Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T21:27:31.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Andrew Yeo
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America, Washington DC
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abinales, Patricio, and Amoroso, Donna J.. State and Society in the Philippines. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.Google Scholar
,American Political Science Association. Task Force on U.S. Standing in World Affairs. 2009. U.S. Standing in The World: Causes, Consequences, and the Future. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association, 2009.Google Scholar
Amouzegar, Mahyar A.Evaluation of Options for Overseas Combat Support Basing. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2006.Google Scholar
Aquino, Belinda. Reflections on the U.S. Bases in the Philippines. Transcript of the Pansol Reflections Series, Calamba, Laguna, Philippines, August 5. Manila: Senate Legislative Publications Staff, 1990.Google Scholar
Ball, Desmond. U.S. Bases in the Philippines: Issues and Implications. Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, 1988.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. “Identity and Alliances in the Middle East,” inThe Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 400–50. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bello, Walden. “Moment of Decision: The Philippines, the Pacific, and U.S. Bases,” in The Sun Never Sets: Confronting the Network of Foreign U.S. Military Bases, edited by Gerson, Joseph and Birchard, Bruce, 149–66. Boston: South End Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bengzon, Alfredo R. A.A Matter of Honor: The Story of the 1990–1991 R.P.-U.S. Bases Talks. Manila: Anvil, 1997.Google Scholar
Bennett, Scott. “Testing Alternative Models of Alliance Duration, 1816–1984.” American Journal of Political Science 41, no. 3 (1997): 846–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Thomas. “Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan,” in The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter, 316–56. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Berger, ThomasCultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Berger, ThomasRedefining Japan and the U.S.-Japan Alliance. New York: Japan Society, 2004.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. “The Transformation of the Swedish Model: Economic Ideas, Distributional Conflict, and Institutional Change.” World Politics 54, no. 1 (2001): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumoeller, Bear. “Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics.” Political Analysis 11, no. 3 (2003): 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Kent E.Embattled Garrisons: Comparative Base Politics and American Globalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Campbell, Kurt, and Ward, Celeste Johnson. “New Battle Stations?” Foreign Affairs 82, no. 5 (2003): 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caouette, Dominique. “Persevering Revolutionaries: Armed Struggle in the 21st Century, Exploring the Revolution of the Communist Party of the Philippines.” PhD dissertation, Cornell University, 2004.
Castro-Guevara, Maria, ed. The Bases Talks Reader: Key Documents of the 1990–91 Philippine-American Cooperation Talks. Manila: Anvil, 1997.
,Center for International Policy. Just the Facts: A Civilian's Guide to U.S. Defense and Security Assistance to Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, D.C.: Center for International Policy, 2003.Google Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo. Anti-Americanism and the American World Order. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J.Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J.Perceptions and Alliances in Europe: 1865–1940.” International Organization 51, no. 1 (1997): 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas J.Fostering Stability or Creating a Monster?” International Security 31, no. 1 (2006): 81–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Congressional Budget Office. Options for Changing the Army's Overseas Basing. Washington, D.C.: CBO, 2004.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. “Philippine Base Closings, 1991–1992 Legislative Chronology,” in Congress and the Nation. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1992.
Cooley, Alexander. “Base Politics.” Foreign Affairs 84, no. 6 (2005): 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooley, AlexanderBase Politics: Democratic Change and the US Military Overseas. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Cortes, Rosario Mendoza, Boncan, Celestina Puyal, and Jose, Ricardo Trota. The Filipino Saga: History as Social Change. Quezon City: New Day Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
Croci, Osvaldo. “The Second Berlusconi Government and Italian Foreign Policy.” International Spectator 37, no. 2 (2002): 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Jason W.Italy-U.S. Relations since the End of the Cold War: Prestige, Peace, and the Transatlantic Balance.” Bulletin of Italian Politics 1, no. 2 (2009): 289–308.Google Scholar
Castro, Renato Cruz. “Adjusting to the Post-US Bases Era: The Ordeal of the Philippine Military's Modernization Program.” Armed Forces and Society 26, no. 1 (1999): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, Renato CruzThe Revitalized Philippine-U.S. Security Relations: A Ghost from the Cold War or an Alliance for the 21st Century?” Asian Survey 43, no. 6 (2003): 971–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, Renato Cruz “Societal Forces as Sources of Military Doctrine and Posture: The Case of the AFP Modernization Program, 1991–2003,” in Asia in the New Millennium: APISA First Congress Proceedings, edited by Acharya, Amitav and Lee, Cai To, 229–47. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International, 2004.Google Scholar
Castro, Renato CruzTwenty-first Century Philippine-American Security Relations: Managing an Alliance in the War of the Third Kind.” Asian Security 2, no. 2 (2006): 102–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Pero, Mario. “Containing Containment: Rethinking Italy's Experience during the Cold War.” Working Paper no. 2. New York: New York University, International Center for Advanced Studies, 2002.
