Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- PART I DERIVED FUNCTORS AND HOMOTOPY (CO)LIMITS
- 1 All concepts are Kan extensions
- 2 Derived functors via deformations
- 3 Basic concepts of enriched category theory
- 4 The unreasonably effective (co)bar construction
- 5 Homotopy limits and colimits: The theory
- 6 Homotopy limits and colimits: The practice
- PART II ENRICHED HOMOTOPY THEORY
- PART III MODEL CATEGORIES AND WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
- PART IV QUASI-CATEGORIES
- Bibliography
- Glossary of Notation
- Index
5 - Homotopy limits and colimits: The theory
from PART I - DERIVED FUNCTORS AND HOMOTOPY (CO)LIMITS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- PART I DERIVED FUNCTORS AND HOMOTOPY (CO)LIMITS
- 1 All concepts are Kan extensions
- 2 Derived functors via deformations
- 3 Basic concepts of enriched category theory
- 4 The unreasonably effective (co)bar construction
- 5 Homotopy limits and colimits: The theory
- 6 Homotopy limits and colimits: The practice
- PART II ENRICHED HOMOTOPY THEORY
- PART III MODEL CATEGORIES AND WEAK FACTORIZATION SYSTEMS
- PART IV QUASI-CATEGORIES
- Bibliography
- Glossary of Notation
- Index
Summary
For a fixed small category D and homotopical category M, the homotopy colimit functor should be a derived functor of colim: MD → M. Assuming that the homotopical category M is saturated, which it always is in practice, the homotopy type of a homotopy colimit will not depend on which flavor of derived functor is used. Because colimits are left adjoints, we might hope that colim has a left derived functor and, dually, that lim: MD → M has a right derived functor, defining homotopy limits.
For special types of diagrams (e.g., if D is a Reedy category), there are simple modfications that produce the right answer. For instance, homotopy pullbacks can be computed by replacing the maps by fibrations between fibrant objects. Or if the homotopical category M is a model category of a particular sort (cofibrantly generated for colimits or combinatorial for limits), then there exist suitable model structures (the projective and injective, respectively) on MD for which Quillen's small object argument can be used to produce deformations for the colimit and limit functors.
These well-documented solutions are likely familiar to those acquainted with model category theory, but they are either quite specialized (those depending on the particular diagram shape) or computationally difficult (those involving the small object argument). By contrast, the theory of derived functors developed in Chapter 2 does not require the presence of model structures on the diagram categories.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Categorical Homotopy Theory , pp. 69 - 75Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014