Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T10:18:58.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Imaging-related anatomy and pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Jeremy Price
Affiliation:
The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
Get access

Summary

Chapter outline

  • Introduction

  • Breast anatomy

  • Basic mammography and breast ultrasound

  • Review of breast histopathology

  • Molecular classification of breast cancer

  • Mammographic correlates of pathologic subtypes

  • Mammographic correlates of molecular subtypes

Introduction

While a basic level of knowledge is assumed, this chapter offers a brief review of breast anatomy, conventional breast imaging and breast pathology as useful background information to subsequent chapters. Over the last decade, the new molecular classification of breast cancer has assumed increasing clinical importance and has improved our understanding of pathogenesis. There is a developing appreciation of the concept that tumor biology may be more important in determining clinical outcomes than tumor burden. The concept of a broad division into low-grade and high-grade pathways of breast cancer development has important implications for management at a time when it is increasingly recognized that over diagnosis and overtreatment are significant issues in breast cancer screening programs. Some correlations between mammographic appearances and tumor pathology are highlighted, which are particularly pertinent in relation to BRCA gene mutation carriers, a high-risk subgroup where the use of screening MRI is becoming routine.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klimberg, V SAtlas of Breast Surgical TechniquesPhiladelphia, PASaunders, Elsevier 2010Google Scholar
Schnitt, S JCollins, L CBiopsy Interpretation of the BreastPhiladelphia, PALippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009Google Scholar
Tot, TThe theory of the sick breast lobe and the possible consequencesInt J Surg Pathol 2007 15 369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpe, C RA developmental hypothesis to explain the multicentricity of breast cancerCMAJ 1998 159 55Google ScholarPubMed
O’Flynn, E A MMorel, J CGonzalez, JPrediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsyClin Radiol 2009 64 178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stomper, P CGeradts, JEdge, S BMammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a massAJR Am J Roentgenol 2003 181 1679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stavros, A TThickman, DRapp, C LSolid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesionsRadiology 1995 196 123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stavros, A TUltrasound of solid breast nodules: distinguishing benign from malignantBreast UltrasoundPhiladelphia, PALippincott Williams & Wilkins 2004 445Google Scholar
Camuto, P MZetrenne, EPonn, TDiabetic mastopathy. A report of 5 cases and a review of the literatureArch Surg 2000 135 1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorncroft, KForsyth, LDesmond, SThe diagnosis and management of diabetic mastopathyBreast J 2007 13 607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, L HPeyvandi, BKlipfel, NGranulomatous lobular mastitis: imaging, diagnosis, and treatmentAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muttarak, MLerttumnongtum, PChaiwun, BSpectrum of papillary lesions of the breast: clinical, imaging, and pathologic correlationAJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 700CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, M JBourke, A GRadiologic appearances of papillary breast lesionsClin Radiol 2008 63 1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, W W MChu, W C WTang, A PRole of radiologic features in the management of papillary lesions of the breastAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 1322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, LTornos, CHuzjan, RIs surgical excision warranted after benign, concordant diagnosis of papilloma at percutaneous breast biopsyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 1328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernik, S FTroob, SYing, B LPapillary lesions of the breast diagnosed by core needle biopsy: 71 cases with surgical follow-upAm J Surg 2009 197 473CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, A JUltrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision of breast papillomas: review of 6-years experienceClin Radiol 2009 64 801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, T WConnolly, J LSchnitt, S JNonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies. To excise or not to exciseAm J Surg Pathol 2002 26 1095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, J THartmann, L CVierkant, R AAn analysis of breast cancer risk in women with single, multiple, and atypical papillomaAm J Surg Pathol 2006 30 665CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabar, LDean, P BStellate lesionsTeaching Atlas of MammographyNew YorkGeorg Thieme Verlag 1985 87Google Scholar
Cawson, J NNickson, CEvans, JVariation in mammographic appearances between projections of small breast cancers compared with radial scarsJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2010 54 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alleva, D QSmetherman, D HFarr, G HRadial scar of the breast: radiologic–pathologic correlation in 22 casesRadioGraphics 1999 19 S27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philpotts, L EShaheen, N AJain, K SUncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importanceRadiology 2000 216 831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, MMasterson, A VKerin, MPathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a reviewJ Clin Pathol 2003 56 721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orel, S GEvers, KYeh, I-TRadial scar with microcalcifications: radiologic–pathologic correlationRadiology 1992 183 479CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cawson, J NMalara, FKavanagh, AFourteen-gauge needle core biopsy of mammographically evident radial scars. Is excision necessaryCancer 2003 97 345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, R JJackman, R JParker, S HPercutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessaryAJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 179 1179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linda, AZuiani, CFurlan, ARadial scars without atypia diagnosed at imaging-guided needle biopsy: how often is associated malignancy found at subsequent surgical excision, and do mammography and sonography predict which lesions are malignantAJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 194 1146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sewell, C WPathology of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situRadiol Clin N Am 2004 42 821CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, H KIoffe, O BBerg, W AWhen is a diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis acceptable at core biopsyRadiology 2003 228 50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, P PHolmes, GLesser, M LJuvenile papillomatosis and breast carcinomaCancer 1985 55 13453.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, P PPapillary duct hyperplasia of the breast in children and young adultsCancer 1985 56 16113.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Joint Committee on CancerAJCC Cancer Staging ManualNew York, NYSpringer 2010Google Scholar
