Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T08:08:59.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Bert J. M. de Vries
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalbers, T., ed. Waardenoriëntaties, wereldbeelden en maatschappelijke vraagstukken: Verantwoording van het opinieonderzoek voor de Duurzaamheidsverkenning Kwaliteit en Toekomst. Report 550031002. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), 2006. Available at .
Acevedo, M., Urban, F., and Shugart, H.. Models of forest dynamics based on roles of tree species, Ecological Modelling 87 (1996): 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achterhuis, H.Utopia's Heritage (De erfenis van de utopie). Amsterdam: Ambo, 1998.Google Scholar
Adams, J. Risk. London: UCL Press Ltd., 1995.Google ScholarPubMed
Akerlof, G., and Shiller, R.. Animal Spirits – How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Henrichs, T., Kaspar, F., Lehner, B., Rösch, T., and Siebert, S.. Global estimation of water withdrawals and availability under current and “business as usual” conditions, Hydrological Science, 48(2003):339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkemade, R., van Oorschot, M., Miles, L., Nellemann, C., Bakkenes, M., and ten Brink, B.. GLOBIO3: A framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss, Ecosystems 12 (2009): 374–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, P., and McGlade, J.. Modelling complex human systems: A fisheries example, European Journal of Operations Research 30 (1987): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, J., Ashby, M., Gutowski, T., and Worrell, E.. Material efficiency: A white paper, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55 (2011): 362–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananthu, T.Gandhi's Hind Swaraj. New Delhi: Gandhi Peace Foundation, n.d.
Anderson, C., Frenken, K., and Hellervik, A.. A complex network approach to urban growth, Environment and Planning A 38 (2006): 1941–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, K.The Great Transformation: The World in the Time of Buddha, Socrates, Confucius and Jeremiah. New York: Random House, 2006.
Armstrong, K.Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar
Arquitt, S., Honggang, X., and Johnstone, R.. A system dynamics analysis of boom and bust in the shrimp aquaculture industry, System Dynamics Review 21 (2005): 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K.The Limits of Organization. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1974.Google Scholar
Arthur, W.Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslin, H., and Bennett, D.. Wildlife and world views: Australian attitudes to wildlife, Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15(2000): 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkisson, A.The ISIS Agreement – How Sustainability Can Improve Organizational Performance and Transform the World. London: Earthscan, 2008.Google Scholar
Aurobindo. Le Cycle Humain. Pondichéry, India: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1972/1998.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R.The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R.The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ayres, R., and Ayres, L., eds. A Handbook of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, R., and Warr, B.. Accounting for growth: the role of physical work, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16 (2005):181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, C., and Schneider, S.. Are the economic costs of stabilizing the atmosphere prohibitive?Ecological Economics 42 (2002): 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Z., Dent, D., Olsson, L., and Schaepman, M.. Proxy global assessment of land degradation, Soil Use and Management 24 (2008): 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakan, J.The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York: Free Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bakkes, J., et al. Background Report to the OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030. Overviews, Details, and Methodology of Model-Based Analysis. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), 2008.
Barash, D.The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition. New York: Times Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Barnes, P.Capitalism 3.0 – A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.Google Scholar
Barney, G., ed. The Global 2000 Report to the President: Entering the 21st Century. London: Penguin Books, 1980/1982.
Barro, R., and Sala-i-Martin, X.. Economic Growth. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Batty, M.Cities and Complexity – Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Basavanna, in: Speaking of Siva (Translated with an introduction by A.K. Ramanujan). London: Penguin Books, 1973.
Batty, M.Rank clocks, Nature 444 (2006): 592–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumann, H., and Tillman, A.-M.. The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA. An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Application. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur AB, 2004.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis, American Economic Review 57 (1967): 415–426Google Scholar
Beder, S.The Nature of Sustainable Development. Newham, Australia: Scribe Publication, 1993.Google Scholar
Beinhocker, E.The Origin of Wealth – Evolution, Complexity and the Radical Remaking of Economics. London: Random House, 2005.Google Scholar
Benítez-López, A., Alkemade, R., and Verweij, P.. The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: A meta-analysis, Biological Conservation 143 (2010): 1307–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F., and Folke, C., eds. Linking Social and Ecological Systems – Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C.. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems – Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bernardini, O., and Galli, R.. Dematerialization: Long-term trends in the intensity of use of materials and energy, Futures 25 (1993): 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beumer, C., and Martens, P.. Noah's ark or world wild web? Cultural perspectives in global scenario studies and their function for biodiversity conservation in a changing world, Sustainability 2 (2010): 3211–3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, R., Kowalewski, S., Feiman, G., and Finsten, L.. Ancient Mesoamerica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Blok, K.Energy Analysis. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Blum, U., and Dudley, L.. Religion and economic growth: Was Weber right?Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11 (2001): 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersema, J. Hoe Groen is het Goede Leven (How Green is the Good Life). Inaugural Address. Amsterdam: Free University, 2002.
Boersema, J., and Reijnders, L.. Principles of Environmental Sciences. The Netherlands: Springer Science +Business Media B.V., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorstin, D.The Discoverers – A History of Man's Search to Know His World and Himself. New York: Vintage Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Boserup, E.Population and Technological Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Bossel, H., and Krieger, H.. Simulation model of natural tropical forest dynamics, Ecological Modelling 59 (1991): 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossel, H.Modeling and Simulation. Wellesley, MA: AK Peters and Wiesbaden: Vieweg, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossel, H.TREEDYN3 forest simulation model, Ecological Modelling 90 (1996): 187–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossel, H.Earth at a Crossroads – Paths to a Sustainable Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Boucheaud, J.-P., and Mézard, M.. Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy, Physica A 282 (2000): 536–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K.Ecodynamics – A New Theory of Societal Evolution. London: Sage Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d'agir Editions, 2001.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F., and Morrison, C.. Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992, The American Economic Review 92 (2002): 727–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousquet, F., and Voinov, A.. Editorial Thematic Issue – Modelling with Stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (2010): 1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwman, L., Kram, T., and Klein Goldewijk, K., eds. Integrated modelling of global environmental change – An overview of IMAGE 2.4. MNP Report 500110002/2006. Bilthoven, 2006. Available at .
Bouwman, F., Beusen, A., and Billen, G.. Human alteration of the global nitrogen and phosphorus soil balances for the period 1970–2050, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 23 (2009): GB0A04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J., and Taylor, M.. The simple economics of Easter Island: A Ricardo-Malthus model of renewable resource use, The American Economic Review, 88 (1998): 119–138.Google Scholar
Braudel, F.Civilization & Capitalism 15th–18th Century. New York: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar
Brede, M., and de Vries, B.. Networks that optimize a trade-off between efficiency and dynamical resilience, Physics Letters A 373 (2009a): 3910–3914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brede, M., and de Vries, B.. Harvesting heterogeneous renewable resources: Uncoordinated, selfish, team-, and community-oriented strategies, Ecological Modelling 25 (2009b): 117–128.Google Scholar
Brock, W., and Durlauf, S.. Discrete choice with social interactions, Review of Economic Studies 68 (2001): 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L.Outgrowing the Earth – The Food Security Challenge in an Age of Falling Water Tables and Rising Temperatures. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004.Google Scholar
Bryson, B.A Short History of Nearly Everything. New York: Broadway Books, 2003.Google Scholar
Buchanan, M.Nexus/Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2002.Google Scholar
Buckingham/USGS. Aluminium stocks in use in automobiles in the United States. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2010. Available at pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3145/fs2005_3145.pdf.
