Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Biographical glossary
- Note on the texts
- Bibliographical note
- On Crimes and Punishments
- Frontispiece
- To the Reader
- Introduction
- 1 The origin of punishment
- 2 The right to punish
- 3 Consequences
- 4 The interpretation of the laws
- 5 The obscurity of the laws
- 6 The proportion between crimes and punishments
- 7 Errors in the measuring of punishments
- 8 The classification of crimes
- 9 Of honour
- 10 Of duels
- 11 Public peace
- 12 The purpose of punishment
- 13 Of witnesses
- 14 Evidence and forms of judgement
- 15 Secret denunciations
- 16 Of torture
- 17 Of the exchequer
- 18 Of oaths
- 19 Of prompt punishments
- 20 Violent crimes
- 21 The punishment of the nobility
- 22 Theft
- 23 Public disgrace
- 24 Parasites
- 25 Banishment and confiscations
- 26 Family feeling
- 27 Lenience in punishing
- 28 The death penalty
- 29 Of detention awaiting trial
- 30 Trials and prescriptions
- 31 Crimes difficult to prove
- 32 Suicide
- 33 Smuggling
- 34 Of debtors
- 35 Asylums
- 36 On setting a price on men's heads
- 37 Attempted crimes, accomplices and immunity
- 38 Leading interrogations, depositions
- 39 Of a particular kind of crime
- 40 False ideas of utility
- 41 How to prevent crimes
- 42 The sciences
- 43 Magistrates
- 44 Public awards
- 45 Education
- 46 Pardons
- 47 Conclusion
- To Jean Baptiste d'Alembert
- To André Morellet
- Inaugural Lecture
- Reflections on the Barbarousness and the Civilisation of Nations and on the Savage State of Man
- Reflections on Manners and Customs
- On Luxury
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
10 - Of duels
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Biographical glossary
- Note on the texts
- Bibliographical note
- On Crimes and Punishments
- Frontispiece
- To the Reader
- Introduction
- 1 The origin of punishment
- 2 The right to punish
- 3 Consequences
- 4 The interpretation of the laws
- 5 The obscurity of the laws
- 6 The proportion between crimes and punishments
- 7 Errors in the measuring of punishments
- 8 The classification of crimes
- 9 Of honour
- 10 Of duels
- 11 Public peace
- 12 The purpose of punishment
- 13 Of witnesses
- 14 Evidence and forms of judgement
- 15 Secret denunciations
- 16 Of torture
- 17 Of the exchequer
- 18 Of oaths
- 19 Of prompt punishments
- 20 Violent crimes
- 21 The punishment of the nobility
- 22 Theft
- 23 Public disgrace
- 24 Parasites
- 25 Banishment and confiscations
- 26 Family feeling
- 27 Lenience in punishing
- 28 The death penalty
- 29 Of detention awaiting trial
- 30 Trials and prescriptions
- 31 Crimes difficult to prove
- 32 Suicide
- 33 Smuggling
- 34 Of debtors
- 35 Asylums
- 36 On setting a price on men's heads
- 37 Attempted crimes, accomplices and immunity
- 38 Leading interrogations, depositions
- 39 Of a particular kind of crime
- 40 False ideas of utility
- 41 How to prevent crimes
- 42 The sciences
- 43 Magistrates
- 44 Public awards
- 45 Education
- 46 Pardons
- 47 Conclusion
- To Jean Baptiste d'Alembert
- To André Morellet
- Inaugural Lecture
- Reflections on the Barbarousness and the Civilisation of Nations and on the Savage State of Man
- Reflections on Manners and Customs
- On Luxury
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
Summary
Private duels, whose origin lay in the very anarchy of the laws, arose from this need for others' esteem. Duels are alleged to have been unknown in the ancient world, perhaps because the ancients did not foregather in temples, in theatres and with their friends warily forearmed, or perhaps because the duel was a common and ordinary spectacle which enslaved and debased gladiators gave to the public, and free men disdained to be considered and called gladiators because of their private combats.
Attempts to put a stop to this custom by decrees of death against those who engage in duels have been in vain, for it is founded on something which some men fear more than death. Deprived of the esteem of others, the man of honour sees himself doomed to become either a merely solitary being, which would be an insupportable condition for a sociable man, or the butt of insults and slander, whose combined effect would be greater than the danger of punishment.
Why is it that ordinary people for the most part do not duel as noblemen do? It is not just that they are unarmed, but because the need for others' esteem is less common among the humble classes than it is among those who, being exalted, regard each other with greater circumspection and jealousy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995