Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 49
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2009
Print publication year:
2007
Online ISBN:
9780511482625

Book description

Plato's dialogues are usually understood as simple examples of philosophy in action. In this book Professor Rowe treats them rather as literary-philosophical artefacts, shaped by Plato's desire to persuade his readers to exchange their view of life and the universe for a different view which, from their present perspective, they will barely begin to comprehend. What emerges is a radically new Plato: a Socratic throughout, who even in the late dialogues is still essentially the Plato (and the Socrates) of the Apology and the so-called 'Socratic' dialogues. This book aims to understand Plato both as a philosopher and as a writer, on the assumption that neither of these aspects of the dialogues can be understood without the other. The argument of the book is closely based in Plato's text, but should be accessible to any serious reader of Plato, whether professional philosopher, classicist, or student.

Reviews

"Rowe...displays an impressive grasp of a wide rage of literature. ...His book offers a penetrating analysis... ." --BMCR

"Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing is an engaging and well-argued book that focuses on both Socratic epistemology and the nature of Platonic argument." --Ancient Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Adam, James, 1963 (1902). The Republic of Plato, 2 vols. (second edition). Cambridge.
Annas, Julia, 1985. ‘Self-knowledge in early Plato’, in Dominic, J. O'Meara (ed.), Platonic Investigations (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, vol. xiii), Washington, DC: 111–38.
Blondell, Ruby, 2002. The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge.
Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Smith, Nicholas D., 2002. ‘Incurable souls in Socratic psychology’, Ancient Philosophy 22: 1–16.
Burnyeat, Myles, 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis.
Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Smith, Nicholas D. 1992 (1977). ‘Socratic midwifery, Platonic inspiration’, in Hugh, H. Benson (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates, New York: 53–65 (reprinted from Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 24 [1977]:7–16).
Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Smith, Nicholas D. 2003. ‘Socrates, money, and the grammar of gignesthai’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies 123: 1–25.
Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Smith, Nicholas D. 2005a. ‘On the source of Burnet's construal of Apology 30b2–4: a correction’, in The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 125: 139–42.
Brickhouse, Thomas C. and Smith, Nicholas D. 2005b. ‘Eikōs Muthos’, Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Scienceii.2: 143–65.
Cooper, John M., 1982. ‘The Gorgias and Irwin's Socrates’, Review of Metaphysics 35: 577–87.
Cooper, John M. (ed.), 1997. Plato, Complete Works. Indianapolis (= ‘the Hackett translation’ [by various authors]).
Cooper, John M. 1999. ‘Socrates and Plato in Plato's Gorgias’, in John M. Cooper (ed.), Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory, Princeton: 29–75.
Cross, R. C. and Woozley, A. D., 1966. Plato'sRepublic: A Philosophical Commentary. London.
Davidson, Donald, 1993. ‘Plato's philosopher’, in Terry, Irwin and Martha, C. Nussbaum (eds.), Virtue, Love and Form: Essays in Memory of Gregory Vlastos, Apeiron 26.3/4: 179–94.
Davidson, Donald 2001 (1983). ‘A coherence theory of truth and knowledge’ (as reprinted, with ‘Afterthoughts’), in Donald Davidson, , Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford: 137–57.
Diès, A., 1913. ‘La transposition platonicienne’, in Aveling, F. et al. (eds.), Annales de l'Institut Supérieur de Philosophie (Université de Louvain), Tome ii: 265–308.
Dodds, E. R., 1959. Plato: Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.
Ebert, Theodor, 2004. Platon, Phaidon. Göttingen.
Frede, Michael, 1992. ‘Plato's arguments and the dialogue form’, in Klagge, J. C. and Smith, N. D. (eds.), Methods of Interpreting Plato and his Dialogues (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy suppl. vol.): 201–19.
Frede, Michael 2000. ‘The literary form of the Sophist’, in Christopher, Gill and Mary, Margaret McCabe (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford: 135–51.
Gerson, Lloyd P., 2003. Knowing Persons: A Study in Plato. Oxford (but see my review in Ancient Philosophy for 2005).
