Kutz, Eleanor, Freire, Paolo (adapted), and Roskelly, Hephzibah. An Unquiet Pedagogy: Transforming Practice in the English Classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1991.Google Scholar
Labov, William. Language in the Inner-City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular (Conduct and Communication). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Lang, James.On Course: A Week-By-Week Guide to Your First Semester of College Teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Langer, J. A.Children Reading and Writing: Structures and Strategies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard.The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard.A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. (2nd edn.) Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard.Revising Prose. (4th edn.) New York: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard.Revising Business Prose. (4th edn.) New York: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
Lanham, Richard.Style: An Anti-Textbook. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Lawler, Traugott, ed., trans. The Parisiana poetria of John of Garland. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
Lazare, Donald. “Teaching the Conflicts about Wealth and Poverty.” In Left Margins: Cultural Studies and Composition Pedagogy. Eds. Fitts, Karen and France, Alan. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995. 189–205.Google Scholar
Leff, Michael.The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory from Cicero to Boethius.” Rhetorica 1 (1983): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, Erika.A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. (4th edn.) New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Locke, John.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. and intro. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
Locke, John.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: W. Tegg, 1849.Google Scholar
Logan, Shirley Wilson.We Are Coming”: The Persuasive Discourse of Nineteenth-Century Black Women. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea A., ed. Reclaiming Rhetorica: Women in the Rhetorical Tradition. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995.
Lunsford, Andrea A., Wilson, Kirt, and Eberly, Rosa, eds. The Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.CrossRef
Lunsford, Andrea A., and Ede, Lisa. “Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy.” CCC 35 (May 1984): 155–71.Google Scholar
Lynn, Steven.Samuel Johnson after Deconstruction. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Lynn, Steven.Johnson's Rambler and Eighteenth-Century Rhetoric.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 19 (1986): 461–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Steven.Texts and Contexts. (6th edn.) New York: Longman, 2010.Google Scholar
MacArthur, Charles. “The Effects of New Technologies on Writing and Writing Processes.” In MacArthur et al. 248–62.
MacArthur, Charles, Graham, Steve, and Fitzgerald, Jill. Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford, 2006.Google Scholar
McCroskey, J. C.An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication. (7th edn.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1997.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Carey.The Evolution of English Prose 1700–1800. Style, Politeness, and Print Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter.Renaissance Rhetoric. New York: Palgrave, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, Richard.Rhetoric in the Middle Ages.” Speculum 17 (1942): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuade, Donald. “Composition and Literary Studies.” In Redrawing the Boundaries: The Transformation of English and American Literary Studies. Eds. Greenblatt, Stephen and Gunn, Giles. New York: MLA, 1992. 482–519.Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven.Disciplinary Identities: Rhetorical Paths of English, Speech, and Composition. New York: MLA, 2006.Google Scholar
Maimon, Elaine, and Nodine, Barbara. “Measuring Syntactic Growth: Errors and Expectations in Sentence-Combining Practice with College Freshmen.” Research in the Teaching of English 12 (1978): 233–44.Google Scholar
Maimon, Elaine, and Nodine, Barbara. “Words Enough and Time: Syntax and Error One Year After.” In Daiker, Kerek and Morenberg. 101–8.
Marrou, H. I.A History of Education in Antiquity. Trans. Lamb, George. London: Sheed and Ward, 1956.Google Scholar
Matsen, Patricia, Rollinson, Philip, and Sousa, Marion. Readings from Classical Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Matsuhashi, Ann.Pausing and Planning: The Tempo of Written Discourse Production.” Research in the Teaching of English 15 (1981): 113–34.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Carol.Well-Tempered Women: Nineteenth-Century Temperance Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Meade, Richard.Who Can Learn Grammar?English Journal 50 (February 1961): 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellon, John.Transformational Sentence Combining. Research Report No. 10. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1969.Google Scholar
Michael, Ian.The Teaching of English: From the Sixteenth Century to 1870. Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihesuah, Devon. “‘Let Us Strive Earnestly to Value Education Aright’: Cherokee Female Seminarians as Leaders of a Changing Culture.” In Hobbs 103–19.
Milic, Louis T.Theories of Style and Their Implications for the Teaching of Composition.” College Composition and Communication 16 (1995): 66–9.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn.Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joseph, Prosser, Michael H. and Benson, Thomas W., eds. Readings in Medieval Rhetoric. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1974.
