Commentary on the Second Geneva Convention Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea
Book contents
- Commentary on the Second Geneva Convention
- Commentary on the Second Geneva Convention
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword by Peter Maurer
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Preamble
- Chapter I General Provisions
- Article 1 Respect for the Convention
- Article 2 Application of the Convention
- Article 3 Conflicts not of an international character
- Article 4 Field of Application
- Article 5 Application by Neutral Powers
- Article 6 Special Agreements
- Article 7 Non-Renunciation of Rights
- Article 8 Protecting Powers
- Article 9 Activities of The Icrc and other Impartial Humanitarian Organizations
- Article 10 Substitutes for Protecting Powers
- Article 11 Conciliation Procedure
- Chapter II Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked
- Chapter III Hospital Ships
- Chapter IV Personnel
- Chapter V Medical Transports
- Chapter VI The Distinctive Emblem
- Chapter VII Execution of the Convention
- Chapter VIII Repression of Abuses and Infractions
- Final Provisions
- Testimonium and Signature Clause
- Sources
- Index
- References
Article 2 - Application of the Convention
from Chapter I - General Provisions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 November 2017
Compiled by
Book contents
- Commentary on the Second Geneva Convention
- Commentary on the Second Geneva Convention
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword by Peter Maurer
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Preamble
- Chapter I General Provisions
- Article 1 Respect for the Convention
- Article 2 Application of the Convention
- Article 3 Conflicts not of an international character
- Article 4 Field of Application
- Article 5 Application by Neutral Powers
- Article 6 Special Agreements
- Article 7 Non-Renunciation of Rights
- Article 8 Protecting Powers
- Article 9 Activities of The Icrc and other Impartial Humanitarian Organizations
- Article 10 Substitutes for Protecting Powers
- Article 11 Conciliation Procedure
- Chapter II Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked
- Chapter III Hospital Ships
- Chapter IV Personnel
- Chapter V Medical Transports
- Chapter VI The Distinctive Emblem
- Chapter VII Execution of the Convention
- Chapter VIII Repression of Abuses and Infractions
- Final Provisions
- Testimonium and Signature Clause
- Sources
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Commentary on the Second Geneva ConventionConvention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, pp. 76 - 133Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Select bibliography
Akande, Dapo, ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 32–79.Google Scholar
Arimatsu, Louise, ‘Beginning of IHL Application: Overview and Challenges’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
Ascencio, Hervé, ‘La responsabilité selon la Cour internationale de Justice dans l'affaire du génocide bosniaque’, Revue générale de droit international public, Vol. 111, No. 2, 2007, pp. 285–304.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, The International Law of Occupation, Princetown University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul, ‘When Does Violence Cross the Armed Conflict Threshold: Current Dilemmas’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘Belligerent Occupation’, Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 4, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 64–66.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, ‘The Nicaragua and Tadić; Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, ‘The Concept of International Armed Conflict’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
David, Eric, Principes de droit des conflits armés, 5th edition, Bruylant, Brussels, 2012.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘Comments on War’, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 27, No. 3, Summer 2004, pp. 877–892.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The International Law of Belligerent Occupation, Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th edition, Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut and Colassis, Laurent, ‘International Humanitarian Law in the Iraq Conflict’, German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 47, 2004, pp. 293–342.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Ola, ‘Multinational peace operations forces involved in armed conflict: who are the parties?’, in Larsen, Kjetil Mujezinović, Cooper, Camilla Guldahl and Nystuen, Gro (eds), Searching for a ‘Principle of Humanity’ in International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 233–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, ‘IHL applicability to international organisations involved in peace operations’, in International Organisations’ Involvement in Peace Operations: Applicable Legal Framework and the Issue of Responsibility, Proceedings of the 12th Bruges Colloquium, 20–21 October 2011, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 42, Autumn 2012, pp. 15–22. (2012a)Google Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, ‘Determining the beginning and end of an occupation under international humanitarian law’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 885, March 2012, pp. 133–163. (2012b)Google Scholar
Ferraro, Tristan, ‘The applicability and application of international humanitarian law to multinational forces’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 95, No. 891, December 2013, pp. 561–612.Google Scholar
Fleck, Dieter, ‘The Law of Non-international Armed Conflict’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 581–610.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter and Dörmann, Knut, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 231–320.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, April 1987, pp. 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘The Administration of Occupied Territory in International Law’, in Playfair, Emma (ed.), International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 45–78.Google Scholar
Grignon, Julia, L'applicabilité temporelle du droit international humanitaire, Schulthess, Geneva, 2014.Google Scholar
ICRC, Occupation and Other Forms of Administration of Foreign Territory, Report of expert meeting edited and prepared by Ferraro, Tristan, ICRC, Geneva, March 2012.Google Scholar
Kleffner, Jann K., ‘Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 43–78.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Ius in bello: Le droit international des conflits armés, Précis, Helbing and Lichtenhahn, Basel, 2003.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Ius in bello: Le droit international des conflits armés, Précis, 2nd edition, Helbing and Lichtenhahn, Basel, 2009.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Porretto, Gabriele and Vité, Sylvain, L'application du droit international humanitaire et des droits de l'homme aux organisations internationales: Forces de paix et administrations civiles transitoires, Bruylant, Brussels, 2005.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert and Vité, Sylvain, Le droit de l'occupation militaire: Perspectives historiques et enjeux juridiques actuels, Bruylant, Brussels, 2009.Google Scholar
