Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T09:21:19.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiological events in biofilm formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2010

David G. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA
David G. Allison
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
P. Gilbert
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
H. M. Lappin-Scott
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Bacteria have been shown to exist predominantly in nature as sessile populations attached to surfaces in contact with water (Geesey et al., 1977). The numbers of bacteria attached to surfaces have been estimated to be between 1000 and 10000 times greater than the numbers of planktonic bacteria in any given environment (Watkins & Costerton, 1984).

The advantages to the micro-organisms of being attached to a surface have been largely attributed to enhanced scavenging of nutrients from both the bulk water and from the substratum with which the bacteria are associated (Marshall, 1976). Microorganisms at surfaces are considered to be exposed to higher nutrient conditions than their planktonic counterparts and, therefore, are at an advantage in the attached state. As a demonstration of this, Kjelleberg et al. (1982) exposed starved planktonic and attached marine bacteria to 2 mg l−1 of both yeast extract and tryptone. The attached population was able to grow under low nutrient conditions, while the planktonic population was not. Further investigations revealed that when adsorbed to surfaces, both low (Power & Marshall, 1988) and high (Samuelsson & Kirchman, 1990) molecular mass compounds were available for microbial growth. These and other studies strengthened the idea that differences in growth rates of surface-associated bacteria and planktonic bacteria were primarily due to differences in nutrient availability. Thus attached bacteria, while nutritionally at an advantage over their planktonic counterparts, have for many years been considered to be similar in other respects to non-attached bacteria.

Continued research began to expose differences between planktonic and attached bacteria that implied physiological alterations following attachment to a surface.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×