- Chapter
Perpetual Peace: a Philosophical Sketch
pp. 93-130- Add bookmark
- Cite
- Share
Summary
'THE PERPETUAL PEACE'
A Dutch innkeeper once put this satirical inscription on his signboard, along with the picture of a graveyard. We shall not trouble to ask whether it applies to men in general, or particularly to heads of state (who can never have enough of war), or only to the philosophers who blissfully dream of perpetual peace. The author of the present essay does, however, make one reservation in advance. The practical politician tends to look down with great complacency upon the political theorist as a mere academic. The theorist's abstract ideas, the practitioner believes, cannot endanger the state, since the state must be founded upon principles of experience ; it thus seems safe to let him fire off his whole broadside, and the worldly-wise statesman need not turn a hair. It thus follows that if the practical politician is to be consistent, he must not claim, in the event of a dispute with the theorist, to scent any danger to the state in the opinions which the theorist has randomly uttered in public. By this saving clause, the author of this essay will consider himself expressly safeguarded, in correct and proper style, against all malicious interpretation.
FIRST SECTION
Which Contains the Preliminary Articles of a Perpetual Peace Between States
1. ‘No conclusion of peace shall be considered valid as such if it was made with a secret reservation of the material for a future war.’
For if this were the case, it would be a mere truce, a suspension of hostilities, not a peace. Peace means an end to all hostilities, and to attach the adjective ‘perpetual’ to it is already suspiciously close to pleonasm. A conclusion of peace nullifies all existing reasons for a future war, even if these are not yet known to the contracting parties, and no matter how acutely and carefully they may later be pieced together out of old documents. It is possible that either party may make a mental reservation with a view to reviving its old pretensions in the future. Such reservations will not be mentioned explicitly, since both parties may simply be too exhausted to continue the war, although they may nonetheless possess sufficient ill will to seize the first favourable opportunity of attaining their end.
About the book
- Chapter DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.007
- Book DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620
- Series Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
- Subjects History,History of Ideas and Intellectual History,Philosophy,Philosophy Texts,Politics and International Relations,Texts in Political Thought
- Format: Paperback
- Publication date: 25 January 1991
- ISBN: 9780521398374
- Format: Digital
- Publication date: 11 May 2019
- ISBN: 9780511809620
- Find out more details about this book
Access options
Review the options below to login to check your access.
Personal login
Log in with your Cambridge Higher Education account to check access.
Purchase options
If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.