Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:27:26.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Beatriz Magaloni
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Voting for Autocracy
Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico
, pp. 273 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rohde, David W.. 1992. “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 82: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron K., and Robinson, James. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Chris. 1989. “Prospective Voting and the Theory of Party Identification.” Unpublished manuscript.
Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Breaking the Iron Triangle: Social Psychology, Demographic Variables and Linear Regression in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14(3): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1996. “The Timing of Political Liberalization: Taiwan as the Canonical Case.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Alesina, Alberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1988. “Credibility and Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters.” American Economic Review 78: 796–805.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Cohen, Gerald D., and Roubini, Nouriel. 1993. “Macroeconomic Policy and Elections in OECD DemocraciesEconomics and Politics 4: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Roubini, Nouriel. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Michael R. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Michael R., and Nagler, Jonathan. 2000. “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1970. “Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant Party.” American Political Science Review. 64(1): 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1987. Political Survival. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Califorina Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Books.Google Scholar
Arriola, Leonardo. 2004. “Managing Political Risks: Coups and Clients in African States, 1971–2001.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Bailey, John. 1994. “Centralism and Political Change in Mexico: The Case of National Solidarity.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur. 1976. Cross-national Time Series, 1815–1973. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Inter-University consortium for Political and Social Research. CD-ROM.
Barro, Robert. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Basánez, Miguel. 1994. “Encuestas y Resultados de la Eleccion de 1994.” Este Pais 43: 13–21.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1984a. “Some Conventional Orthodoxies in the Study of Agrarian Change.” World Politics 36(2): 234–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1984b. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1989. Beyond the Miracle of the Market. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 2001. Prosperity and Violence. New York: Norton.
Bates, Robert, Greif, Avner, Levy, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumhogger, Goswin. 1999. “Zimbabwe.” In Nohlen, Dieter et al., Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George R., Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensusán, Graciela. 2004. “A New Scenario for Mexican Trade Unions: Changes in the Structure of Political and Economic Opportunities.” In Middlebrook, Kevin J. (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London / Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan. 2003. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55 (July): 517–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G., and Tiao, G.. 1992. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank. 1955. “Mexico: An Experiment in One-Party Democracy.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Brandenburg, Frank. 1964. The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Walle, Nicholas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1996. “Social Spending and Political Support: The ‘Lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in Mexico.” Comparative Politics 26(January): 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 1996. “Economic Reform, Public Opinion and Presidential Approval in Mexico 1988–1993.” Comparative Political Studies 29(October): 566–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 2001. “Economic Reforms and Political Support in Mexico.” In Stokes, Susan (ed.), Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, et al. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 1992. Generals in the Palacio: The Military in Modern Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 1995. Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 1999. Politics in Mexico: The Decline of Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campuzano, Irma. 1995. Baja California en los Tiempos del PAN. México: La Jornada Ediciones.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge. 1995. The Mexican Shock. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge. 2000. Perpetuating Power: How Mexican Presidents Were Chosen. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Casar, María Amparo. 2002. “Executive-Legislative Relations: The Case of Mexico (1946–1997).” In Nacif, Benito and Morgenstern, Scott (eds.), Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chand, Vikram. 2001. Mexico's Political Awakening. South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehabi, H. E., and Linz, eds Juan J.. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chull Shin, Doh. 1994. “On the Third Wave of Democratization. A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research.” World Politics 47 (October): 135–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinta, Alberto. 1999. “Uncertainty and Electoral Behavior in Mexico in the 1997 Congressional Elections.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth B.. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth B. 1992. The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico (Research Series No. 83). Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep. 1991. “Transitions by Agreement: Modeling the Spanish Way.” American Political Science Review 85(4): 1283–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep, and Pascual, Margot. 1994. “The Polish Games of Transition.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 27(3): 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1975. Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 2004. “Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell, eds. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan, eds. 1994. Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Gentleman, Judith, and Smith, Peter, eds. 1989. Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cox, W. Gary. 1991. “SNTV and d'Hont are ‘Equivalent’.” Electoral Studies 10: 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. Gary. 1994. “Strategic Voting Equilibria under the Single Nontransferable Vote.” American Political Science Review 88: 608–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.” Journal of Politics 48(May): 370–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. Gary, and Thies, Michael. 2000. “How Much Does Money Matter? ‘Buying Votes’ in Japan, 1967–1990.” Comparative Political Studies 33(1): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, Michael, and Laakso, Liisa. 2002. Multi-Party Politics in Africa. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Craig, Ann, and Wayne Cornelius. 1995. “Houses Divided. Parties and Political Reform in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. 1992. “Crisis Economica = Crisis de Legitimidad.” In Bazdresch, Carlos (ed.), Mexico: Auge, Crisis y Ajuste. Vol. 1. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. 2004. “Party Competition in Mexico: Evolution and Prospects.” In Middlebrook, Kevin (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London/Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, and Meltzer, Allan. 1986. “A Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy, the Cost of Democratic Government, and the Benefits of a Constitution.” Economic Inquiry 24: 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert, ed. 1973. Regimes and Oppositions. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz, and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, A. Otto, Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64: 426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, Madrid H.. 2004. Cambio de Rumbo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1961. “Social Mobilization and Political Development.” American Political Science Review 55(3): 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. To Craft Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13.2(April): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, et al., eds. 1989. Democracy in Developing Countries: Asia. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 1997. “Political Responses to Regional Inequality: Taxation and Distribution in Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2004. “Decentralization, Democratization and Federalism in Mexico.” In Middlebrook, Kevin (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London / Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez, and Beatriz Magaloni. 2002. “The Erosion of One-Party Rule: Clientelism, Portfolio Diversification and Electoral Strategy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29–September 1.
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Beatriz Magaloni. 1995. “Transition Games: Initiating and Sustaining Democracy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September.
