Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:57:12.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How important is it to learn language rather than create it?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2024

Susan Goldin-Meadow*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA http://goldin-meadow-lab.uchicago.edu/
*
Corresponding author: Susan Goldin-Meadow; Email: sgm@uchicago.edu

Abstract

I focus here on concepts that are not part of core knowledge – the ability to treat people as social agents with shareable mental states. Spelke proposes that learning language from another might account for the development of these concepts. I suggest that homesigners, who create language rather than learn it, may be a potential counterexample to this hypothesis.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coppola, M., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Grammatical subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. PNAS, 102(52), 1924919253, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509306102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148153. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D., Özyurek, A., Gurcanli, O., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 12(3), 318330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2020). Discovering the biases children bring to language learning. Perspectives in Child Development, 14, 195201. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Brentari, D., Coppola, M., Horton, L., & Senghas, A. (2015). Watching language grow in the manual modality: Nominals, predicates, and handshapes. Cognition, 135, 381395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Mylander, C., & Butcher, C. (1995). The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: Morphology in self-styled gesture systems. Cognition, 56, 195262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, S., Mylander, C., & Franklin, A. (2007). How children make language out of gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 87135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morford, J. P., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997) From here to there and now to then: The development of displaced reference in homesign and English. Child Development, 68, 420435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, L. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2018). Human infants’ understanding of social imitation: Inferences of affiliation from third party observations. Cognition, 170, 3148. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyers, J., & Senghas, A. (2009). Language promotes false-belief understanding: Evidence from Nicaraguan Sign Language. Psychological Science, 20, 805812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaepen, E., Coppola, M., Spelke, E., Carey, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Number without a language model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 31633168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, E. S. (2022). What babies know: Core knowledge and composition (Vol. 1). Oxford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2018). How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account. PNAS, 115, 84918498. doi:10.1073/Pnas.1804761115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed