Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T01:57:08.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Phase comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2009

Andrea Leonardo Lacaita
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Salvatore Levantino
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Carlo Samori
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The phase comparison path in a phase-locked loop detects the phase delay between the reference and the feedback oscillation. Since the time delay between the edge of the reference signal and the subsequent edge of the divider signal is measured, the phase delay is a signal sampled at the reference frequency.

The phase comparison can be performed either in the analogue or in the digital domain. The analogue implementations, although they use logic circuits such as the XOR gate or the tri-state PFD, provide an analogue value of the phase error. Instead, digital implementations derive the phase error by subtracting the instantaneous count of the reference counter from that of the feedback counter. After the phase error is detected, it is filtered and applied to the VCO tuning port.

The type of phase detection affects the in-band noise, the level of spurious tones and the lock acquisition behaviour. The non-linearity of the phase comparison path may seriously degrade both noise and spurs. Thus, it has to be accurately examined and attenuated.

Phase comparison path

An analogue phase detector is, typically, a logic circuit, which generates pulses of duration equal to the time difference between the REF and the DIV edges. The phase comparison path is sketched in Figure 9.1(a). The phase detector output is low-pass filtered, to extract its average value, or it is accumulated into an integrator in a type-II loop.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Muer, B. and Steyaert, M. S. J., A CMOS monolithic ΔΣ-controlled fractional-N frequency synthesizer for DCS-1800, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 37, Jul. 2002, 835–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T.-C. and Razavi, B., A stabilization technique for phase-locked frequency synthesizers, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 38, Jun. 2003, 888–94.Google Scholar
Perrot, M. H., Trott, M. D. and Sodini, C. G., A modeling approach for ΔΣ fractional-N frequency synthesizers allowing straightforward noise analysis, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 37, Aug. 2002, 1028–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuta, M., A new PLL with fast settling time and low phase noise, Microw. J., Jun. 1997, 94–108.Google Scholar
T.-Y. Hsu, , T.-R. Hsu, , C.-C. Wang, , Y.-C. Liu, and C.-Y. Lee, , Design of a wide-band frequency synthesizer based on TDC and DVC techniques, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 37, Oct. 2002, 1244–55.Google Scholar
Staztweki, R. B., Muhammad, K., Leipold, D.et al., All-digital TX frequency synthesizer and discrete-time receiver for Bluetooth radio in 130-nm CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 39, Dec. 2004, 2278–91.Google Scholar
Egan, W. F., Frequency Synthesis by Phase Lock, New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1990, 2nd edn, 2000.Google Scholar
Razavi, B., Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
M. H. Perrot, Techniques for High Data Rate Modulation and Low Power Operation of Fractional-N Frequency Synthesizers, Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Sep. 1997.
Temporiti, E., Albasini, G., Bietti, I., Castello, R. and Colombo, M., A 700-kHz bandwidth ΔΣ fractional synthesizer with spurs compensation and linearization techniques for WCDMA applications, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 39, Sep. 2004, 1446–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H. Huh, , Koo, Y., Lee, K.-Y.et al., Comparison frequency doubling and charge pump matching techniques for dual-band ΔΣ fractional-N frequency synthesizer, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 40, Nov. 2005, 2228–36.Google Scholar
Meninger, S. E. and Perrot, M. H., A 1 MHz bandwidth 3.6-GHz 0.18-μm CMOS fractional-N synthesizer utilizing a hybrid PFD/DAC structure for reduced broadband phase noise, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 41, Apr. 2006, 966–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S. F. Gillig, Linearized Three State Phase Detector, U.S. Patent 4970475, Nov. 1990.
Hegazi, E. and Abidi, A. A., A 17-mW transmitter and frequency synthesizer for 900-MHz GSM fully integrated in 0.35-μm CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 38, May 2003, 782–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zargari, M.et al., A single-chip dual-band tri-mode CMOS transceiver for IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless LAN, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 39, Dec. 2004, 2239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, W., Design of high-performance CMOS charge pumps in phase-locked loops, Proc. 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2, Jun. 1999, 545–8.Google Scholar
Rategh, H. R., Samavati, H. and Lee, T. H., A CMOS frequency synthesizer with an injection-locked frequency divider for a 5-GHz wireless LAN receiver, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 35, May 2000, 780–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
I. Vassiliou, , Vavelidis, K., Georgantas, T.et al., A single-chip digitally calibrated 5.15–5.825-GHz 0.18-μm CMOS transceiver for 802.11a wireless LAN, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 38, Dec. 2003, 2221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, T. A. D., Filiol, N. M., Du, Q. and Kostamovaara, J., Techniques for in-band phase noise reduction in ΔΣ synthesizers, IEEE T. Circuits-II, 50, Nov. 2003, 794–803.Google Scholar
B. De Muer, and Steyaert, M. S. J., On the analysis of ΔΣ fractional-N frequency synthesizers for high-spectral purity, IEEE T. Circuits-II, 50, Nov. 2003, 784–93.Google Scholar
Arora, H., Klemmer, N., Morizio, J. C. and Wolf, P. D., Enhanced phase noise modeling of fractional-N frequency synthesizers, IEEE T. Circuits-I, 52, Feb. 2005, 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Zhang, , Der, L., Guo, D.et al., A single-chip dual-band direct-conversion IEEE 802.11a/b/g WLAN transceiver in 0.18-μm CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-St. Circ., 40, Sep. 2005, 1932–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×