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2001. “Party Dominance and the Logic of Electoral Design in Mexico's Transition to Democracy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(3): 271–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Beatriz Magaloni, and Barry Weingast. 2004. “Democratization and the Economy in Mexico: Equilibrium (PRI) Hegemony and Its Demise.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics. 58(November): 1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge. 1999. “The Transformation of Mexico's Electoral and Party Systems 1988–97.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge. 2004. “Why and How Did Mexico's 2000 Presidential Election Campaign Matter.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge, and Lawson, Chappell, eds. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A.. 1995. “Shaping Mexico's Electoral Arena: Construction of Partisan Cleavages in the 1988 and 1991 National Elections.” American Political Science Review 89: 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge, and McCann, James. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge, and Poiré, Alejandro, eds. 1999. Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K., and Endersby, James W.. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23(1): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1991. Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1994. “Bringing the Poor Back In: National Solidarity as a Strategy of Regime Legitimation.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1986. “Duverger's Law: Forty Years Later.” In Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend (eds.), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, and Dornbusch, Rudiger, eds. 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Lemarchand, Rene. 1981. Political Clientelism, Patronage and Development. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enelow, M. James, and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83: 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estévez, Federico, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2000. “Partidos Legislativos y sus Electorados en la Batalla Presupuestal de 1997.” ITAM Working Papers in Politics.
Fearon, James. 2000. “Why Use Elections to Allocate Power?” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Ferejohn, John A. 1986Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Foeken, Richard, and Tom Dietz. 2000. “Of Ethnicity, Manipulation and Observation: The 1992 and 1997 Elections in Kenya.” In Abbinik, Jon and Hesseling, Gerti (eds.), Election Observation and Democratization in Africa. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico.” World Politics 46(2): 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Adam Przeworski. 2001. “Dictatorial Institutions and the Survival of Dictators.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2.
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, September.
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, and Waterbury, John. 1977. Patrons and Clients. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Gershberg, Alec Ian. 1994. “Distributing Resources in the Education Sector.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.
Glickman, Harvey, ed. 1995. Ethnic Conflict and Democratization in Africa. Atlanta, Georgia: African Studies Association Press.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam. 2004. “International Economic Sources of Regime Change: How European Economic Integration Undermined Italy's Postwar Party System.” Comparative Political Studies 37(December): 1238–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy.” World Politics 53(4): 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Edmund T., and Jomo, K. S.. 1997. Malaysia's Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez López, Marcela, and Sandra Pineda Antúnez. 1999. El Reparto Municipal del Pronasol: Criterios de Asignación en Aguascalientes y Michoacán. B.A. thesis, ITAM, Mexico.
Gómez Tagle, Silvia. 1997. La Transición Inconclusa: Treinta Años de Elecciones en México. México: El Colegio de México.
González, María de Los Angeles. 2002. “Do Changes in Democracy Affect the Political Budget Cycle? Evidence from Mexico.” Review of Development Economics 6(2): 204–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Casanova, Pablo. 1965. La Democracia en México. México City: ERA.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert, eds. 1992. The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 1999. “The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions.” In Anderson, Lisa (ed.), Transitions to Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
Haggard, Stephan, and Webb, Steven. 1994. Voting for Reform. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hansen, Roger D. 1974. The Politics of Mexican Development. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1992. Open Letters. New York: Vintage.
Heath, Jonathan. 1999. Mexico and the Sexenio Curse: Presidential Successions and Economic Crises in Modern Mexico. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hilley, John. 2001. Malaysia: Mahathirism, Hegemony and the New Opposition. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1981. “Exit, Voice and the State.” In his Essays in Trespassing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hiskey, Jonathan. 1999. “Does Democracy Matter? Electoral Competition and Local Development in Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Hiskey, Jonathan. 2003. “Demand Based Development and Local Electoral Environments.” Comparative Politics 36(1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, et al. 2001. “AMELIA: A Program for Missing Data (Windows Version).” Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1970. “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems.” In Huntington, Samuel P. and Moore, Clement H. (eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ingham, Kenneth. 1990. Politics in Modern Africa: The Uneven Tribal Dimension. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joseph, Richard. 1999. “Democratization in Africa after 1989: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives.” In Anderson, Lisa (ed.), Transitions to Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry L. 1990. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry L. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry L., and Schmitter, Philippe. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe.” International Social Science Journal 128(May): 269–84.Google Scholar
Kasara, Kimuli. 2005. “A Prize Too Large to Share: Opposition Coalitions and the Kenyan Presidency, 1991–2002.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Kaufman, Robert. 1977a. “Corporatism, Clientelism, and Partisan Conflict: A Study of Seven Countries.” In Malloy, James M. (ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert. 1977b. “Mexico and Latin American Authoritarianism.” In Reyna, Jose Luis and Weinert, Richard S. (eds.), Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert, Carlos Bazdresh, and Blanca Heredis. 1994. “Mexico: Radical Reform in a Dominant Party System.” In Haggard, Stephen and Webb, Steven B. (eds.), Voting for Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Trejo, Guillermo. 1996. “Regionalismo, Transformación del régimen y Pronasol: La Política del Programa Nacional de Solidaridad en Cuatro Estados Mexicanos.” Política y Gobierno 3(2): 245–80.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Trejo, Guillermo. 1997. “Regionalism, Regime Transformation, and PRONASOL: The Politics of the National Solidarity Programme in Four Mexican States.” Journal of Latin American Studies 29: 717–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert, and Zuckerman, Leo. 1998. “Attitudes toward Economic Reform in Mexico: The Role of Political Orientations.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keech, William R. 1995. Economic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Phil. 2003. “Clientelism, Development and Democracy.” Unpublished manuscript, World Bank.