Miller, Richard E.The Arts of Complicity: Pragmatism and the Culture of Schooling.” College English 61:1 (September 1998): 10–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard E.Composing English Studies: Towards a Social History of the Discipline.” College Composition and Communication 45 (May 1994): 164–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard E.A Writing Program's Assets Reconsidered: Getting beyond Impassioned Teachers and Enslaved Workers.” Pedagogy 1 (2001): 241–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Susan.Trust in Texts: A Different History of Rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, Thomas.The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Gordon.Hamlet's Castle: The Study of Literature As a Social Experience. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Mooney, Paul. “Yale Professor at Peking U. Assails Widespread Plagiarism in China.” Chronicle of Higher Education News Blog. November 21, 2007.http://chronicle.com/news/article/3678/yale-professor-at-peking-u-assails-widespread-plagiarism-in-china.
Moran, Michael G.Eighteenth-Century British and American Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1994.Google Scholar
Morenberg, Max, Daiker, Donald, and Kerek, Andrew. “Sentence Combining at the College Level: An Experimental Study.” Research in the Teaching of English 12 (October 1978): 245–56.Google Scholar
Muckelbauer, John.The Future of Invention: Rhetoric, Postmodernism, and the Problem of Change. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., ed. Medieval Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Medieval Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
Murphy, James J.Medieval Rhetoric: A Select Bibliography. (2nd edn.) University of Toronto Press, 1989.CrossRef
Murphy, James J., ed. Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Murphy, James J.Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. (First published 1974). Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2001.
Murphy, James J., ed. The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing. New York: MLA, 1982.
Murphy, James J., ed. A Short History of Writing Instruction. (2nd edn.) Davis, California: Hermagoras Press, 2001.
Murphy, James J., ed. Three Rhetorical Arts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.
Murphy, James J., and Katula, Richard, with Hill, Forbes and Ochs, Donovan. A Synoptic History of Classical Rhetoric. (3rd edn.) Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.Google Scholar
Murphy, James J., moderator. “The Politics of Historiography.” Octalog. Rhetoric Review 7 (Autumn 1988): 5–49.CrossRef
Murray, Donald.Learning by Teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1982.Google Scholar
Murray, Donald. “Teach Writing as a Process Not Product.” The Leaflet (November 1972): 11–14. Repr. Cross-Talk in Comp Theory: A Reader. Ed. Villanueva, Victor. (2nd edn.) Urbana: NCTE, 2003. 3–6.Google Scholar
Murray, Donald.Write Before Writing.” College Composition and Communication 29 (December 1978): 375–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Donald.A Writer Teaches Writing. (2nd edn.) Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg.From Discovery to Invention: The Writing and Rewriting of Two Patents.” Social Studies of Science 25 (1995): 57–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Ray.The Progymnasmata of Apthonius in Translation.” Speech Monographs 19 (1952): 265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neel, Jasper.Plato, Derrida, and Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Nelson, Nancy.The Reading-Writing Nexus in Discourse Research.” In Bazerman Handbook. 435–50.
Newkirk, Thomas.The Performance of Self in Student Writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1997.Google Scholar
Newlands, Carole, trans. Peter Ramus's Attack on Cicero: Text and Translation of Ramus's Brutinae Quaestiones. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Newlands, Carole, and Murphy, James J., ed. Arguments in Rhetoric Against Quintilian: Translation and Text of Peter Ramus's Rhetoricae Distinctiones in Quintilianum (1549). Dekalb: Illinois University Press, 1986.
Writers, Newsweek. “Why Johnny Can't Write.” Newsweek 92 (8 December 1975): 58–65.Google Scholar
Nold, Ellen, and Freeman, S. W.. “An Analysis of Readers' Responses to Essays.” Research in the Teaching of English 11 (1977): 164–74.Google Scholar
North, Stephen.The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1987.Google Scholar
Nystrand, Martinet al. “Rhetoric's Audience and Linguistics Speech Community: Implications for Understanding Writing, Reading, and Text.” In Nystrand. What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse. New York: Academic, 1982. 1–28.Google Scholar
Nystrand, Martin. “The Social and Historical Context for Writing Research.” In Handbook of Writing Research. Eds. MacArthur, Charles, Graham, Steve, and Fitzgerald, Jill. New York: Guilford, 2006.Google Scholar
Nystrand, Martin.Where Did Composition Studies come From? An Intellectual History.” Written Communication 10 (1993): 267–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Donovan.Aristotle's Concept of Formal Topics.” Speech Monographs 36 (1969): 419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Donovan. “Cicero's Topica: A Process View of Invention.” In Explorations in Rhetoric: Studies in Honor of Douglas Ehninger. Ed. McKerrow, Ray. Glenview, IL: Scott, 1983.Google Scholar
O'Hare, Frank.Sentence Combining: Improving Student Writing without Formal Grammar Instruction. Research Report No. 15. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1973.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard.English in America: A Radical View of the Profession. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Ohmann, Richard. “Professionalizing Politics.” In Rosner et al. 227–34.