Buringh, P.The land resource for agriculture, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B310 (1985): 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capra, F.The Hidden Connections – Integrating the Biological, Cognitive, and Social Dimensions of Life into a Science of Sustainability. New York: Doubleday, 2002.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S., and Brock, W.. Rising variance: A leading indicator of ecological transition, Ecology Letters 9 (2006): 311–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, T.An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Castells, M.The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.Google Scholar
Castells, M.The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Cavana, R., and Ford, A.. Environmental and resource systems, System Dynamics Review (Special Issue) 20 (2004): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavane, R., Davies, P., Robson, R., and Wilson, K.. Drivers of quality in health services: Different worldviews of clinicians and policy managers revealed, System Dynamics Review 15 (1999): 315–340.Google Scholar
Chaisson, E.Cosmic Evolution – The Rise of Complexity in Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, D. K.The Archaeology of Ancient Indian Cities. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Chalmers, R.What Is This Thing Called Science? (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Chisholm, M. The increasing separation of production and consumption. In The Earth as Transformed by Human Action – Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years, pp. 87–102, edited by Turner, B., Clark, W., Kates, R., Richards, J., Mathews, J., and Meyer, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Cirera, X., and Masset, E.. Income distribution trends and future food demand, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (2010): 2821–2834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claassen, R.Het eeuwig tekort. Amsterdam: Ambo, 2004.Google Scholar
Clark, C.Mathematical Bioeconomics – The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. Wiley Interscience, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Clark, , , N., Perez-Trejo, F., and Allen, P.. Evolutionary Dynamics and Sustainable Development: A Systems Approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Clark, W., and Dickson, N.. Sustainability science: The emerging research program, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 100 (2003): 8059–8061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Common, M., and Stagl, S.. Ecological Economics – An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., Low, B., Ostrom, E., and Wilson, J., eds. Institutions, Ecosystems, and Sustainability. Ecological Economics Series. London: CRC Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., and Steffen, W., eds. Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth (IHOPE). 96th Dahlem Workshop. Boston: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., Steffen, W., Crumley, C., Dearing, J., Hibbard, K., et al. Sustainability or collapse: what can we learn from integrating the history of humans and the rest of nature?Ambio 36, (2007): 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, A.Ecological Imperialism – The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Daly, H.Steady-State Economics: The Economics of Biophysical Equilibrium and Moral Growth. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1977.Google Scholar
Daly, H., and Cobb, J.. For the Common Good – Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Daly, H.Beyond Growth. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Daré, W., Ducrot, R., Botta, A., and Etienne, M.. Repères méthodologiques pour la mise en oeuvre d'une demarche de modélisation d'accompagnement. ComMod (2009).
Dasgupta, P. S., and Heal, G. W.. Exhaustible Resources and Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P.Economics – A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P.Discounting climate change, Journal of Risk Uncertainty 37 (2008): 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Geus, A. Modelling to predict or to learn? In Modelling for learning (special issue), pp. 1–5, edited by Morecroft, J. and Sterman, J.. European Journal of Operational Research 59 (1992): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Geus, M. The End of Over-Consumption: Towards a Lifestyle of Moderation and Self-Restraint. Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Books, 2003.Google Scholar
de Kok, J., and Wind, H.. Designing rapid assessment models of water systems based on internal consistency, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 128 (2002): 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Roos, A., and Persson, L.. Unstructured population models: Do population-level assumptions yield general theory? In Dynamic Food Webs – Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development and Environmental Change, pp. 31–62, edited by de Ruiter, P, Wolters, V, and Moore, J. Theoretical Ecology Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, P., Wolters, V., and Moore, J., eds. Dynamic Food Webs – Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development and Environmental Change. Theoretical Ecology Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar
de Vries, B., Uitham, K., and Zijlstra, G. J.. Kernenergie in Nederland, Acta Politica 2 (1977): 161–206.Google Scholar
de Vries, B. Perspectieven op duurzame ontwikkeling, Lucht en Omgeving 6 (1989): 168–172.Google Scholar
de Vries, B. Effects of resource assessments on optimal depletion estimates, Resources Policy 15 (1989): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, B., and Benders, R.. Electric power planning in a gaming context, Simulation and Games 20 (1989): 227–244.Google Scholar
de Vries, B. SusClime – a simulation game on population and development in a resource- and climate-constrained two-country world, Simulation & Games 29 (1998): 216–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, B. Perceptions and risks in the search for a sustainable world – a model-based approach, International Journal of Sustainable Development 4 (2001): 434–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, B., and Goudsblom, J., eds. Mappae Mundi – Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-ecological Perspective. Myths, Maps, and Models. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
de Vries, B., Thompson, M., and Wirtz, K.. Understanding: Fragments of a unifying perspective. In Mappae Mundi – Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-ecological Perspective. Myths, Maps, and Models, pp. 257–300, edited by de Vries, B. and Goudsblom, J.. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
de Vries, B. Scenarios: Guidance for an uncertain and complex world? In Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth (IHOPE) – 96th Dahlem Workshop, pp. 378–398, edited by Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., and Steffen, W.. Boston: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar
de Vries, B., Revi, A., Bhat, G., Hilderink, H., and Lucas, P.. India 2050: Scenarios for an uncertain future. MNP Report. 2007. 550033002/2007. Available at
de Vries, B. Environmental modelling for a sustainable world. In Principles of Environmental Sciences, pp. 345–373, edited by Boersema, J. and Reijnders, L.. Netherlands: Springer Science +Business Media B.V., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, B., and Petersen, A.. Conceptualizing sustainable development: An assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios, Ecological Economics 68 (2009): 1006–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, B. Interacting with complex systems: Models and games for a sustainable economy. PBL Background Studies Report number 550033003. 2010. Available at .
de Waal, F. Primates and Philosophers – How Morality Evolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Dearing, J.Climate-human-environment interactions: Resolving our past, Climate of the Past 2 (2006): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeny, P., and McNicoll, G.. Population and Development Review 37 Special Volume on Demographic Transition (2011).CrossRef
Dennett, D.Kinds of Minds – The Origins of Consciousness. London: Orion Books, 1997/2001.Google Scholar
den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., and Moltmann, S.. The Triptych approach revisited: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation, Energy Policy 36 (2008): 1107–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devara, Dasimayya, in: Speaking of Siva (Translated with an introduction by A.K. Ramanujan). London: Penguin Books. London.
Diamond, J.Collapse – How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Penguin Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Dicken, P.Global Shift – Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications, 2009.Google Scholar
Dietz, S., and Neumayer, E.. Genuine savings: A critical analysis of its policy-guiding value, Int. J Environment and Sustainable Development 3 (2004): 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., and Shwom, R.. Environmental values, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (2005): 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirzo, R., and Raven, P.. Global state of biodiversity and loss, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28 (2003): 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disperati, P., van de Steeg, J., van Breugel, P., Notenbaert, A., Owuor, J., and Herreror, M.. Environmental Security and Pastoralism. International Livestock Research institute (ILRI) Report, Nairobi, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döpfer, K., ed. The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., and Roventini, A.. The microfoundations of business cycles: An evolutionary, multi-agent model, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18 (2008): 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, P., and Sloep, P.. Mathematical Modeling in the Life Sciences. New York: Ellis Horwood, 1992.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., Gasper, D., Ney, S., and Thompson, M.. Human needs and wants. In Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol. 1: The Societal Framework, pp. 195–264, edited by Rayner, S. and Malone, E.. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Duchin, F., and Lang, G.-M.. The Future of the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dudley, R.A basis for understanding fishery management dynamics, System Dynamics Review 24 (2008): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, D., and Geurts, J.. Policy Games for Strategic Management: Pathways into the Unknown. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dumont, L.Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dunham, J.An agent-based spatially explicit epidemiological model in MASON, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS) 9 (2005). Available at jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/1/3.html.Google Scholar
Dunne, J., Williams, R., and Martinez, N.. Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 99 (2002): 12917–12922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earle, C.The myth of the southern soil miner: Macrohistory, agricultural innovation, and environmental change. In The Ends of the Earth – Perspectives on Modern Environmental History. Studies in Environment and History, edited by Worster, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R.Modernization and fertility. In Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries (Vol. 2), edited by Bulatao, R. and Lee, R.. London: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Easton, T.Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Environmental Issues. Contemporary Learning Series (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.Google Scholar
Easwaran, E.The Bhagavad Gita. London: Arkana Penguin Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Edelstein-Keshet, L.Mathematical Models in Biology. New York: Random House, 1988.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency (EEA). The European Environment – Synthesis. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2010. Available at eea.europa.eu.