Keohane, Robert, King, Gary, and Verba, Almond. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O., Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17(February): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1060. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, Roderick D. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, et al. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 49–69.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1992. “Review: Comparative Historical Research and Rational Choice Theory: The Case of Transitions to Democracy.” Theory and Society. 22(3): 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6/7): 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph. 1988. “Electoral Reform in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Klesner, Joseph. 1993. “Modernization, Economic Crisis and Electoral Alignment in Mexico.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 9(2): 187–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph. 1994. “Realignment or Dealignment? Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System.” In Maria Lorena Cook, Middlebrook, Kevin J., and Molinar, Juan, (eds.), Politics of Economic Restructuring State-Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. La Jolla: center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph, and Chappell Lawson. 2004. “Political Reform, Electoral Participation, and the Campaign of 2000.” In Domíguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Elections. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in East European Revolutions of 1989.” World Politics 44: 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1991. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 1999. “Why Cárdenas Won: The 1997 Election in Mexico City.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2004a. “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2004b. “Building the Fourth Estate: Media Opening and Democratization in Mexico.” In Middlebrook, Kevin (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London/Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Ethnicity in Tropical Africa: Competing Solidarities in Nation Building.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene, and Legg, Keith. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis.” Comparative Politics 4(2): 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar
Levitzky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 1998. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jih-weh. 2003. “Transition through Transaction: Taiwan's Constitutional Reforms in the Lee Teng-hui Era.” In Lee, Wei-chin and Wang, T. Y (eds.), Sayonara to the Lee Teng-hui Era. Lanham: University of Maryland Press.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar. 1976. “Stabilization Policies in Open Economics with Endogenous Politicians.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 1–19.
Lindbeck, Assar, and Weibull, Jörgen. 1987. “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.” Public Choice 52(2): 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1957. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 1989. El Llamado a las Urnas. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha, 1939–1994: Oposición Leal y Partido de Protesta. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 2003. “The National Action Party (PAN): From the Fringes of the Political System to the Heart of Change.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy(eds.), Christian Democracy in Latin America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Sussane. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics. 47(1): 42–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso. 2000. El Poder Compartido. México: Oceano.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso. 2001. “Democratization through Federalism? The National Action Party Strategy, 1939–1995.” In Middlebrook, Kevin J. (ed.), Party Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico: National and State Level Analyses of the Partido Accion Nacional. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Lustig, Nora. 1992. Mexico: The Remaking of an Economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2005. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants and Bankers: The American Electorate and the US Economy.” American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1994. “Elección Racional y Voto Estratégico: Algunas Aplicaciones al caso Mexicano.” Política y Gobierno 1(2): 309–44.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1996. “Dominio de Partido y Dilemas Duvergerianos en las Elecciones Presidenciales de 1994.” Política y Gobierno 3: 281–326.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1997. “The Dynamics of Dominant Party Decline: The Mexican Transition to Multipartyism.” Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1999. “Is the PRI Fading? Economic Performance, Electoral Accountability and Voting Behavior in the 1994 and 1997 Elections.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2003. “Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher (eds.), Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2004. “Contested Elections, Electoral Fraud and the Transition Game.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2005. “The Demise of Mexico's One-Party Dominant Regime: Elite Choices and the Masses in the Establishment of Democracy.” In Frances, Haggopian and Mainwaring, Scott (eds.), The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, and Federico Estévez. (forthcoming) “Private versus Public Goods as Electoral Investments: A Portfolio Diversification Model with Evidence from Mexico.” In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven (eds.), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Competition. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, and Federico Estévez. 2000. “Federalism, Redistributive Politics and Poverty Relief Spending: The Programa Nacional de Solidaridad in Mexico (1989–1994).” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Moreno. 2003. “Catching All Souls: The Partido Acción Nacional and the Politics of Religion in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy (eds.), Christian Democracy in Latin America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Poiré. 2004a. “The Issues, the Vote and the Mandate for Change.” In Dominguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Poiré. 2004b. “Strategic Coordination in the 2000 Mexican Presidential Race.” In Dominguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Aníbal Perez Liñán. 2005. “Latin American Democratization since 1978.” In Haggopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott (eds.), The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, James A., ed. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Marawall, Ignacio, and Adam Przeworski. 2003. “Introduction.” In Marawall, Ignacio and Przeworski, Adam (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, and Keith Jaggers. 2003. “Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003.” <www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity>
Medina, Luis. 1978. Evolución Electoral en el México Contemporáneo. México: Gaceta Informativa de la Comisión Federal Electoral.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1986. “Political Liberalization in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico.” In O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Lawrence (eds.), Latin America, Pt.2, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 2004. “Mexico's Democratic Transitions: Dynamics and Prospects.” In Middlebrook, Kevin J. (ed.), Party Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico: National and State Level Analyses of the Partido Acción Nacional. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1987. “Regreso a Chihuahua.” Nexos 111(March): 21–32.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1991. El Tiempo de la Legitimidad. Elecciones, Autoritarismo y Democracia en México. México: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1996. “Changing the Balance of Power in a Hegemonic Party System: The Case of Mexico.” In Lijphart, Arendt and Waisman, Carlos (eds.), Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, and Weldon, Jeffrey. 1990. “Elecciones de 1988 en Mexico: Crisis del Autoritarismo.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 52(4): 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, and Jeffrey Weldon. 1994. “Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Moore, Clement H. 1970. “The Single Party as a Source of Legitimacy.” In Samuel Huntington and Clement H. Moore (eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1998. “Party Competition and the Issue of Democracy: Ideological Space in Mexican Elections.” In Mónica Serrano (ed.), Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections. London: University of London Press.
