Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:01:51.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - The progress drive hypothesis: an interpretation of early imitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

By
Frédéric Kaplan  and
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
Edited by
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv  and
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Frédéric Kaplan
Affiliation:
Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Paris, France
Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
Affiliation:
Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Paris
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The functional role of early imitation has been discussed in a variety of contexts. Its role for the cognitive development of the child has been regularly emphasized since Piaget (1962). Its communicative function and its role for the development of social coordination know-how have also been put forward (Nadel, 2002). Early imitative capabilities could also be important in the process of identification with others helping the very young infant to take a ‘like-me stance’ (Meltzoff and Gopnick, 1993). Eventually, it has been argued that infants also engage in ‘self-imitation’ and that this process is crucial for the objectivation of themselves as distinct entities (Rochat, 2002). This multiplicity of approaches points to a consensus that early imitation is a crucial basic mechanism for the development of cognitive, social and communicative aspects of children's behaviour and even more generally for the construction of their awareness about themselves, others and the external environment. Despite its importance, a question regarding early imitation remains only partially answered: what pushes animals and infants to engage in imitative behaviour?

Early imitation seems to appear at an age when children do not discriminate clearly between themselves and others. It is argued that early imitation actually plays a role for identification with and discrimination from others. As a consequence, potential mechanisms for early imitation should not rely on the notions of self and others.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions
 , pp. 361 - 378
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andry, P., Gaussier, P., Moga, S., Banquet, J. and Nadel, J. (2001). Learning and communication in imitation: an autonomous robot perspective. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 31(5), 431–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. (1960). Design For a Brain. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. (1925). Mental Development in the Child and the Race.The Macmillan Company, New York.Google Scholar
Barto, A., Singh, S. and Chentanez, N. (2004). Intrinsically motivated learning of hierarchical collections of skills. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL 2004).Google Scholar
Csikszenthmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of Minds: Towards an Understanding of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Drescher, G. L. (1991). Made-up Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elman, J. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Heimann, M. (2002). Notes on individual differences and the assumed elusiveness of neonatal imitation. In Meltzoff, A. N. and Prinz, W. (eds.), The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution and Brain Bases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herder, J. (1772). Traite sur l'origine de la langue. Aubier Montaigne: Palimpseste (1992 edn.).Google Scholar
Herrmann, J., Pawelzik, K. and Geisel, T. (2000). Learning predictive representations. Neurocomputing, 32–3, 785–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X. and Weng, J. (2002). Novelty and reinforcement learning in the value system of developmental robots. In Prince, C., Demiris, Y., Marom, Y., Kozima, H. and Balkenius, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 94, 47–55.Google Scholar
Kaplan, F. and Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2003). Motivational principles for visual know-how development. In Prince, C., Berthouze, L., Kozima, H., Bullock, D., Stojanov, G. and Balkenius, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 101, 73–80.Google Scholar
Kaplan, F. and Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2004). Maximizing learning progress: an internal reward system for development. In Iida, F., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L. and Kuniyoshi, Y. (eds.), Embodied Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 3139. New York: Springer-Verlag, 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1968). Vom Weltbild des Verhaltensforschers. Munchen: dtv.Google Scholar
Marshall, J., Blank, D. and Meeden, L. (2004). An emergent framework for self-motivation in developmental robotics. In International Conference on Development and Learning. San Diego: Salk Institute.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. and Gopnick, A. (1993). The role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind. In Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg S. and Cohen, D. (eds.), Understanding Other Minds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 335–66.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A. and Moore, M. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 74–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. and Corkum, V. (1994). Social understanding at the end of the first year of life. Developmental Review, 14, 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadel, J. (2002). Imitation and imitation recognition: functional use of imitation in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism. In Meltzoff, A. and Prinz, W. (eds.), The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution and Brain Bases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2005). The self-organization of speech sounds. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 233(3), 435–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oudeyer, P.-Y. and Kaplan, F. (2004). Intelligent adaptive curiosity: a source of self-development. In Berthouze, L., Kozima, H., Prince, C. G., Sandini, G., Stojanov, G., Melta, G. and Balkenius, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, Lund University Cognitive Studies, vol. 117, 127–30.
Oudeyer, P.-Y. and Kaplan, F. (2006). Discovering communication. Connection Science, 18(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. New York: Norton Press.Google Scholar
Rochat, P. (2002). Ego function of early imitation. In Meltzoff, A. and Prinz, W. (eds.), The Imitative Mind: Development, Evolution and Brain Bases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, H. (1977). Early interactive development in studies of mother-infant interaction. In Proceedings of Loch Lomonds Symposium. New York: Academic Press, 3–18.Google Scholar
Schmidhuber, J. (1991). Curious model-building control systems. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Singapore: IEEE, Vol. 2, 1458–63.Google Scholar
Schmidhuber, J. (2003). Exploring the predictable. In Ghosh, S. and Tsutsui, S. (eds.), Advances in Evolutionary Computing: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 579–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steels, L. (2004). The autotelic principle. In Fumiya, I., Pfeifer, R., Steels, L. and Kunyoshi, K. (eds.), Embodied Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3139 of Lecture Notes in AI. New York: Springer Verlag, 231–42.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. and Barto, A. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thrun, S. (1995). Exploration in active learning. In Arbib, M. (ed.), Handbook of Brain Science and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). The development of higher psychological processes. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weng, J., McClelland, J., Pentland, A., Sporns, O., Stockman, I., Sur, M. and Thelen, E. (2001). Autonomous mental development by robots and animals. Science, 291, 599–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological review, 66, 297–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×