Kuerer, H MAlbarracin, C TYang, W TDuctal carcinoma in situ: state of the science and roadmap to advance the fieldJ Clin Oncol 2009 27 279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arpino, GLaucirica, RElledge, R MPremalignant and in situ breast disease: biology and clinical implicationsAnn Intern Med 2005 143 446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elsheikh, T MSilverman, J FFollow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situAm J Surg Pathol 2005 29 534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, D LSchuyler, P ADupont, W DAtypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort studyLancet 2003 361 125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgian-Smith, DLawton, T JCalcifications of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: radiologic–pathologic correlationAJR Am J Roentgenol 2001 176 1255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahoney, M CRobinson-Smith, T MShaughnessy, E ALobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-upAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 949CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neil, MMadan, RTawfik, O WLobular carcinoma in situ/atypical lobular hyperplasia on breast needle biopsies: does it warrant surgical excisional biopsy? A study of 27 casesAnn Diagn Pathol 2010 14 251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pestalozzi, B CZahrieh, DMallon, EDistinct clinical and prognostic features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: combined results of 15 International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trialsJ Clin Oncol 2008 26 3006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, ALakhani, S RSimpson, P TPleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: molecular pathology and clinical impactFuture Oncol 2009 5 233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridolfi, R LRosen, P PPort, AMedullary carcinoma of the breast. A clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-upCancer 1977 40 13653.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shousha, SMedullary carcinoma of the breast and BRCA1 mutationHistopathology 2000 37 182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, J IChoi, D HPark, WDifferences in prognostic factors and patterns of failure between invasive micropapillary carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: matched case-control studyThe Breast 2010 19 231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adrada, BArribas, EGilcrease, MInvasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI featuresAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 W58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanrahan, E OGonzalez-Angulo, A MGiordano, S HOverall survival and cause-specific mortality of patients with stage T1a, bN0M0 breast carcinomaJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 4952CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singletary, S EAllred, CAshley, PRevision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancerJ Clin Oncol 2002 20 3628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oakman, CViale, GDi Leo, AManagement of triple negative breast cancerThe Breast 2010 19 312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldhirsch, AIngle, J NGelber, R DThresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009Ann Oncol 2009 20 1319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roses, R EPaulson, E CSharma, AHER-2/neu overexpression as a predictor for the transition from in situ to invasive breast cancerCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009 18 1386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakha, E AReis-Filho, J SEllis, I OBasal-like breast cancer: a critical reviewJ Clin Oncol 2008 26 2568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perou, C MSørlie, TEisen, M BMolecular portraits of human breast tumorsNature 2000 406 747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotiriou, CPusztai, LGene-expression signatures in breast cancerN Engl J Med 2009 360 790CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sørlie, TTibshirani, RParker, JRepeated observation of breast tumour subtypes in independent gene expression data setsProc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 8418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldhirsch, AWood, W CGelber, R DProgress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007Ann Oncol 2007 18 1133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheang, M C UChia, S KVoduc, DKi67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101 736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, N CJones, A LManagement of breast cancer–Part IIBMJ 2008 337 164Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, N CJones, A LManagement of breast cancer–Part IBMJ 2008 337 107Google ScholarPubMed
Elias, A DTriple-negative breast cancer. A short reviewAm J Clin Oncol 2010 33 637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, P TReis-Filho, J SGale, TMolecular evolution of breast cancerJ Pathol 2005 205 248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moulis, SSgroi, D CRe-evaluating early breast neoplasiaBreast Cancer Res 2008 10 302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sotiriou, CWirapati, PLoi, SGene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosisJ Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98 262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivshina, A VGeorge, JSenko, OGenetic reclassification of histologic grade delineates new clinical subtypes of breast cancerCancer Res 2006 66 10292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsikitis, V LChung, M ABiology of ductal carcinoma in situ classification based on biologic potentialAm J Clin Oncol 2006 29 305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burstein, H JPolyak, KWong, J SDuctal carcinoma in situ of the breastN Engl J Med 2004 350 430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz, L KCryns, V LSymmans, W FTriple negative breast carcinoma and the basal phenotype: from expression profiling to clinical practiceAdv Anat Pathol 2007 14 419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, M LBerman, H KMiller, CAbrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumorsCancer Cell 2007 12 479CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruthi, SBrandt, K RDegnim, A CA multidisciplinary approach to the management of breast cancer, part 1: prevention and diagnosisMayo Clin Proc 2007 82 999CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahoney, M CBevers, TLinos, EOpportunities and strategies for breast cancer prevention through risk reductionCA Cancer J Clin 2008 58 347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armes, J EEgan, A J MSouthey, M CThe histologic phenotypes of breast carcinoma occurring before age 40 years in women with and without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutationsCancer 1998 83 23353.