Moreno, Alejandro. 1999a. “Campaign Awareness and Voting in the 1997 Mexican Congressional Elections.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1999b. Political Cleavages: Issues, Parties, and the Consolidation of Democracy. Boulder, Colorado: Perseus.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. El Votante Mexicano. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Moreno, Alejandro. 2004. “The Effects of Negative Campaigns on Mexican Voters.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2001. “Better the Devil You Kow than the Saint You Don't? Risk Propensity and Vote Choice in Mexico.” Journal of Politics 63(1): 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neocosmos, Michael. 2003. “The Politics of National Elections in Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland.” In Cowen, Michael and Laakso, Lisa (eds.), Multiparty Elections in Africa. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John. 1979. The Changing American Voter, enl. ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1993. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William. 1975. “The Political Buisnesss Cycle.” Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of Califorinia, Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2000. Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozbudun, Ergun. 1989. “Turkey: Crisis, Interruptions, and Reequilibration.” In Diamond, Larry et al. (eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries: Asia. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Pacheco Méndez, Guadalupe. 1995. “Los Resultados Electorales de 1994.” In Moncayo, Pablo Pascual (ed.), Las Elecciones de 1994. México: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas. 1989. “A Mathematical Proof of Duverger's Law.” In Ordeshook, Peter C. (ed.), Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J., ed. 1990. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 1990. Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics. Chur, Switzerland and New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Pessino, Carola. 1991. “From Aggregate Shocks to Labor Market Adjustments: Shifting of Wage Profiles under Hyperinflation in Argentina.” Unpublished manuscript.
Pinkney, Robert. 1997. Democracy and Dictatorship in Ghana and Tanzania. Ipswich: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poiré, Alejandro. 1999. “Retrospective Voting, Partisanship and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. B., and Whitten, G. D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1987. “Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts.” In Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune (eds.), Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworksi, Adam. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, rev. ed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1990. “Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1993. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85(3): 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1976. “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's Law.” Comparative Politics 9: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A., and Thierry Verdier. 2002. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1995. “Municipal Autonomy and the Politics of Intergovernmental Finance: Is It Different for the Opposition?” In Rodríguez, Victoria E. and Ward, Peter M. (eds.), Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., and Ward, Peter M.. 1995. Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., and Ward, Peter M.. 1998. Political Change in Baja California: Democracy in the Making?La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Roggoff, Kenneth. 1990. “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles.” American Economic Review 80: 21–36.Google Scholar
Roggoff, Kenneth, and Sibert, Anne. 1988. “Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles.” Review of Economic Studies 55: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, Carlos. 1994. El Programa Nacional de Solidaridad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Romero, Vidal. 2005. “Misaligned Interests and Commitment Problems: A Study of Presidents and Their Parties with Application to the Mexican Presidency and Privatization in Latin America.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Ross, Michael. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?World Politics 53(April): 325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudebeck, Lars. 2003. “Multi-Party Elections in Guinea-Bissau.” In Cowen, Michael and Laakso, Lisa (eds.), Multiparty Elections in Africa. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2: 337–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schady, Norbert R. 2000. “The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991–95.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2000. “Mexico's Victory: The Democratic Revelation.” Journal of Democracy 11(3): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. W.. 1977. Friends, Followers and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?Review of Politics 36: 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1972. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Robert E. 1959. Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (México). 1994. Hechos en Solidaridad. CD-ROM.
Serrano, Mónica. 1995. “The Armed Branches of the State: Civil–Military Relations in Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 27(2): 423–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, Donald, and Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. “Transitions through Transaction: Democratization in Brazil and Spain.” In Selcher, Wayne (ed.), Political Liberalization in Brazil: Dilemmas and Future Prospects. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy without Competition in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1979. Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1971. The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 1996. “Public Opinion and Market Reforms: The Limits of Economic Voting.” Comparative Political Studies 29: 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2001. Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence form Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Valeria Brusco, and Marcelo Nazareno. 2003. “Selective Incentives and Electoral Mobilization: Evidence from Argentina.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Mathew S.. 1989. Seats and Votes. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Presenting and Interpreting Statistical Results, version 2.0. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. <http://gking.harvard.edu.>Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walle, Nicolas. 2001. African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2001. “Presidentialism and Clientelism in Africa's Emerging Party Systems.” Unpublished manuscript.
Van de Walle, Nicholas. (forthcoming) “The Evolution of Political Clientelism in Africa.” In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven (eds.), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villarreal, Andrés. 1999. “Public Opinion of the Economy and the President among Mexico City Residents: The Salinas Sexenio.” Latin American Research Review 34(2): 132–51.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 1999. “On the Nature of First Democratic Elections.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43(2): 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2004. “The Paradox of ‘Warlord’ Democracy: A Theoretical Investigation.” American Political Science Review 98(1): 17–33.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard, and Neeman, Zvika. 2002. “A Theory of Post-Civil War Democratization.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(October): 439–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91(2): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Mathew Soberg (eds.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2002. “What's Left and Who's Right in Mexican Politics?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 25–28.
Zinser, Aguilar. 1994. Vamos a ganar. México: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Paolino, Phil, and Rohde, David W.. 1992. “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” American Political Science Review 82: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron K., and Robinson, James. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Chris. 1989. “Prospective Voting and the Theory of Party Identification.” Unpublished manuscript.
Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Breaking the Iron Triangle: Social Psychology, Demographic Variables and Linear Regression in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14(3): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1996. “The Timing of Political Liberalization: Taiwan as the Canonical Case.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Alesina, Alberto. 1987. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-party System as a Repeated Game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 651–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto. 1988. “Credibility and Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters.” American Economic Review 78: 796–805.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Cohen, Gerald D., and Roubini, Nouriel. 1993. “Macroeconomic Policy and Elections in OECD DemocraciesEconomics and Politics 4: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Roubini, Nouriel. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Michael R. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Michael R., and Nagler, Jonathan. 2000. “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1970. “Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant Party.” American Political Science Review. 64(1): 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1987. Political Survival. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of Califorina Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1968. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Books.Google Scholar
Arriola, Leonardo. 2004. “Managing Political Risks: Coups and Clients in African States, 1971–2001.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Bailey, John. 1994. “Centralism and Political Change in Mexico: The Case of National Solidarity.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur. 1976. Cross-national Time Series, 1815–1973. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Inter-University consortium for Political and Social Research. CD-ROM.
Barro, Robert. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Basánez, Miguel. 1994. “Encuestas y Resultados de la Eleccion de 1994.” Este Pais 43: 13–21.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1984a. “Some Conventional Orthodoxies in the Study of Agrarian Change.” World Politics 36(2): 234–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1984b. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1989. Beyond the Miracle of the Market. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 2001. Prosperity and Violence. New York: Norton.
Bates, Robert, Greif, Avner, Levy, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumhogger, Goswin. 1999. “Zimbabwe.” In Nohlen, Dieter et al., Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George R., Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensusán, Graciela. 2004. “A New Scenario for Mexican Trade Unions: Changes in the Structure of Political and Economic Opportunities.” In Middlebrook, Kevin J. (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London / Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan. 2003. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55 (July): 517–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G., and Tiao, G.. 1992. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburg, Frank. 1955. “Mexico: An Experiment in One-Party Democracy.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Brandenburg, Frank. 1964. The Making of Modern Mexico. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Walle, Nicholas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1996. “Social Spending and Political Support: The ‘Lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in Mexico.” Comparative Politics 26(January): 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 1996. “Economic Reform, Public Opinion and Presidential Approval in Mexico 1988–1993.” Comparative Political Studies 29(October): 566–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buendía, Jorge. 2001. “Economic Reforms and Political Support in Mexico.” In Stokes, Susan (ed.), Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, et al. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 1992. Generals in the Palacio: The Military in Modern Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 1995. Political Recruitment across Two Centuries: Mexico 1884–1991. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic. 1999. Politics in Mexico: The Decline of Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campuzano, Irma. 1995. Baja California en los Tiempos del PAN. México: La Jornada Ediciones.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge. 1995. The Mexican Shock. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Jorge. 2000. Perpetuating Power: How Mexican Presidents Were Chosen. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Casar, María Amparo. 2002. “Executive-Legislative Relations: The Case of Mexico (1946–1997).” In Nacif, Benito and Morgenstern, Scott (eds.), Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chand, Vikram. 2001. Mexico's Political Awakening. South Bend, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehabi, H. E., and Linz, eds Juan J.. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chull Shin, Doh. 1994. “On the Third Wave of Democratization. A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research.” World Politics 47 (October): 135–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinta, Alberto. 1999. “Uncertainty and Electoral Behavior in Mexico in the 1997 Congressional Elections.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth B.. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth B. 1992. The Contradictory Alliance: State-Labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico (Research Series No. 83). Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep. 1991. “Transitions by Agreement: Modeling the Spanish Way.” American Political Science Review 85(4): 1283–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep, and Pascual, Margot. 1994. “The Polish Games of Transition.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 27(3): 275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1975. Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 2004. “Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell, eds. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan, eds. 1994. Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Gentleman, Judith, and Smith, Peter, eds. 1989. Mexico's Alternative Political Futures. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cox, W. Gary. 1991. “SNTV and d'Hont are ‘Equivalent’.” Electoral Studies 10: 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. Gary. 1994. “Strategic Voting Equilibria under the Single Nontransferable Vote.” American Political Science Review 88: 608–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.” Journal of Politics 48(May): 370–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, W. Gary, and Thies, Michael. 2000. “How Much Does Money Matter? ‘Buying Votes’ in Japan, 1967–1990.” Comparative Political Studies 33(1): 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, Michael, and Laakso, Liisa. 2002. Multi-Party Politics in Africa. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Craig, Ann, and Wayne Cornelius. 1995. “Houses Divided. Parties and Political Reform in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. 1992. “Crisis Economica = Crisis de Legitimidad.” In Bazdresch, Carlos (ed.), Mexico: Auge, Crisis y Ajuste. Vol. 1. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Crespo, José Antonio. 2004. “Party Competition in Mexico: Evolution and Prospects.” In Middlebrook, Kevin (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London/Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cukierman, Alex, and Meltzer, Allan. 1986. “A Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy, the Cost of Democratic Government, and the Benefits of a Constitution.” Economic Inquiry 24: 367–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert, ed. 1973. Regimes and Oppositions. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz, and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, A. Otto, Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review 64: 426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, Madrid H.. 2004. Cambio de Rumbo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. 1961. “Social Mobilization and Political Development.” American Political Science Review 55(3): 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. To Craft Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13.2(April): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, et al., eds. 1989. Democracy in Developing Countries: Asia. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 1997. “Political Responses to Regional Inequality: Taxation and Distribution in Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto. 2004. “Decentralization, Democratization and Federalism in Mexico.” In Middlebrook, Kevin (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London / Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Federico Estévez, and Beatriz Magaloni. 2002. “The Erosion of One-Party Rule: Clientelism, Portfolio Diversification and Electoral Strategy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29–September 1.
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Beatriz Magaloni. 1995. “Transition Games: Initiating and Sustaining Democracy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September.