Dionisio, Josephine. Enhanced Documentation on National Peace Coalitions and Citizens' Groups Peace-Building Experiences in the Philippines. Manila: UNDP, 2005.Google Scholar
Docena, Herbert. At the Door of All the East: The Philippines in United States Military Strategy. Quezon City: Focus on the Global South, 2007.Google Scholar
Docena, Herbert “Plenary Panel Four Presentation: How Do We Strengthen the International Network for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases?” Quito, Ecuador, 2007.
,Ecuador No Bases Coalition. Base de Manta: Ojos y oidos del Plan Colombia. Quito: Ecuador No Bases Coalition, 2007.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Robert D.The Return of the Amami Islands: The Reversion Movement and U.S.-Japan Relations. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Miriam. “The Dynamics of the Opposition to the US Bases in the Philippines.” Kasarinlan 7, no. 4 (1992): 62–87.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Miriam “Anti-Bases Coalition,” in Studies on Coalition Experiences, edited by Cala, C. and Grageda, J., 4–27. Manila: Bookmark, 1994.Google Scholar
,Foreign Service Institute, ,Department of Foreign Affairs. Primer on the R.P-U.S. Military Bases Agreement. Manila: FSI, 1989.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Douglas. “The Peculiarities of Italo-American Relations in Historical Perspective.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 3, no. 1 (1998): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Friends of the Filipino People. For Philippine Survival: Nationalist Essays by Claro Recto and Renato Constantino. Manila: Friends of the Filipino People, n.d.
Funabashi, Yoichi. Alliance Adrift. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, and Meyer, David. “Framing Political Opportunity,” inComparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 275–90 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles. How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Golay, Frank H.Face of Empire: United States-Philippine Relations, 1898–1946. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison Center for Southeast Asian Studies, 1998.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O.. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, and Jasper, James. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar
Greco, Ettore. Italy's European Vocation: The Foreign Policy of the New Prodi Government. U.S.-Europe Analysis Series. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2006.Google Scholar
Haas, Mark L.The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789–1989. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong. “The Two South Koreas: A House Divided.” Washington Quarterly 28 (2005): 57–72.Google Scholar
Hahm, ChaibongSouth Korea's Progressives and the U.S.-ROK Alliance.” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 17 (2007): 187–202.Google Scholar
Harkavy, Robert E.Bases Abroad: The Global Foreign Military Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Harkavy, Robert E.Strategic Basing and the Great Powers, 1200–2000. London: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Selig. “South Korea-U.S. Alliance under the Roh Government.” Nautilus Policy Forum Online 06–28A, April 11, 2006. http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0628Harrison.html.
Ina, Hisayoshi. “The Japan-U.S. Security Alliance in a New Era of International Relations,” in Japan-U.S. Security Alliance for the 21st Century: Cornerstone of Democracy, Peace and Prosperity for Our Future Generations, edited by ,Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 3–14. Tokyo: Overseas Public Relations Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1996.Google Scholar
Inoue, Masamichi. Okinawa and the U.S. Military: Identity Making in the Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Paul. “The Consequences of Bushismo in Vicenza, Italy.” March 2005. http://www.peaceandjustice.it/vicenza-dal-molin.php.