EEA. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000. Copenhagen, European Environmental Agency, 2001.Google Scholar
Elgin, , , D. Awakening Earth: Exploring the Co-evolution of Human Culture and Consciousness. New York: Morrow, 1993.Google Scholar
Elias, N. The Civilizing Process. Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967/2000.Google Scholar
Ellis, E., and Ramankutty, N.. Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 (2008): 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, E., Klein Goldewijk, K., Siebert, S., Lightman, D., and Ramankutty, N.. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000, Global Ecology and Biogeography 19 (2010): 589–606.Google Scholar
Elvin, M.Three thousand years of unsustainable growth: China's environment from archaic times to the present, East Asian History 6 (1993): 7–46.Google Scholar
Engelen, G., White, R., and Uljee, I.. Exploratory modeling of socio-economic impacts of climate change. In Climate Change in the Intra-Americas Sea, edited by Maul, G.. London: Edward Arnold, 1993.Google Scholar
Engelen, G., White, R., Uljee, I., and Wargnies, S.. Numerical modeling of small island small socio-economics to achieve sustainable development. In Small Islands: Marine Science and Sustainable Development, Coastal and Estuarine Studies Volume 51, pp. 437–463, edited by Maul, G.. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen, G., White, R., Uljee, I., and Drazan, P.. Using cellular automata for integrated modelling of socio-environmental systems, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 34 (1995): 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelen, G.Models in policy formulation and assessment: The WADBos decision-support system. In Environmental Modelling: Finding Simplicity in Complexity, pp. 257–271, edited by Wainwright, J and Mulligan, M.. Environmental Modelling – Finding Simplicity in Complexity. London: John Wiley& Sons, Ltd., 2004.Google Scholar
Epstein, J., and Axtell, R., eds. Growing Artificial Societies. Washington, DC/Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution Press/MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Eriksson, A., and Lindgren, K.. Cooperation in an unpredictable environment. In Artificial Life VIII, edited by Standish, R., Abbass, M., and Bedau, H.. Boston: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Etienne, M., Le Page, C., and Cohen, M.. A step-by-step approach to building land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS) 6 (2003). Available at jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/2.html.Google Scholar
Etienne, M., Cohen, M., and Le Page, C.. A step-by-step approach to build-up land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS) 7 (2003):Google Scholar
Falkenmark, M. and Lindh, G.How can we cope with the water resources situation by the year 2015?Ambio 3 (1976): 114–122.Google Scholar
Falkenmark, M., and Rockström, J.. The new blue and green water paradigm, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. (2006): 129–132.
Fay, T., and Greeff, J.. Lion, wildebeest and zebra: A predator-prey model, Ecological Modelling 196 (2006): 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein, C., and Thomas, M.. Making History Count – A Primer in Quantitative Methods for Historians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferber, J.Multi-Agent Systems – An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. London: Addison-Wesley, 2000.Google Scholar
Ferber, J. Multi-agent concepts and methodologies. In Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences, pp. 7–34, edited by D. Phan and F. Amblard. Oxford: Bardwell Press, 2007.
Fernández, J., and Selma, M.. The dynamics of water scarcity on irrigated landscapes: Mazarrón and Aguilas in south-eastern Spain, System Dynamics Review 20 (2004): 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, J., and Ruzmaikin, A.. Climate stability and the development of agricultural societies, Climatic Change 84 (2007): 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, A., and McCay, B.. Crossing the threshold of ecosystem resilience: The commercial extinction of cod. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems – Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, pp. 311–337, edited by Berkes, F. and Folke, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Fischer, G., Shah, M., van Velthuizen, H., and Nachtergaele, F.. Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century. IIASA/FAO Report, 2001. Available at .
Fischer-Kowalski, M., and Haberl, H., eds. Socioecological Transitions and Global Change: Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J., and Pry, R.. A simple substitution model of technological change, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 3 (1971): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K. V.The cultural evolution of civilizations, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3 (1972): 399–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florax, R., and de Groot, H.. Meta-analyse als hulpmiddel bij beleidsinstrumentatie, ESB 90 (2005): D8–D10.Google Scholar
Folmer, H., Landis Gabel, H., and Opschoor, H.. Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics – A Guide for Students and Decision-Makers. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1995.Google Scholar
Ford, A.Modeling the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Ford, J., and Myers, R.. A global assessment of salmon aquaculture impacts on wild salmonids, PloS Biology (2008). Available at .
Forrester, J.World Dynamics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Frenken, K. Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2006.Google Scholar
Frondel, M., and Schmidt, C.. The empirical assessment of technology differences: Comparing the comparable, The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (2006): 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F.The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Avon Books, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S., and Ravetz, J.. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gales, B., Kander, A., Malanima, P., and Rubio, M.. North versus South: Energy transition and energy intensity in Europe over 200 years, European Review of Economic History 11 (2007): 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, O., and Weil, D.. Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond, The American Economic Review, 90 (2000): 806–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S., and Grainger, R.. Gloom and doom? The future of marine capture fisheries, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360 (2005): 21–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, S., and Charles, A.. Fishery systems and linkages: From clockworks to soft watches, ICES Journal of Marine Science 64 (2007): 580–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S., and Rosenberg, A.. Food security and marine capture fisheries: Characteristics, trends, drivers and future perspectives, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (2010): 2869–2880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, D.Future Babble: Why Expert Predictions Are Next to Worthless, and You Can Do Better. New York: Dutton, 2010.Google Scholar
Geels, F.Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy 31 (2002): 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F.Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930) – A case study in multi-level perspective, Technology in Society 27 (2005): 363–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F., and Schot, J.. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy 36 (2007): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, H., and Lambin, E.. What drives tropical deforestation? IHDP-IGBP LUCC Report Series No. 4. Available at .
Geist, H., ed. Our Earth's Changing Land – An Encyclopedia of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change. Westport, CT/London: Greenwood Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Giampietro, M.Multi-scale Integrated Analysis of Agroecosystems. Advances in Agroecology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N., and Doran, J., eds. Simulating Societies – The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena. London: UCL Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N., and Troitzsch, K.. Simulation for the Social Scientist. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gilding, P.The Great Disruption: Why the Climate Crisis Will Bring On the End of Shopping and the Birth of a New World. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gilg, O., Hanski, I., and Sittler, B.. Cyclic dynamics in a simple vertebrate predator-prey community, Science 302 (2003): 866–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H.Beyond Homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics, Ecological Economics Special Issue 35 (2000): 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H.Behavioral game theory and contemporary economic theory, Analyse & Kritik 27 (2005): 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordano, M.Global groundwater? Issues and solutions, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (2009): 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, P., and associates. The World's Water: The Biennial Report on Freshwater. Washington, DC: Resources. Island Press, 2011.CrossRef
Gong, M., and Wall, G.. On exergy and sustainable development – Part 2: Indicators and methods, Exergy, an International Journal 4 (2001): 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, H.The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery, The Journal of Political Economy, 62 (1954): 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L., Peterson, G., and Bennett, E.. Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4 (2008): 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, A.The Human Impact – Man's Role in Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, J.Fire and Civilization. London: Penguin, 1992.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, J., Jones, E., and Mennell, S.. Course of Human History: Economic Growth, Social Process and Civilization. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, J.The past 250 years: Industrialization and globalization. In Mappae Mundi – Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-ecological Perspective. Myths, Maps, and Models, pp. 353–378, edited by de Vries, B. and Goudsblom, J.. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gourou, P.Les pays tropicaux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1947.Google Scholar
Grazi, F., Van den Bergh, J., and Rietveld, P.. Spatial welfare economics versus ecological footprint: Modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade, Environmental Resource Economics 38 (2007): 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenblat, C.Designing Games and Simulations: An Illustrated Handbook. London: Sage Ltd., 1988.Google Scholar
Grigg, D.The Agricultural Systems of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigg, D.The industrial revolution and land transformation. In Land Transformation in Agriculture, edited by Wolman, M. and Fournier, F.. New York: John Wiley, 1987.Google Scholar
Grimm, V., and Wissel, H.. Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: An inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion, Oecologia 109 (1997): 323–334.
