Skip to main content Accessibility help
Internet Explorer 11 is being discontinued by Microsoft in August 2021. If you have difficulties viewing the site on Internet Explorer 11 we recommend using a different browser such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox.

Last updated 16 July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. Alternative purchasing options are available . For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident

Home
> Modularity, neuroscience, and embodied…

Chapter 18: Modularity, neuroscience, and embodied cognition

Chapter 18: Modularity, neuroscience, and embodied cognition

pp. 412-433

Authors

, University of Manchester
Resources available Unlock the full potential of this textbook with additional resources. There are free resources and Instructor restricted resources available for this textbook. Explore resources
  • Add bookmark
  • Cite
  • Share

Summary

Introduction

In the previous chapter we saw that one of the crucial assumptions behind cognitivism was what Fodor called methodological solipsism. This is the idea, ultimately deriving from Descartes, that the mind is to be understood in its own terms rather than in terms of its connection to the environment. The nature, even the existence, of an environment external to the mind is as irrelevant to a description of its operations as it would be to the description of a computer’s programe: the program is still the same program regardless of what is going on outside the computer.

We also saw that one of the corollaries of this view was that all the constraints and structuring of behaviour could not be seen as the effects of environmental or situational factors because these were considered irrelevant to the actual nature of the mind. Structure, even the structure of overt behaviour, had to come from inside the mind. Fodor puts it thus:

Behavior is organized, but the organization of behavior is merely derivative; the structure of behavior stands to mental structure as an effect stands to its cause.

(Fodor 1983, p. 2)

About the book

Access options

Review the options below to login to check your access.

Purchase options

Purchasing is temporarily unavailable, please try again later

Have an access code?

To redeem an access code, please log in with your personal login.

If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.

Also available to purchase from these educational ebook suppliers