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Page, Benjamin. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” American Political Science Review 99, no. 1 (2005): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “The Japan-U.S. Special Action Committee (SACO) Interim Report,” in Japan-U.S. Security Alliance for the 21st Century: Cornerstone of Democracy, Peace and Prosperity for Our Future Generations, edited by ,Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 83–84. Tokyo: Overseas Public Relations Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1996.Google Scholar
,Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Japan-U.S. Declaration on Joint Security – Alliance for the Twenty-First Century.” April 16, 1996. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/security.html.
,Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs “Report on the Interim Review of the Guidelines for U.S.-Japan Defense Cooperation.” June 17, 1997. http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/guideline.html.
,Japan Ministry of National Defense. Defense of Japan 2006. Japan Ministry of National Defense, 2006. http://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/pdf/2006/4–2–1.pdf.
Johnson, Chalmers A.Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2000.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A.The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A.Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Jung, Wook-Shik. Dongmaeng-ae dut [Alliance Trap]. Seoul: Samin Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kane, Tim. Global Troop Deployment Dataset 1950–2005. Washington, D.C.: Heritage Foundation, 2006.Google Scholar
Karnow, Stanley. In Our Image: America's Empire in the Philippines. New York: Foreign Policy Association, 1989.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, PeterJapanese Security in Perspective. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Keohane, Robert O.. Anti-Americanisms in World Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, Nobuo. “Japan's National Security: Structures, Norms, and Policies.” International Security 17, no. 4 (1993): 84–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, NobuoJapan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism.” International Security 26, no. 3 (2001): 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kim, Mikyoung. “The U.S. Military Transformation and Its Implications for the ROK-U.S. Alliance.” IFANS Review 13, no. 1 (2005): 15–39.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-han. “Juhan-migun bandae tujaeng-ui haet-bul, Maehyang-ri” [Maehyangri, the sunshine of the opposition struggle against United States Forces, Korea], in Kang, Jae-sook, Nogunri ae-seo Maehyangri kkaji [From Nogunri to Maehyangri], 243–70. Seoul: Deep Freedom Press, 2001.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16, no. 1 (1986): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Youkyoung. “Hanguk-ui banmi-gun-giji undong-gwa dongasia yundae” [Anti-U.S. military base movements and East Asian solidarity], in Bipan Sahoehak Daehoe (8th Meeting, November 4–5), 297–310. Seoul: College of Social Science, Seoul National University, 2005.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D.Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Larson, Eric V.Assuring Access in Key Strategic Regions: Toward a Long-Term Strategy. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2004.Google Scholar
Larson, Eric V., Levin, Norman D., Baik, Seonhae, and Savych, Bogdan. Ambivalent Allies? A Study of South Korean Attitudes Toward the U.S. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2004.Google Scholar
Lee, Nae-Young. “Changing South Korean Public Opinion on the U.S. and the ROK-U.S. Alliance.” Paper prepared for a workshop on “America in Question: Korean Democracy and the Challenge of Non-Proliferation on the Peninsula.” Seoul, South Korea, May 10–11, 2005.
Lee, Sook-Jong. The Transformation of South Korean Politics: Implications for U.S.-Korea Relations. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, and Savun, Burcu. “Terminating Alliances: Why Do States Abrogate Agreements?” Journal of Politics 69, no. 4 (2007): 1118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Livingston, Ian S., Messera, Heather L., and O'Hanlon, Michael. Afghanistan Index, April 8. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2010.Google Scholar
Lutz, Catherine. The Bases of Empire: The Global Struggle against U.S. Military Posts. New York: New York University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. “Political Opportunities: Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions,” in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 23–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug “Legacies of Anti-Americanism: A Sociological Perspective,” in Anti-Americanisms in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Keohane, Robert O.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRef
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, Katherine T.Military Power and Popular Protest: The U.S. Navy in Vieques, Puerto Rico. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 6 (1977): 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormack, Gavan. “The Okinawan Election and Resistance to Japan's Military First Politics.” Japan Focus no. 688, November 15, 2006. http://www.japanfocus.org/products/details/2275.
