Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:00:09.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Chain, tree, and network: the development of phylogenetic systematics in the context of genealogical visualization and information graphics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

By
Nobuhiro Minaka
Edited by
David Williams ,
Michael Schmitt  and
Quentin Wheeler
David Williams
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Michael Schmitt
Affiliation:
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Germany
Quentin Wheeler
Affiliation:
State University of New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics
The Legacy of Willi Hennig
 , pp. 410 - 430
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibald, J.D. (2014). Aristotle’s Ladder, Darwin’s Tree: The Evolution of Visual Metaphors for Biological Order. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Q.D. and Gray, R.D. (2003). Curious parallels and curious connections: phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Systematic Biology, 54, 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive Foundations of Natural History : Towards an Anthropology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547-609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbrook, A.C., Howe, C.J., Blake, N. and Robinson, P. (1998). The phylogeny of The Canterbury Tales. Nature, 394, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsanti, G. (1992). La scala, la mappa, l’albero: immagini e classificazioni della natura fra Sei e Ottocento. Florence: Sansoni Editore.Google Scholar
Baum, D. and Smith, S. (2013). Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Greenwood Village, TX: Roberts and Company.Google Scholar
Cameron, H. Don (1987). The upside-down cladogram: problems in manuscript affiliation. In Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Hoenigswald, H.M. and Wiener, L.F., Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, B.A. and Priestely, H.A. (2002). Introduction to Lattices and Order, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dress, A., Huber, K.T., Koolen, J., Moulton, V., and Spillner, A. (2012). Basic Phylogenetic Combinatorics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M.J. (1990). Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson’s version of cladistics? Cladistics, 6, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. (2004). Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Fitzhugh, K. (2006). The abduction of phylogenetic hypotheses. Zootaxa, 1145, 1–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, P. and Renfrew, C. (eds.) (2006). Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages. Cambridge: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. (2004). Family resemblances and family trees: two cognitive metaphors. Critical Inquiry, 30, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S.J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homology, or why history matters. American Scientist, 74, 60–69.Google Scholar
Greg, W.W. (1927). The Calculus of Variants: An Essay on Textual Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, J.R. (1954). The Language of Taxonomy: An Application of Symbolic Logic to the Study of Classificatory Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutscher Zentralverlag.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1957). Systematik und Phylogenese. In Bericht über die Hundertjahrfeierder Deutschen Entomologischen Gesellschaft Berlin, 30. September bis 5. Oktober 1956, ed. Hannemann, H. -J., 50–71. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1974). Kritische Bemerkungen zur Frage “Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?” Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 12, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1975). “Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?”: a reply to Ernst Mayr. Systematic Zoology, 24, 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1982). Phylogenetische Systematik. Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, H.M. (1973). Studies in Formal Historical Linguistics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, H.M. and Wiener, L.F. (eds.) (1987). Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, F.R., Kendall, D.G., and Tăutu, P. (eds.) (1971). Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, G. (1972). Carl Johan Schlyter and textual scholarship. Saga och Sed (Kungliga Gustav Adolf Akademiens Aarsbok), 1972, 48–80.Google Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1979). The limits of cladism. Systematic Zoology, 28, 414–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, C. (2000). L’ombre des ancêtres: essai sur l’imaginaire médiéval de laparenté. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, C. (2003). L’arbre des familles. Paris: Éditions de la Martière.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. (1993). Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground : An Essay in Naturalistic Epistemology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lam, H.J. (1936). Phylogenetic symbols, past and present (being an apology for genealogical trees). Acta Biotheoretica, Series A, 2, 153–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, R. (1992). What’s So Special about the Past? In History and Evolution, ed. by Nitecki, M.H. and Nitecki, D.V., 55–67, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lima, M. (2014). The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Lipo, C.P., O’Brien, M.J., Collard, M., and Shennan, S.J. (eds.) (2005). Mapping our Ancestors: Phylogenetic Approaches in Anthropology and Prehistory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Maas, P. (1927). Textkritik, 2nd edition [1950]. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Maas, P. (1937). Leitfehler und stemmatische Typen. Byzantinische Zeitschrift, 37, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minaka, N. (1993). Cladistics and biogeographic methods: cladograms, components, and parsimony. Bulletin of the Biogeographical Society of Japan 48(2), 1–27. [In Japanese with English abstract]Google Scholar