Ohmann, Richard.Use Definite, Specific, Concrete Language.” College English 41 (1979): 390–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, Wendy. Rhetoric: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Gary.Clichés: Error Recognition or Subjective Reality?College English 44 (February 1982): 190–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J., S.J.The Writer's Audience Is Always a Fiction.” PMLA 90 (January 1975): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J., S.J.Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. (2nd edn.) New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Paine, Charles. “Relativism, Racial Pedagogy, and the Ideology of Paralysis.” College English 51:6 (October 1989): 557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajares, Frank, and Valiante, Gio. “Influence of Writing Self-Efficacy Beliefs on the Writing Performance of Upper Elementary Students.” Journal of Educational Research 90 (1997): 353–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, William Riley.Where Do English Departments Come From?College English 28 (1967): 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Lucille Vaughan.The Lively Art of Writing. New York: Follett, 1965.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Perl, Sondra.The Composing Processes of Unskilled College Writers.” Research in the Teaching of English 13 (December 1978): 317–36.Google Scholar
Phelps, Louise Weatherbee.Composition as a Human Science: Contributions to the Self-Understanding of a Discipline. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Pianko, Sharon.A Description of the Composing Processes of College Freshman Writers.” Research in the Teaching of English 13 (February 1979): 5–22.Google Scholar
Plato, . Gorgias. Trans. Lamb, W. R. M.. Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . Phaedrus and Letters VII and VIII. Trans. Hamilton, Walter. Repr. New York: Penguin, 1981.Google Scholar
Poster, Carol.Aristotle's Rhetoric Against Rhetoric: Unitarian Reading and Esoteric Hermeneutics.” American Journal of Philology 118 (Summer 1997): 219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulakos, John.Sophistical Rhetoric in Classical Greece. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pressley, Michael, Mohan, Lindsay, Fingeret, Lauren, Reffit, Kelly, and Raphael-Bogaert, Lisa. “Writing Instruction in Engaging and Effective Elementary Settings.” In Graham et al. 13–27.
Price, Margaret.Beyond ‘Gotcha!’: Situating Plagiarism in Policy and Pedagogy.” College Composition and Communication 51 (September 2002): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintilian, . Institutes. The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Trans. Butler, H. E.. 4 vols. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1920–22.Google Scholar
Rabil, Albert, Jr., ed. Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy. 3 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988.
Ramus, Peter.Arguments in Rhetoric Against Quintilian [1549]. Trans. Carole Newlands and James J. Murphy. DeKalb: University of Northern Illinois Press, 1983.
Rebhorn, Wayne.Baldesar Castiglione, Thomas Wilson, and the Courtly Body of Renaissance Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 11 (1993): 241–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricks, Vickie. “‘In an Atmosphere of Peril’: College Women and Their Writing.” In Hobbs 59–83.
Rijlaarsdam, Gert, and Bergh, Huub. “Writing Process Theory: A Functional Dynamic Approach.” In MacArthur et al. 41–53.
Riley, Kathryn, and Parker, Frank. English Grammar: Prescriptive, Descriptive, Generative, Performance. New York: Pearson, 1998.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Joy, and Boardman, Kathleen. “Feminism in Composition: Inclusion, Metonymy, and Disruption.” College Composition and Communication 50 (1999): 585–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Rhys.Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism. New York: Longmans, 1928.Google Scholar
Roberts, Tim S.Student Plagiarism in an Online World: Problems and Solutions. Hershey, NY: Idea Group, 2007.Google Scholar
Rohman, Gordon, and Wlecke, Albert. “Pre-writing: The Stage of Discovery in the Writing Process.” College Composition and Communication 16 (1965): 106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollinson, Philip, and Geckle, Richard. A Guide to Classical Rhetoric. Signal Mountain, TN: Summertown, 1998.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard.Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Rose, Mike.Writer's Block: The Cognitive Dimension. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Rosner, Mary, Boehm, Beth, and Journet, Debra. History, Reflection, and Narrative: The Professionalization of Composition, 1963–1983. Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999.Google Scholar
Rosten, Leo. The Many Worlds of Leo Rosten. New York: Harper, 1964.Google Scholar
Royster, Jackie Jones, and Williams, J. C.. “History in the Spaces Left: African American Presence and Narratives of Composition Studies.” College Composition and Communication 50 (1999): 563–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rucker, Darnell.Plato and the Poets.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (Winter 1966): 167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, David. “Historical Studies of Composition.” In Smagorinsky. 243–75.
