Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- General Editor's Preface
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Propaganda and legend: Accounts of the invasions and conquest of England
- 2 Hindsight: Features explaining the invasions and conquest
- 3 Swein Forkbeard's first invasion
- 4 Swein Forkbeard's second invasion
- 5 The invasion in 1006
- 6 Swein Forkbeard's third invasion
- 7 Thorkell the Tall and the English succession
- Conclusion
- 1 Heimskringla
- 2 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A reconstruction of the annal for the year 1008
- Bibliography
- Index
- Warfare in History
Conclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- General Editor's Preface
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Propaganda and legend: Accounts of the invasions and conquest of England
- 2 Hindsight: Features explaining the invasions and conquest
- 3 Swein Forkbeard's first invasion
- 4 Swein Forkbeard's second invasion
- 5 The invasion in 1006
- 6 Swein Forkbeard's third invasion
- 7 Thorkell the Tall and the English succession
- Conclusion
- 1 Heimskringla
- 2 The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A reconstruction of the annal for the year 1008
- Bibliography
- Index
- Warfare in History
Summary
Three periods of Anglo-Saxon history are particularly well documented: the reigns of Alfred the Great, Æthelred (the Unready), and Edward the Confessor. Much has been written about the reigns of Alfred and Edward, but, by comparison, little attention has been paid to the reign of Æthelred.
An examination of the sources for Æthelred's reign shows that he and his councillors have been victims of much malign propaganda. In the period immediately after his death, Æthelred's failure to combat and defeat invading armies was contrasted unfavourably with the dynamic actions of his son, King Edmund Ironside, and it was suggested that God had used the invasions to punish the English nation because the murder of King Edward the Martyr, in 978, had gone unpunished. After the Norman Conquest, this suggestion was taken further. It was said that God had punished the English by allowing a Danish conquest and then a Norman conquest of the country because of the murder of King Edward the Martyr, a murder which had been instigated by his (step) mother Queen Ælfthryth, who wanted her son, Æthelred, to become king. This malign propaganda led to an assessment of the king and his reign which can be summarised in the words of Eadmer:
The indolence of the King became known round about and the greed of those outside her borders, aiming rather at the wealth than the lives of the English, invaded the country by sea at one point after another and laid waste at first the villages and cities near the coast, then those further inland and in the end the whole province, driving the inhabitants in wretchedness from their homes. The King instead of meeting them in arms panic-stricken shamelessly offered them money sueing for peace; where-upon they accepted the price and retired to their homes, only to return in still greater numbers and still more ruthless, from renewed invasion to receive increased rewards.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2003