Koutroulis, Vaios, ‘L'affaire des Activités armées sur le territoire du Congo (Congo c. Ouganda): une lecture restrictive du droit de l'occupation?’, Revue belge de droit international, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2006, pp. 703–741.Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, Dino, ‘The Tremors of Tadić;,’ Israel Law Review, Vol. 43, 2010, pp. 262–300.Google Scholar
Lijnzaad, Liesbeth, ‘How Not to Be an Occupying Power: Some Reflections on UN Security Council Resolution 1483 and the Contemporary Law of Occupation’, in Lijnzaad, Liesbeth, van Sambeek, Johanna and Tahzib-Lie, Bahia (eds), Making the Voice of Humanity Heard, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2004, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘What does IHL regulate and is the current armed conflict classification adequate?’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Marouda, Maria-Daniella, ‘Application of international humanitarian law in contemporary armed conflicts: Is it ‘simply’ a question of facts?’, in Perrakis, Stelios and Marouda, Maria-Daniella (eds), Armed Conflicts and International Humanitarian Law 150 Years after Solferino: Acquis and Prospects, Bruylant, Brussels, 2009, pp. 201–244.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 553–604.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘State Responsibility for Genocide: A Follow-Up’, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 669–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘End of IHL Application: Overview and challenges’, in Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law, Proceedings of the 13th Bruges Colloquium, 18–19 October 2012, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 43, Autumn 2013, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Marko and Hadzi-Vidanovic, Vidan, ‘A taxonomy of armed conflict’, in White, Nigel D. and Henderson, Christian (eds), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Jus post Bellum, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013, pp. 256–314.Google Scholar
Okimoto, Keiichiro, The Distinction and Relationship between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2011.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, ‘Overlap and Convergence: The Interaction between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2007, pp. 157–196.Google Scholar
Partsch, Karl Josef, ‘Armed conflict’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. I, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1992, p. 252.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, ‘What Is a Military Occupation?’, British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1984, pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, ‘The End of Occupation: Iraq 2004’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello, The Separation between the Legality of the Use of Force and Humanitarian Rules to be Respected in Warfare: Crucial or Outdated?’, in Schmitt, Michael N. and Pejic, Jelena (eds), International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, 2007, pp. 241–264.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘International humanitarian law and peace operations, scope of application ratione materiae’, in Beruto, Gian Luca (ed.), International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and Peace Operations, Proceedings of the 31st Round Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4–6 September 2008, International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San Remo, 2008, pp. 100–106.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘A plea in defence of Pictet and the inhabitants of territories under invasion: the case for the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention during the invasion phase’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 885, March 2012, pp. 42–50.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘The Concept and the Beginning of Occupation’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 1389–1419.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law Protect in War? Vol. I, 3rd edition, ICRC, Geneva, 2011, p. 122.Google Scholar
Schindler, Dietrich, ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’, Recueil des cours de l'Académie de droit international de La Haye, Vol. 163, 1979, pp. 117–164.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Classification of cyber conflict’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012, pp. 245–260. (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Classification in Future Conflict’, in Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 455–477. (2012b)Google Scholar
Shields Delessert, Christiane, Release and Repatriation of Prisoners of War at the End of Active Hostilities: A Study of Article 118, Paragraph 1 of the 3rd Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, Zurich, 1977.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The United Nations as an Actor Bound by International Humanitarian Law’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1998, pp. 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The applicability of international humanitarian law to peace operations, from rejection to acceptance’, in Beruto, Gian Luca (ed.), International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and Peace Operations, Proceedings of the 31st Round Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law, 4–6 September 2008, International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San Remo, 2008, pp. 90–99.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The Secretary General's Bulletin on the Observance by United Nations Forces of International Humanitarian Law: A Decade Later’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 39, 2009, pp. 357–377.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, ‘The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 3, July 2009, pp. 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venturini, Gabriella, ‘The Temporal Scope of Application of the Conventions’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
Vité, Sylvain, ‘Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal concepts and actual situations’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, March 2009, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
Voelckel, Michel, ‘Faut-il encore déclarer la guerre?’, Annuaire français de droit international, Vol. 37, 1991, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, Marten, ‘Is the law of occupation applicable to the invasion phase? Challenging the Pictet theory’, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 94, No. 885, March 2012, pp. 30–36. (2012a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwanenburg, Marten, ‘International organisations vs. troops contributing countries: Which should be considered as the party to an armed conflict during peace operations?’, International Organisations’ Involvement in Peace Operations: Applicable Legal Framework and the Issue of Responsibility, Proceedings of the 12th Bruges Colloquium, 20–21 October 2011, College of Europe/ICRC, Collegium No. 42, Autumn 2012, pp. 23–28. (2012b).Google Scholar