McCormack, Gavan “Abe and Okinawa: Collision Course?” Japan Focus no. 914, September 1, 2007. http://www.japanfocus.org/products/details/2512.
McCormack, GavanClient State: Japan in American Embrace. London: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J.The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton, 2001.Google Scholar
Meyer, David.A Winter of Discontent: The Nuclear Freeze and American Politics. New York: Praeger, 1990.Google Scholar
Meyer, DavidPolitical Opportunity and Nested Institutions.” Social Movement Studies 2, no. 1 (2003): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, DavidProtest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David, and Minkoff, Debra. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82, no. 4 (2004): 1457–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, Felipe. “Filipino Public Opinion on the Issue of American Facilities in the Philippines.” Quezon City: Social Weather Station, 1989.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Derek, ed. Strategy and Sentiment: South Korean Views of the United States and the U.S.-ROK Alliance. Washington, D.C.: CSIS, 2004.
Mochizuki, Mike. Toward a True Alliance: Restructuring U.S.-Japan Security Relations. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, MikeChange in Japan's Grand Strategy: Why and How Much?Asia Policy 4 (2007): 191–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteleone, Carla. “The Evolution of the Euro-Atlantic Pluralistic Security Community.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 5, no. 1 (2007): 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Katharine H. S. “Korean Nationalism, Anti-Americanism, and Democratic Consolidation,” in Korea's Democratization, edited by Kim, Samuel, 135–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Moon, Katharine H. S. “South Korean Civil Society and Alliance Politics,” in Strategy and Sentiment: South Korean Views of the United States and the U.S.-ROK Alliance, edited by Mitchell, Derek, 50–58. Washington, D.C.: CSIS, 2004.Google Scholar
Morrison, Charles, ed. Asia Pacific Security Outlook 1997. Honolulu: East-West Center, 1997.
Mulgan, Aurelia George. “Managing the U.S. Base Issue in Okinawa: A Test for Japanese Democracy.” Working Paper no. 2000/1, Department of International Relations, Australian National University, Canberra, January 2000.
,National Democratic Front. Our Vision of a Just and Democratic Society. Philippines: Gintong Tala, 1987.Google Scholar
Nuti, Leopoldo. “The Role of the U.S. in Italy's Foreign Policy.” International Spectator 38, no. 1 (2003): 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Doo-hui. “A-jik kkeun-naji ahn-eun SOFA gaejeong undong” [The unfinished SOFA revision movement], in Kang, Jae-sook, Nogunri eseo Maehyangri kkaji [From Nogunri to Maehyangri], 200–42. Seoul: Deep Freedom Press, 2001.Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, Michael. Unfinished Business: U.S. Overseas Military Presence in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security, 2008.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Yukio. “Searching for a Solution to the Okinawan Problem,” in Japan-U.S. Security Alliance for the 21st Century: Cornerstone of Democracy, Peace and Prosperity for Our Future Generations, edited by ,Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 43–60. Tokyo: Overseas Public Relations Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1996.Google Scholar
Ota, Masahide. The Battle of Okinawa: The Typhoon of Steel and Bombs. Tokyo: Kume Publishing Company, 1984.Google Scholar
Ota, MasahideEssays on Okinawa Problems. Okinawa: Yui Shuppan, 2000.Google Scholar
,Overseas Basing Committee. Interim Report of the Commission on Review of Overseas Military Facility Structure of the United States. Arlington, Va.: Overseas Basing Committee, 2005.Google Scholar
Kun-Young, Park. “80 nyun-dae hanguk-ui banmijoo-ui, byun-hwa, jeonmang, geuligo ham-eui” [South Korean anti-Americanism, change, prospects, and togetherness]. Presented at Perspectives of Social Science in the 1980s from a 21st Century Perspective. Seoul, South Korea, October 7, 2005.
Kun-Young, ParkA New U.S.-ROK Alliance: A Nine Point Policy Recommendation for a Reflective and Mature Relationship. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert, and Krauss, Ellis S.. “Japan's ‘Coalition of the Willing’ on Security Policies.” Orbis 49, no. 3 (2005): 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Pew Research Center, Pew Global Attitudes Project. “America's Image Slips, but Allies Share U.S. Concerns Over Iran, Hamas.” June 15, 2006.