Russell, David.Writing in the Academic Disciplines 1870–1990. (2nd edn.) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Salvatori, Mariolina.Pedagogy 1819–1929: Disturbing History. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Raúl.The Function of Theory in Composition Studies. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schiappa, Edward.Landmark Essays on Classical Greek Rhetoric. Davis, CA: Hermagoras, 1994.Google Scholar
Schiappa, Edward.Protagoras and Logos: A Study of Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schilb, John.Writing Theory and Critical Theory. New York: MLA, 1994.Google Scholar
Schultz, Lucille M.The Young Composers: Composition's Beginnings in Nineteenth-Century Schools. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Robert.Patterns of Exposition. New York: Longman, 2003.Google Scholar
Scott, Fred Newton, with Carpenter, George and Baker, Franklin. The Teaching of English in the Elementary and Secondary Schools. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1908.Google Scholar
Scott, William.Lessons in Elocution. London: Longman, 1779.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Timothy.Nature of the Reading-Writing Relation: An Exploratory Multivariate Analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (1984): 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, Timothy, and Lomax, R. G.. “An Analysis and Comparison of Theoretical Models of the Reading-Writing Relationship.” Journal of Educational Psychology 78 (1986): 116–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, Mina.Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas.British Education. London: Strahan, 1756.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Thomas.Lectures on Elocution. London: Strahan, 1762.Google Scholar
Shor, Ira.Freire for the Classroom: A Sourcebook for Liberatory Teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1987.Google Scholar
Sloane, Thomas.Donne, Milton, and the End of Humanist Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sloane, Thomas.On the Contrary: The Protocol of Traditional Rhetoric. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sloane, Thomas, ed. Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, Peter, ed. Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change. New York: Teachers College, 2006.
Smith, Adam.Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Ed. Bryce, J. C.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael, Hillocks, George, and Cheville, Julie. “‘I Guess I'd Better Watch My English’: Grammars and the Teaching of Language Arts.” In Handbook of Writing Research. Eds. MacArthur, Charles, Graham, Steve, and Fitzgerald, Jill, New York: Guilford, 2006. 263–74.Google Scholar
Smith, Morton.The Ancient Greeks. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Smith, Morton, and Combs, Warren E.. “The Effects of Overt and Covert Cues on Written Syntax.” Research in the Teaching of English 14 (1980): 19–38.Google Scholar
Smith, William. Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Vol. I. Boston: Little, Brown, 1867.Google Scholar
Smitherman, Geneva.Talkin and Testifyin: The Language of Black America. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sommers, Nancy.Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Adult Experienced Writers.” College Composition and Communication 31 (1981): 378–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, Margaret. “Thinking about Writing: E. D. Hirsch's Philosophy of Composition.” boundary 2 8:2 (Winter 1980): 349–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, Rosamond Kent. The Older Sophists: A Complete Translation by Several Hands …Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas.History of the Royal Society. Eds. Cope, Jackson and Jones, Harold. St. Louis, MO: Washington University Studies, 1958.Google Scholar
Stoehr, Taylor.Tone and Voice.” College English 30 (1968): 150–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, William.Sentence-Combining: A Composing Book. New York: Random, 1973.Google Scholar
Strunk, William, and White, E. B.. Elements of Style. (4th edn.) New York: Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore, trans., ed., with notes and essays on the text. Boethius's “De topicis differentiis.” Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978.
Stump, Eleonore, trans., with notes and an introduction. Boethius's “In Ciceronis Topica.” Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.
Sutherland, Christine Mason and Sutcliffe, Rebecca, eds. The Changing Tradition: Women in the History of Rhetoric. University of Calgary Press, 1999.