Groenewold, H. Evolutie van kennis, waarden en macht. Technische Universiteit Twente, 1981.
Grove, A., and Rackham, O.. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe – An Ecological History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Grübler, A.Technology and Global Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Grübler, A., and Nakicenovic, N.. Long Wave, Technology Diffusion, and Substitution. Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA, 1991.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., and Holling, C.. Panarchy – Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Haas, P., Keohane, R., and Levy, M., eds. Institutions for the Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Haberl, H.Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development, Ambio 26 (1997): 143–146.Google Scholar
Haddeland, I.Anthropogenic Impacts on the Continental Water Cycle. Ph.D. Thesis. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, 2006.Google Scholar
Haley, S.Capital accumulation and the growth of aggregate agricultural production, Agricultural Economics 6 (1991): 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, S., Held, D., and Thompson, K.. Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Bodmin, Cornwall: MPG Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Handy, C.The Hungry Spirit – Beyond Capitalism – A Quest for Purpose in the Modern World. London: Arrow Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Hanjra, M., and Qureshi, M.. Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change, Food Policy 35 (2010): 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G.The tragedy of the commons, Science 162 (1968): 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Harman, W.An Incomplete Guide to the Future. Stanford, CA: Stanford Alumni Association, 1976.Google Scholar
Harris, D.Mineral Resource Appraisal. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Harte, J.Toward a synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian worldviews, Physics Today 10 (2002): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, F.Environmental perception and human responses in history and prehistory. In The Way the Wind Blows: Climate, History, and Human Action, pp. 121–140, edited by McIntosh, R, Tainter, J., and McIntosh, S.. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hedlund-de Witt, A. The rising culture and worldview of contemporary spirituality: A sociological study of potentials and pitfalls for sustainable development, Ecological Economics 70 (2011): 1057–1065.
Heijden, K. van der.Scenarios – The Art of Strategic Conversation. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1996.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, R.The Worldly Philosophers. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1955.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, R., and Milberg, W.. The Making of Economic Society (12th ed.). New York: Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2005.Google Scholar
Hein, P., van Kopen, C., de Groot, R., and van Ierland, E.. Spatial Scales, Stakeholders and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University, 2005. Available at .Google Scholar
Hein, L.Optimising the Management of Complex Dynamic Ecosystems. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen University, 2005.Google Scholar
Hein, L., and van Ierland, E.. Efficient and sustainable management of complex forest ecosystems, Ecological Modeling 190 (2006): 351–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbing, D., and Yu, W.. The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 106 (2009): 3680–3685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helpman, E.The Mystery of Economic Growth. Boston: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hettelingh, J.-P., de Vries, B., and Hordijk, L.. Integrated assessment. In Principles of Environmental Sciences, pp. 385–420, edited by Boersema, J. and Reijnders, L.. The Netherlands: Springer Science +Business Media B.V., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilderink, H.World Population in Transition – An Integrated Regional Modelling Framework. Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen. Ph. D. Thesis. Groningen, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 2000.Google Scholar
Hilderink, H., Lucas, P., and Kok, M, eds. Beyond 2015: Long-term Development and the Millennium Development Goals. Report 55002500. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), 2009.
Hirsch, F.Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Hirsch, R.Mitigation of maximum world oil production: Shortage scenarios, Energy Policy 36 (2008): 881–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hisschemöller, M., Eberg, J., Engels, A., and von Moltke, K.. Environmental institutions and learning: Perspectives from the policy sciences. In Principles of Environmental Sciences, pp. 281–303, edited by Boersema, J. and Reijnders, L.. The Netherlands: Springer Science +Business Media B.V., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitlin, S., and Piliavin, J.. Values: reviving a dormant concept, Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 359–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, P., and Vermeer, E.. China's Limits to Growth – Greening State and Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G.Decomposition and growth: Biological metaphors in economics from the 1880s to the 1980s. In The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, pp. 105–148, edited by Döpfer, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, R., and van den Bergh, J.. Structural decomposition analysis of physical flows in the economy, Environmental and Resource Economics 23 (2002): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G.Cultural dimensions in management and planning, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 1 (1984): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J.Hidden Order – How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Helix Books/Addison-Wesley, 1996.Google Scholar
Holling, C. Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecological Systems 4 (1973): 1–23.
Holling, C.The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In The Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Local Surprise and Global Change, edited by Clark, W. and Munn, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/IIASA, 1986.Google Scholar
Hollis, M.The Philosophy of Science – An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Homer-Dixon, T.The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hueting, R.New Scarcity and Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1980.Google Scholar
Hulme, M.Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA (2004). See
IEA (2010). See
IFPRI (2008). See
Inglehart, R., and Welzel, C.. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INFO Project. 2003. See Project Publications at info.k4health.org/about.shtml.
IPCC. Climate Change 2001 (TAR). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
IPCC. Climate Change 2007 (AR4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ironmonger, D., and Sonius, E.. Household productive activities. In Households Work, edited by Ironmonger, D. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1989.Google Scholar
IUCN-WWF (1991). Caring for the world: a strategy for sustainability. IUCN-UNEP-WWF Report. See
Izard, C., and Müller, D.. Tracking the devil's metal: Historical global and contemporary U.S. tin cycles, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54 (2010): 1436–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, T.Prosperity without Growth – Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Earthscan, 2009.Google Scholar
Jager, W., Janssen, M., de Vries, B., de Greef, J., and Vlek, C.. Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo Economicus and Homo Psychologicus in an ecological-economic model, Ecological Economics 35 (2000): 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jager, W., and Mosler, H.-J.. Simulating human behavior for understanding and managing environmental resource use, Journal of Social Issues 63 (2007): 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K., Qi, A., and Ober, E.. Possible changes to arable crop yields, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (2010): 2835–2851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W.The Varieties of Religious Experience – A Study in Human Nature (The Gifford Lectures Edinburgh 1901–02). Glasgow: Collins Fountain Books, 1902/1977.Google Scholar
Janssen, M., ed. Complexity and Ecosystem Management – The Theory and Practice of Multi-agent Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Janssen, M., Kohler, T., and Scheffer, M.. Sunk-cost effects and vulnerability to collapse in ancient societies, Current Anthropology 44 (2003): 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, P., Heuberger, P., and Tiktak, A.. Metamodelleren bij het MNP-RIVM. MNP-Report, Bilthoven, 2005.Google Scholar
Jantsch, E. The Self-organizing Universe. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1980.
Jarvis, P.Ecological Principles and Environmental Issues. Essex, UK: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education, 2000.Google Scholar
Jeong, H., Tombor, B., Albert, R., Oltvai, Z., and Barabási, A.. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks, Nature 407 (2000): 651–654.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, E. The European Miracle (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981/2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, C.G.The Nature of the Psyche. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junginger, M., van Sark, W., and Faaij, A., eds. Technological Learning in the Energy Sector. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N., eds. Well-Being – The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
Kates, R., Clark, W, Corell, R., Hall, J., Jaeger, C., Lowe, I., et al. Sustainability science, Science 292 (2001): 641–642. Available at .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauffman, S.At Home in the Universe – The Search for Laws of Complexity. London: Viking, 1995.Google Scholar
Kay, J.Culture and Prosperity: The Truth about Markets – Why Some Nations Are Rich but Most Remain Poor. New York: HarperBusiness, 2004.Google Scholar
Kearney, J.Food consumption trends and drivers, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (2010): 2793–2807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kefi, S., Rietkerk, M., Alados, C. L., Pueyo, Y., Papanastasis, V. P., ElAich, A., and de Ruiter, P. C.. Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems, Nature 449 (2007): 213–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King Hubbert, M. The energy resources of the Earth, Scientific American 225 (1971): 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirman, A.Ants, rationality, and recruitment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, vol. 1 (1993): 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klee, R., and Graedel, T.. Elemental cycles: A status report on human or natural dominance, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29 (2004):69–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C., Evans, T., and Rivers, R.. Modelling maritime interaction in the Aegean Bronze Age, Antiquity 82 (2008): 1009–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, M., and Jäger, J., eds. Vulnerability of People and the Environment – Challenges and Opportunities. PBL/UNEP Background Studies, 2007. Available at .