Gonzalez, Francisco, 1998. Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato's Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Evanston, IL.
Grote, George, 1865. Plato and the Other Companions of Sokrates, 3 vols. London.
Hackforth, R., 1952. Plato'sPhaedrus. Cambridge.
Irwin, Terence, 1979. Plato: Gorgias (Clarendon Plato series). Oxford.
Irwin, Terence 1995. Plato's Ethics. Oxford.
Johansen, T. K., 2004. Plato's Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge.
Kahn, Charles H., 1983. ‘Drama and dialectic in Plato's Gorgias’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 75–122.
Kahn, Charles H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: the Philosophical use of a Literary Form. Cambridge.
Kahn, Charles H. 2002. ‘On Platonic chronology’, in Julia, Annas and Christopher, Rowe (eds.), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient, Cambridge, MA/Washington, DC: 93–127.
Kamtekar, Rachana, 1997 (1999). ‘Philosophical rule from the Republic to the Laws: commentary on Schofield’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13: 241–52.
Kraut, Richard, 1992. ‘Introduction to the study of Plato’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Study of Plato, Cambridge: 1–50.
Kraut, Richard 2003. ‘Justice in Plato and Aristotle: withdrawal versus engagement’, in Robert, Heinaman (ed.), Plato and Aristotle's Ethics, Aldershot: 153–67.
Laks, André, 1990. ‘Legislation and demiurgy: on the relationship between Plato's Republic and Laws’, in Classical Antiquity 9: 209–29.
Mackenzie, Mary Margaret, 1982. ‘Paradox in Plato's Phaedrus’, in Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. 28: 64–76.
Moreau, Joseph, 1953. ‘Platon et la connaissance de l’âme’, in Revue des Études Anciennes 55: 249–57.
Morgan, Kathryn, 2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato. Cambridge.
Morrow, Glenn R., 1993. Plato's Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of theLaws. Princeton.
Penner, Terry, 1987. The Ascent from Nominalism. Dordrecht.
Penner, Terry 1991. ‘Desire and power in Socrates: the argument of Gorgias 466a–468e that orators and tyrants have no power in the city’, Apeiron 24: 147–202.
Penner, Terry and Rowe, Christopher, 2005. Plato's Lysis (Cambridge Studies in the Dialogues of Plato). Cambridge.
Press, Gerald (ed.), 2000. Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity. Lanham, MD.
Renaud, François, 1999. Die Resokratisierung Platons. Die platonische Hermeneutik Hans-Georg Gadamers. Sankt Augustin.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J., 1986. ‘The argument and structure of Plato's Phaedrus’, in Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. 32: 106–25.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 1988. Plato, Phaedrus (second, corrected edition). Warminster.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 1993. Plato, Phaedo. Cambridge.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 1999. ‘La forme dramatique et la structure du Philèbe’, in Dixsaut, M. (ed.), La fêlure du plaisir. Études sur le Philèbe de Platon, 1: Commentaires, Paris: 9–25.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2002a. ‘Reply to Penner’, in Julia, Annas and Christopher, Rowe (eds.), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient, Cambridge, MA/Washington, DC: 213–25.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2002b. ‘Handling a philosophical text’, in Roy, K. Gibson and Christina, Shuttleworth Kraus (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, Leiden: 295–318.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2002c. ‘Socrates and Plato on virtue and the good: an analytical approach’, in Reale, G. and Scolnicov, S. (eds.), New Images of Plato, Sankt Augustin: 253–64.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2003a. ‘Reply to Richard Kraut’, in Robert, Heinaman (ed.), Plato and Aristotle's Ethics, Aldershot: 168–76.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2003b. ‘The status of the “myth” in Plato's Timaeus’, in Carlo, Natali and Stefano, Maso (eds.), Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, Amsterdam: 21–31.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2004a. ‘The case of the missing philosophers in Plato's Timaeus-Critias’, in Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, Neue Folge, Band 28b: 57–70.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2004b (1995). Plato: Statesman (second, corrected edition). Oxford/Warminster.