Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T10:13:05.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Problem-solving applications of breast MRI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Jeremy Price
Affiliation:
The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bluemke, D AGatsonis, C AChen, M HMagnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsyJAMA 2004 292 2735CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, M DBlume, JBluemke, D ADiagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter studyRadiology 2006 238 42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimauchi, AJansen, S AAbe, HBreast cancers not detected at MRI: review of false-negative lesionsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 194 1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, C KSchrading, SWardelmann, EMagnetic resonance imaging versus mammography for diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 1504Google Scholar
Kuhl, C KScience to practice: why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR imagesRadiology 2009 253 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzocchi, MZuiani, CPanizza, PContrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trialAJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 1723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kneeshaw, P JLowry, MManton, DDifferentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imagingThe Breast 2006 15 29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C HSmith, R CLevine, J AClinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogramAJR Am J Roentgenol 1999 173 1323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moy, LElias, KPatel, VIs breast MRI helpful in the evaluation of inconclusive mammographic findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 986CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C HProblem solving MR imaging of the breastRadiol Clin N Am 2004 42 919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, R MVeltman, JBarentsz, J OThe value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumor extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breastEur J Surg Oncol 2008 34 135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, MOrel, SBreast, M Rimaging in the diagnostic settingMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006 14 329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, R EWallace, T WYankaskas, B CAnalysis of cancers missed at screening mammographyRadiology 1992 184 613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yazici, BSever, A RMills, PScar formation after stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy of benign breast lesionsClin Radiol 2006 61 619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frei, K AKinkel, KBonel, H MMR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imagingAJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 175 1577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J MOrel, S GCzerniecki, B JMRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancerAJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 182 473CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, E SKinkel, KEsserman, L JMagnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricityAnn Surg Oncol 2003 10 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, B THarvey, J ACohen, M ANipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processesRadioGraphics 2009 29 509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, W ASigns in MR-MammographyBerlin HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giess, C SKeating, D MOsborne, M PRetroareolar breast carcinoma: clinical, imaging and histopathological featuresRadiology 1998 207 669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabioglu, NHunt, K HSingletary, S ESurgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple dischargeJ Am Coll Surg 2003 196 354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orel, S GDougherty, C SReynolds, CMR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experienceRadiology 2000 216 248CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakahara, HNamba, KWatanabe, RA comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patients with nipple dischargeBreast Cancer 2003 10 320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwab, S AUder, MSchulz-Wendtland, RDirect MR galactography: feasibility studyRadiology 2008 249 54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, PKurihara, YKanemaki, YHigh-resolution MRI in detecting subareolar breast abscessAJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 188 1568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echevarria, J JLopez-Ruiz, J AMartin, DUsefulness of MRI in detecting occult breast cancer associated with Paget’s disease of the nipple–areolar complexBr J Radiol 2004 77 1036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrogh, MMorris, E ALiberman, LMRI identifies otherwise occult disease in select patients with Paget disease of the nippleJ Am Coll Surg 2008 206 316CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlidis, NBriasoulis, EHainsworth, JDiagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primaryEur J Cancer 2003 39 1990CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vlastos, GJean, M EMirza, A NFeasibility of breast preservation in the treatment of occult primary carcinoma presenting with axillary metastasesAnn Surg Oncol 2001 8 425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varadarajan, REdge, S BYu, JPrognosis of occult breast carcinoma presenting as isolated axillary nodal metastasisOncology 2006 71 456CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Bresser, Jde Vo, Bvan der Ent, FBreast MRI in clinically and mammographically occult breast cancer presenting with an axillary metastasis: a systematic reviewEur J Surg Oncol 2010 36 114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, J AMorris, E AVan Zee, K JMagnetic resonance imaging facilitates breast conservation for occult breast cancerAnn Surg Oncol 2000 7 411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galimberti, VBassani, GMonti, SClinical experience with axillary presentation breast cancerBreast Cancer Res Treat 2004 88 43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, E ASchwartz, L HDershaw, D DMR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinomaRadiology 1997 205 437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, C LMorris, E ADorn, P LUtility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with occult primary breast cancerAnn Surg Oncol 2005 12 1045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, KMedoro, LKennedy, DBreast magnetic resonance imaging: an essential role in malignant axillary lymphadenopathy of unknown originAustralas Radiol 2005 49 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esserman, LKaplan, JPartridge, SMRI phenotype Is associated with response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III breast cancerAnn Surg Oncol 2001 8 549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauri, DPavlidis, NIoannidis, J PANeoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysisJ Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97 188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mieog, J Svan der Hage, J Avan de Velde, C JNeoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancerBr J Surg 2007 94 1189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazouni, CPeintinger, FWan-Kau, SResidual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcomeJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, E RWang, JBryant, JPathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy. Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) protocol B-18aCancer 2002 95 681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilles, RGuinebretiere, JToussaint, CLocally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapyRadiology 1994 191 633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balu-Maestro, CChapellier, CBleuse, AImaging in evaluation of reponse to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRIBreast Cancer Res Treat 2002 72 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieber, ABrambs, HGabelmann, ABreast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapyEur Radiol 2002 12 1711CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martincich, LMontemurro, FDe Rosa, GMonitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingBreast Cancer Res Treat 2004 83 67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belli, PCostantini, MMalaspina, CMRI accuracy in residual disease evaluation in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapyClin Radiol 2006 61 946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, S CGibbs, J ELu, YAccuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 179 1193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibault, FNos, CMeunier, MMRI for surgical planning in patients with breast cancer who undergo preoperative chemotherapyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 183 1159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, ESlanetz, PKopans, D BProspective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancerAJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 184 868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julius, TKemp, S EGKneeshaw, P JMRI and conservative treatment of locally advanced breast cancerEur J Surg Oncol 2005 31 1129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stucky, C-CHMcLaughlin, S ADueck, A CDoes magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancerAm J Surg 2009 198 547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchholz, T ALehman, C DHarris, J RStatement of the science concerning locoregional treatments after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute ConferenceJ Clin Oncol 2008 26 791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, A MMeric-Bernstam, FHunt, K KBreast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experienceJ Clin Oncol 2004 22 2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, KEisenhauer, EChristian, MMeasuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurementJ Natl Cancer Inst 1999 91 532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, CJacobsson, HHatschek, TRadiologic measurements of tumor response to treatment: practical approaches and limitationsRadioGraphics 2008 28 329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loo, C ETeerstra, H JRodenhuis, SDynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial resultsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2008 191 1331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, E LBlackwell, K LBaker, J AAccuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapyAJR Am J Roentgenol 2003 181 1275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partridge, S CGibbs, J ELu, YMRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survivalAJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 184 1774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenzon, MZuiani, CLondero, VAssessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: is volumetric MRI a reliable toolEur J Radiol 2009 71 82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hylton, NBlume, JGatsonis, CMRI tumor volume for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: findings from ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007J Clin Oncol, 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition) 2009 27 529Google Scholar
Morrow, MStrom, E ABassett, L WStandard for breast conservation in the management of invasive breast carcinomaCA Cancer J Clin 2002 52 277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, A MMeric-Bernstam, FHunt, K KBreast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A prognostic index for clinical decision-makingCancer 2005 103 689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhirsch, AIngle, J NGelber, R DThresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009Ann Oncol 2009 20 1319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J-HMehta, R SCarpenter, P MMagnetic resonance imaging in predicting pathologic response of triple negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapyJ Clin Oncol 2007 25 5667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J HFeig, BAgrawal, GMRI evaluation of pathologically complete response and residual tumors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapyCancer 2008 112 17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denis, FDesbiez-Bourcier, A VChapiron, CContrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging underestimates residual disease following neoadjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy for breast cancerEur J Surg Oncol 2004 30 1069CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, C-PWu, M-TChang, H-TMonitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using parametric contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot studyAcad Radiol 2007 14 561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Khoury, CServois, VThibault, FMR quantification of the washout changes in breast tumors under preoperative chemotherapy: feasibility and preliminary resultsAJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 184 1499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padhani, A RHayes, CAssersohn, LPrediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical resultsRadiology 2006 239 361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMartini, W BLehman, C DPeacock, SComputer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapyAcad Radiol 2005 12 806CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, T CDemartini, W BPartridge, S CBreast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesionsRadiology 2007 244 94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodhams, RKakita, SHata, HIdentification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging – comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findingsRadiology 2010 254 357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, E LEubank, W BMankoff, D AFDG PET, PET/CT, and breast cancer imagingRadioGraphics 2007 27 S215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, H SYoon, WChung, T WFDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases: usefulness and limitationsRadioGraphics 2007 27 S197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×