Kok, M., Lüdeke, M., Sterzel, T., Lucas, P., Walter, C., Janssen, P., and de Soysa, I.. Quantitative Analysis of Patterns of Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change. PBL/PIK/NTNU Background Studies, 2001. Available at .
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., and Fischer-Kowalski, M.. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century, Ecological Economics 68 (2009): 2696–2705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruyt, B., van Vuuren, D, de Vries, B., and Groenenberg, H.. Indicators for energy security, Energy Policy 37, vol. 6 (2009): 2166–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuik, O., and Verbruggen, H., eds. In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, R., Henn, J., and Lindenberger, D.. Capital, labor, energy and creativity: Modeling innovation diffusion, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 13 (2002): 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambin, E., Geist, H., and Lepers, E.. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28 (2003): 205–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambin, E., and Geist, H., eds. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change – Local Processes and Global Impacts. The IGBP Series. Berlin: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
Lansing, J.Perfect Order: Recognizing Complexity in Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Lao-Tzu, Tao Te Ching (Introduced by Burton Watson). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993.
Layard, R.Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Leemans, R., and Kleidon, A.. In Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts? 88th Dahlem Workshop, edited by Reynolds, J. and Stafford Smith, D.. Berlin: Dahlem University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Kates, R., and Parris, T.. Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31 (2006): 413–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licker, R., Johnston, M., Foley, J., Barford, C., Kucharik, C., Monfreda, C., and Ramankutty, N.. Mind the gap: How do climate and agricultural management explain the “yield gap” of croplands around the world?Global Ecology and Biogeography 19 (2010): 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, M., Metzler, R., and Bar-Yam, Y.. Global pattern formation and ethnic/cultural violence, Science 317 (2007):1540–1544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limburg, K., O’Neill, R., Costanza, R., and Farber, S.. Complex systems and valuation. Special Issue: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives, Ecological Economics 41 (2002): 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, K.Evolutionary phenomena in simple dynamics. In: Artificial Life II, SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Vol. X, edited by Langton, C., Taylor, C., Farmer, J., and Rasmussen, J.. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1991.Google Scholar
Little, L., and McDonald, A.. Simulations of agents in social networks harvesting a resource, Ecological Modelling 204 (2007): 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, T., and Hannah, L, eds. Climate Change and Biodiversity. New Haven/London: Yale University, 2005.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D.Awareness of human impacts: Changing attitudes and emphases. In The Earth as Transformed by Human Action – Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years, pp. 121–136, edited by Turner, B., Clark, W, Kates, R., Richards, J., Mathews, J., and Meyer, W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lüdeke, M., Petschel-Held, G., and Schellnhuber, H.. Syndromes of global change: The first panoramic view, GAIA 13 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, S., and Armstrong, P.. Some of the nineteenth century origins of the sustainability concept, Environment, Development and Sustainability 6 (2004): 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., and S. Scherbov. The end of world population growth, Nature 412 (2001): 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, W., O’Neill, B., and Scherbov, S.. Europe's population at a turning point, Science 299 (2003): 1991–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D.Sustainable Energy – Without the Hot Air. UIT Cambridge, 2009. Available at .Google Scholar
Maddison, A.Monitoring the World Economy. Paris: OECD Development Centre Studies, 1995.Google Scholar
Maddison, A.The World Economy. Vol. 1: A Millennial Perspective; Vol. 2: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD Development Centre Studies, 2006.Google Scholar
Madsen, J., Ang, J., and Banerjee, R.. Four centuries of British economic growth: The roles of technology and population, Journal of Economic Growth 15 (2010): 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malenbaum, W.World Demand for Raw Materials in 1985 and 2000. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
Mäler, K.-G., Xepapadeas, A., and de Zeeuw, A.. The economics of shallow lakes, Environmental and Resource Economics 26 (2003): 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, S.Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory, Geoforum 32 (2001): 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, P.Health transitions in a globalising world: Towards more disease or sustained health?Futures 34 (2002): 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A.Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper, 1954.Google Scholar
Matsutani, A. Shrinking-Population Economics – Lessons from Japan. Tokyo: International House of Japan, 2006.Google Scholar
Max-Neef, M.Human Scale Development – Conception, Application and Further Reflections. London: The Apex Press, 1991.Google Scholar
May, R.Will a large, complex system be stable?Nature 238 (1972): 413–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R.Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Nature 261 (1976): 459–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R.Harvesting natural populations in a randomly fluctuating environment, Science 197 (1977): 463–465.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazoyer, M., and Roudart, L.. Histoire des agricultures du monde. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1997.Google Scholar
McGovern, T.The economics of extinction in Norse Greenland. In Climate and History – Studies in Past Climates and Their Potential Impact on Man, edited by Wigley, T., Ingram, M., and Farmer, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
McNeill, J.Social, economic, and political forces in environmental change: Decadal scale (1900–2000). In Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth (IHOPE) – 96th Dahlem Workshop, edited by Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., and Steffen, W.. Boston: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being – Our Human Planet. Synthesis and Summary for Decision Makers. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Behrens, W. III. The Limits to Growth. New York: Potomac Associates, 1971.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., and Randers, J.. Beyond the Limits – Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Ltd., 1991.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. Fish Banks Ltd. Durham: University of New Hampshire, 1996.
Meadows, D. H. Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development. Report to the Balaton Group. Sustainability Institute, 1998.
Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., and Meadows, D. H.. Limits to Growth – The 30-Year Update. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2004.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. L. Evaluating past forecasts: Reflections on one critique of The Limits to Growth. In Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth (IHOPE) – 96th Dahlem Workshop, edited by Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., and Steffen, W.. Boston: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H.Thinking in Systems. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Meinshausen, M. What does a 2°C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? In Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, edited by Schellnhuber, J., Cramer, W., Nakicenovic, N., Wigley, T., and Yohe, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Mertz, O., Wadley, R., Nielsen, U., Bruun, T., Colfer, C., de Neergaard, A., et al. A fresh look at shifting cultivation: Fallow length an uncertain indicator of productivity, Agricultural Systems 96 (2008): 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, B., Berk, M., den Elzen, M., de Vries, B., and van Vuuren, D.. Towards an equitable global climate change regime: Compatibility with Article 2 of the Climate Change Convention and the link with sustainable development, Climate Policy 2 (2002): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, B.Controlling Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, P., and Ausubel, J.. Carrying capacity: A model with logistically varying limits, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 61 (1999): 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migheli, M.Supporting the free and competitive market in China and India: Differences and evolution over time, Economic Systems 34 (2010): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, E., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjaerseth, J., and Carlin, E.. Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M.Complexity – A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
MNP. Duurzaamheidsverkenning (Sustainability Outlook). Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), 2004.Google Scholar
Morecroft, J., and Sterman, J.. Modelling for learning (special issue), European Journal of Operations Research 59 (1992): 1.Google Scholar
Morrison, C., and Thorbecke, E.. The concept of agricultural surplus, World Development 18 (1990): 1081–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxnes, E.Not only the tragedy of the commons: Misperceptions of bioeconomics, Management Science 44 (1998): 1234–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyo, D.Dead Aid – Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is Another Way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.Google Scholar
Mulder, K.Sustainable Development for Engineers. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., et al. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., and Winter, S.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Neumann, K., Verburg, P., Stehfest, E., and Müller, C. The yield gap of global grain production: A spatial analysis, Agricultural Systems 103 (2010): 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, M. The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Review 45 (2003): 167–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niamir-Fuller, M., and Turner, M., eds. Managing Mobility in African Rangelands: The Legitimization of Transhumance. London: Intermediate Technology Publications, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolis, G., and Prigogine, I.. Exploring Complexity – An Introduction. New York: Freeman & Company, 1989.Google Scholar
Nieuwlaar, E., and de Ruiter, W.. Toegepaste Thermodynamica en Energieconversies. Cursuscode GEO2–2212. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University, 2010.Google Scholar
Nijs, T. de, de Niet, R., and Crommentuijn, L.. Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030, Journal of Environmental Management 72 (2004): 35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, S. Experiences of policy reforms of the forest sector in transition and other countries, Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005): 831–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norberg, J., and Cummings, G., eds. Complexity Theory for a Sustainable Future. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.Geography and macroeconomics: New data and new findings, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 105 (2005): 3510–3517.Google Scholar
Nowak, M., and Sigmund, K.. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games, Science 303 (2004): 793–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M.Evolutionary Dynamics – Exploring the Equations of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M., and Sen, A., eds. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odling-Smee, J., Laland, K., and Feldman, M. Niche construction – The neglected process in evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Odum, H. Environment, Power and Society. New York: Wiley, 1976.
OECD, 2008. Available at .
OECD Factbook, 2007. Available at
OECD/IEA. World Energy Outlook 2010. IEA Report. Paris: OECD. See .
Okin, G. Toward a unified view of biophysical land degradation processes in arid and semi-arid lands. In Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts? 88th Dahlem Workshop, pp. 95--109, edited by Reynolds, J and Stafford Smith, D. Berlin: Dahlem University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Oldeman, L., Hakkeling, R., and Sombroek, G.. World Map of the Status of Human-Induced Soil Degradation (2nd ed.). Wageningen, the Netherlands: ISRIC, 1990.Google Scholar
Opschoor, H.The ecological footprint: Measuring rod or metaphor?Ecological Economics 32 (2000): 363–365.Google Scholar
Ormerod, P.The Butterfly Economy: A New General Theory of Social and Economic Behavior. London: Basic Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E.Governing the Commons – The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E.Collective action and the evolution of social norms, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (2000): 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., and Weber, E., eds. The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002.
Ostrom, E., Janssen, M., and Anderies, J.. Going beyond panaceas – Special feature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 104 (2007): 15176–15178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E.A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems, Science 325 (2009): 419–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papyrakis, E., and Gerlagh, R.. The resource curse hypothesis and its transmission channels, Journal of Comparative Economics 32 (2004): 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papyrakis, E., and Gerlagh, R.. Resource windfalls, investment, and long-term income, Resources Policy 31 (2006): 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parris, T., and Kates, R.. Characterizing a sustainability transition: Goals, targets, trends, and driving forces, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 100 (2003): 8068–8073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parris, T., and Kates, R.. Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 28 (2003): 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parson, E.Protecting the ozone layer. In Institutions for the Earth, pp. 27–73, edited by Haas, P, Keohane, R, and Levy, M. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Pauly, D., and Palomares, M.-L.. Fishing down marine food web: It is far more pervasive than we thought, Bulletin of Marine Science 72 (2005): 197–211.Google Scholar
PBL. Growing within Limits. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2009.Google Scholar
PBL. Assessing an IPCC Assessment: An Analysis of Statements on Projected Regional Impacts in the 2007 Report. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2010a.Google Scholar
PBL. Rethinking Global Biodiversity Strategies. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2010b.Google Scholar
PBL. Zure regen – Een analyse van dertig jaar verzuringsproblematiek in Nederland. PBL Beleidsstudies (Buijsman et al.). Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2010c.Google Scholar
Pearce, D.Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pearce, D.An intellectual history of environmental economics, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27 (2002): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J., and Benjaminsen, T.. One leg or two? Food security and pastoralism in the Northern Sahel, Human Ecology 36 (2008): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, D.The evolutionary roots of our environmental problems: Toward a Darwinian ecology, The Quarterly Review of Biology 78 (2003): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, P., and Batten, D., eds. Complex Science for a Complex World – Exploring Human Ecosystems with Agents. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Perman, R., Yue Ma, J. McGilvray, and Common, M., eds. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd., 2003.Google Scholar
Peters, , G., R. Andrew, and J. Lennox. Constructing an environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output table using the GTAP database, Economic Systems Research 23 (2011): 131–152.
Petschel-Held, G., Block, A., Cassel-Gintz, M., Kropp, J., Lüdeke, M., Moldenhauer, O., et al. Syndromes of global change: A qualitative modelling approach to assist global environmental management, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 4 (1999): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan, D., and Amblard, F., eds. Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation in the Social and Human Sciences. Oxford: Bardwell Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Pielke, R. Jr. The Honest Broker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S.The structure of foodwebs, Theoretical Population Biology 16 (1979): 144–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J., and Gilmore, J.. The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Polimeni, J., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M., and Alcott, B.. The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements. London: Earthscan, 2009.Google Scholar
Pollock, S.Ancient Mesopotamia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ponting, C.A Green History of the World. London: Penguin Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Proctor, R., and Schiebinger, L.. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Pumain, D., ed. Hierarchy in Natural and Social Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railsback, S., and Grimm, V. Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13 (1999): 997–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A., Monfreda, C., and Foley, J.. Farming the planet: I. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22 (2008): .Google Scholar
Raquez, P., and Lambin, E.. Conditions for a sustainable land use: Case study evidence, Journal of Land Use Science 1 (2006): 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnieks, , F., and N. Carreck. Clarity on honey bee collapse? Science 327 (2010): 152–153.
Ravetz, J.The No-Nonsense Guide to Science. Oxford: New Internationalist, 2006.Google Scholar
Rayner, S., and Malone, E., eds. Human Choice and Climate Change (4 vols.). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rayo, L., and Becker, G.. Evolutionary efficiency and happiness, Journal of Political Economy 115 (2007): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. W.Kinship based demographic simulation of societal processes, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1 (1998): 1.Google Scholar
Reader, J.Man on Earth. New York: Perennial Library, 1988.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L.Human Impact on Ancient Environments. Tucson: University of Arizona, 1999.Google Scholar
Reich, W. Supercapitalism. New York: Knopf Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., and Cherry, J., eds. Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Revi, A., Dronin, N., and de Vries, B.. Population and environment in Asia since 1600 AD. In Mappae Mundi – Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-ecological Perspective. Myths, Maps, and Models, pp. 301–352, edited by de Vries, B and Goudsblom, J. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J., and Stafford Smith, D., eds. Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts? 88th Dahlem Workshop. Berlin: Dahlem University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Riahi, K., Grübler, A, and Nakicenovic, N.. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 74 (2007): 887–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. P. Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S., de Ruiter, P., and van de Koppel, J.. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Science 305 (2004): 1926–1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RIVM. Zorgen voor Morgen. Nationale milieuverkenning 1985–2010. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: RIVM, 1988.Google Scholar
Robert, J.Water Is a Commons. Mexico City: Habitat International Coalition, 1994.Google Scholar
Roberts, N., Andersen, D., Deal, R., Garet, M., and Shaffer, W.. Introduction to Computer Simulation – A System Dynamics Approach. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. The End of Food. London: Bloomsbury, 2008.