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2001. “Party Dominance and the Logic of Electoral Design in Mexico's Transition to Democracy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(3): 271–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Beatriz Magaloni, and Barry Weingast. 2004. “Democratization and the Economy in Mexico: Equilibrium (PRI) Hegemony and Its Demise.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics. 58(November): 1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge. 1999. “The Transformation of Mexico's Electoral and Party Systems 1988–97.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge. 2004. “Why and How Did Mexico's 2000 Presidential Election Campaign Matter.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge, and Lawson, Chappell, eds. 2004. Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A.. 1995. “Shaping Mexico's Electoral Arena: Construction of Partisan Cleavages in the 1988 and 1991 National Elections.” American Political Science Review 89: 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge, and McCann, James. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge, and Poiré, Alejandro, eds. 1999. Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K., and Endersby, James W.. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23(1): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1991. Neopopulist Solutions to Neoliberal Problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1994. “Bringing the Poor Back In: National Solidarity as a Strategy of Regime Legitimation.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1986. “Duverger's Law: Forty Years Later.” In Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend (eds.), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian, and Dornbusch, Rudiger, eds. 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Lemarchand, Rene. 1981. Political Clientelism, Patronage and Development. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd. 2004. Courting Democracy in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enelow, M. James, and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83: 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estévez, Federico, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2000. “Partidos Legislativos y sus Electorados en la Batalla Presupuestal de 1997.” ITAM Working Papers in Politics.
Fearon, James. 2000. “Why Use Elections to Allocate Power?” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Ferejohn, John A. 1986Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Foeken, Richard, and Tom Dietz. 2000. “Of Ethnicity, Manipulation and Observation: The 1992 and 1997 Elections in Kenya.” In Abbinik, Jon and Hesseling, Gerti (eds.), Election Observation and Democratization in Africa. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico.” World Politics 46(2): 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Adam Przeworski. 2001. “Dictatorial Institutions and the Survival of Dictators.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2.
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, Georgia, September.
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest, and Waterbury, John. 1977. Patrons and Clients. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Gershberg, Alec Ian. 1994. “Distributing Resources in the Education Sector.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.
Glickman, Harvey, ed. 1995. Ethnic Conflict and Democratization in Africa. Atlanta, Georgia: African Studies Association Press.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam. 2004. “International Economic Sources of Regime Change: How European Economic Integration Undermined Italy's Postwar Party System.” Comparative Political Studies 37(December): 1238–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy.” World Politics 53(4): 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, Edmund T., and Jomo, K. S.. 1997. Malaysia's Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez López, Marcela, and Sandra Pineda Antúnez. 1999. El Reparto Municipal del Pronasol: Criterios de Asignación en Aguascalientes y Michoacán. B.A. thesis, ITAM, Mexico.
Gómez Tagle, Silvia. 1997. La Transición Inconclusa: Treinta Años de Elecciones en México. México: El Colegio de México.
González, María de Los Angeles. 2002. “Do Changes in Democracy Affect the Political Budget Cycle? Evidence from Mexico.” Review of Development Economics 6(2): 204–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Casanova, Pablo. 1965. La Democracia en México. México City: ERA.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert, eds. 1992. The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 1999. “The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions.” In Anderson, Lisa (ed.), Transitions to Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
Haggard, Stephan, and Webb, Steven. 1994. Voting for Reform. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hansen, Roger D. 1974. The Politics of Mexican Development. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1992. Open Letters. New York: Vintage.
Heath, Jonathan. 1999. Mexico and the Sexenio Curse: Presidential Successions and Economic Crises in Modern Mexico. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hilley, John. 2001. Malaysia: Mahathirism, Hegemony and the New Opposition. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin, and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1981. “Exit, Voice and the State.” In his Essays in Trespassing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hiskey, Jonathan. 1999. “Does Democracy Matter? Electoral Competition and Local Development in Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Hiskey, Jonathan. 2003. “Demand Based Development and Local Electoral Environments.” Comparative Politics 36(1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, et al. 2001. “AMELIA: A Program for Missing Data (Windows Version).” Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1970. “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-Party Systems.” In Huntington, Samuel P. and Moore, Clement H. (eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ingham, Kenneth. 1990. Politics in Modern Africa: The Uneven Tribal Dimension. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joseph, Richard. 1999. “Democratization in Africa after 1989: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives.” In Anderson, Lisa (ed.), Transitions to Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry L. 1990. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 23(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl, Terry L. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry L., and Schmitter, Philippe. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe.” International Social Science Journal 128(May): 269–84.Google Scholar
Kasara, Kimuli. 2005. “A Prize Too Large to Share: Opposition Coalitions and the Kenyan Presidency, 1991–2002.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Kaufman, Robert. 1977a. “Corporatism, Clientelism, and Partisan Conflict: A Study of Seven Countries.” In Malloy, James M. (ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert. 1977b. “Mexico and Latin American Authoritarianism.” In Reyna, Jose Luis and Weinert, Richard S. (eds.), Authoritarianism in Mexico. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert, Carlos Bazdresh, and Blanca Heredis. 1994. “Mexico: Radical Reform in a Dominant Party System.” In Haggard, Stephen and Webb, Steven B. (eds.), Voting for Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Trejo, Guillermo. 1996. “Regionalismo, Transformación del régimen y Pronasol: La Política del Programa Nacional de Solidaridad en Cuatro Estados Mexicanos.” Política y Gobierno 3(2): 245–80.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Trejo, Guillermo. 1997. “Regionalism, Regime Transformation, and PRONASOL: The Politics of the National Solidarity Programme in Four Mexican States.” Journal of Latin American Studies 29: 717–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert, and Zuckerman, Leo. 1998. “Attitudes toward Economic Reform in Mexico: The Role of Political Orientations.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keech, William R. 1995. Economic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Phil. 2003. “Clientelism, Development and Democracy.” Unpublished manuscript, World Bank.
