Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:59:16.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Personality, Behavioral Thresholds, and the Creative Scientist

from Part I - Process and Structure of the Creative Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

By
Gregory J. Feist
Edited by
Gregory J. Feist ,
Roni Reiter-Palmon  and
James C. Kaufman
Gregory J. Feist
Affiliation:
San José State University, California
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research , pp. 64 - 83
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acar, S., & Sen, S. (2013). A multilevel meta-analysis of the relationship between creativity and schizotypy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 214–28. doi:10.1037/a0031975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–32. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1030304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Austin, E. J. (2005). Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 451–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbage, D. R., & Ronan, K. R. (2000). Philosophical worldview and personality factors in traditional and social scientists: study the world in our own image. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 405–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stott, C., Bolton, P., & Goodyer, I. (1997). Is there a link between engineering and autism? Autism, 1, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. Bolton, P., Wheelwright, S., Short, L., Mead, G., et al. (1998). Autism occurs more often in families of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, Autism, 2, 296–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Burtenshaw, A., & Hobson, E. (2007). Mathematical talent is linked to autism. Human Nature, 18, 125–31. doi: 10.1007/s12110-007–9014-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Robinson, J., & Woodbury-Smith, M. (2005). The Adult Asperger Assessment (AAA): A diagnostic method. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 807–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, F. X. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, F. X. (1963). Creativity and Psychological Health. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior: can the Big Five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores? Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 90–7. doi:10.1080/10400410903579627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billington, J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2007). Cognitive style predicts entry into physical sciences and humanities: questionnaire and performance tests of empathy and systemizing. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 260–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, J. (1978). The Q-Sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Busse, T. V., & Mansfield, R. S. (1984). Selected personality traits and achievement in male scientists. Journal of Psychology, 116, 117–31.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. M., & Yung, C. K. (2006). Sex and discipline differences in empathizing, systemizing, and autistic symptomatology: evidence from a student population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, S. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: a shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 144–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H. (2014). Leveraging the “mad genius” debate: why we need a neuroscience of creativity and psychopathology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, M. F., Switala, A. E., Trippe, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2007). Comparative minicolumnar morphometry of three distinguished scientists. Autism, 11, 557–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, J. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C., Wang, J., Liang, C.-T., & Liang, C. (2014). Curvilinear effects of openness and agreeableness on the imaginative capability of student designers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: which is a better predictor of student performance? Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Y., Hsu, C., & Shih, H. (2015). Experienced high performance work system, extroversion personality, and creativity performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(2), 531–49. doi:10.1007/s10490-014–9403-yGoogle Scholar
Claridge, G., Pryor, R., & Watkins, G. (1990). Sounds from the Bell Jar: Ten Psychotic Authors. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, J. B. (1988). Differences among clinical psychologists: scientists, practitioners, and science-practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19, 642–55.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: the openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, S. G., White, O., & Eysenck, H. J. (1976). Personality and mental illness. Psychological Reports, 39, 1011–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4, 366–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 2, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2006a). How development and personality influence scientific thought, interest, and achievement. Review of General Psychology, 10, 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2006b). The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2010). The Function of Personality in Creativity: The Nature and Nurture of the Creative Personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 113–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2012). Predicting interest in and attitudes toward science from personality and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 771–5. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J., & Rosenberg, E. L. (2015). Psychology: Perspectives & Connections (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2013). Theories of Personality (8th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Francis, B., Skelton, C., & Read, B. (2012). The Identities and Practices of High Achieving Pupils: Negotiating Achievement and Peer Cultures. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Frayling, C. (2005). Mad, Bad and Dangerous? The Scientist and the cinema. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Focquaert, F., Steven, M. S., Wolford, G. L., Colden, A., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2007). Empathizing and systemizing cognitive traits in the sciences and humanities. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gelade, G. A. (2002). Creative style, personality and artistic endeavour. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 128, 213–34.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., & Woodworth, D. G. (1960). Stylistic variations among professional research scientists. Journal of Psychology, 49, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosul, M. & Feist, G. J. (2014). The creative person in science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8, 30–43. doi: 10.1037/a0034828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, L. (1997). Inadequate cortical feature maps: a neural circuit theory of autism. Biological Psychiatry, 42, 1138–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haller, C. S., & Courvoiser, D. S. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 4, 149–60. doi: 10.1037/a00117084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 913–29.Google Scholar