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breast Cancer Linkage ConsortiumPathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sporadic casesLancet 1997 349 1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, W DStefansson, I MChappuis, P OGermline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst 2003 95 1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhani, S RKhanna, K KChenevix-Trench, GAre estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers sporadicBreast Cancer Res 2010 12 104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tung, NWang, YCollins, L CEstrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic featuresBreast Cancer Res 2010 12 R12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakha, E AEl-Sayed, M EGreen, A RPrognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancerCancer 2007 109 25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheang, M C UVoduc, DBajgik, CBasal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotypeClin Cancer Res 2008 14 1368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, L CMartyniak, AKandel, M JBasal cytokeratin and epidermal growth factor receptor expression are not predictive of BRCA1 mutation status in women with triple-negative breast cancersAm J Surg Pathol 2009 33 1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilanus-Linthorst, MVerhoog, LObdeijn, IA BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumour independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammographyInt J Cancer 2002 102 91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilanus-Linthorst, M M AObdeijn, I-MHop, W C JBRCA1 mutation and young age predict fast breast cancer growth in the Dutch, United Kingdom, and Canadian magnetic resonance imaging screening trialsClin Cancer Res 2007 13 7357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, W DMetcalfe, l KHanna, WDisruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1-related breast carcinomaCancer 2003 98 1569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, A JRakha, E APinder, S EBasal phenotype: a powerful prognostic factor in small screen-detected invasive breast cancer with long term follow-upJ Med Screen 2007 14 210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luck, A AEvans, A JGreen, A RThe influence of basal phenotype on the metastatic pattern of breast cancerClin Oncol 2008 20 40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, L JEvans, A JCornford, E JWill MRI screening deliver the expected survival advantage in BRCA1 carriersClin Radiol 2009 64 1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nunzio, M CEvans, A JPinder, S ECorrelations between the mammographic features of screen detected invasive breast cancer and pathologic prognostic factorsThe Breast 1997 6 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A JPinder, S EJames, J JIs mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancerAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 1377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, M CYankaskas, B CBiesemier, K WAssociation of stellate mammographic pattern with survival in small invasive breast tumorsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabar, LChen, H-HDuffy, S WA novel method for prediction of long-term outcome of women with T1a, T1b, and 10–14mm invasive breast cancers: a prospective studyLancet 2000 355 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabar, LChen, TH-HYen, M F AMammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1–14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Suggestions for the reconsideration of current therapeutic practice and the TNM classification systemCancer 2004 101 1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurfjell, EThurfjell, M GLindgren, AMammographic finding as predictor of survival in 1–9 mm invasive breast cancers. Worse prognosis for cases presenting as calcifications aloneBreast Cancer Res Treat 2001 67 177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, CGiven-Wilson, R MDuffy, S WMammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicatorClin Radiol 2004 59 165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, J JEvans, A JPinder, S EIs the presence of mammographic comedo- calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancersClin Radiol 2003 58 54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, AJames, JPinder, SMammographic casting-type calcification associated with small screen-detected invasive breast cancers: is this a reliable prognostic indicatorClin Radiol 2004 59 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaas, RKroger, RHendriks, J H CLThe significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriersEur Radiol 2004 14 1647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collett, KStefansson, I MEide, JA basal epithelial phenotype is more frequent in interval breast cancers compared with screen detected tumorsCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 14 1108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, E SMcLennan, J LMoore, D HDuctal carcinoma in situ in BRCA mutation carriersJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, W-TDryden, MBroglio, KMammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal womenBreast Cancer Res Treat 2008 111 405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dogan, B EGonzalez-Angulo, A MGilcrease, MMultimodality imaging of triple receptor-negative tumors with mammography, ultrasound, and MRIAJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 194 1160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luck, A AEvans, A JJames, J JBreast carcinoma with basal phenotype: mammographic findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, F JWarren, R MKwan-Lim, GCancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and in women at high risk for breast cancer: MR imaging and mammographic featuresRadiology 2009 252 358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bane, A LBeck, J CBleiweiss, IBRCA2 mutation-associated breast cancers exhibit a distinguishing phenotype based on morphology and molecular profiles from tissue microarraysAm J Surg Pathol 2007 31 121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, B KPisano, E DKuzimak, C MCorrelation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomasAcad Radiol 2006 13 1211CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, S 2009 http://www.dslrf.org/breastcancer/content.asp?L2=1&L3=1&SID=120
National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center and Australian Cancer NetworkThe Pathology Reporting of Breast Cancer. A Guide for Pathologists, Surgeons, Radiologists and OncologistsSurry Hills, NSW, AustraliaNational Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center 2008Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×