AIAA, Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, AIAA-G-077–1998 (1998).Google Scholar

ASME, V&V 10 - 2006 Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (2006).Google Scholar

Brock, J.S., Kamm, J.R., Rider, W.J., Brandon, S.T., Woodward, C., Knupp, P., and Trucano, T.G., Verification Test Suite for Physics Simulation Codes, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-UR-06–8421 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyack, B.E., “Quantifying reactor safety margins Part 1: An overview of the code scaling, applicability, and uncertainty evaluation methodology,” Nucl. Engrng Design, 119, 1–15 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, K.M. and Hemez, F.M., “A framework for assessing confidence in computational predictions,” Exp. Tech., 25, 50–55 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helton, J., Conceptual and Computational Basis for the Quantification of Margins and Uncertainty, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2009-3055 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hills, R., Witkowski, W., Rider, W., Trucano, T., and Urbina, A., “Development of a fourth generation predictive capability maturity model,” Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2013-8051 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemez, F.M., Non-Linear Error Ansatz Models for Solution Verification in Computational Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-UR-05–8228 (2005).Google Scholar

Kamm, J.R., Brock, J.S., Brandon, S.T., Cotrell, D.L., Johnson, B., Knupp, P., Rider, W.J., Trucano, T.G., and Weirs, V.G., Enhanced Verification Test Suite for Physics Simulation Codes, Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-14379, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory report LLNL-TR-411291, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2008-7813 (2008).Google Scholar

Knupp, P. and Salari, K., Verification of Computer Codes in Computational Science and Engineering, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2003).Google Scholar

Knupp, P., Ober, C., and Bond, R., “Measuring progress in order-verification within software development projects,” Engrng. Comp., 23, 283–294 (2007).Google Scholar

Mahadevan, S. and Rebba, R., “Validation of reliability computational models using Bayes networks,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 87(2), 223–232 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R., Unal, C., Stewart, J., and Williams, B., Using Error and Uncertainty Quantification to Verify and Validation Modeling and Simulation, Los Alamos National Laboratories report LA-UR-10-06125 (2010).Google Scholar

Oberkampf, W.L., “What are validation experiments?,” Exp. Tech., 25, 35–40 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberkampf, W.L. and Trucano, T.G., “Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics,” Prog. Aerospace Sci., 38, 209–272 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberkampf, W.L., Trucano, T.G., and Hirsch, C., “Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 57, 345–384 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberkampf, W.L. and Trucano, T.G., “Verification and validation benchmarks,” Nucl. Design Engrng, 23, 716–743 (2007); also available as Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2007-0853 (2007).Google Scholar

Oberkampf, W. L., Pilch, M., and Trucano, T. G., Predictive Capability Maturity Model for Computational Modeling and Simulation, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND 2007–5948 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberkampf, W.L. and Roy, C.J., Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberkamf, W.L. and Smith, B., Assessment criteria for computational fluid dynamic validation benchmark experiments, 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 2014-0205, January 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilch, M., Trucano, T.G., and Helton, J.C., Ideas Underlying Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties (QMU): A White Paper, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2006-5001 (2006).Google Scholar

Rider, W.J., Kamm, J.R., and Weirs, V.G., Code Verification Workflow in CASL, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2010-7060P (2010).Google Scholar

Roache, P., “Code verification by the method of manufactured solutions,” J. Fluids Engrng, 124, 4–10 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roache, P., “Building PDE Codes to be verifiable and validatable,” Comput. Sci. Engrng., 6, 30–38 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roache, P., Fundamentals of Verification and Validation, Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, NM (2009).Google Scholar

Roy, C.J., “Review of code and solution verification procedures for computational simulation,” J. Comput. Phys., 205, 131–156 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roy, C.J. and Oberkampf, W.L., “A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing,” submitted to Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrng. (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salari, K. and Knupp, P., Code Verification by the Method of Manufactured Solutions, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2000-14444 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sargent, R.G., “Verification and validation of simulation models,” in Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Medeiros, D.J., Watson, E.F., Carson, J.S., and Manivannan, M.S., 121–130 (1998).Google Scholar

Sargent, R.G., “Some approaches and pardigms for verifying and validation simulation models,” in Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Peters, B.A., Smith, J.S., Medeiros, D.J., and Rohrer, M.W., 106–114 (2001).Google Scholar

Schwer, L.E., “An overview of the PTC 60 / V&V 10 guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics,” Reprint by ASME, available at http://cstools.asme.org/csconnect/pdf/CommitteeFiles/24816.pdf (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sornette, D., Davis, A.B., Ide, K., Vixie, K.R., Pisarenko, V., and Kamm, J. R., “Algorithm for model validation: Theory and applications,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6562–6567 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stern, F., Wilson, R.V., Coleman, H.W., Paterson, E.G., “Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 1: Methodology and procedures,” J. Fluids Engrng, 123, 793–802 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, F., Wilson, R.V., and Shao, J., “Quantitative V&V of CFD simulations and certification Of CFD codes,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 50, 1335–1355 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, J.W., Measures of Progress in Verification, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2005-4021P (2005).Google Scholar

Szilard, R., Zhang, H., Kothe, D., and Turinsky, P., The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors, Idaho National Laboratory (United States): Funding organization: DOE-NE (United States) (2011).Google Scholar

Trucano, T.G., Pilch, M., and Oberkampf, W.L., General Concepts for Experimental Validation of ASCI Code Applications, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2002-0341 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trucano, T.G., Pilch, M., and Oberkampf, W.L., On the Role of Code Comparisons in Verification and Validation, Sandia National Laboratories report SAND2003-2752 (2003).Google Scholar

Trucano, T.G., Swiler, L.P., Igusa, T., Oberkampf, W.L., and Pilch, M., “Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: What’s what,” Reliab. Engrng. Syst. Safety, 92, 1331–1357 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, R. and Mahadevan, S., “Bayesian methodology for reliability model acceptance,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 80(10, 95–103 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar