No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Revenge and forgiveness or betrayal blindness?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2012
Abstract
McCullough et al. hypothesize that evolution has selected mechanisms for revenge to deter harms and for forgiveness to preserve valuable relationships. However, in highly dependent relationships, the more adaptive course of action may be to remain unaware of the initial harm rather than risk alienating a needed other. We present a testable model of possible victim responses to interrelational harm.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
DePrince, A. P., Brown, L. S., Cheit, R. E., Freyd, J. J., Gold, S. N., Pezdek, K. & Quina, K. (2012) Motivated forgetting and misremembering: Perspectives from Betrayal Trauma Theory. In: True and false recovered memories: Toward a reconciliation of the debate. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 58, ed. Belli, R. F., pp. 193–243. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. & O'Sullivan, M. (2006) From flawed self-assessment to blatant whoppers: The utility of voluntary and involuntary behavior in detecting deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 24:673–86.Google Scholar
Freyd, J. J. (1996) Betrayal trauma: The logic of forgetting childhood abuse. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freyd, J. J., DePrince, A. P. & Gleaves, D. (2007) The state of betrayal trauma theory: Reply to McNally (2007) – Conceptual issues and future directions. Memory 15:295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness
Related commentaries (27)
A systems view on revenge and forgiveness systems
Adaptationism and intuitions about modern criminal justice
Affective antecedents of revenge
An eye for an eye: Reciprocity and the calibration of redress
An implausible model and evolutionary explanation of the revenge motive
Applying the revenge system to the criminal justice system and jury decision-making
Forgiveness is institutionally mediated, not an isolable modular output
It takes more to forgive: The role of executive control
No such thing as genuine forgiveness?
On the differential mediating role of emotions in revenge and reconciliation
On the evolutionary origins of revenge and forgiveness: A converging systems hypothesis
Pathways to abnormal revenge and forgiveness
Personality, self-control, and welfare-tradeoff ratios in revenge and forgiveness
Revenge and forgiveness in the New South Africa
Revenge and forgiveness or betrayal blindness?
Revenge can be more fully understood by making distinctions between anger and hatred
Revenge without redundancy: Functional outcomes do not require discrete adaptations for vengeance or forgiveness
Revenge, even though it is not your fault
Revenge: An adaptive system for maximizing fitness, or a proximate calculation arising from personality and social-psychological processes?
Revenge: Behavioral and emotional consequences
The cultural shaping of revenge
The elementary dynamics of intergroup conflict and revenge
The fuzzy reality of perceived harms
The logic of moral outrage
Third parties belief in a just world and secondary victimization
Towards a multifaceted understanding of revenge and forgiveness
Why so complex? Emotional mediation of revenge, forgiveness, and reconciliation
Author response
Putting revenge and forgiveness in an evolutionary context