Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T00:43:21.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Theatres and repertory

from Part I - 1660 to 1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Robert Hume
Edited by
Joseph Donohue
Joseph Donohue
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Summary

An historian of English drama in the period 1660–1776 needs to start by admitting that sequential analysis of new plays by themselves can only yield a very partial picture. We may legitimately characterize the new plays and trace generic changes, but we must reckon with the fact that these plays were the product of a theatre system that emphasized the appeal of favourite actors and relied heavily on stock repertory. New plays occupied few nights in most seasons and they do not really have a separate history of their own.

The period we are considering is tidily bounded at the outset by the restoration of the theatres by Charles II when he returned from exile in 1660. No satisfying terminus ad quem exists: there is no sharp break in the drama between the revival of playwriting in the 1750s (following the lull caused by the Licensing Act of 1737) and the 1820s, when ‘illegitimate’ competitors put the patent theatres on the skids. The year 1776 makes a convenient stopping point: Garrick retired from acting and management at Drury Lane that year (selling out to a partnership headed by Richard Brinsley Sheridan), and Thomas Harris was just beginning his long reign as manager at Covent Garden. In drama, though there is no abrupt change, the social comedies and fancy musicals (‘English operas’) of the eighties and nineties reflect norms significantly different from those of the sixties and seventies.

The future of English drama was profoundly affected by the terms of its relegitimation in 1660. Four points are fundamental. These are the duopoly created by the patent grants of 1662 and 1663, the introduction of actresses on the public stage, the construction of changeable scenery theatres, and the radically unequal division of rights to old plays between the two companies that jointly shared a monopoly on dramatic entertainment in London.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of British Theatre , pp. 53 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, Emmett L. ‘The Restoration audience’. Philological Quarterly 45 (1966):.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism, 1730–1830. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bawcutt, N.W. The Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels 1623–73. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bevis, RichardW. The Laughing Tradition: Stage Comedy in Garrick’s Day. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Boswell, Eleanore. The Restoration Court Stage (1660–1702). London: George Allen & Unwin, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannan, Paul D. ‘New directions in serious drama on the London stage, 1675–1678’. Philological Quarterly 73 (1994):.Google Scholar
Cibber, ColleyAn Apology for the Life of Mr Colley Cibber Written by Himself. Ed. Lowe, Robert W.. 2 vols. London: John C. Nimmo, 1889.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. The Letters of John Dryden. Ed. Ward, Charles E.. Durham: Duke University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Harbage, Alfred. Cavalier Drama. New York Modern Language Association, 1936.Google Scholar
Hogan, Charles Beecher. Shakespeare in the Theatre, 1701–1800. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952–7.Google Scholar
Howe, Elizabeth. The First English Actresses: Women and Drama 1660–1700. Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hughes, DerekEnglish Drama 1660–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert D. ‘“Before the Bard”: Shakespeare in early eighteenth-century London’, ELH: A Journal of English Literary History 64 (1997):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert D.The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D.Henry Fielding and the London Theatre, 1728–1737. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D. ‘The London theatre from The Beggar’s Opera to the Licensing Act’. In The Rakish Stage, ed. Hume, , chap. 1.
Hume, Robert D. ‘Securing a repertory: plays on the London stage 1660–5’. In Poetry and Drama 1570–1700: Essays in Honour of Harold F. Brooks. Ed. Coleman, Antony and Hammond, Antony. London: Methuen, 1981.Google Scholar
Kenny, Shirley Strum. ‘Humane comedy’. Modern Philology 75 (1977):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewes, Paulina. Authorship and Appropriation: Writing for the Stage in England, 1660–1710. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kewes, Paulina. ‘“[A] Play, which I presume to call original”: appropriation, creative genius, and eighteenth-century playwriting’. Studies in the Literary Imagination 34.1 (2001):.Google Scholar
Langhans, Edward A. ‘The theatres’. In Hume, , ed., London Theatre World,.
Langhans, Edward A. ‘Tough actresses to follow’. In Schofield, and Macheski, , eds., Curtain Calls.
Love, Harold. ‘Who were the Restoration audience?’ Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milhous, Judith, and Hume, Robert D.. ‘New light on English acting companies in 1646, 1648, and 1660’. Review of English Studies n.s. 42 (1991):.Google Scholar
Milhous, Judith, and Hume, Robert D.. ‘Playwrights’ remuneration in eighteenth-century London’. Harvard Library Bulletin n.s. 10 (1999):.Google Scholar
Milhous, Judith. ‘The multimedia spectacular on the Restoration stage’. In Kenny, , ed., British Theatre,.
Milhous, Judith. Thomas Betterton and the Management of Lincoln’s Inn Fields, 1695–1708. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Nicoll, Allardyce. A History of English Drama 1660–1900. Vol. I: Restoration Drama, 4th edn, 1965; vol. II: Early Eighteenth-Century Drama, 3rd edn, 1965; vol. III: Late Eighteenth-Century Drama 1750–1800, 2nd edn, 1952; vol. IV: Early Nineteenth-Century Drama, 1800–1850, 2nd edn, 1963; vol. V: Late Nineteenth-Century Drama,Cambridge University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Owen, Susan J.Restoration Theatre and Crisis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scouten, Arthur H. ‘Notes toward a history of Restoration comedy’. Philological Quarterly 45 (1966):.Google Scholar
Scouten, Arthur H., and Hume, Robert D.. ‘Restoration comedy and its audiences, 1660–1776’. Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980):.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, John Harrington. The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorelius, Gunnar. ‘The Giant Race Before the Flood’: Pre-Restoration Drama on the Stage and in the Criticism of the Restoration. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 4. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1966.Google Scholar
Southern, Richard. Changeable Scenery: Its Origin and Development in the British Theatre. London: Faber & Faber, 1952.Google Scholar
Tave, Stuart M.The Amiable Humorist: A Studyin the Comic Theory and Criticism of the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries. University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Theatres and repertory
  • Edited by Joseph Donohue, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Book: The Cambridge History of British Theatre
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521650687.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Theatres and repertory
  • Edited by Joseph Donohue, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Book: The Cambridge History of British Theatre
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521650687.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Theatres and repertory
  • Edited by Joseph Donohue, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Book: The Cambridge History of British Theatre
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521650687.003
Available formats
×