Arnold, R. and Quénivet, N. N. R., International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: Towards a New Merger in International Law (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar

Bricmont, J., Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War (Delhi: Aakar Books, 2007).Google Scholar

Cryer, R. and Boister, N., Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: Charter, Indictment, and Judgments (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cushman, T., The Human Rights Case for the War in Iraq: A Consequentialist View (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

de Vattel, É., The Law of Nations; Or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns …: A Work Tending to Display the True Interest of Powers, trans. from the French (Philadelphia: Pitt, Nicklin & T. Johnson, 1829).Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., Of War and Law (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Macklem, P., The Sovereignty of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Meron, T., Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Provost, R., International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Just And Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument With Historical Illustrations, 4th edn (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Effect of Rights on Political Culture’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999), 99–116.Google Scholar

Lazar, S., ‘The Morality and Law of War’, in Marmor, A. (ed.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Law (London: Routledge, 2012), 364–79.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J., ‘How to Judge Soldiers Whose Cause is Unjust’, in Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008), 112–30.Google Scholar

McMahan, J., ‘The Morality of War and the Law of War’, in Rodin, D. and Shue, H. (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers (Oxford University Press, 2008), 19–43.Google Scholar

Office of the United States Chief of Counsel For Prosecution of Axis Criminality, ‘Chapter IX Launching of Wars of Aggression’, in Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (The Red Set), vol. I (8 vols., Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1946), 370–874.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘The Human Right to Peace’, in Eide, A., Möller, J. Th. and Ziemele, I. (eds.), Making Peoples Heard. Essays on Human Rights in Honour of Gudmundur Alfredsson (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2011), 43–57.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Freedom from Fear and the Human Right to Peace’, in Keane, D. and McDermott, Y. (eds.), The Challenge of Human Rights: Past, Present and Future (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012), 36–51.Google Scholar

af Jochnick, C. and Normand, R., ‘Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War’, Harvard International Law Journal, 35 (1994), 49–95.Google Scholar

Alston, P., ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 815–44.Google Scholar

Arneson, R. J., ‘Just Warfare Theory and Noncombatant Immunity’, Cornell International Law Journal, 39 (2006), 663–88.Google Scholar

Bellin, E., ‘The Iraqi Intervention and Democracy in Comparative Historical Perspective’, Political Science Quarterly, 119 (2004), 595–608.Google Scholar

Benbaji, Y., ‘The War Convention and the Moral Division of Labour’, Philosophical Quarterly, 59 (2009), 593–617.Google Scholar

Bennoune, K., ‘Toward a Human Rights Approach to Armed Conflict: Iraq 2003’, UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, 11 (2004), 171–228.Google Scholar

Boister, N., ‘The Application of Collective and Comprehensive Criminal Responsibility for Aggression at the Tokyo International Military Tribunal: The Measure of the Crime of Aggression?’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8 (2010), 425–47.Google Scholar

Bomann-Larsen, L., ‘Licence to Kill? The Question of Just vs. Unjust Combatants’, Journal of Military Ethics, 3 (2004), 142–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnham, G., Lafta, R., Doocy, S. and Roberts, L., ‘Mortality after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey’, The Lancet, 368 (2006), 1421–28.Google Scholar

Bush, J. A., ‘“The Supreme … Crime” and its Origins: The Lost Legislative History of the Crime of Aggressive War’, Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 2324–423.Google Scholar

de Mesquita, B. B. and Downs, G. W., ‘Intervention and Democracy’, International Organization, 60 (2006), 627–49.Google Scholar

Dill, J., ‘Should International Law Ensure the Moral Acceptability of War?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), 253–70.Google Scholar

Durand, A., ‘Gustave Moynier and the Peace Societies’, International Review of the Red Cross, 36 (1996), 532–50.Google Scholar

Engle, K., ‘Calling in the Troops: The Uneasy Relationship among Women’s Rights, Human Rights, and Humanitarian Intervention’, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 20 (2007), 189–226.Google Scholar

Falk, R., ‘Haiti Intervention: A Dangerous World Order Precedent for the United Nations’, Harvard International Law Journal, 36 (1995), 341–58.Google Scholar

Farer, T., ‘Un-Just War Against Terrorism and the Struggle to Appropriate Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 30 (2008), 356–403.Google Scholar

Freeman, M., ‘International Law and Internal Armed Conflicts: Clarifying the Interplay between Human Rights and Humanitarian Protections’, Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (2000), https://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/152, last accessed 3 November 2015.Google Scholar