Keohane, Robert, King, Gary, and Verba, Almond. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O., Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” Journal of Politics 17(February): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1060. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, Roderick D. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, et al. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 49–69.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1992. “Review: Comparative Historical Research and Rational Choice Theory: The Case of Transitions to Democracy.” Theory and Society. 22(3): 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6/7): 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph. 1988. “Electoral Reform in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Klesner, Joseph. 1993. “Modernization, Economic Crisis and Electoral Alignment in Mexico.” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 9(2): 187–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph. 1994. “Realignment or Dealignment? Consequences of Economic Crisis and Restructuring for the Mexican Party System.” In Maria Lorena Cook, Middlebrook, Kevin J., and Molinar, Juan, (eds.), Politics of Economic Restructuring State-Society Relations and Regime Change in Mexico. La Jolla: center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph, and Chappell Lawson. 2004. “Political Reform, Electoral Participation, and the Campaign of 2000.” In Domíguez, Jorge I. and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Elections. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in East European Revolutions of 1989.” World Politics 44: 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1991. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 1999. “Why Cárdenas Won: The 1997 Election in Mexico City.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2004a. “Television Coverage, Vote Choice, and the 2000 Campaign.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell. 2004b. “Building the Fourth Estate: Media Opening and Democratization in Mexico.” In Middlebrook, Kevin (ed.), Dilemmas of Political Change in Mexico. London: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London/Center for U.S.–Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Ethnicity in Tropical Africa: Competing Solidarities in Nation Building.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene, and Legg, Keith. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis.” Comparative Politics 4(2): 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.Google Scholar
Levitzky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 1998. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jih-weh. 2003. “Transition through Transaction: Taiwan's Constitutional Reforms in the Lee Teng-hui Era.” In Lee, Wei-chin and Wang, T. Y (eds.), Sayonara to the Lee Teng-hui Era. Lanham: University of Maryland Press.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar. 1976. “Stabilization Policies in Open Economics with Endogenous Politicians.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 1–19.
Lindbeck, Assar, and Weibull, Jörgen. 1987. “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.” Public Choice 52(2): 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1957. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 1989. El Llamado a las Urnas. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 1999. El Partido Acción Nacional, la larga marcha, 1939–1994: Oposición Leal y Partido de Protesta. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 2003. “The National Action Party (PAN): From the Fringes of the Political System to the Heart of Change.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy(eds.), Christian Democracy in Latin America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Sussane. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics. 47(1): 42–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso. 2000. El Poder Compartido. México: Oceano.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso. 2001. “Democratization through Federalism? The National Action Party Strategy, 1939–1995.” In Middlebrook, Kevin J. (ed.), Party Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico: National and State Level Analyses of the Partido Accion Nacional. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Lustig, Nora. 1992. Mexico: The Remaking of an Economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2005. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants and Bankers: The American Electorate and the US Economy.” American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1994. “Elección Racional y Voto Estratégico: Algunas Aplicaciones al caso Mexicano.” Política y Gobierno 1(2): 309–44.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1996. “Dominio de Partido y Dilemas Duvergerianos en las Elecciones Presidenciales de 1994.” Política y Gobierno 3: 281–326.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1997. “The Dynamics of Dominant Party Decline: The Mexican Transition to Multipartyism.” Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 1999. “Is the PRI Fading? Economic Performance, Electoral Accountability and Voting Behavior in the 1994 and 1997 Elections.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2003. “Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher (eds.), Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2004. “Contested Elections, Electoral Fraud and the Transition Game.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2005. “The Demise of Mexico's One-Party Dominant Regime: Elite Choices and the Masses in the Establishment of Democracy.” In Frances, Haggopian and Mainwaring, Scott (eds.), The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, and Federico Estévez. (forthcoming) “Private versus Public Goods as Electoral Investments: A Portfolio Diversification Model with Evidence from Mexico.” In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven (eds.), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Competition. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, and Federico Estévez. 2000. “Federalism, Redistributive Politics and Poverty Relief Spending: The Programa Nacional de Solidaridad in Mexico (1989–1994).” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Moreno. 2003. “Catching All Souls: The Partido Acción Nacional and the Politics of Religion in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy (eds.), Christian Democracy in Latin America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Poiré. 2004a. “The Issues, the Vote and the Mandate for Change.” In Dominguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Alejandro Poiré. 2004b. “Strategic Coordination in the 2000 Mexican Presidential Race.” In Dominguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Aníbal Perez Liñán. 2005. “Latin American Democratization since 1978.” In Haggopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott (eds.), The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew, eds. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, James A., ed. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Marawall, Ignacio, and Adam Przeworski. 2003. “Introduction.” In Marawall, Ignacio and Przeworski, Adam (eds.), Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, and Keith Jaggers. 2003. “Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003.” <www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity>
Medina, Luis. 1978. Evolución Electoral en el México Contemporáneo. México: Gaceta Informativa de la Comisión Federal Electoral.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1986. “Political Liberalization in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico.” In O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Lawrence (eds.), Latin America, Pt.2, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 2004. “Mexico's Democratic Transitions: Dynamics and Prospects.” In Middlebrook, Kevin J. (ed.), Party Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in Mexico: National and State Level Analyses of the Partido Acción Nacional. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1987. “Regreso a Chihuahua.” Nexos 111(March): 21–32.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1991. El Tiempo de la Legitimidad. Elecciones, Autoritarismo y Democracia en México. México: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1996. “Changing the Balance of Power in a Hegemonic Party System: The Case of Mexico.” In Lijphart, Arendt and Waisman, Carlos (eds.), Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, and Weldon, Jeffrey. 1990. “Elecciones de 1988 en Mexico: Crisis del Autoritarismo.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología 52(4): 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan, and Jeffrey Weldon. 1994. “Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity.” In Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan (eds.), Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Moore, Clement H. 1970. “The Single Party as a Source of Legitimacy.” In Samuel Huntington and Clement H. Moore (eds.), Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1998. “Party Competition and the Issue of Democracy: Ideological Space in Mexican Elections.” In Mónica Serrano (ed.), Governing Mexico: Political Parties and Elections. London: University of London Press.