Swift, Jonathan.Proposal for Correcting … the English Tongue. London: Tooke, 1712.Google Scholar
Tate, Gary, Rupiper, Amy, and Schick, Kurt. A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Tate, Gary, Corbett, Edward P. J., and Myers, Nancy. The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook. (4th edn.) Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Thomas, Joseph, Manchester, Frederick and Scott, Franklin. Composition for College Students. New York: Macmillan, 1925.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Thomas of. Summa de arte praedicandi (“The Ultimate Guide to the Art of Preaching”). Published as Thomas de Chobham. Ed. Morenzoni, F., Corpus Christianorum, continuatio medievalis 82. Turnhout: Brepols, 1988.Google Scholar
Thornburg, Thomas.Swift and the Ciceronian Tradition. Muncie: Ball State University, 1980.Google Scholar
Tobin, Lad. “Process Pedagogy.” In A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. Eds. Tate, Gary, Rupiper, Amy, and Schick, Kurt. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. 1–18.Google Scholar
Tompkins, Jane.A Life in School: What the Teacher Learned. New York: Basic, 1997.Google Scholar
Town, K. “The Process Approach: Early Versions in the English Journal, 1912–1960.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1988.Google Scholar
Trimble, John.Writing with Style. (2nd edn.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
Ulman, H. Lewis.Things, Thoughts, Words, and Actions: The Problem of Language in Late Eighteenth-Century British Rhetorical Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian.Classical Rhetoric in English Poetry. London: Macmillan, 1970.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian.InDefence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian., ed. Rhetoric Revalued: Papers from the International Society for the History of Rhetoric. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies, 1982.Google Scholar
Wagner, David L.The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Wallechinsky, David.The New Book of Lists: The Original Compendium of Curious Information. Edinburgh: Canongate, 2005.Google Scholar
Ward, John O.Ciceronian Rhetoric in Treatise, Scholion, and Commentary. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 1995.Google Scholar
Wardy, Robert.The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato, and Their Successors. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Warnick, Barbara.The Sixth Canon: Belletristic Rhetorical Theory and Its French Antecedents. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Warriner, John.English Grammar and Composition. New York: Harcourt, 1963.Google Scholar
Weathers, Winston.Teaching Style: A Possible Anatomy.” College Composition and Communication 21 (1970): 144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weathers, Winston.An Alternate Style: Options in Composition. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, 1980.Google Scholar
Weidner, Heidemarie. “Silks, Congress Gaiters, and Rhetoric: A Butler University Graduate of 1860 Tells Her Story.” In Hobbs 248–63.
Weiss, Robert.Imitation Theory and Teacher Writing: An Annotated Bibliography.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 11:4 (Autumn 1981): 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Olga, and Hodges, Carolyn. Standing Outside on the Inside: Black Adolescents and the Construction of Academic Identity. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wendell, Barrett.English Composition. New York: Scribner's, 1891.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, Molly Meijer.Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard.Elements of Rhetoric. London, 1828. Facsimile reproduction, intro. Charlotte Downey and Howard Coughlin. Delmar, NY: Scholars' Facsimiles, 1991.Google Scholar
Williams, James D.Preparing to Teach Writing: Research, Theory, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998.Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph.Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. (7th edn.) New York: Longman, 2002.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas.The Arte of Rhetorique [1560]. Ed. Medine, Peter E.. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Winterowd, Ross.Rhetoric: A Synthesis. New York: Holt, 1968.Google Scholar
Winterowd, Ross.The Contemporary Writer: A Practical Rhetoric. New York: Harcourt, 1975.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, John.The Selected Writings of John Witherspoon. Ed. Miller, Thomas. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary.A Vindication of the Rights of Woman with Strictures on Moral and Political Subjects. London: Joseph Johnson, 1792.Google Scholar
Woods, Marjorie Curry, trans. An Early Commentary on the Poetria nova of Geoffrey of Vinsauf. New York: Garland, 1985.
Wooten, Cecil, ed. Hermogenes' On Types of Style. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.
Worsham, Lynn, Dobrin, Sidney, and Olson, Gary. The Kinneavy Papers: Theory and the Study of Discourse. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wright, Elizabethada and Halloran, S. Michael. “From Rhetoric to Composition: The Teaching of Writing in America to 1900.” In A Short History of Writing Instruction. (2nd edn.) Ed. Murphy, James J.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hermagoras Press, 2001. 213–46.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles.The Infinite Gift: How Children Learn and Unlearn All the Languages of the World. New York: Scribner, 2006.Google Scholar
Young, Richard, and Liu, Yameng, eds. Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention in Writing. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Young, Richard, and Liu, Yameng, Becker, Alton, and Pike, Kenneth. Rhetoric: Discovery and Change. New York: Harcourt, 1970.Google Scholar
Zaluda, Scott.Lost Voices of the Harlem Renaissance: Writing Assigned at Howard University, 1919–31.” College Composition and Communication 50 (1998): 232–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinsser, William.On Writing Well. 25th Anniversary Edn. New York: Collins, 2001.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Steven Lynn, University of South Carolina
  • Book: Rhetoric and Composition
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780172.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Steven Lynn, University of South Carolina
  • Book: Rhetoric and Composition
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780172.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Steven Lynn, University of South Carolina
  • Book: Rhetoric and Composition
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780172.008
Available formats
×