Gattini, A., ‘The UN Compensation Commission: Old Rules, New Procedures on War Reparations’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002), 161–81.Google Scholar

Gerwin, M., ‘Peace, Honesty, and Consent: A Hobbesian Definition of “Peace”’, Peace Research, 23 (1991), 75–85.Google Scholar

Gillard, E-C., ‘Reparation for Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 529–53.Google Scholar

Glanville, L., ‘The Antecedents of “Sovereignty as Responsibility”’, European Journal of International Relations, 17 (2010), 233–55.Google Scholar

Goodman, R., ‘The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 819–53.Google Scholar

Hsiao-Rei Hicks, M. et al., ‘The Weapons That Kill Civilians: Deaths of Children and Noncombatants in Iraq, 2003–2008’, New England Journal of Medicine, 360 (2009), 1585–88.Google Scholar

Kahl, C. H., ‘In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs? Norms, Civilian Casualties, and US Conduct in Iraq’, International Security, 32 (2007), 7–46.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Occupied Zone: A Zone of Reasonableness?’, Israel Law Review, 41 (2008), 13–40.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power’, Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1 (2010), 47–58.Google Scholar

Kreß, C. and Mégret, F., ‘The Regulation of Non-International Armed Conflicts: Can a Privilege of Belligerency be Envisioned in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts?’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96(893) (2014), 29–66.Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D., ‘The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 235–82.Google Scholar

Lazar, S., ‘The Responsibility Dilemma for Killing in War: A Review Essay’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 38 (2010), 180–213.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘Just War and Human Rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9 (1980), 160–81.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘The Legacies of Nuremberg’, Social Research, 54 (1987), 779–829.Google Scholar

Luban, D., ‘A Theory of Crimes against Humanity’, Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), 85–167.Google Scholar

Lubell, N., ‘Challenges in Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict’, International Review of the Red Cross, 87 (2005), 737–54.Google Scholar

Macklem, P., ‘What is International Human Rights Law: Three Applications of a Distributive Account’, McGill Law Journal, 52 (2007), 575–604.Google Scholar

Martinez, J. and Bouvier, A., ‘Assessing the Relationship between Jus in Bello and Jus Ad Bellum: An “Orthodox” View’, American Society of International Law: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, 100 (2006), 109–12.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Epilogue to an Endless Debate: The International Criminal Court’s Third Party Jurisdiction and the Looming Revolution of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001), 247–68.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘L’étatisme spécifique du droit international’, Revue québécoise de droit international (RQDI), 24 (2012), 105–29.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Missions autorisées par le conseil de sécurité à l’heure de la R2P: au-delà du jus in bello?’, Revue de droit militaire et de droit de la guerre, 52 (2013), 205–40.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘The Apology of Utopia: Reflections on Some Koskenniemian Themes with Particular Emphasis on Massively Institutionalized Human Rights Law’, Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 27 (2013), 455–97.Google Scholar

Mégret, F., ‘Response to Claus Kreß: Leveraging the Privilege of Belligerency in Non-International Armed Conflict Towards Respect for the Jus in Bello’, International Review of the Red Cross, 96 (2014), 44–66.Google Scholar

Mégret, F. and Pinto, F., ‘“Prisoners’ Dilemmas”: The Potemkin Villages of International Law?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 16 (2003), 467–90.Google Scholar

Meisels, T., ‘Combatants: Lawful and Unlawful’, Law and Philosophy, 26 (2007), 31–65.Google Scholar

Meron, T., ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’, American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000), 239–78.Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘Norm Conflict in International Law: Whither Human Rights’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 20 (2009), 69–131.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’, New England Review (1990–), 27 (2006), 252–64.Google Scholar

Modirzadeh, N. K., ‘The Dark Sides of Convergence: A Pro-Civilian Critique of the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict’, International Law Studies Series, US Naval War College, 86 (2010) 349–410.Google Scholar

Orford, A., ‘Muscular Humanitarianism: Reading the Narratives of the New Interventionism’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 679–711.Google Scholar

Rocheleau, J., ‘Combatant Responsibility for Fighting in Unjust Wars’, Social Philosophy Today, 26 (2010), 93–106.Google Scholar

Rodin, D., ‘Liability of Ordinary Soldiers for Crimes of Aggression’, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6 (2007), 591–607.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Lex Specialis – Belt and Suspenders – The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus Ad Bellum’, Israel Law Review, 40 (2007), 592–613.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A., ‘Freedom from Fear, Human Rights, and the Crime of Aggression’, Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 43 (2011), 167–72.Google Scholar