Pineo, Ronn F.Ecuador and the United States: Useful Strangers, The United States and the Americas. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines.” International Organization 52, no. 3 (1998): 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, RichardTransnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics.” World Politics 55, no. 4 (2003): 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, Kenneth B.Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. New York: Public Affairs, 2007.Google Scholar
,Republic of Ecuador. Letter from Rafael Correa to participants of the International No Bases Conference. Official letter no. DPR-0-07-8, March 6, 2007.
,Republic of Ecuador, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Plan Nacional de Política Exterior. http://www.mmrree.gov.ec/mre/documentos/ministerio/planex/planex_esp.htm.
,Republic of Korea, Ministry of National Defense. News Release. “Pyeongtaek – Giji pok-ryuk si-wui-dae-ae jangbyung soo-sib-myung boo-sang” [Pyeontaek Base, soldiers injured by violent protestors], May 5, 2006.
,Republic of Korea, Ministry of National DefenseDefense White Paper, 2006.
Republic of Korea, National Assembly Records, Unification and Foreign Affairs Committee, 250th Assembly, 16th Meeting, December 7, 2004.
,Republic of Korea, National Assembly Records – Main Assembly. 250th Assembly, 14th Meeting, December 9, 2004.
,Republic of the Philippines. Record of the Senate. Fifth Regular Session, July 22 to September 30, 1991, Vol. 1, nos. 1–27. Manila: Senate Legislative Publications Staff, 1992.Google Scholar
,Republic of the Philippines, Congress. Tenth Congress, Second Regular Session. Joint Resolution No. 28, “Joint resolution expressing the approval by both houses of congress of Republic Act No. 7898,” December 19, 1996.
,Republic of the Philippines, Department of Foreign Affairs. The Visiting Forces Agreement (A Primer). Manila: Department of Foreign Affairs, 1998.Google Scholar
,Republic of the Philippines, Department of National Defense. In Defense of the Philippines: 1998 Defense Policy Paper. Quezon City: DND, 1998.Google Scholar
,Republic of the Philippines, Malacanang Palace, Office of the Press Secretary. “Joint Statement between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America,” October 18, 2003.
,Republic of the Philippines, Senate Legislative Publications Staff. The Bases of Their Decisions: How the Senators Voted on the Treaty of Friendship between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the United States of America. Manila: Senate of the Philippines, 1991.Google Scholar
,Republic of the Philippines, Senate Legislative Publications StaffThe Visiting Forces Agreement: The Senate Decision. Manila: Senate of the Philippines, 1999.Google Scholar
Rimanelli, Marco. Italy between Europe and the Mediterranean: Diplomacy and Naval Strategy from Unification to NATO, 1800–2000. New York: P. Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Rochon, Thomas, and Meyer, David, eds. Coalitions and Political Movements: The Lessons of the Nuclear Freeze. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 1997.
Saavedra, Luis Ángel. Operaciones De Avansada O Base Militar Operativa? Un Análisis De La Base De Manta. [Operations of Outpost or Operative Military Base? An Analysis of the Manta Base]. Quito: Fundación Regional de Asesoría en Derechos Humanos, INREDH, 2007.Google Scholar
Saavedra, Luis ÁngelThe Manta Base: A U.S. Military Fort in Ecuador.” Fellowship 73, no. 1 (2007): 20–21.Google Scholar
Salonga, Jovito R.The Senate That Said No: A Four-Year Record of the First Post-EDSA Senate. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J.Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J., and Boyd, Patrick. “Prosperity's Children: Generational Change and Japan's Future Leadership.” Asia Policy 6 (2008): 15–51.Google Scholar
Sandars, C. T.America's Overseas Garrisons: The Leasehold Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirmer, Daniel Boone. U.S. Bases by Another Name: ACSA in the Philippines. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Philippines Bases Network, 1995.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L.Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook, and Burke, Kristine. “North Korea and Contending South Korean Identities: Analysis of the South Korean Media; Policy Implications for the United States.” KEI: Academic Paper Series 2, no. 4 (2007): 1–12.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Silliman, Sidney G., and Noble, Lela Garner, eds. Organizing for Democracy: NGOs, Civil Society, and the Philippine State. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1998.