Robeyns, I., and van der Veen, R.. Sustainable Quality of Life – Conceptual Analysis for a Policy-Relevant Empirical Specification. Report 550031005. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL)/University of Amsterdam, 2007.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.Ordinary Differential Equations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W, Noone, K, Persson, A, Chapin, F, Lambin, E, et al. A safe operating space for humanity, Nature 461 (2009): 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Rinaldo, A.. Fractal River Basins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M.The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Rosen, R.Anticipatory Systems. New York: Pergamon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Rosenau-Tornow, D., Buchholz, P., Riemann, A., and Wagner, M.. Assessing the long-term supply risks for mineral raw materials – a combined evaluation of past and future trends, Resources Policy 34 (2009): 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M.Does oil hinder democracy?World Politics 53 (2001): 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotmans, J. and de Vries, B.. Perspectives on Global Change – the TARGETS Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruth, M., and Hannon, B.. Modeling Dynamic Economic Systems. New York: Springer, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabates, R., Gould, B., and Villarreal, H.. Household composition and food expenditures: A cross-country comparison, Food Policy 26 (2001): 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safarzynska, K., and van den Bergh, J.. Demand-supply coevolution with multiple increasing returns: Policy analysis for unlocking and system transitions, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 (2010): 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M.Stone Age Economics. London: Tavistock Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.Foundations of Economic Analysis (8th ed.). New York: Atheneum, 1947/1976.Google Scholar
Sassi, O., Crassous, R., Hourcade, J.-C., Gitz, V., Waisman, H., and Guivarch, C.. Imaclim-R: A modelling framework to simulate sustainable development pathways, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 10 (2010): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satake, A., and Rudel, T.. Modeling the forest transition: Forest scarcity and ecosystem service hypothesis, Ecological Applications 17 (2007): 2024–2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, A., Heywood, J., Jacoby, H., and Waitz, I.. Transportation in a Climate-Constrained World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar
SCEP. Man's Impact on the Global Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Schandl, H., and Schulz, N.. Industrial ecology: The UK. In A Handbook of Industrial Ecology, pp. 323–333, edited by R. Ayres and L. Ayres. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
Schandl, H., and Krausmann, F.. The great transformation: A socio-metabolic reading of the industrialization of the United Kingdom. In Socioecological Transitions and Global Change: Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use, edited by M. Fischer-Kowalski and H. Haberl. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2007.Google Scholar
Schandl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Grunhubel, C., and Krausmann, F.. Socio-metabolic transitions in developing Asia, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (2009): 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J., Folke, C., and Walker, B.. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature 413 (2001): 591–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffer, M.Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S., Dakos, V., et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions, Nature 461 (2009): 53–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheffer, V.The rise and fall of a reindeer herd, The Scientific Monthly 73 (1951): 356–362.Google Scholar
Schneider, S., and Boston, P., eds. Scientists on Gaia. Boston: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Schnellnhuber, G., Block, A., Cassel-Gintz, M., Kropp, J., Lammel, G., Lass, W., et al. Syndromes of global change, GAIA 6 (1997): 19–34.Google Scholar
Schnellnhuber, G., Crutzen, P., Clark, W., and Hunt, J.. Earth system analysis for sustainability, Environment 47(2005): 10–27.Google Scholar
Schrijver, N.Development without Destruction – The UN and Global Resource Management. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E.Small Is Beautiful. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E. A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Harper Perennial, 1977.
Schwartz, M., and Thompson, M.. Divided We Stand – Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P.The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York: Currency Doubleday, 1995.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S.Beyond individualism/collectivism: New dimensions of values. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory Application and Methods, edited by Kim, U, Triandis, H, Kagitcibasi, C, Choi, S, and Yoon, G. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, F. G. Fagiolo, D. Sornette, F. Vega-Redondo, A. Vespignani, and D. R. White. Economic networks: The new challenges, Science 325 (2009): 422–425.Google Scholar
Scott, J.Seeing like a State – How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Senge, P.The Fifth Discipline – The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency, 1990.Google Scholar
Seppelt, R., and Richter, O.. It was an artefact not the result: A note on system dynamics model development tools, Environmental Modeling & Software 20 (2005): 1543–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, I.Learning how to learn – Psychology and spirituality in the Sufi way. London: Penguin Books, London, 1978/1985.
Shiva, Vandana. The practice of earth democracy, Development Dialogue, What Next? 52 (August 2009). Available at Google Scholar
Sieferle, R.Ruckblick auf die Natur – eine Geschichte des Menschen und seiner Umwelt. Munich: Luchterhand, 1997.Google Scholar
Sietz, D., Lüdeke, M., and Walther, C.. Categorisation of typical vulnerability patterns in global drylands, Global Environmental Change 21 (2011): 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Small, C., and Cohen, J.. Continental physiography, climate and the global distribution of human population, Current Anthropology 45 (2004): 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smil, V.Energy in World History. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sohngen, B., Mendelsohn, R., and Sedjo, R.. Forest management, conservation, and global timber markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 (1999): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, R., and Goodwin, B.. Signs of Life – How Complexity Pervades Biology. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Soramäki, K., Bech, M., Arnold, J., Glass, R., and Beyeler, W.. The topology of interbank payment flows, Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications – Physica A 379 (2007): 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorokin, P.Social and Cultural Dynamics. London: Transaction Publishers, 1957.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., and Tyson, P.. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure. New York: Springer, 2004.Google Scholar
Steg, L., and Vlek, C.. Social science and environmental behaviour. In Principles of Environmental Sciences, pp. 97–142, edited by Boersema, J. and Reijnders, L.. The Netherlands: Springer Science +Business Media B.V., 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterman, J.The economic long wave: theory and evidence, System Dynamics Review 2 (1986): 87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterman, J.Business Dynamics – Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
Sterman, J., and Sweeney, L.. Cloudy skies: Assessing public understanding of global warming, System Dynamics Review 18 (2002): 207–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D., Common, M., and Barbier, E.. Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development, World Development 24 (1996): 1151–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D.The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve, World Development 32 (2004): 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N.The economics of climate change, American Economic Review 98 (2008): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stikker, A.Water – The Blood of the Earth. Exploring Sustainable Water Management for the New Millennium. New York: , 2007.Google Scholar
Ströbele, W.Wirtschaftswachstum bei begrenzten Energieressourcen. Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt, 1984.Google Scholar
Strogatz, S.Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos – with Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.Google Scholar
Sustainability Institute. Commodity Systems Challenges. A Sustainability Institute Report, April 2003. Available at .
Swinnen, J., Banerjee, A., and de Gorter, H.. Economic development, institutional change, and the political economy of agricultural protection – an econometric study of Belgium since the 19th century, Agricultural Economics 26 (2001): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tainter, J.The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Tainter, J.Problem solving: Complexity, history, sustainability, Population and Environment 22 (2000): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TCEPD (Taiwan Council for Economic Planning and Development). Taiwan 2000 – Balancing Economic Growth and Environmental Protection. Taipei: Taiwan National University, 1989.Google Scholar
Tannahill, R.Food in History. New York: Stein and Day, 1973.Google Scholar
Tasaka, H.Invisible Capitalism: Beyond Monetary Economy and the Birth of New Paradigm Economies. New York: Jorge Pinto Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. S. Buffalo hunt: International trade and the virtual extinction of the North American bison, American Economic Review 101 (2011): 3162–3195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TDBT (The Danish Board of Technology). Oil-based Technology and Economy Prospects for the Future. 2004. Available at .
Teilhard de Chardin, P. L’avenir de l'homme. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1959.Google Scholar
Teives Henriques, S., and Kander, A.. The modest environmental relief resulting from the transition to a service economy, Ecological Economics 70 (2010): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TEPD (2010). Transportation Energy Data Book 2010. Available at cta.ornl.gov/data/download29.shtml.
Tesfatsion, L.Introduction to the special issue on agent-based computational economics, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 25 (2001): 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirgood, J.Man and the Mediterranean Forest – A History of Resource Depletion. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildawsky, A.. Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.The dynamics of cultural theory and their implications for the enterprise culture. In Understanding the Enterprise Culture, edited by Heap, S and Ross, A. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.Security and solidarity: An anti-reductionist framework for thinking about the relationship between us and the rest of nature, The Geographical Journal 163 (1997): 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P.Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (2010): 2853–2867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstan, R., Brockington, S., and Roberts, C.. The effects of 118 years of industrial fishing on UK bottom trawl fisheries, Nature Communications 1 (2010): .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toth, F. L.Policy exercises, Simulation & Games 19 (1988): 235–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totman, C.The Green Archipelago: Forestry in Pre-industrial Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Toynbee, A.Mankind and Mother Earth: A Narrative History of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Turchin, P.Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Turchin, P.Complex Population Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Turner, B., Clark, W., Kates, R., Richards, J., Mathews, J., and Meyer, W., eds. The Earth as Transformed by Human Action – Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Turner, G.A comparison of The Limits to Growth with 30 years of reality, Global Environmental Change 18 (2008): 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylecote, A.The Long Wave in the World Economy – The Present Crisis in Historical Perspective. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Ulanowicz, R.Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. San Jose, CA: Excel Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN (United Nations). Indicators of Sustainable Development – Framework and Methodologies. New York: UN, 1996.Google Scholar
UNAIDS. 2004. Available at .
UNEP. Global Environmental Outlook 2. 2000. Available at .