Minaka, N. (1997). Systematics, Phylogenetics, and the Tree of Life: A Cladistic Perspective. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Minaka, N. (2005). Ernst Mayr and Willi Hennig: Revisiting the Systematics Controversy in the 1970s. Taxa: Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, 19, 95–101. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Minaka, N. (2006). Tree-Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic World View. Tokyo: Kodansha. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Minaka, N. (2015). Translator’s note: The great tree of knowledge – Past, present, and future. In Lima, M. (2015). The Book of Trees. Translated by Minaka, N.. Tokyo: BNN, Inc., pp. 202–207. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Minaka, N. and Sugiyama, K. (2012). Phylogeny Mandala: Chain, Tree, and Network. Tokyo: NTT Publishing. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Nakao, H. and Minaka, N. (eds.) (2012). An Introduction to Cultural Phylogenetics: An Unified Framework for Studying Patterns in Cultural Evolution. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo. [In Japanese]Google Scholar
Nelson, G. (1973). Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationship. Systematic Zoology, 22, 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. (1979). Cladistic analysis and synthesis: Principles and definitions, with a historical note on Adanson’s Familles des plantes (1763–1764). Systematic Zoology, 28, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. and Platnick, N. (1981). Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M.J. and Lyman, R. Lee (2003). Cladistics and Archaeology. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
O’Hara, R.J. (1996). Trees of history in systematics and philology. Memorie della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, 27, 81–88.Google Scholar
Papavero, N. and Llorente, J. (eds.) (2008). Principia Taxonomica: Una Introducción a los Fundamentos Lógicos, Filosóficos y Metodológicos de las Escuelas de Taxonomía Biológica, Volumen I – IX. Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Pietsch, T.W. (2012). Trees of Life: A Visual History of Evolution. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platnick, N.I. (1979). Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics. Systematic Zoology, 28, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platnick, N.I. and D.Cameron, H. (1977). Cladistic methods in textual, linguistic, and phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Zoology, 26, 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragan, M.A. (2009). Trees and networks before and after Darwin. Biology Direct, 4, 43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P.M.W. and O’Hara, R.J. (1992). Report on the textual criticism challenge 1991. Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 3, 331–337.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, J. (ed.) (1998). Sir Walter Wilson Greg: A Collection of His Writings. New York: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Schadt, H.(1982). Die Darstellungen der Arbores Consanguinitatis und der Arbores Affinitates: Bildschemata in juristischen Handschriften. Tübingen: Verlag Ernst Wasmuth.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Burkhardt, A. (2005). Stammbäume der Kunst: Zur Genealogie der Avantgarde. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (2013). From Taxonomy to Phylogenetics: Life and Work of Willi Hennig. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semple, C. and Steel, M. (2003). Phylogenetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G.G.(1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Waddell, P.J. and Hillis, D.M. (1996). Phylogenetic inference. In Molecular Systematics, Second Edition, ed. by Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C. and Mable, B.K., 407–514. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1963). La genesi del metodo del Lachmann. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1971). Die Entstehung der Lachmannschen Methode. Translated by Irmer, D.. Hamburg: Hermut Buske.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (2005). The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method. Translated by Most, G.W.. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. (2004). Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, W. (1847). The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon Their History. Second Edition. 2 Volumes. London: John W. Parker. [Reprinted in 1967: F. Cass, New York]Google Scholar
Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B. (1910–13). Principia Mathematica (Three Volumes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, D.M. and Ebach, M.C. (2008). Foundations of Systematics and Biogeography. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1937). The Axiomatic Method in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, C.K. (2009). Naming Nature: The Clash between Instinct and Science. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, W. (1931). Arbeitsweise der botanischen Phylogenetik und anderer Gruppierungswissenschaften. In Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden, Abteilung IX: Methoden zur Erforschung der Leistungen des tierischen Organismus, Teil 3: Methoden der Vererbungsforschung, Heft 6 (Lieferung 356), ed. Abderhalden, E., 941–1053. Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×