Simbulan, Roland G.A Guide to Nuclear Philippines: A Guide to the U.S. Military Bases, Nuclear Weapons, and What the Filipino People Are Doing About These. Manila: IBON Databank Philippines, 1989.Google Scholar
Simbulan, Roland G. “September 16, 1991: The Day the Senate Said ‘No!’ to Uncle Sam – An Insider's Account.” NFPC Library Archives, September 11, 2002. Also found at http://www.yonip.com/main/articles/september_16.html.
Singer, J. David. “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14, no. 1 (1961): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research,” in Bringing the State Back In, edited by Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 3–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, Sheila A. “Challenging National Authority: Okinawa Prefecture and the U.S. Military Bases,” in Local Voices, National Issues: The Impact of Local Initiative in Japanese Policy-making, edited by Smith, Sheila A., 75–114. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sheila A.Shifting Terrain: The Domestic Politics of U.S. Military Presence in Asia. Honolulu: East-West Center, 2006.Google Scholar
Snow, David, Rochford, Burke, Worden, Steven, and Benford, Robert. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51, no. 4 (1986): 464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack L.Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy since Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Steinberg, David I.Korean Attitudes Toward the United States: Changing Dynamics. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 2004.Google Scholar
Straub, David. “U.S. and ROK Strategic Doctrines and the U.S.-ROK Alliance.” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 17 (2007): 165–86.Google Scholar
Suh, Jae-Jung. “Persistence and Termination of Military Alliances: NATO, the Soviet Union-Egypt, and the United States-Iran.” Unpublished dissertation chapter, University of Pennsylvania, 2000.
Suh, Jae-Jung “Bound to Last? The U.S.-Korea Alliance and Analytical Eclecticism,” in Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity, Power and Efficiency, edited by Suh, Jae-Jung, Carlson, Allen, and Katzenstein, Peter, 131–71. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hitoshi. “Japan-U.S. Alliance for the 21st Century – President Clinton's Visit to Japan,” in Japan-U.S. Security Alliance for the 21st Century: Cornerstone of Democracy, Peace and Prosperity for Our Future Generations, edited by ,Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 3–14. Tokyo: Overseas Public Relations Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1996.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hitoshi. “Japanese Foreign Policy under Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda.” East Asia Insights 5, no. 2 (2007): 1–4.Google Scholar
Tanji, Miyume. Myth, Protest and Struggle in Okinawa. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G.Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G.The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999): 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney G.. Contentious Politics. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
,United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan. Afghanistan: Annual Report on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, 2008. Kabul: United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, 2009.Google Scholar
,United States CINPAC Virtual Information Center. “Special Press Summary: Land Partnership Plan and Yongsan Relocation,” January 31, 2002.
,United States Department of Defense. “Strengthening U.S. Global Defense Posture: Report to Congress,” Washington, D.C., September 17, 2004.
,United States Department of DefenseBase Structure Report: A Summary of the Department of Defense's Real Property Inventory. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Under-Secretary of Defense, 2009.Google Scholar
,United States Department of State. “U.S. Troop Relocation Shows Strength of U.S.-Korea Alliance.” Transcript of U.S. and ROK representatives discussing the Alliance Policy Initiative, July 28, 2004. http://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2004/040728/epf307.htm (last accessed May 10, 2007).
,United States Department of State “Senior Administration Officials from the Departments of State and Defense.” Foreign Press Center Briefing, Washington, D.C., August 16, 2004.
,United States Department of State, Office of International Information Programs. “U.S. Official Praises Philippine Anti-Terrorism Effort,” November 16, 2001. Available at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2001/11/mil-011117-usia03.htm.
