Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T02:30:52.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Simulation in the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2016

Paul G. Tucker
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it

Antoine de Saint-Exupery, French pilot and writer

Introduction

Slotnick et al. (2014) note that in 2025 air transport will contribute 1.5 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions annually. The aerospace industry has largely given rise to the inception of computational fluid dynamics and much of its subsequent development. It seems likely, that with modern CFD developments, it will play a paramount role in continuing to help alleviate the environmental impact of aircraft. In aerospace, CFD originally would focus on studying basic airfoils. However, nowadays it has gone well beyond this. To meet the modern multi-objective, multi-scale, coupled industrial requirements, CFD has become a highly multi-disciplinary subject area. It is hoped that this aspect has come across in the preceding text.

Figure 8.1 shows the growth of computers. The dotted line shows the growth with year of the number one fastest computer. The full line gives the 500th fastest. The dashed line gives the growth in the use of LES in an applied, industrial turbomachinery journal – the ASME Journal of Turbomachinery. There is a clear trend in the growth in the use of eddy-resolving simulations with increased computing power. Clearly the industrial use of eddy-resolving simulations will lag this more academic use. However, as noted by Lele and Nichols (2014), for non-wall bounded flows, eddy-resolving simulations could be used in industry in the next five to ten years. Indeed there is some current use for specific circumstances. Also, notably, Morton et al. (2007) performed eddy-resolving simulations for F/A–18 fighter configuration. Tail buffet compared well with real flight spectral data.

In this chapter, it is explored how CFD will look in the next decade and beyond. Much of these ideas are based on the contributions to the Royal Society Theme issue of Tucker and DeBonis (2014).

Computer Science and Computers

As can be seen from Figure 8.1, there is healthy growth in computing power. As noted by Jameson (2008), in the past twenty-five years, computers have become a million times faster. However, algorithmic improvements are needed that are customized for high-performance computers. It is quite power intensive to move data around in memory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADDAD, Y., GAITONDE, U., LAURENCE, D. & ROLFO, S. 2008. Optimal unstructured meshing for large eddy simulations. In Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations, Springer.
BISETTI, F., ATTILI, A. & PITSCH, H. 2014. Advancing predictive models for particulate formation in turbulent flames via massively parallel direct numerical simulations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130324.Google Scholar
BRANDVIK, T. & PULLAN, G. 2010. SBLOCK: A framework for efficient stencil-based PDE solvers on multi-core platforms. IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT). Paper No. 1181–1188.
CARPENTER, P. W., KUDAR, K. L., ALI, R., SEN, P. K. & DAVIES, C. 2007. A deterministic model for the sublayer streaks in turbulent boundary layers for application to flow control. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 2419–2441. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2016.CrossRef
CORRIGAN, A., CAMELLI, F., LÖHNER, R. & MUT, F. 2010. Porting of FEFLO to GPUs. 5th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ECCOMAS CFD, J. C. F. Pereira and A. Sequeira (Eds.), Lisbon, Portugal, 14–17 June.
DECK, S., GAND, F., BRUNET, V. & KHELIL, S. B. 2014. High-fidelity simulations of unsteady civil aircraft aerodynamics: stakes and perspectives. Application of zonal detached eddy simulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130325.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, A., FFOWCS WILLIAMS, J. & GREITZER, E. 1989. Active suppression of aerodynamic instabilities in turbomachines. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 5, 204–211.Google Scholar
FUJII, K. 2014. High-performance computing-based exploration of flow control with micro devices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130326.Google Scholar
GILES, M. & REGULY, I. 2014. Trends in high-performance computing for engineering calculations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130319.Google Scholar
GILES, M. B., MUDALIGE, G. R., SHARIF, Z., MARKALL, G. & KELLY, P. H. 2011. Performance analysis and optimization of the OP2 framework on many-core architectures. The Computer Journal, 55(2), 168–180.Google Scholar
GOURDAIN, N., SICOT, F., DUCHAINE, F. & GICQUEL, L. 2014. Large eddy simulation of flows in industrial compressors: A path from 2015 to 2035. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130323.Google Scholar
HADJADJ, A. 2012. Large-eddy simulation of shock/boundary-layer interaction. AIAA Journal, 50, 2919–2927.Google Scholar
JAMESON, A. 2008. Formulation of kinetic energy preserving conservative schemes for gas dynamics and direct numerical simulation of one-dimensional viscous compressible flow in a shock tube using entropy and kinetic energy preserving schemes. Journal of Scientific Computing, 34, 188–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LARSSON, J. & WANG, Q. 2014. The prospect of using large eddy and detached eddy simulations in engineering design, and the research required to get there. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130329.Google Scholar
LELE, S. K. & NICHOLS, J. W. 2014. A second golden age of aeroacoustics?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130321.Google Scholar
LÖHNER, R. & BAUM, J. D. 2013. Handling tens of thousands of cores with industrial/legacy codes: Approaches, implementation and timings. Computers & Fluids, 85, 53–62.Google Scholar
MORTON, S. A., CUMMINGS, R. M. & KHOLODAR, D. B. 2007. High resolution turbulence treatment of F/A-18 tail buffet. Journal of Aircraft, 44, 1769–1775.Google Scholar
REYNOLDS-BARREDO, J. M., NEWMAN, D. E., SANCHEZ, R., SAMADDAR, D., BERRY, L. A. & ELWASIF, W. R. 2012. Mechanisms for the convergence of time-parallelized, parareal turbulent plasma simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 231, 7851–7867.Google Scholar
SLOTNICK, J. P., KHODADOUST, A., ALONSO, J. J., DARMOFAL, D. L., GROPP, W. D., LURIE, E. A., MAVRIPLIS, D. J. & VENKATAKRISHNAN, V. 2014. Enabling the environmentally clean air transportation of the future: a vision of computational fluid dynamics in 2030. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130317.Google Scholar
TUCKER, P. & DEBONIS, J. 2014. Aerodynamics, computers and the environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372, 20130331.Google Scholar
TYACKE, J. C, & TUCKER, P. G., 2015. Future use of large eddy simulation in aeroengines, Journal of Turbomachinery, 137(8), 081005.Google Scholar
VOIGT, C., FREY, C. & KERSKEN, H. 2010. Development of a generic surface mapping algorithm for fluid-structure-interaction simulations in turbomachinery. 5th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ECCOMAS CFD, J. C. F. Pereira and A. Sequeira (Eds.), Lisbon, Portugal, 14–17 June.
WERDER, T., WALTHER, J. H. AND KOUMOUTSAKOS, P. 2005. Hybrid atomistic–continuum method for the simulation of dense fluid flows, Journal of Computational Physics, 205(1), 373–390.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, J. F. 2002. Noise, anti-noise and fluid flow control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360, 821–832.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Simulation in the Future
  • Paul G. Tucker, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Simulation in the Future
  • Paul G. Tucker, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Simulation in the Future
  • Paul G. Tucker, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139872010.009
Available formats
×