UNEP. Global Environmental Outlook: Environment for Development (GEO–4). Nairobi: UN, 2007.Google Scholar
van Beek, L., and Bierkens, M.. The Global Hydrological Model PCR-GLOBWB: Conceptualization, Parameterization and Verification. Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2008. Available at vanbeek.geo.uu.nl/suppinfo/vanbeekbierkens2009.pdf.
van Beek, L., Wada, Y., and Bierkens, M.. Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability, Water Resources Research 47 (2011): W07517, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, J., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., and Munda, G.. Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy, Ecological Economics 32 (2000): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, J., ed. Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2002.Google Scholar
van den Bergh, J., Faber, A., Idenburg, A., and Oosterhuis, F.. Evolutionary Economics and Environmental Policy: Survival of the Greenest. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Bergh, J. The GDP paradox, Journal of Economic Psychology 30 (2009): 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Leeuw, S., ed. The Archaeomedes Project: Understanding the Natural and Anthropogenic Causes of Land Degradation and Desertification in the Mediterranean Basin. Brussels, Science Research Development European Commission Report EUR 18181 EN. Brussels, 1998.
van der Leeuw, S., and de Vries, B.. The Roman Empire. In Mappae Mundi – Humans and Their Habitats in a Long-Term Socio-ecological Perspective. Myths, Maps, and Models, pp. 209–256, edited by de Vries, B and Goudsblom, J. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
van Egmond, N., and de Vries, B.. Sustainability: the search for the integral worldview, Futures 43 (2011): 853–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Praag, B., and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.. Happiness Quantified. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Praag, B., and Frijters, P.. The measurement of welfare and well-being: The Leyden approach. In Well-Being – The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by Kahneman, D, Diener, E, and Schwarz, N. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D., Strengers, B., and de Vries, B.. Long-term perspectives on world metal use – a model-based approach, Resources Policy 25 (2000): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Vuuren, D., de Vries, B., Beusen, A., and Heuberger, P.. Conditional probabilistic estimates of 21st century greenhouse gas emissions based on the storylines of the IPCC-SRES scenarios, Global Environmental Change 18 (2008): 635–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zon, R. Duurzame ontwikkeling in historisch perspectief. Vakreviews Duurzame Ontwikkeling. RU Groningen/KUN, 2002.
Veenhoven, R.Is happiness relative?Social Indicators Research 24 (1991): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennix, J.Group model building: Tackling messy problems, System Dynamics Review 15 (1999): 379–401.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verburg, P., Veldkamp, A., and Fresco, L.. Simulation of changes in the spatial pattern of land use in China, Applied Geography 19 (1999): 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verburg, P., de Groot, W., and Veldkamp, A.. Methodology for multi-scale land-use change modelling: Concepts and challenges. In Global Environmental Change and Land Use, edited by Dolman, A, Verhagen, A, and Rovers, C. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Verburg, P., Overmars, K., Huigen, M., de Groot, W., and Veldkamp, A.. Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines, Applied Geography 26 (2006): 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verburg, P., van Berkel, D., van Doorn, A., van Eupen, M., and van den Heiligenberg, H.. Trajectories of land use change in Europe: A model-based exploration of rural futures, Landscape Ecology 25 (2010): 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vervoort, J., Kok, K., van Lammeren, R., and Veldkamp, T.. Stepping into futures: Exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems, Futures 42 (2010): 604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verweij, M., and Thompson, M., eds. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics, and Plural Perceptions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vringer, K., and Blok, K.. Long-term trends in direct and indirect household energy intensities: A factor in dematerialisation?Energy Policy 28 (2000): 713–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vringer, K., Aalbers, T., and Blok, K.. Household energy requirement and value pattern, Energy Policy 35 (2007): 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VROM/ABF. 2009. Statistical Data on Housing in the Netherlands. See .
Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N., Deumling, D, Callejas Linares, A, Jenkins, M, Kapos, V, et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 99 (2002): 9266–9271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, Y., Van Beek, L., van Kempen, C., Reckman, J., Vasak, S., and Bierkens, M.. Global depletion of groundwater resources, Geophysical Research Letters 37 (2010): L20402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, Y., van Beek, L., Viviroli, D., Dürr, H., Weingartner, R., and Bierkens, M.. Global monthly water stress: 2. Water demand and severity of water stress, Water Resources Research 47 (2011): W07518, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, J., and Mulligan, M.. Environmental Modelling – Finding Simplicity in Complexity. London: John Wiley& Sons, Ltd., 2004.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Anderies, J., Kinzig, A., and Ryan, P., eds. Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems – Comparative Studies and Theory Development. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Wall, G., and Gong, M.. On exergy and sustainable development – Part I: Conditions and concepts, Exergy International Journal 1 (2001): 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C.Adaptive Management. New York: Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar
Warde, P.Energy Consumption in England & Wales 1560–2000. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 2007.Google Scholar
Warr, A., Schandl, H., and Ayres, R.. Long-term trends in resource exergy consumption and useful work supplies in the UK, 1900 to 2000, Ecological Economics 68 (2002): 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassenaar, T. P. Gerber, M. Rosales, M. Ibrahim, P. Verburg, , and Steinfeld, H.. Predicting land use changes in the neotropics: The geography of pasture expansion into forest, Global Environmental Change 17 (2007): 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D.Small Worlds – The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness. Princeton Studies in Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Volker, B., and Hasselmann, K.. A multi-actor dynamic integrated assessment model (MADIAM) of induced technological change and sustainable economic growth, Ecological Economics 54 (2005): 306–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbuch, G., and Boudjema, G. Dynamical aspects in the adoption of agri-environmental measures, Advances in Complex Systems 2 (1999): 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisdorf, J.From foraging to farming: Explaining the Neolithic revolution, Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (2005): 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welcomme, J., Cowx, I., Coates, D., Béné, C., Funge-Smith, S., Halls, A., and Lorenzen, K.. Inland capture fisheries, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (2010): 2881–2896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wene, K.-O./IEA. Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. Paris: IEA, 2000.Google Scholar
Westhoek, H., van den Berg, M., and Bakkes, J.. Scenario development to explore the future of Europe's rural areas, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114 (2006): 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R., and Engelen, G.. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling, Environment and Planning B 24 (1997): 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO. 2002. Available at .
Wilber, K.The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion. Dublin: Gateway, 2001.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R.Poverty and Progress: An Ecological Model of Economic Development. London: Methuen & Co., 1973.Google Scholar
Williams, M.A new look at global forest histories, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33 (2008): 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.Sociobiology – The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf, 1998.Google Scholar
Wilting, H., Faber, A., and Idenburg, A.. Investigating new technologies in a scenario context: Description and application of an input-output method, Journal of Cleaner Production 16S1 (2008): S102–S112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M.Legacy – A Search for the Origins of Civilization. London: BBC Worldwide Ltd., 1999.Google Scholar
World Bank. Expanding the Measure of Wealth – Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development. New York: World Bank, 1997.Google Scholar
WRI. World Resources Report, Chapter 2: Taking stock of ecosystems. 2000–2001.
WRI (2003). World Resource Report.
Wright, R.Nonzero –The Logic of Human Destiny. New York: Pantheon Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Yates, R.War, food shortages, and relief measures in early China. In Hunger in History – Food Shortage, Poverty, and Deprivation, pp. 147–177, edited by Newman, L. London: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Yeats, W. The Second Coming: Collected Poems of W.B.Yeats. New York: Scribner Paperback Poetry, 1939/1996.Google Scholar
Yergin, D.The Prize – The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power. London: Simon & Schuster, 1991.Google Scholar
ZTB (Zentrum fur Transformation der Bundeswehr). Peak Oil – Sicherheitspolitische Implikationen knapper Ressources. 2010. Available at .
Dakang, Zuo. The Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. In The Earth as Transformed by Human Action – Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere over the Past 300 Years, edited by Turner, B, Clark, W, Kates, R, Richards, J, Mathews, J, and Meyer, W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Bert J. M. de Vries, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Sustainability Science
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794469.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Bert J. M. de Vries, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Sustainability Science
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794469.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Bert J. M. de Vries, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Sustainability Science
  • Online publication: 05 January 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794469.018
Available formats
×