Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:25:41.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Theatre and the female presence

from Part I - 1660 to 1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Joseph Donohue
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

In the autumn and winter of 1660–61, London play-goers witnessed a theatrical revolution. Women had begun performing in public playhouses, and before long they displaced the young men who had been trained, in the Elizabethan tradition, to play women’s roles. Their impact would be far-reaching. In the winter of 1663–4, the first play by an Englishwoman to be performed publicly, Katherine Philips’s translation of Corneille’s La Mort de Pompée, was presented in Dublin. Other women followed Philips, though seldom in great numbers. Meeting resistance in ways that female performers did not, female playwrights never became a powerful presence, although a few women were signally successful.

There had been female performers and playwrights in England in the early seventeenth century, but not in a public, commercial context. In the élite, protected environment of the court, female members of the royal family and court ladies appeared in elaborate entertainments known as masques and performed occasionally in plays. Whilst they enacted characters and spoke lines in plays, their function in masques was chiefly decorative and ceremonial: lavishly costumed, and displayed amid elaborate scenery, they joined in the dances that concluded these productions. Writing court masques in the 1630s, William Davenant learned how to display female performers and deploy stage spectacle – experience that he put to good use with his female performers in the Duke’s Company in the 1660s.

Like the women who performed at court, early female dramatists were also amateurs functioning within an élite, protected environment. Plays by aristocratic women were likely read aloud, perhaps even given amateur performance, in private households. Plays by three women – Mary Herbert, Countess of Pembroke; Elizabeth Cary Countess of Falkland; and Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle – were published between 1592 and 1668.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bawcutt, N.W. The Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels 1623–73. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Behn, Aphra. The Works of Aphra Behn. Ed. Todd, Janet. Vol. V. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cotton, Nancy. Women Playwrights in England, C. 1363–1750. Lewisburgh, PA: Bucknell University Press; London: Associated University Presses, 1980.Google Scholar
Donkin, Ellen. Getting into the Act: Women Playwrights in London 1776–1829. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Downes, John. Roscius Anglicanus or an Historical Review of the Stage. Ed. Milhous, Judith and Hume, Robert D.. London: Society for Theatre Research, 1987.Google Scholar
Garrick, David. Letters. Ed. Little, David M. and Kahrl, George M.. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Highfill, Philip H., Burnim, Jr, Kalman A. and Langhans, Edward A.. A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers and Other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800. 16 vols. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1973–93.Google Scholar
Howe, Elizabeth. The First English Actresses: Women and Drama 1660–1700. Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D., ed. The Rakish Stage. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lafler, Joanne. The Celebrated Mrs Oldfield: The Life and Art of an Augustan Actress. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lock, F. P.Susanna Centlivre. New York: Twayne, 1979.Google Scholar
Mann, David D., and Mann, Susan Garland, eds. Women Playwrights in England, Ireland, and Scotland 1660–1823. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Milhous, Judith. Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, 1695–1708. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Milhous, Judith. ‘United Company finances, 1682–1692’. Theatre Research International 7 (winter 1981/2):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, MaryThe Provoked Wife: The Life and Times of Susannah Cibber. London: Hutchinson, 1977.Google Scholar
Nicoll, Allardyce. A History of English Drama 1660–1900. Vol. I: Restoration Drama, 4th edn, 1965; vol. II: Early Eighteenth-Century Drama, 3rd edn, 1965; vol. III: Late Eighteenth-Century Drama 1750–1800, 2nd edn, 1952; vol. IV: Early Nineteenth-Century Drama, 1800–1850, 2nd edn, 1963; vol. V: Late Nineteenth-Century Drama,Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Payne, Deborah C.Reified object or emergent professional? Retheorizing the Restoration actress’. In Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theatre. Ed. Canfield, J. Douglas and Payne, Deborah C.. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Pearson, Jacqueline. The Prostituted Muse: Images of Women and Women Dramatists 1642–1737. New York St Martin’s Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pix, Mary. The Plays of Mary Pix. Ed. Steeves, Edna. New York: Garland, 1982.Google Scholar
Roberts, David. TheLadies:FemalePatronageof Restoration Drama, 1660–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Laura J.Playwrights and Plagiarists in Early Modern England: Gender, Authorship Literary Property. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. ‘The introduction of actresses in England: delay or defensiveness?’ In Enacting Gender on the English Renaissance Stage. Ed. Comensoli, Viviana and Russell, Anne. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lennep, William, et al. The London Stage 1660–1800: A Calendar of Plays, Entertainments & After pieces Together with Casts, Box-Office Receipts and Contemporary Comment Compiled from the Playbills, Newspapers and Theatrical Diaries of the Period. 11 vols. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1960–8.Google Scholar
Wilson, John Harold. All the King’s Ladies: Actresses of the Restoration. University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×