Moreno, Alejandro. 1999a. “Campaign Awareness and Voting in the 1997 Mexican Congressional Elections.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 1999b. Political Cleavages: Issues, Parties, and the Consolidation of Democracy. Boulder, Colorado: Perseus.Google Scholar
Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. El Votante Mexicano. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Moreno, Alejandro. 2004. “The Effects of Negative Campaigns on Mexican Voters.” In Domínguez, Jorge and Lawson, Chappell (eds.), Mexico's Pivotal Democratic Election: Campaign Effects and the Presidential Race of 2000. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2001. “Better the Devil You Kow than the Saint You Don't? Risk Propensity and Vote Choice in Mexico.” Journal of Politics 63(1): 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neocosmos, Michael. 2003. “The Politics of National Elections in Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland.” In Cowen, Michael and Laakso, Lisa (eds.), Multiparty Elections in Africa. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John. 1979. The Changing American Voter, enl. ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1993. Classics in Voting Behavior. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William. 1975. “The Political Buisnesss Cycle.” Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of Califorinia, Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2000. Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga. 1994. “Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozbudun, Ergun. 1989. “Turkey: Crisis, Interruptions, and Reequilibration.” In Diamond, Larry et al. (eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries: Asia. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Pacheco Méndez, Guadalupe. 1995. “Los Resultados Electorales de 1994.” In Moncayo, Pablo Pascual (ed.), Las Elecciones de 1994. México: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas. 1989. “A Mathematical Proof of Duverger's Law.” In Ordeshook, Peter C. (ed.), Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J., ed. 1990. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 1990. Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics. Chur, Switzerland and New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Pessino, Carola. 1991. “From Aggregate Shocks to Labor Market Adjustments: Shifting of Wage Profiles under Hyperinflation in Argentina.” Unpublished manuscript.
Pinkney, Robert. 1997. Democracy and Dictatorship in Ghana and Tanzania. Ipswich: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poiré, Alejandro. 1999. “Retrospective Voting, Partisanship and Loyalty in Presidential Elections: 1994.” In Domínguez, Jorge I. and Poiré, Alejandro (eds.), Toward Mexico's Democratization: Parties, Campaigns, Elections and Public Opinion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. B., and Whitten, G. D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1987. “Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts.” In Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune (eds.), Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworksi, Adam. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Douglas. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, rev. ed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1990. “Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 335–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 1993. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85(3): 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1976. “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's Law.” Comparative Politics 9: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 753–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A., and Thierry Verdier. 2002. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1995. “Municipal Autonomy and the Politics of Intergovernmental Finance: Is It Different for the Opposition?” In Rodríguez, Victoria E. and Ward, Peter M. (eds.), Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., and Ward, Peter M.. 1995. Opposition Government in Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E., and Ward, Peter M.. 1998. Political Change in Baja California: Democracy in the Making?La Jolla, California: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Roggoff, Kenneth. 1990. “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles.” American Economic Review 80: 21–36.Google Scholar
Roggoff, Kenneth, and Sibert, Anne. 1988. “Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles.” Review of Economic Studies 55: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas, Carlos. 1994. El Programa Nacional de Solidaridad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Romero, Vidal. 2005. “Misaligned Interests and Commitment Problems: A Study of Presidents and Their Parties with Application to the Mexican Presidency and Privatization in Latin America.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Ross, Michael. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?World Politics 53(April): 325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudebeck, Lars. 2003. “Multi-Party Elections in Guinea-Bissau.” In Cowen, Michael and Laakso, Lisa (eds.), Multiparty Elections in Africa. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Towards a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2: 337–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schady, Norbert R. 2000. “The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund (FONCODES), 1991–95.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2000. “Mexico's Victory: The Democratic Revelation.” Journal of Democracy 11(3): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. W.. 1977. Friends, Followers and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?Review of Politics 36: 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1972. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Robert E. 1959. Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Secretaría de Desarrollo Social (México). 1994. Hechos en Solidaridad. CD-ROM.
Serrano, Mónica. 1995. “The Armed Branches of the State: Civil–Military Relations in Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 27(2): 423–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, Donald, and Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. “Transitions through Transaction: Democratization in Brazil and Spain.” In Selcher, Wayne (ed.), Political Liberalization in Brazil: Dilemmas and Future Prospects. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy without Competition in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1979. Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1971. The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 1996. “Public Opinion and Market Reforms: The Limits of Economic Voting.” Comparative Political Studies 29: 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2001. Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence form Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Valeria Brusco, and Marcelo Nazareno. 2003. “Selective Incentives and Electoral Mobilization: Evidence from Argentina.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Mathew S.. 1989. Seats and Votes. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Presenting and Interpreting Statistical Results, version 2.0. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. <http://gking.harvard.edu.>Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walle, Nicolas. 2001. African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, Nicolas. 2001. “Presidentialism and Clientelism in Africa's Emerging Party Systems.” Unpublished manuscript.
Van de Walle, Nicholas. (forthcoming) “The Evolution of Political Clientelism in Africa.” In Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven (eds.), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Villarreal, Andrés. 1999. “Public Opinion of the Economy and the President among Mexico City Residents: The Salinas Sexenio.” Latin American Research Review 34(2): 132–51.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 1999. “On the Nature of First Democratic Elections.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 43(2): 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2004. “The Paradox of ‘Warlord’ Democracy: A Theoretical Investigation.” American Political Science Review 98(1): 17–33.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard, and Neeman, Zvika. 2002. “A Theory of Post-Civil War Democratization.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14(October): 439–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91(2): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Mathew Soberg (eds.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2000. Forging Democracy from Below. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2002. “What's Left and Who's Right in Mexican Politics?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 25–28.
Zinser, Aguilar. 1994. Vamos a ganar. México: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Beatriz Magaloni, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Voting for Autocracy
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510274.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Beatriz Magaloni, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Voting for Autocracy
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510274.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Beatriz Magaloni, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Voting for Autocracy
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510274.011
Available formats
×