Schachter, O., ‘The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion’, American Journal of International Law, 78 (1984), 645–50.Google Scholar

Scharf, M. P., ‘Tainted Provenance: When, if Ever, Should Torture Evidence be Admissible’, Washington & Lee Law Review, 65 (2008), 129–72.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Genocide and Atrocity Crimes’, Genocide Studies and Prevention, 1 (2006), 229–50.Google Scholar

Scheffer, D., ‘Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 40 (2007), 111–35.Google Scholar

Schmitt, M. N., ‘Wound, Capture, or Kill: A Reply to Ryan Goodman’s “The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants”’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 855–61.Google Scholar

Sellars, K., ‘Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo’, European Journal of International Law, 21 (2010), 1085–102.Google Scholar

Simpson, G., ‘“Stop Calling it Aggression”: War as Crime’, Current Legal Problems, 61 (2008), 191–228.Google Scholar

Smith, M. E., ‘NATO, the Kosovo Liberation Army, and the War for an Independent Kosovo: Unlawful Aggression or Legitimate Exercise of Self-Determination’, Army Law (2001), 1–22.Google Scholar

Smith, T. W., ‘Can Human Rights Build a Better War?’, Journal of Human Rights, 9 (2010), 24–44.Google Scholar

Solomon, S., ‘Targeted Killings and the Soldiers’ Right to Life’, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 14 (2007), 99–120.Google Scholar

Steinhoff, U., ‘Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants’, Journal of Ethics, 16 (2012), 339–66.Google Scholar

Tomasevski, K., ‘The Right to Peace’, Current Research on Peace and Violence, 5 (1982), 42–69.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, C., ‘Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law’, European Journal of International Law, 21 (2010), 15–23.Google Scholar

Watkin, K., ‘Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict’, American Journal of International Law, 98 (2004), 1–34.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, F. and Elias, O., ‘Humanitarian Considerations in the Work of the United Nations Compensation Commission’, International Review of the Red Cross, 85 (2003), 555–81.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, American Journal of International Law, 41 (1947), 38–72.Google Scholar

Wright, Q., ‘The Outlawry of War and the Law of War’, American Journal of International Law, 47 (1953), 365–76.Google Scholar

Zolo, D., ‘Who is Afraid of Punishing Aggressors? On the Double-Track Approach to International Criminal Justice’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5 (2007), 799–807.Google Scholar

Bankovic, Stojanovic, Stoimedovski, Joksimovic and Sukovic v. Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, App. No. 52207/99, ECtHR (2001).Google Scholar

Georgia v. Russia, Case No. 38263/08, ECtHR, 13 December 2011.Google Scholar

Smith and others v. The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41.Google Scholar

Compensation Claims Commission, ‘The Report and Recommendation of the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the First Instalment of “F2” Claims’, UN Doc. S/AC.26/1999/23.Google Scholar

Compensation Claims Commission, ‘Report and Recommendations Concerning the Third Instalment of “F2” Claims’, UN Doc. S/AC.26/2002/7.Google Scholar

Compensation Claims Commission, ‘Report and Recommendations made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the Fourth Instalment of “F1” Claims’, UN Doc. S/AC.26/2000/13.Google Scholar

Council of Europe, Human Rights of Members of the Armed Forces, Recommendation CM/Rec (2010) 4 of the Committee of Ministers and Explanatory Memorandum, 2010.Google Scholar

Decision No. 19, Doc. A/AC 26/1992/19, 24 March 1994.Google Scholar

Decision No. 11, ‘Eligibility for Compensation of Members of the Allied Coalition Armed Forces’, Doc. A/SC 26/1992/11, 26 June 1992.Google Scholar

Docherty, B. and Garlasco, M. E., ‘Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq’, Report (New York: Human Rights Watch, 2009), available at: http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/handle/123456789/17195, last accessed 3 January 2015.Google Scholar

Kovalick, D., ‘Amnesty International and the Human Rights Industry’, Counterpunch (2012), available at: www.counterpunch.org/2012/11/08/amnesty-international-and-the-human-rights-industry, last accessed 3 January 2015.Google Scholar

Rowley, C., ‘The Problem with Human Rights/Humanitarian Law taking Precedence over the Nuremberg Principle: Torture is Wrong but so is the Supreme War Crime’, Antiwar.com Blog, 11 January 2013.Google Scholar