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2005a. ‘Hommes et monstres: Platon et Socrate parlent de la nature humaine’, in John, Dillon and Monique, Dixsaut (eds.), Agonistes: Essays in Honour of Denis O'Brien, Aldershot: 139–55.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2005b. ‘What difference do Forms make for Platonic epistemology?’, in Christopher, Gill (ed.), Virtue, Norms, and Objectivity, Oxford: 215–32.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2006a. ‘The literary and philosophical style of the Republic’, in Gerasimos, X. Santas (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Plato'sRepublic, Oxford: 7–24.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2006b. ‘The Symposium as a Socratic dialogue’, in James, H. Lesher, Debra, Nails, and Frisbee, Sheffield (eds.), Plato's Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA: 9–22.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2007a. ‘Plato and the Persian wars’, in Emma, Bridges, Edith, Hall and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars. Oxford: 85–104.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2007b. ‘The moral psychology of the Gorgias’, in Michael, Erler and Luc, Brisson (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: 90–101.
Rowe, C[hristopher] J. 2007c. ‘The place of the Republic in Plato's political thought’, in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato'sRepublic, Cambridge: 27–54.
Rutherford, R. B., 1995. The Art of Plato: Ten Essays in Platonic Interpretation. London.
Santas, Gerasimos X., 1979. Socrates: Philosophy in Plato's Early Dialogues. London.
Schofield, Malcolm, 1997. Saving the City. London.
Schofield, Malcolm 1997 (1999). ‘The disappearing philosopher-king’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13: 213–41.
Schofield, Malcolm 2006. Plato (Founders of Modern Political and Social Thought). Oxford.
Scott, Dominic, 1995. Recollection and Experience: Plato's Theory of Learning and its Successors. Cambridge,
Sedley, David, 1990. ‘Teleology and myth in the Phaedo’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 5: 359–83.
Sedley, David 1995. ‘The dramatis personae of Plato's Phaedo’, in Timothy, Smiley (ed.), Philosophical Dialogues: Plato, Hume, Wittgenstein (Proceedings of the British Academy 85), Oxford: 3–26.
Sedley, David 2003. Plato'sCratylus (Cambridge Studies in the Dialogues of Plato). Cambridge.
Sedley, David 2004. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato's Theaetetus. Oxford.
Sedley, David Forthcoming. ‘Myth, politics and punishment in Plato's Gorgias’, in Catalin Partenie (ed.), Plato's Myths. Cambridge.
Shorey, Paul, 1903. The Unity of Plato's Thought. Chicago.
Silverman, Allan, 2002. The Dialectic of Excellence: A Study of Plato's Metaphysics. Princeton.
Slings, S. R. †, 2003. Platonis Rempublicam recognovit, etc. S. R. S. (Oxford Classical Texts). Oxford.
Slings, S. R. 2005. Critical Notes on Plato'sPoliteia. Leiden.
Stokes, Michael C., 1997. Plato: Apology. Warminster.
De Strycker, E. and Slings, S. R., 1994. Plato'sApology of Socrates. Edited and completed from the papers of the late Strycker, E. (S. J.), Leiden.
Szlezák, Thomas A., 1985. Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie. Interpretationen zu den frühen und mittleren Dialogen. Berlin.
Szlezák, Thomas A. 2004. Das Bild des Dialektikers in Platons Späten Dialogen. Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie, Teil Ⅱ. Berlin.
Tarrant, Harold, 2002. ‘Elenchos and exetasis. Capturing the purpose of Socratic interrogation’, in Gary, A. Scott (ed.), Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato's Dialogues and Beyond, Philadelphia: 61–7.
Taylor, A. E., 1928. A Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Oxford.
Taylor, C. C. W., 2000. A Very Short Introduction to Socrates. Oxford.
Thesleff, Holger, 1982. Studies in Plato's Chronology (Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 70). Helsinki.
Thompson, W. H., 1868. The Phaedrus of Plato, with English notes and dissertations. London.
Tigerstedt, , E. N., 1977. Interpreting Plato (Stockholm Studies in History of Literature, 17). Uppsala.
Vlastos, Gregory, 1971. ‘The paradox of Socrates’, in G. Vlastos, , The Philosophy of Socrates: A Collection of Critical Essays, New York: 1–21.
Vlastos, Gregory 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge.
Vlastos, Gregory 1994. Socratic Studies (ed. Burnyeat, M.). Cambridge.
Wardy, Robert, 1996. The Birth of Rhetoric. London.
White, Nicholas, 2002. Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics. Oxford.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.