Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T09:03:41.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Textual Conventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2018

Kenneth Fincham
Affiliation:
University of Kent, Canterbury
Get access

Summary

The original spelling and punctuation have been retained, except where the latter obscures the sense of a passage, standard abbreviations have been extended, and capitalization modernized. Typographical omissions have been supplied, and placed within square brackets.

Unless indicated otherwise, manuscripts have not hitherto been printed, or printed items reprinted.

Collations:

Some sets of articles are numbered consecutively though they contain several sections, grouped under different headings. In collating these sets, references are made simply to numbers of individual articles. Other sets, however, are divided into a series of separately-numbered sections. These latter sections are here given numbers, printed in bold type both in the text and in the collations. Numbers of individual articles are printed in Roman type: when two sets are collated, the derivative has the numbers of its articles placed in brackets, while the original does not. In a few cases, the derivative has a different sequence of sections from the original, to which attention is drawn in the footnotes, and in these cases those sectional numbers of the derivative varying from the original are also placed in brackets. In most cases, the original and derivative share the same sequence of sections, the numbers of which are printed without brackets.

In collating sets, individual articles are placed in one of four categories: Identical, Modification, Omission and Addition. Each needs some explanation.

Identical: This category includes not just the exact reproduction in the derivative of an individual article from the original, but also an article in the derivative which contains very minor variations in construction or phraseology, which make no difference to the sense or purpose of the original article. For example, in his enquiries for London diocese in 1612, based on a set for London diocese in 1605, Bishop John King added ‘touching the premisses’ to the end of article 4 in section 1, which, nevertheless, is here entered as identical. To count every tiny change, however trivial, is neither useful nor economical. Articles in this category are listed by section and number.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Textual Conventions
  • Edited by Kenneth Fincham, University of Kent, Canterbury
  • Book: Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Early Stuart Church: I. 1603-25
  • Online publication: 01 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787441118.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Textual Conventions
  • Edited by Kenneth Fincham, University of Kent, Canterbury
  • Book: Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Early Stuart Church: I. 1603-25
  • Online publication: 01 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787441118.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Textual Conventions
  • Edited by Kenneth Fincham, University of Kent, Canterbury
  • Book: Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Early Stuart Church: I. 1603-25
  • Online publication: 01 September 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787441118.002
Available formats
×