,United States General Accounting Office. Overseas Presence: Issues Involved in Reducing the Impact of the U.S. Military Presence on Okinawa. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1998.Google Scholar
,United States General Accounting OfficeBriefing Report to the Chairman, Caucus of International Narcotics Control, U.S. Senate: Drug Control, International Counterdrug Sites Being Developed. Washington, D.C.: GAO, 2000.Google Scholar
,United States General Accounting OfficeDefense Infrastructure: Basing Uncertainties Necessitate Reevaluation of U.S. Construction Plans in South Korea.” Washington, D.C.: GAO, 2003.Google Scholar
,United States House of Representatives, Committee on Armed Services. Military Installations and Facilities Subcommittee: Hearings on Military Construction, H.R. 1208. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992.Google Scholar
,United States House of Representatives. “Counter-drug Implications of the U.S. Leaving Panama.” Prepared testimony by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Drug Enforcement Policy and Support Ana Marie Salazar, House Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources, June 9, 2000.
,United States Information Service. Background on the Bases: American Military Facilities in the Philippines. Manila: United States Information Service, 1988.Google Scholar
,United States Information ServiceIn Our Mutual Interest: U.S. Military Facilities in the Philippines. Manila: United States Information Service, 1990.Google Scholar
,University of Bologna, Master's in International Relations Students 2005–06. “Italian Foreign Policy.” Working Paper for the course on Analisi della Politica Estera [Foreign Policy Analysis], July 27, 2006.
Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Walt, StephenTaming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy. New York: W.W. Norton, 2005.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
Weitsman, Patricia A.Dangerous Alliances: Proponents of Peace, Weapons of War. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Weldes, Jutta. “Constructing National Interests.” European Journal of International Relations 2, no. 3 (1996): 275–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,White House, Office of the Press Secretary. “Joint Statement between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines,” November 20, 2001. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011120–13.html.
,White House, Office of the Press Secretary. “Joint Statement between the United States of America and the Republic of the Philippines,” May 19, 2003. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030519–3.html.
Wohlforth, William. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wui, Marlon, and Lopez, Glenda, eds. State–Civil Society Relations in Policy-making. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Yee, Albert. “The Causal Effects of Ideas on Policies.” International Organization 50, no. 1 (1996): 69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, Andrew. “Local National Dynamics and Framing in South Korean Anti-Base Movements.” Kasarinlan 21, no. 2 (2006): 34–69.Google Scholar
Yeo, Andrew. “Not in Anyone's Backyard: The Emergence and Identity of a Transnational Anti-Base Network.” International Studies Quarterly 53, no. 3 (2009): 571–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonetani, Julia. “Playing Base Politics in a Global Strategic Theater.” Critical Asian Studies 33, no. 1 (2001): 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonetani, Julia “Future ‘Asset,’ But at What Price? The Okinawa Initiative Debate,” in Islands of Discontent: Okinawan Responses to Japanese and American Power, edited by Hein, Laura and Selden, Mark, 243–72. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003.Google Scholar
Yoon, Kwang-Ung. “Migoon-giji ijeong sa-eob gwal-lyeon beu-ri-ping” [Briefing on issues related to the USFK base relocation project], Ministry of National Defense, May 3, 2006. Available at http://www.mnd.go.kr/cms.jsp?p_id=03406000000000.
Yoon, Kwang-Ung. “Pyeongtaek migoon giji eejeon jaegeumtoh opda” [No Reevaluation of Pyeongtaek Base Relocation]. Special Statement Prepared by the MND Minister of Defense, May 4. MND News Brief, May 3, 2006. Available at http://mnd.news.go.kr/warp/webapp/news/print_view?id=5ae9967224cc3de6665c2c17.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Andrew Yeo, Catholic University of America, Washington DC
  • Book: Activists, Alliances, and Anti-U.S. Base Protests
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842344.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Andrew Yeo, Catholic University of America, Washington DC
  • Book: Activists, Alliances, and Anti-U.S. Base Protests
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842344.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Andrew Yeo, Catholic University of America, Washington DC
  • Book: Activists, Alliances, and Anti-U.S. Base Protests
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842344.011
Available formats
×