Theatres and repertory

Robert Hume

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521650687.003

2 - Theatres and repertory

from Part I - 1660 to 1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Robert Hume

Edited by

Joseph Donohue

Show author details

Joseph Donohue: Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Book contents

Get access

Summary

An historian of English drama in the period 1660–1776 needs to start by admitting that sequential analysis of new plays by themselves can only yield a very partial picture. We may legitimately characterize the new plays and trace generic changes, but we must reckon with the fact that these plays were the product of a theatre system that emphasized the appeal of favourite actors and relied heavily on stock repertory. New plays occupied few nights in most seasons and they do not really have a separate history of their own.

The period we are considering is tidily bounded at the outset by the restoration of the theatres by Charles II when he returned from exile in 1660. No satisfying terminus ad quem exists: there is no sharp break in the drama between the revival of playwriting in the 1750s (following the lull caused by the Licensing Act of 1737) and the 1820s, when ‘illegitimate’ competitors put the patent theatres on the skids. The year 1776 makes a convenient stopping point: Garrick retired from acting and management at Drury Lane that year (selling out to a partnership headed by Richard Brinsley Sheridan), and Thomas Harris was just beginning his long reign as manager at Covent Garden. In drama, though there is no abrupt change, the social comedies and fancy musicals (‘English operas’) of the eighties and nineties reflect norms significantly different from those of the sixties and seventies.

The future of English drama was profoundly affected by the terms of its relegitimation in 1660. Four points are fundamental. These are the duopoly created by the patent grants of 1662 and 1663, the introduction of actresses on the public stage, the construction of changeable scenery theatres, and the radically unequal division of rights to old plays between the two companies that jointly shared a monopoly on dramatic entertainment in London.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of British Theatre , pp. 53 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521650687.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, Emmett L. ‘The Restoration audience’. Philological Quarterly 45 (1966):.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730–1830. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bawcutt, N.W. The Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels 1623–73. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bevis, RichardW. The Laughing Tradition: Stage Comedy in Garrick’s Day. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Boswell, Eleanore. The Restoration Court Stage (1660–1702). London: George Allen & Unwin, 1932.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cannan, Paul D. ‘New directions in serious drama on the London stage, 1675–1678’. Philological Quarterly 73 (1994):.Google Scholar

Cibber, ColleyAn Apology for the Life of Mr Colley Cibber Written by Himself. Ed. Lowe, Robert W.. 2 vols. London: John C. Nimmo, 1889.Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Dryden, John. The Letters of John Dryden. Ed. Ward, Charles E.. Durham: Duke University Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Harbage, Alfred. Cavalier Drama. New York Modern Language Association, 1936.Google Scholar

Hogan, Charles Beecher. Shakespeare in the Theatre, 1701–1800. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952–7.Google Scholar

Howe, Elizabeth. The First English Actresses: Women and Drama 1660–1700. Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hughes, DerekEnglish Drama 1660–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D. ‘“Before the Bard”: Shakespeare in early eighteenth-century London’, ELH: A Journal of English Literary History 64 (1997):.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D.The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D.Henry Fielding and the London Theatre, 1728–1737. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hume, Robert D. ‘The London theatre from The Beggar’s Opera to the Licensing Act’. In The Rakish Stage, ed. Hume, , chap. 1.

Hume, Robert D. ‘Securing a repertory: plays on the London stage 1660–5’. In Poetry and Drama 1570–1700: Essays in Honour of Harold F. Brooks. Ed. Coleman, Antony and Hammond, Antony. London: Methuen, 1981.Google Scholar

Kenny, Shirley Strum. ‘Humane comedy’. Modern Philology 75 (1977):.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina. Authorship and Appropriation: Writing for the Stage in England, 1660–1710. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina. ‘“[A] Play, which I presume to call original”: appropriation, creative genius, and eighteenth-century playwriting’. Studies in the Literary Imagination 34.1 (2001):.Google Scholar

Langhans, Edward A. ‘The theatres’. In Hume, , ed., London Theatre World,.

Langhans, Edward A. ‘Tough actresses to follow’. In Schofield, and Macheski, , eds., Curtain Calls.

Love, Harold. ‘Who were the Restoration audience?’ Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980):.CrossRef Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith, and Hume, Robert D.. ‘New light on English acting companies in 1646, 1648, and 1660’. Review of English Studies n.s. 42 (1991):.Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith, and Hume, Robert D.. ‘Playwrights’ remuneration in eighteenth-century London’. Harvard Library Bulletin n.s. 10 (1999):.Google Scholar

Milhous, Judith. ‘The multimedia spectacular on the Restoration stage’. In Kenny, , ed., British Theatre,.

Milhous, Judith. Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, 1695–1708. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Nicoll, Allardyce. A History of English Drama 1660–1900. Vol. I: Restoration Drama, 4th edn, 1965; vol. II: Early Eighteenth-Century Drama, 3rd edn, 1965; vol. III: Late Eighteenth-Century Drama 1750–1800, 2nd edn, 1952; vol. IV: Early Nineteenth-Century Drama, 1800–1850, 2nd edn, 1963; vol. V: Late Nineteenth-Century Drama,Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Owen, Susan J.Restoration Theatre and Crisis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRef Google Scholar

Scouten, Arthur H. ‘Notes toward a history of Restoration comedy’. Philological Quarterly 45 (1966):.Google Scholar

Scouten, Arthur H., and Hume, Robert D.. ‘Restoration comedy and its audiences, 1660–1776’. Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980):.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, John Harrington. The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1948.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sorelius, Gunnar. ‘The Giant Race Before the Flood’: Pre-Restoration Drama on the Stage and in the Criticism of the Restoration. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 4. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1966.Google Scholar

Southern, Richard. Changeable Scenery: Its Origin and Development in the British Theatre. London: Faber & Faber, 1952.Google Scholar

Tave, Stuart M.The Amiable Humorist: A Studyin the Comic Theory and Criticism of the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries. University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Book contents

2 - Theatres and repertory

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive