Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- General Editor's Preface
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Propaganda and legend: Accounts of the invasions and conquest of England
- 2 Hindsight: Features explaining the invasions and conquest
- 3 Swein Forkbeard's first invasion
- 4 Swein Forkbeard's second invasion
- 5 The invasion in 1006
- 6 Swein Forkbeard's third invasion
- 7 Thorkell the Tall and the English succession
- Conclusion
- 1 Heimskringla
- 2 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A reconstruction of the annal for the year 1008
- Bibliography
- Index
- Warfare in History
3 - Swein Forkbeard's first invasion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- General Editor's Preface
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Propaganda and legend: Accounts of the invasions and conquest of England
- 2 Hindsight: Features explaining the invasions and conquest
- 3 Swein Forkbeard's first invasion
- 4 Swein Forkbeard's second invasion
- 5 The invasion in 1006
- 6 Swein Forkbeard's third invasion
- 7 Thorkell the Tall and the English succession
- Conclusion
- 1 Heimskringla
- 2 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A reconstruction of the annal for the year 1008
- Bibliography
- Index
- Warfare in History
Summary
Leding or Lið
In 1986, Professor Niels Lund published an important paper that discussed:
the organisation of those Viking armies which under the leadership of Swein Forkbeard and his son Cnut succeeded in conquering England in the second decade of the eleventh century: were the forces of these kings privately organized, like the ones operating in the ninth century, or were they state armies recruited on the basis of a public obligation on all free men to serve the king in war?
Professor Lund's paper explains that this question ‘has an important bearing on the problem of the formation of the state of Denmark’, and he has continued to develop his views on this subject over subsequent years. A privately organised army was a lið; a state army was a leding. In this book, it is intended to use the terms leding and lið solely in relation to developments in England. In this context, the conclusion of Lund's paper is important:
The conquests of England accomplished first by Swein Forkbeard and then by his son Cnut undoubtedly belong to the most spectacular achievements of the whole Viking age, and there can be little doubt that the armies involved were bigger and probably drawn from a wider area, indeed from most of Scandinavia, than Viking armies had previously been. This does not mean, however, that they were different in principle from those armies with which the west was already familiar. The distinction between the two Viking ages of Britain does not lie in state organization in the sense that in the second of these ages the kings of Denmark were able to draw on resources not available to their predecessors in the ninth century; it lies in a difference of purpose and determination and perhaps in their greater ability to control the magnates within their empire, reflecting the growth of royal power between Horik I and Swein Forkbeard.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2003