Brower, A.V.Z. (2000). Evolution is not a necessary assumption of cladistics. Cladistics, 19, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, J.M. (1987). Cladistics of cladists. Cladistics, 3, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dumont, H.J., Vierstraete, A. and Vanfleteren, J.R. (2010). A molecular phylogeny of the Odonata (Insecta). Systematic Entomology, 35, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupuis, C. (1990). Hennig, Emil Hans Willi. In Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Volume 17 (Supplement 2), ed. Holmes, F.L.. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, pp. 407–410.Google Scholar

Ebach, M.C., Morrone, J.J. and Williams, D.M. (2008). A new cladistics of cladists. Biology and Philosophy, 23, 153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, M.S. and Kristensen, N.P. (2013). A history of entomological classification. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 585–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Farris, J.S. (1969). A successive approximation approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology, 18, 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farris, J.S. (1983). The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In Advances in Cladistics 2, Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, ed. Platnick, N.I. and Funk, V.A.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 7–36, 701–702.Google Scholar

Farris, J.S. (1988). Hennig86 version 1.5, Computer programme and manual, published by the author.Google Scholar

Farris, J.S. (2014). Homology and misdirection. Cladistics, 30, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flot, J.-F., Couloux, A. and Tillier, S. (2010). Haplowebs as a graphical tool for delimiting species: a revival of Doyle’s “field for recombination” approach and its application to the coral genus Pocillopora in Clipperton. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10:372. DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-372.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M.T. (1987). Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biology and Philosophy, 2, 127–143.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutscher Zentralverlag.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. (1952). Autorreferat: Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 2, 329–331.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. (1957). Systematik und Phylogenese. In Bericht über die Hundertjahrfeier der Deutschen Entomologischen Gesellschaft Berlin, ed. Hannemann, H.-J.. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, pp. 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. (1974). Kritische Bemerkungen zur Frage ‘Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification?.’ Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 12, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennig, W. (1982). Phylogenetische Systematik. Berlin-Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. (1983). Stammesgeschichte der Chordaten (Fortschritte der Zoologischen Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 2). Berlin-Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. (1984). Aufgaben und Probleme stammesgeschichtlicher Forschung. Berlin-Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar

Hennig, W. and Schlee, D. (1978). Abriß der phylogenetischen Systematik. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Serie A, Nr. 319, 1–11.Google Scholar

Hennig, W., Bollmann, H. and Machatschke, J. (1953). Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 3 (Sonderheft), 1–85.Google Scholar

Hull, D.L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, D.L. (1989). The evolution of phylogenetic systematics. In The Hierarchy of Life, ed. Fernholm, B., , B., Bremer, K. and Jörnvall, H.. Amsterdam: Elsevier (Excerpta Medica), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar

Kitching, I.J., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, D.M. (1998). Cladistics. The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kluge, A. and Farris, J.S. (1969). Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of the anurans. Systematic Zoology, 18, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, E. (1974). Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 12, 94–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mishler, B.D. (2000). Deep phylogenetic relationships among ‘plants’ and their implications for classification. Taxon, 49, 661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neigel, J.E. and Avise, J.C. (1986). Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In Evolutionary Processes and Theory, ed. Nevo, E. and Karlin, S.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, G.J. and Platnick, N.I. (1981). Systematics and Biogeography, Cladistic and Vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Nixon, K.C. and Carpenter, J.M. (1993). On outgroups. Cladistics, 9, 413–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Panchen, A.L. (1992). Classification, Evolution, and the Nature of Biology. Cambridge-New York-Oakleigh: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, C. (1982). Morphological characters and homology. In Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, ed. Joysey, K.A. and Friday, A.E.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 21–74.Google Scholar

Platnick, N.I. (1977). Cladograms, phylogenetic trees, and hypothesis testing. Systematic Zoology, 26, 438–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platnick, N.I. (1979). Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics. Systematic Zoology, 28, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Remane, A. (1952). Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Theoretische Morphologie und Systematik I. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest and Portig.Google Scholar

Rieppel, O. (2010). Reydon on species, individuals and kinds: a reply. Cladistics, 26, 341–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rieppel, O. (2011). Species are individuals – the German tradition. Cladistics, 27, 629–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmitt, M. (2013). From Taxonomy to Phylogenetics – Life and Work of Willi Hennig. Leiden – Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuh, R.T. and Brower, A.V.Z. (2009). Biological Systematics – Principles and Applications, 2nd edition. Ithaca, London: Comstock Publishing Associates.Google Scholar

Sharma, P.P., Kaluziak, S.T., Pérez-Porro, A.R., et al. (2014). Phylogenomic interrogation of Arachnida reveals systemic conflicts in phylogenetic signal. Molecular Biology and Evolution. DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swofford, D.L. (1985). PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. User’s manual. Champaign, IL: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar

Vanderlaan, T.A., Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M. and Wilkins, J.S. (2013). Defining and redefining monophyly: Haeckel, Hennig, Ashlock, Nelson and the proliferation of definitions. Australian Systematic Botany, 26, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wägele, J.-W. (2000). Grundlagen der Phylogenetischen Systematik. München: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar

Wägele, J.-W. (2004). Hennig’s Phylogenetic Systematics brought up to date. In Milestones in Systematics, ed. Williams, D.M. and Forey, P.L.. London: CRC Press, pp. 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watrous, L.E. and Wheeler, Q.D. (1981). The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology, 30, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, Q.D. (2008). Undisciplined thinking: morphology and Hennig’s unfinished revolution. Systematic Entomology, 33, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiley, E.O. (1981). Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Wiley, E.O. and Lieberman, B.S. (2011). Phylogenetics – Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, D.M. and Forey, P.L. (ed.) (2004). Milestones in Systematics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar