Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Biographical glossary
- Note on the texts
- Bibliographical note
- On Crimes and Punishments
- Frontispiece
- To the Reader
- Introduction
- 1 The origin of punishment
- 2 The right to punish
- 3 Consequences
- 4 The interpretation of the laws
- 5 The obscurity of the laws
- 6 The proportion between crimes and punishments
- 7 Errors in the measuring of punishments
- 8 The classification of crimes
- 9 Of honour
- 10 Of duels
- 11 Public peace
- 12 The purpose of punishment
- 13 Of witnesses
- 14 Evidence and forms of judgement
- 15 Secret denunciations
- 16 Of torture
- 17 Of the exchequer
- 18 Of oaths
- 19 Of prompt punishments
- 20 Violent crimes
- 21 The punishment of the nobility
- 22 Theft
- 23 Public disgrace
- 24 Parasites
- 25 Banishment and confiscations
- 26 Family feeling
- 27 Lenience in punishing
- 28 The death penalty
- 29 Of detention awaiting trial
- 30 Trials and prescriptions
- 31 Crimes difficult to prove
- 32 Suicide
- 33 Smuggling
- 34 Of debtors
- 35 Asylums
- 36 On setting a price on men's heads
- 37 Attempted crimes, accomplices and immunity
- 38 Leading interrogations, depositions
- 39 Of a particular kind of crime
- 40 False ideas of utility
- 41 How to prevent crimes
- 42 The sciences
- 43 Magistrates
- 44 Public awards
- 45 Education
- 46 Pardons
- 47 Conclusion
- To Jean Baptiste d'Alembert
- To André Morellet
- Inaugural Lecture
- Reflections on the Barbarousness and the Civilisation of Nations and on the Savage State of Man
- Reflections on Manners and Customs
- On Luxury
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
25 - Banishment and confiscations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Biographical glossary
- Note on the texts
- Bibliographical note
- On Crimes and Punishments
- Frontispiece
- To the Reader
- Introduction
- 1 The origin of punishment
- 2 The right to punish
- 3 Consequences
- 4 The interpretation of the laws
- 5 The obscurity of the laws
- 6 The proportion between crimes and punishments
- 7 Errors in the measuring of punishments
- 8 The classification of crimes
- 9 Of honour
- 10 Of duels
- 11 Public peace
- 12 The purpose of punishment
- 13 Of witnesses
- 14 Evidence and forms of judgement
- 15 Secret denunciations
- 16 Of torture
- 17 Of the exchequer
- 18 Of oaths
- 19 Of prompt punishments
- 20 Violent crimes
- 21 The punishment of the nobility
- 22 Theft
- 23 Public disgrace
- 24 Parasites
- 25 Banishment and confiscations
- 26 Family feeling
- 27 Lenience in punishing
- 28 The death penalty
- 29 Of detention awaiting trial
- 30 Trials and prescriptions
- 31 Crimes difficult to prove
- 32 Suicide
- 33 Smuggling
- 34 Of debtors
- 35 Asylums
- 36 On setting a price on men's heads
- 37 Attempted crimes, accomplices and immunity
- 38 Leading interrogations, depositions
- 39 Of a particular kind of crime
- 40 False ideas of utility
- 41 How to prevent crimes
- 42 The sciences
- 43 Magistrates
- 44 Public awards
- 45 Education
- 46 Pardons
- 47 Conclusion
- To Jean Baptiste d'Alembert
- To André Morellet
- Inaugural Lecture
- Reflections on the Barbarousness and the Civilisation of Nations and on the Savage State of Man
- Reflections on Manners and Customs
- On Luxury
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
Summary
But should someone who is banished and excluded forever from the society of which he was a member be deprived of his possessions? This question can be considered from various points of view. The loss of one's goods is a greater punishment than that of banishment; so there ought to be some cases in which, proportionately with the crime, there ought to be partial or total loss of possessions or none at all. All possessions shall be forfeit when the banishment laid down by law is such as to sever all the ties between society and the malefactor. In such a case, the citizen dies and the man remains, and as far as the body politic is concerned, this should have the same effect as natural death. It would therefore seem that the convict's goods should pass to his legitimate heirs rather than to the prince, since death and banishment are identical in the eyes of the body politic. But it is not on account of this subtlety that I dare to oppose the confiscation of goods. If some writers have upheld the view that confiscations have put a brake on vendettas and private bullying, they have not observed that a punishment is just not simply because it produces some good, but because it is necessary.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Beccaria: 'On Crimes and Punishments' and Other Writings , pp. 58 - 59Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995
- 1
- Cited by