Hart, J. J. (1982). Psychology of the scientists: XLVI. Correlation between theoretical orientation in psychology and personality type. Psychological Reports, 50, 795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, R. D. (1994). From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1970). Mathematicians: the creative researcher and the average PhD. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18, 209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Pred, R. S. (1988). Making it without losing it: type A, achievement motivation and scientific attainment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iuculano, T., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Supekar, K., Lynch, C. J., Khousam, A., et al. (2014). Brain organization underlying superior mathematical abilities in children with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 223–30. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.06.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity: interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 480–7. doi:10.1037/a0039826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, I. (2003). Singular scientists. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96, 36–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 102–38). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. A., Germer, C. K., Efran, J. S., & Overton, W. F. (1988). Personality as the basis for theoretical predilections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 824–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. A. (1997). The boffin: a stereotype of scientists in post-war British films (1945–1970). Public Understanding of Science, 6, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 214–32. doi:10.1037/aca0000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: the Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 233–55. doi: 10.1002/jocb.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., Ramesh, S., et al. (2014). Who finds Bill Gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 1–19. doi: 10.1002/jocb.78Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–58. doi:10.1111/jopy.12156Google ScholarPubMed
King, L. A., McKee, W. L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Y.-G., & Kim, J.-Y. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251–61. doi: 10.1080/104004108022785677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokosh, J. (1969). MMPI personality characteristics of physical and social science students. Psychological Reports, 24, 883–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusumakar, V., Bond, J., & Yatham, L. N. (2002). Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypomania and Mania. In Yatham, L. N. & Kusumakar, V. (eds.), Bipolar Disorder: A Clinician’s Guide to Biological Treatments (2nd edn., pp. 1–18). New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: the importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 996–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd-Evans, R., Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Bipolar Disorder and Creativity: Investigating a Possible Link. In Columbus, A. & Columbus, A. (eds.), Advances in Psychology Research (Vol. 40, pp. 111–41). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, J. W., Foster, N., Patel, H., Carmody, P., Gibson, L. W., et al. (2012). An investigation of the personality traits of scientists versus nonscientists and their relationship with career satisfaction. R&D Management, 42, 47–59.Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The Price of Greatness: Resolving the Creativity and Madness Controversy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In Search of Human Effectiveness. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
Mason, O., Claridge, G., & Jackson, M. (1995). New scales for the assessment of schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (eds.), Personality Theory and Research (pp. 139–53). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M., & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the Big Six vocational interest types. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 447–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, H. (2003). Einstein and Newton showed signs of autism. New Scientist, April 30.Google Scholar
Nasar, S. (1998). A Beautiful Mind. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, H., & Fitzgerald, M. (2003). Did Alan Turing have Asperger’s syndrome? Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 20, 28–31. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700007503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavitra, K. S., Chandrashekar, C. R., & Choudhury, P. (2007). Creativity and mental health: a profile of writers and musicians. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickover, C. A. (1998). Strange Brains and Genius: The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen. New York: Plenum Trade.Google Scholar
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: a study of 291 world famous men. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53–66. doi:10.1080/10400410701841955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rado, S. (1953). Dynamics and classification of disordered behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 110, 4060–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2008). Dimensional schizotypy, autism, and unusual word associations in artists and scientists. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 465–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royalty, G. M., & Magoon, T. M. (1985). Correlates of scholarly productivity among counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 458–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1987). Personality Characteristics Associated with High Research Productivity. In Jackson, D. & Rushton, J. P. (eds.), Scientific Excellence, (pp. 129–48). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sacks, O. (2001). Henry Cavendish: an early case of Asperger’s syndrome? Neurology, 57, 1347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 300–14. doi: 10.1177/001698620504900404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurkin, J. (2006). Broken Genius: The Rise and Fall of William Shockley, Creator of the Electronic Age. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Wigert, B. (2011). Cantankerous creativity: honesty, humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 687–9. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: a hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suls, J., & Fletcher, B. (1983). Social comparison in the social and physical sciences: an archival study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), 575–80. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.44.3.575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Personal characteristics that distinguish creative scientists from less creative scientists. Journal of Creative Behavior (in press). doi:10.1002/jocb.99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, N. D., Wurtzburg, S. J., & Centifanti, L. C. M. (2015). Empathy or science? Empathy explains physical science enrollment for men and women. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treffert, D. A. (2006). Extraordinary People: Understanding Savant Syndrome (Updated Version). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.Google Scholar
van Tilburg, W. P., Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2015). The mnemonic muse: nostalgia fosters creativity through openness to experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zelst, R. H., & Kerr, W. A. (1954). Personality self-assessment of scientific and technical personnel. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 145–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheim, M. (2011). Physics on the Fringe: Smoke Rings, Circlons, and Alternative Theories of Everything. New York: Walker.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. (1994). The personality of physicists. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 187–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. (2011). “The world in our own image” explored: philosophical worldview, gender-role and masculine gender role stress in nontraditional and traditional physical and social scientists. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71, 5108.Google Scholar
Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: non-linear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(5), 783–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachar, P., & Leong, F. T. L. (1992). A problem of personality: scientist and practitioner differences in psychology. Journal of Personality, 60, 667–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×